BAP Enthusiast said:
So who exactly were the bad guys over there? The Taliban originally formed to stop child rape and here we are giving viagra to tribal leaders to help them rape more kids. That is, our side directly contributed and supported abject evil. There is no justification for any of this.
Also it tells me that all of the refugees coming from Afghanistan won't be terrorists but will be child rapists. Guess this explains why our elites want it to happen so much, the clearly feel a kinship with these people.
Is there anything that the CIA has done that hasn't been utterly reprehensible?
The Taliban doesn't engage in child rape? The Taliban are the good guys?
This narrative has been thrown around a lot lately. That doesn't make it accurate.
There were some bad people who we were allied with. That doesn't make everyone operating on our side evil.
In World War II, we were allied with Josef Stalin, Ho Chi Minh, Mao Zedong, and several others who one would not classify as the cream of the crop in terms of sainthood. Did that make fighting Hitler and Imperial Japan unnecessary?
Last time I checked, no one within the Northern Alliance shielded Al-Qaeda and provided "The Base" with a base to attack and kill thousands of our countrymen.
That was the Taliban.
Almost 20 years later...and we have a President actually allying himself to the Taliban and trusting them with the safe conduct of Americans to Karzai International to be safely evacuated.
You are kidding yourself if you believe this rhetoric of a virtuous Taliban has a shred of truth in it.
If it were true, then why do we see Afghan women giving their children, especially their girls, to American soldiers and our allies for safe conduct elsewhere?
If the Taliban were truly the epitome of virtue and honest dealing, then why would you see this going on?