Kraken lawyer sanction hearings today

24,609 Views | 273 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by HTownAg98
Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

DallasGrad18 said:

Old McDonald said:

DallasGrad18 said:

Old McDonald said:

still funny to look back on that period and how many people were so certain Powell and Wood were going to deliver. just about everyone with half an ounce of sense was calling them out as grifters and charlatans, but people agonizing over trump's loss were so desperate to latch onto any hope they could that they placed it (along with some of their hard earned dollars) with these bozos


Still waiting for your Russia collusion evidence. So many stones, so many glass houses.
russian collusion was a hoax pushed to undermine trump and hamstring his administration. just like the theories and lawsuits powell and wood were pushing following the election were scams to grift dollars away from disheartened trump supporters. hope that helps.


Yet you and your ilk incessantly peddled all of the hoaxes
in pursuit of a "Trump is Satan" narrative. Maybe if y'all had an ounce of integrity, conservatives would respect your opinions. However, you don't care about the means to the end, and once the mission is accomplished you sit here and act conciliatory while admitting you were an amoral piece of **** to accomplish your goals.

I really hope conservatives grow a spine and start playing hardball. Letting you petulant children have any say in our lives is a travesty of the greatest proportions.
i did no such thing, and have been consistent in my opinions of russian collusion since it started.

at any rate, this thread is about lin and powell's hearing so i won't indulge further your desire to derail with whataboutisms and generic whining about the left.


Nothing whataboutism about what I've said. Nice deflect. You want to discuss the trial at hand? Powell and Wood said they had evidence. We supported them until it was proven that they didn't. I don't know anybody that sent them a single cent, and the repercussions on their legal careers are obviously going to outweigh their "grift." This is nothing more than a sad troll on a topic that nobody here clings too. We followed these people for about a month until they were proven to not have anything. You peddled in misinformation for 4 years and continue to do so today.

Go back to stumping for Avenatti and telling us why Trump's kids are evil but Hunter and the Biden admin is the "most ethical in history."
GTdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

They're not going to get disbarred. They're definitely getting sanctions, and will be referred for discipline. But they won't lose their licenses over this.
I'm not sure any of them are admitted to the Michigan Bar or Eastern District of Michigan. May effect future pro hac vice admissions.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Powell (completely unprompted): I take responsibility for everything, and I would fill this case again.

She is now the leader in the clubhouse for the biggest sanction.
leftcoastaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

Powell (completely unprompted): I take responsibility for everything, and I would fill this case again.

She is now the leader in the clubhouse for the biggest sanction.


Powell saw the fundraiser angle there at the end. GoFundMe page posted up by the end of the day. Calling out Fink and political is laughable. Compare the amount of money collected by the rubes between Sid and Fink and then get back to me.
M-K-TAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

thirdcoast said:


If that was Antifa on the other side of the window, you called those guys patriot heroes. Instead it's a bunch of crazed Trump supporters trying to disrupt the vote calculations. Why did that mob think that the election supervisors would let into the tabulation room? The actual observers were already in the room, but it's a funny pic for you guys to misconstrue what actually happened that day.
What you fail to mention is they kicked out the Republican observers... You are the one lying here. You have zero credibility. The only crazed people are the ones that were kicking out observers threatening them with violence etc... But hey bring back your stupid scoreboard so we can all have a laugh.
No observers were kicked out. That's a lie, just like all the other lies that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell perpetuated after the election and are currently being grilled about from a federal judge. Sorry you fell for them. Sidney and Lin are about it get what's coming to them for all their lies that they spread. That's what this thread is about.

You're right it was a big laugh to see the GOP lawsuits fail 0-60 after the election. Probably going to update it after this hearing today.
Yes they were.. We can go back and forth on this all day long. I could give you the evidence but you will just triple down and make up some nonsense to deny it. What planet do you live on?? Obviously not the one called reality. Sidney and Lin got their facts wrong but everyone knows the election was stolen.. maybe not by Dominion but it was stolen by other means. The only big lie is the one repeated by you and your minions that this was the most secure election in history and no fraud occurred. puhleeze. Election was stolen.. you know it,, I know it, We all know it.
Just like the Iowa caucus was stolen too.....



2016 same bs. You've been lied to for so long you have no idea.

By the way, hearing is still going on and Lin and Sidney are getting roasted. Just uncovering more lies that have warped your reality. Their only defense so far is that none of them actually read the affidavits that they submitted to the court so there is no way they can be held responsible if they were full of lies.
Sidney and Lin went in the wrong direction.. so what.. they knew something was amiss with the election so I give them credit for that..... . I know what my own eyes see... no one is lying to me.. except you. Election was stolen that's obvious.. . Your obsession with them and Trump is kinda creepy but whatever makes you happy....
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure they'll just get fined. But it needs to be a big one to make a public impact and send a message to anyone trying to pull this garbage in the future. They were down 150,000+ votes. The affidavits were someone saw a bin with a lid off, someone saw a person walking around with a plastic bag and votes were counted multiple times even though the total count wasn't off by anywhere near where they were claiming. Total garbage.

Fink's closing was good. On Jan 5th, they briefed that Wood and Powell were using this lawsuit to try to impact Congress on 1/6. You can't file garbage in Court and then go all over social media citing the case to tout the Big Lie.

Judge should have let Lin Wood argue a bit after Fink. He may have grounds to say his due process was violated. But he can file a supplemental brief in 14 days, so there's that.

He's going to claim that's not enough time and pull a bunch of other B.S.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DallasGrad18 said:


Nothing whataboutism about what I've said. Nice deflect. You want to discuss the trial at hand? Powell and Wood said they had evidence. We supported them until it was proven that they didn't. I don't know anybody that sent them a single cent, and the repercussions on their legal careers are obviously going to outweigh their "grift." This is nothing more than a sad troll on a topic that nobody here clings too. We followed these people for about a month until they were proven to not have anything. You peddled in misinformation for 4 years and continue to do so today.

Go back to stumping for Avenatti and telling us why Trump's kids are evil but Hunter and the Biden admin is the "most ethical in history."


again, i've done no such thing. but it seems like you're enjoying yourself tilting at strawmen on a topic "no one cares about" so i'll leave you to it.
Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

DallasGrad18 said:


Nothing whataboutism about what I've said. Nice deflect. You want to discuss the trial at hand? Powell and Wood said they had evidence. We supported them until it was proven that they didn't. I don't know anybody that sent them a single cent, and the repercussions on their legal careers are obviously going to outweigh their "grift." This is nothing more than a sad troll on a topic that nobody here clings too. We followed these people for about a month until they were proven to not have anything. You peddled in misinformation for 4 years and continue to do so today.

Go back to stumping for Avenatti and telling us why Trump's kids are evil but Hunter and the Biden admin is the "most ethical in history."


again, i've done no such thing. but it seems like you're enjoying yourself tilting at strawmen on a topic "no one cares about" so i'll leave you to it.


Gaslight the night away, Biden voter.
leftcoastaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

thirdcoast said:


If that was Antifa on the other side of the window, you called those guys patriot heroes. Instead it's a bunch of crazed Trump supporters trying to disrupt the vote calculations. Why did that mob think that the election supervisors would let into the tabulation room? The actual observers were already in the room, but it's a funny pic for you guys to misconstrue what actually happened that day.
What you fail to mention is they kicked out the Republican observers... You are the one lying here. You have zero credibility. The only crazed people are the ones that were kicking out observers threatening them with violence etc... But hey bring back your stupid scoreboard so we can all have a laugh.
No observers were kicked out. That's a lie, just like all the other lies that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell perpetuated after the election and are currently being grilled about from a federal judge. Sorry you fell for them. Sidney and Lin are about it get what's coming to them for all their lies that they spread. That's what this thread is about.

You're right it was a big laugh to see the GOP lawsuits fail 0-60 after the election. Probably going to update it after this hearing today.
Yes they were.. We can go back and forth on this all day long. I could give you the evidence but you will just triple down and make up some nonsense to deny it. What planet do you live on?? Obviously not the one called reality. Sidney and Lin got their facts wrong but everyone knows the election was stolen.. maybe not by Dominion but it was stolen by other means. The only big lie is the one repeated by you and your minions that this was the most secure election in history and no fraud occurred. puhleeze. Election was stolen.. you know it,, I know it, We all know it.
Just like the Iowa caucus was stolen too.....



2016 same bs. You've been lied to for so long you have no idea.

By the way, hearing is still going on and Lin and Sidney are getting roasted. Just uncovering more lies that have warped your reality. Their only defense so far is that none of them actually read the affidavits that they submitted to the court so there is no way they can be held responsible if they were full of lies.
Sidney and Lin went in the wrong direction.. so what.. they knew something was amiss with the election so I give them credit for that..... . I know what my own eyes see... no one is lying to me.. except you. Election was stolen that's obvious.. . Your obsession with them and Trump is kinda creepy but whatever makes you happy....


..and Ted Cruz stole the Iowa caucus. Yep nobody is lying to you. SMH.
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

thirdcoast said:


If that was Antifa on the other side of the window, you called those guys patriot heroes. Instead it's a bunch of crazed Trump supporters trying to disrupt the vote calculations. Why did that mob think that the election supervisors would let into the tabulation room? The actual observers were already in the room, but it's a funny pic for you guys to misconstrue what actually happened that day.
What you fail to mention is they kicked out the Republican observers... You are the one lying here. You have zero credibility. The only crazed people are the ones that were kicking out observers threatening them with violence etc... But hey bring back your stupid scoreboard so we can all have a laugh.
No observers were kicked out. That's a lie, just like all the other lies that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell perpetuated after the election and are currently being grilled about from a federal judge. Sorry you fell for them. Sidney and Lin are about it get what's coming to them for all their lies that they spread. That's what this thread is about.

You're right it was a big laugh to see the GOP lawsuits fail 0-60 after the election. Probably going to update it after this hearing today.
Yes they were.. We can go back and forth on this all day long. I could give you the evidence but you will just triple down and make up some nonsense to deny it. What planet do you live on?? Obviously not the one called reality. Sidney and Lin got their facts wrong but everyone knows the election was stolen.. maybe not by Dominion but it was stolen by other means. The only big lie is the one repeated by you and your minions that this was the most secure election in history and no fraud occurred. puhleeze. Election was stolen.. you know it,, I know it, We all know it.
Just like the Iowa caucus was stolen too.....



2016 same bs. You've been lied to for so long you have no idea.

By the way, hearing is still going on and Lin and Sidney are getting roasted. Just uncovering more lies that have warped your reality. Their only defense so far is that none of them actually read the affidavits that they submitted to the court so there is no way they can be held responsible if they were full of lies.
Sidney and Lin went in the wrong direction.. so what.. they knew something was amiss with the election so I give them credit for that..... . I know what my own eyes see... no one is lying to me.. except you. Election was stolen that's obvious.. . Your obsession with them and Trump is kinda creepy but whatever makes you happy....


..and Ted Cruz stole the Iowa caucus. Yep nobody is lying to you. SMH.
This is a fart in the wind compared to the lies told about Trump, including by federal agencies.
A & M, GIVE US ROOM!

eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasGrad18 said:

Sure. There will likely not be any large-scale fraud exposed. What is undeniable, however, is that mailing out unsolicited mail-in ballots is criminal. It promotes the act of ballot harvesting, which should be a federal crime. If you can't admit that, then you're not worth talking to.

The problem, however, is that you don't really care. You'll feign interest in reconciling here, but all you care about is the end that Biden won. You won't support any measures to fix the means that allowed him to cheat. You're a ****ing moron if you think he gets 81 million votes in a legitimate election under normal rules.
Do voters say, "Look! I got a ballot in the mail. Instead of returning it myself, I'm going to have some stranger return it for me"?
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
leftcoastaggie said:

HTownAg98 said:

Powell (completely unprompted): I take responsibility for everything, and I would fill this case again.

She is now the leader in the clubhouse for the biggest sanction.


Powell saw the fundraiser angle there at the end. GoFundMe page posted up by the end of the day. Calling out Fink and political is laughable. Compare the amount of money collected by the rubes between Sid and Fink and then get back to me.
i know this comment is tongue in cheek but it gets at what we've all been saying since they burst onto the national stage. one of the most common defenses of powell and wood was "why would they risk their legal careers if they know they're full of it" and the answer is because the notoriety and ability to grift is quite lucrative. their behavior in the hearing (combative, unapologetic) is part of the act, appealing to the kinds of people they can continue to dupe in the future.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ChemEAg08 said:

GeorgiAg said:

Dow Jones is up. Unemployment is down.

He dropped the ball on immigration, I agree.

I would vote for DeSantis. But not if Trump is anywhere near the ticket.


Open job positions at record highs
Inflation at 20+ year highs
Illegal immigration at record highs
Your president threatening citizens with nukes, f-15s, and door to door mandatory vaccines
Killing domestic O&G but approving Russian O&G projects
His son painting pictures for up to $500k a pop to anonymous buyers (if DJT jr did this you'd have an aneurism)

Care to let us know your opinions on those?
Biden is threatening us with nukes? And F-15s?

I hate to defend Biden, but I don't believe for a second that he is threatening us with nukes and F-15s.
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

ChemEAg08 said:

GeorgiAg said:

Dow Jones is up. Unemployment is down.

He dropped the ball on immigration, I agree.

I would vote for DeSantis. But not if Trump is anywhere near the ticket.


Open job positions at record highs
Inflation at 20+ year highs
Illegal immigration at record highs
Your president threatening citizens with nukes, f-15s, and door to door mandatory vaccines
Killing domestic O&G but approving Russian O&G projects
His son painting pictures for up to $500k a pop to anonymous buyers (if DJT jr did this you'd have an aneurism)

Care to let us know your opinions on those?
Biden is threatening us with nukes? And F-15s?

I hate to defend Biden, but I don't believe for a second that he is threatening us with nukes and F-15s.
Is that not what this article says?

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-f-15s-nukes-fight-233843549.html

This one provides more context to make it clear he's talking about people who support the 2nd amendment, not "insurrectionists" like the Yahoo article claims.

https://ktrh.iheart.com/featured/michael-berry/content/2021-06-24-biden-threatens-law-abiding-gun-owners-with-nukes-f-15s/

Stupid and wrong about cannons, of course, but also far more Putinesque dictatorial than GeorgiAg is concerned Trump was.
A & M, GIVE US ROOM!

eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasGrad18 said:

BCG Disciple said:

I agree on the mail in ballots being mailed potentially being more susceptible to fraud. Texas shut down the Harris county activist that was the county clerk for doing this. Other states may have had laws allowing it. But without knowing all controls in place, it is reasonable to expect this to be less secure.

However, you're talking about a gray area of law and you're projecting unverified fraud on to it. I think the left did a better job of expanding the gray area and getting people to vote and yes, I think Biden got 80million + votes because it was easier to vote, and their fan base was motivated amidst the worlds largest pandemic and most devastating (from an economic standpoint) and a polarizing personality that already triggered half of them.


You're wrong and I don't believe you. The left was not more motivated for Biden than Obama. It's only gray area if you want it to be. People like you that bury their heads in the sand and defy common sense because they like the result are why the radicals have such a foothold in the culture nowadays.

ETA expanding the gray area is a cute euphemism for cheating. Nice.
I suspect that it wasn't so much that they were motivated to vote for Biden by Biden, but that they were motivated to vote for Biden by Trump.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasGrad18 said:

Just like you refuse to see the fact that mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting are the sole reason the dementia patient you voted for is occupying the White House today. Are you proud of voting for someone in the mental state that Biden is in?

Fact of the matter is you've conceded that unsolicited mail-in ballots are bad, but you're defending results determined by unsolicited mail-in ballots. The right is correct to be skeptical of the results. You are a lemming to say it's all conspiracy theories, and you should be the #1 cheerleader for any and all scrutiny of the election. If you are right, it will be proven.

You can disagree with the notion that the election was fraudulent. However, you have no ground to stand on to claim the right is acting like petulant conspiracy theorists when the other side spent 4 years drumming up bull**** to undermine a duly elected president. Your best move is to shut the hell up and hope the audits don't prove you wrong because your position is just as unfounded as the position that there was massive fraud.
It doesn't seem to me that you know what ballot harvesting is.
Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

DallasGrad18 said:

Just like you refuse to see the fact that mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting are the sole reason the dementia patient you voted for is occupying the White House today. Are you proud of voting for someone in the mental state that Biden is in?

Fact of the matter is you've conceded that unsolicited mail-in ballots are bad, but you're defending results determined by unsolicited mail-in ballots. The right is correct to be skeptical of the results. You are a lemming to say it's all conspiracy theories, and you should be the #1 cheerleader for any and all scrutiny of the election. If you are right, it will be proven.

You can disagree with the notion that the election was fraudulent. However, you have no ground to stand on to claim the right is acting like petulant conspiracy theorists when the other side spent 4 years drumming up bull**** to undermine a duly elected president. Your best move is to shut the hell up and hope the audits don't prove you wrong because your position is just as unfounded as the position that there was massive fraud.
It doesn't seem to me that you know what ballot harvesting is.


Ditto.
leftcoastaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

DallasGrad18 said:

Just like you refuse to see the fact that mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting are the sole reason the dementia patient you voted for is occupying the White House today. Are you proud of voting for someone in the mental state that Biden is in?

Fact of the matter is you've conceded that unsolicited mail-in ballots are bad, but you're defending results determined by unsolicited mail-in ballots. The right is correct to be skeptical of the results. You are a lemming to say it's all conspiracy theories, and you should be the #1 cheerleader for any and all scrutiny of the election. If you are right, it will be proven.

You can disagree with the notion that the election was fraudulent. However, you have no ground to stand on to claim the right is acting like petulant conspiracy theorists when the other side spent 4 years drumming up bull**** to undermine a duly elected president. Your best move is to shut the hell up and hope the audits don't prove you wrong because your position is just as unfounded as the position that there was massive fraud.
It doesn't seem to me that you know what ballot harvesting is.


I know. It's what those GOP operatives were arrested for in NC.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasGrad18 said:

eric76 said:

DallasGrad18 said:

Just like you refuse to see the fact that mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting are the sole reason the dementia patient you voted for is occupying the White House today. Are you proud of voting for someone in the mental state that Biden is in?

Fact of the matter is you've conceded that unsolicited mail-in ballots are bad, but you're defending results determined by unsolicited mail-in ballots. The right is correct to be skeptical of the results. You are a lemming to say it's all conspiracy theories, and you should be the #1 cheerleader for any and all scrutiny of the election. If you are right, it will be proven.

You can disagree with the notion that the election was fraudulent. However, you have no ground to stand on to claim the right is acting like petulant conspiracy theorists when the other side spent 4 years drumming up bull**** to undermine a duly elected president. Your best move is to shut the hell up and hope the audits don't prove you wrong because your position is just as unfounded as the position that there was massive fraud.
It doesn't seem to me that you know what ballot harvesting is.


Ditto.
I use the term correctly. Your use of the term makes no sense at all unless you think that it means something entirely different.

Ballot harvesting is the practice of someone picking up completed mail in ballots from voters and delivering them to the drop off point. For example, if your grandparents are unable to get out of the house and so you pick up their ballots and drop them off on their behalf, that is ballot harvesting. The practice is legal in a number of states. I think that n some states, legal ballot harvesting is limited to family members.

Ballot harvesting is not limited to Democrats -- both parties do it. For example, in the 2020 election, the GOP in California set up their own "official" ballot drop off boxes. That is ballot harvesting.
MilanoCowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ChemEAg08 said:

GeorgiAg said:

Dow Jones is up. Unemployment is down.

He dropped the ball on immigration, I agree.

I would vote for DeSantis. But not if Trump is anywhere near the ticket.


Open job positions at record highs
Inflation at 20+ year highs
Illegal immigration at record highs
Your president threatening citizens with nukes, f-15s, and door to door mandatory vaccines
Killing domestic O&G but approving Russian O&G projects
His son painting pictures for up to $500k a pop to anonymous buyers (if DJT jr did this you'd have an aneurism)

Care to let us know your opinions on those?
Excellent points.
I'd like to add that gasoline price today is exactly double the cost of Dec 20 in my area. That seems to be 100% inflation to me. That spike is affecting costs of all product shipped by truck, boat, and plane.
Milano Cowboy
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

I hate to defend Biden.


False

Just incredibly false
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maroon Dawn said:

eric76 said:

I hate to defend Biden.


False

Just incredibly false
There is nothing false about it.

I don't like Tweedledee any more than I liked Tweedledum.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

DallasGrad18 said:

eric76 said:

DallasGrad18 said:

Just like you refuse to see the fact that mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting are the sole reason the dementia patient you voted for is occupying the White House today. Are you proud of voting for someone in the mental state that Biden is in?

Fact of the matter is you've conceded that unsolicited mail-in ballots are bad, but you're defending results determined by unsolicited mail-in ballots. The right is correct to be skeptical of the results. You are a lemming to say it's all conspiracy theories, and you should be the #1 cheerleader for any and all scrutiny of the election. If you are right, it will be proven.

You can disagree with the notion that the election was fraudulent. However, you have no ground to stand on to claim the right is acting like petulant conspiracy theorists when the other side spent 4 years drumming up bull**** to undermine a duly elected president. Your best move is to shut the hell up and hope the audits don't prove you wrong because your position is just as unfounded as the position that there was massive fraud.
It doesn't seem to me that you know what ballot harvesting is.


Ditto.
I use the term correctly. Your use of the term makes no sense at all unless you think that it means something entirely different.

Ballot harvesting is the practice of someone picking up completed mail in ballots from voters and delivering them to the drop off point. For example, if your grandparents are unable to get out of the house and so you pick up their ballots and drop them off on their behalf, that is ballot harvesting. The practice is legal in a number of states. I think that n some states, legal ballot harvesting is limited to family members.

Ballot harvesting is not limited to Democrats -- both parties do it. For example, in the 2020 election, the GOP in California set up their own "official" ballot drop off boxes. That is ballot harvesting.
Ballot harvesting is also the practice of sending operatives to senior living facilities, going door-to-door to "help" the occupants complete their ballots (if, of course, that step is completed... Completely unnecessary, btw, as the ballots can be gathered and completed without the recipient's input and/or knowledge), and taking the whole kit & caboodle to an official drop off point.

This version of ballot harvesting also works well with low income housing projects.

I think the point is that the broad possibilities of actions or scenarios that can occur under ballot harvesting - some legitimate, some not - indicate that the term 'ballot harvesting' needs to be better defined.
500,000ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The photos of people hanging up coverings for the election counters have been a pet peeve of mine. I was watching the election coverage and flipping back and forth between Fox and CNN. CNN was live inside the Detroit center, showing the Rep and Dem watchers inside. Also, showing a group of people outside the windows looking in and trying to see the ballots. Which was plausible since counters were up against that window. That is why they added the coverings there. Next day, I see that exact image as proof of election rigging in Detroit.
leftcoastaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
500,000ags said:

The photos of people hanging up coverings for the election counters have been a pet peeve of mine. I was watching the election coverage and flipping back and forth between Fox and CNN. CNN was live inside the Detroit center, showing the Rep and Dem watchers inside. Also, showing a group of people outside the windows looking in and trying to see the ballots. Which was plausible since counters were up against that window. That is why they added the coverings there. Next day, I see that exact image as proof of election rigging in Detroit.


Just part of the lie to be perpetuated by meme.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That "hearing" today was a farce.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, Lin Wood appears to have posted a screenshot or video clip of the hearing after they were explicitly instructed by the judge not to do so. If you wanted to piss off the judge even more, this is the way to do it.
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

M-K-TAG said:

leftcoastaggie said:

thirdcoast said:


If that was Antifa on the other side of the window, you called those guys patriot heroes. Instead it's a bunch of crazed Trump supporters trying to disrupt the vote calculations. Why did that mob think that the election supervisors would let into the tabulation room? The actual observers were already in the room, but it's a funny pic for you guys to misconstrue what actually happened that day.
What you fail to mention is they kicked out the Republican observers... You are the one lying here. You have zero credibility. The only crazed people are the ones that were kicking out observers threatening them with violence etc... But hey bring back your stupid scoreboard so we can all have a laugh.
No observers were kicked out. That's a lie, just like all the other lies that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell perpetuated after the election and are currently being grilled about from a federal judge. Sorry you fell for them. Sidney and Lin are about it get what's coming to them for all their lies that they spread. That's what this thread is about.

You're right it was a big laugh to see the GOP lawsuits fail 0-60 after the election. Probably going to update it after this hearing today.
Yes they were.. We can go back and forth on this all day long. I could give you the evidence but you will just triple down and make up some nonsense to deny it. What planet do you live on?? Obviously not the one called reality. Sidney and Lin got their facts wrong but everyone knows the election was stolen.. maybe not by Dominion but it was stolen by other means. The only big lie is the one repeated by you and your minions that this was the most secure election in history and no fraud occurred. puhleeze. Election was stolen.. you know it,, I know it, We all know it.
Just like the Iowa caucus was stolen too.....



2016 same bs. You've been lied to for so long you have no idea.

By the way, hearing is still going on and Lin and Sidney are getting roasted. Just uncovering more lies that have warped your reality. Their only defense so far is that none of them actually read the affidavits that they submitted to the court so there is no way they can be held responsible if they were full of lies.
Sidney and Lin went in the wrong direction.. so what.. they knew something was amiss with the election so I give them credit for that..... . I know what my own eyes see... no one is lying to me.. except you. Election was stolen that's obvious.. . Your obsession with them and Trump is kinda creepy but whatever makes you happy....


..and Ted Cruz stole the Iowa caucus. Yep nobody is lying to you. SMH.


Just because Trump said Cruz cheated in Iowa won't change my opinion on the 2020 election. Significant irregularities happened and I'm told to shut up and don't ask questions and put my mask on.

Once forensic audits show the true outcome then I'll accept it (and hey it may be for biden you never know).
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

aTmAg said:

Some PATHETIC moderator is deleting nearly every post I make. Yet, OP is responding and has stated that he used not downvoting my posts.

WTF staff???
I"m a big boy. I know y'all think I'm wrong. I think you are wrong about Trump. I think he's a dangerous wanna-be Putin style autocrat. I'm here to discuss.

Staff warned other posters before about "you voted for this" getting old - I didn't object then either. I think it's kind of funny.


Is this the kind of stuff you think Trump would do in his 2nd term? So you voted for biden to avoid it? (Credit to good poster)

GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ChemEAg08 said:

GeorgiAg said:

aTmAg said:

Some PATHETIC moderator is deleting nearly every post I make. Yet, OP is responding and has stated that he used not downvoting my posts.

WTF staff???
I"m a big boy. I know y'all think I'm wrong. I think you are wrong about Trump. I think he's a dangerous wanna-be Putin style autocrat. I'm here to discuss.

Staff warned other posters before about "you voted for this" getting old - I didn't object then either. I think it's kind of funny.


Is this the kind of stuff you think Trump would do in his 2nd term? So you voted for biden to avoid it? (Credit to good poster)


Yeah, I'm gonna give that the 24 hour rule. A government asking private companies to scan text messages doesn't sound Kosher to me, if they did that. I guess Twitter and Facebook already do that to an extent, but it's not the same. Those are messages posted in a public forum, not person to person.

This sounds like an exaggerated sound bite. We'll see what they say to this.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ChemEAg08 said:

GeorgiAg said:

aTmAg said:

Some PATHETIC moderator is deleting nearly every post I make. Yet, OP is responding and has stated that he used not downvoting my posts.

WTF staff???
I"m a big boy. I know y'all think I'm wrong. I think you are wrong about Trump. I think he's a dangerous wanna-be Putin style autocrat. I'm here to discuss.

Staff warned other posters before about "you voted for this" getting old - I didn't object then either. I think it's kind of funny.


Is this the kind of stuff you think Trump would do in his 2nd term? So you voted for biden to avoid it? (Credit to good poster)




Same poster, hours apart:

Quote:

GeorgiAg said:

Scanning SMS for speech makes me concerned. The government wants private corporations to scan your test messages for content.

That is (maybe not even) one step away from Big Brother.



Grab your clown shoes on the way out.

Honk honk.
leftcoastaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

That "hearing" today was a farce.
One lawyer's "farce" is another lawyer's sanctions.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
leftcoastaggie said:

aggiehawg said:

That "hearing" today was a farce.
One lawyer's "farce" is another lawyer's sanctions.
Do you have any concrete evidence that ethical canons and disciplinary rules were violated? Nothing I saw/heard today held much water on that issue.

That's why it was a farce but not the only reason. Wasn't conducted in proper motion practice, for one thing.
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

That "hearing" today was a farce.
Anything specific?
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

leftcoastaggie said:

aggiehawg said:

That "hearing" today was a farce.
One lawyer's "farce" is another lawyer's sanctions.
Do you have any concrete evidence that ethical canons and disciplinary rules were violated? Nothing I saw/heard today held much water on that issue.

That's why it was a farce but not the only reason. Wasn't conducted in proper motion practice, for one thing.


As a non-lawyer, I'm going to side with Ms AggieHawg based on her input and analysis in the Chauvin trial thread. Not some childish leftist who only shows up to mock Trump and disappears when we talk about biden doing something insane.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.