You seem reasonable, but have taken a stance protecting someone who has violated her oath of office openly, has continually openly lied in Congress in the past and is now in the streets pushing a narrative prior to a jury trial conclusion. If there is a mistrial, acquittal, or manslaughter verdict there will most certainly be subsequent rioting and looting.B-1 83 said:I'm being confrontational now.Maroon Dawn said:B-1 83 said:I missed the "assault" part somewhere.......Maroon Dawn said:
Can't help but notice the Libs here defending Aunty Maxine keep skating by her very clearly telling people to break the law by committing assault and violating curfew
Telling people to get confrontational with others is telling them to assault others
Stop being intentionally obtuse
- No, but that is what Maxine Waters called for along with breaking the law.
Am I being violent?
- No, but not sure anyone said you were being violent, just that the rhetoric spewed by Maxine Waters might be interpreted she supports acts of violence. Note that I said MIGHT BE.
Now I've gone from a liberal to a Marxist???Quote:
Intentionally obtuse to defend a fellow Marxist inciting lawlessness
- No you aren't, but I remember you attacked me with "IF THE SHOE FITS".
Wtf is wrong with you people?
- Maybe people are tired of being called names and react.
Actively calling for a murder conviction in a very contentious trial openly suggesting that a manslaughter conviction is unacceptable even if the jury so decides. That is openly denying due process clearly defined in our Constitution.