Did Maxine Waters Travel Across State Lines To Incite A Riot

11,075 Views | 160 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by aggiehawg
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


She is telling them to get confrontational. Plus, Democrats get to have it both ways on every topic. The days of actual fairness and standards are over.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


Can you show us where trump said to get confrontational and ignore police orders?
No he can't.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like extortion. Guilty of murder or we will burn the country down. If we had a real government, they would be going after Mad Maxine, BLM, and their puppets under RICO laws.
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
If you want to see how in bed the media is with the left, just watch their reactions to this compared to January 6th. Sickening...
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maroon Dawn said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


Can you show us where trump said to get confrontational and ignore police orders?
That's not calling for riots. Those things can be done without looting, violence, or property destruction. I think that beotch is a sht stain on society, but anyone with half a brain can see those charges would never stand up.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

Maroon Dawn said:


.....
That's not calling for riots.
Maxine Waters advocating getting confrontational and ignoring curfews(lawlessness).

What do you consider "confrontational", let alone breaking the law by ignoring curfews. Curfews are designed to protect people from the lawless rioting and looting.

By going public it appears she is knowingly threatening the jurors and the court, "we demand a murder conviction regardless of the law and our court system."
Cobra39
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is one ignorant individual.

Cobra39
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She has company.

B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

Maroon Dawn said:


.....
That's not calling for riots.
Maxine Waters advocating getting confrontational and ignoring curfews(lawlessness).

What do you consider "confrontational", let alone breaking the law by ignoring curfews. Curfews are designed to protect people from the lawless rioting and looting.

By going public it appears she is knowingly threatening the jurors and the court, "we demand a murder conviction regardless of the law and our court system."
A fine line, indeed, but certainly not one that justifies impeachment.
mazag08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My Name Is Judge said:

Waffledynamics said:

Holy crap she just went way above and beyond anything they accused Trump of when they said he incited a riot.


Where's Aggiedub & his expert opinion on inciting riots?
Watch out when you call out other posters.

Holding people accountable to their words is not allowed.
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Multiculturalism will be the death of America.
Fightin TX Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-maxine-waters-on-if-derek-chauvin-is-acquitted-get-more-confrontational-on-the-street

Trump impeachment standard is that this is incitement to violence. Where are you at, Dems? I expect to see Maxine expelled from Congress next week.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh man... she's going to jail!


LOL just joking
Donald J Trump is my President
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fightin TX Aggie said:



https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-maxine-waters-on-if-derek-chauvin-is-acquitted-get-more-confrontational-on-the-street

Trump impeachment standard is that this is incitement to violence. Where are you at, Dems? I expect to see Maxine expelled from Congress next week.
It was BS, as impeachment for this would be BS. That being said, at least I'm consistent. Liberals and Democrats? Seemingly not so much.
snowdog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


WRONG!!

Violence, looting and rioting has already been happening,, and Maxine calls for MORE confrontation. How is that not inciting more riots?

Typical. You libs contort yourselves into a pretzel talking about how Trump calling for peace means he initiated a riot, and Maxine calling ror more riots doesn't mean she's calling for riots.

Useful idiots.

Her words will probably cost lives and she will blame racism for it. **** that horrible hag.
Love Gun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Could this be grounds for a mistrial based on external influence?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

Maroon Dawn said:


.....
That's not calling for riots.
Maxine Waters advocating getting confrontational and ignoring curfews(lawlessness).

What do you consider "confrontational", let alone breaking the law by ignoring curfews. Curfews are designed to protect people from the lawless rioting and looting.

By going public it appears she is knowingly threatening the jurors and the court, "we demand a murder conviction regardless of the law and our court system."
A fine line, indeed, but certainly not one that justifies impeachment.
The Democratic Party leadership impeached President Trump for just saying "peaceful protests" which are quite legal. Maxine Waters advocating breaking the law. Yes, impeachable or at least censorship, especially openly trying to intimidate jurors and he courts of Minnesota.

It very sad you are defending such despicable behavior.
houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These statements here....are criminal. Our concerned moderates and liberal filth eunuchs will not post on this thread because they are hypocritical cowards.
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
snowdog90 said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


WRONG!!

Violence, looting and rioting has already been happening,, and Maxine calls for MORE confrontation. How is that not inciting more riots?

Typical. You libs contort yourselves into a pretzel talking about how Trump calling for peace means he initiated a riot, and Maxine calling ror more riots doesn't mean she's calling for riots.

Useful idiots.

Her words will probably cost lives and she will blame racism for it. **** that horrible hag.
B1 is a lib?


Oh how laughably ignorant.

Go read some of his past posts
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
snowdog90 said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


WRONG!!

Violence, looting and rioting has already been happening,, and Maxine calls for MORE confrontation. How is that not inciting more riots?

Typical. You libs contort yourselves into a pretzel talking about how Trump calling for peace means he initiated a riot, and Maxine calling ror more riots doesn't mean she's calling for riots.

Useful idiots.

Her words will probably cost lives and she will blame racism for it. **** that horrible hag.
And there it is!!!!!!!! B-1 83 is now one of "you libs" because I understand the English language and what it just might mean in a legal sense! Classic F16. Since your reading comprehension obviously sucks, I'll state it again: Neither Trump's call to "fight" nor her call to get "confrontational" is absolutely calling for riots. The terms "fight" and "confrontational" have multiple meanings. One can be "confrontational" (in their face), and one can ignore the police (just stand in the already crowded street/park after curfew) without constituting what any reasonable person would call a "riot".
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

Maroon Dawn said:


.....
That's not calling for riots.
Maxine Waters advocating getting confrontational and ignoring curfews(lawlessness).

What do you consider "confrontational", let alone breaking the law by ignoring curfews. Curfews are designed to protect people from the lawless rioting and looting.

By going public it appears she is knowingly threatening the jurors and the court, "we demand a murder conviction regardless of the law and our court system."
A fine line, indeed, but certainly not one that justifies impeachment.
The Democratic Party leadership impeached President Trump for just saying "peaceful protests" which are quite legal. Maxine Waters advocating breaking the law. Yes, impeachable or at least censorship, especially openly trying to intimidate jurors and he courts of Minnesota.

It very sad you are defending such despicable behavior.
Another poster with learning disabilities. I think Trumps impeachment was BS, and I think calling this "inciting a riot" is BS. I'm consistent. You're not.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

Maroon Dawn said:


.....
That's not calling for riots.
Maxine Waters advocating getting confrontational and ignoring curfews(lawlessness).

What do you consider "confrontational", let alone breaking the law by ignoring curfews. Curfews are designed to protect people from the lawless rioting and looting.

By going public it appears she is knowingly threatening the jurors and the court, "we demand a murder conviction regardless of the law and our court system."
A fine line, indeed, but certainly not one that justifies impeachment.
The Democratic Party leadership impeached President Trump for just saying "peaceful protests" which are quite legal. Maxine Waters advocating breaking the law. Yes, impeachable or at least censorship, especially openly trying to intimidate jurors and he courts of Minnesota.

It very sad you are defending such despicable behavior.
Another poster with learning disabilities. I think Trumps impeachment was BS, and I think calling this "inciting a riot" is BS. I'm consistent. You're not.
You complete ignore the fact that Maxine Waters advocates breaking the law so no you are not consistent.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

Maroon Dawn said:


.....
That's not calling for riots.
Maxine Waters advocating getting confrontational and ignoring curfews(lawlessness).

What do you consider "confrontational", let alone breaking the law by ignoring curfews. Curfews are designed to protect people from the lawless rioting and looting.

By going public it appears she is knowingly threatening the jurors and the court, "we demand a murder conviction regardless of the law and our court system."
A fine line, indeed, but certainly not one that justifies impeachment.
The Democratic Party leadership impeached President Trump for just saying "peaceful protests" which are quite legal. Maxine Waters advocating breaking the law. Yes, impeachable or at least censorship, especially openly trying to intimidate jurors and he courts of Minnesota.

It very sad you are defending such despicable behavior.
Another poster with learning disabilities. I think Trumps impeachment was BS, and I think calling this "inciting a riot" is BS. I'm consistent. You're not.
Oh, forgot to include you have resorted to name calling. Sorry your debating in this discussion has deteriorated to the point of name calling.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

richardag said:

B-1 83 said:

Maroon Dawn said:


.....
That's not calling for riots.
Maxine Waters advocating getting confrontational and ignoring curfews(lawlessness).

What do you consider "confrontational", let alone breaking the law by ignoring curfews. Curfews are designed to protect people from the lawless rioting and looting.

By going public it appears she is knowingly threatening the jurors and the court, "we demand a murder conviction regardless of the law and our court system."
A fine line, indeed, but certainly not one that justifies impeachment.
The Democratic Party leadership impeached President Trump for just saying "peaceful protests" which are quite legal. Maxine Waters advocating breaking the law. Yes, impeachable or at least censorship, especially openly trying to intimidate jurors and he courts of Minnesota.

It very sad you are defending such despicable behavior.
Another poster with learning disabilities. I think Trumps impeachment was BS, and I think calling this "inciting a riot" is BS. I'm consistent. You're not.
Oh, forgot to include you have resorted to name calling. Sorry your debating in this discussion has deteriorated to the point of name calling.
If the shoe fits........ I plainly stated that NEITHER situation called for riots. I defended the freedoms of both speakers. You couldn't comprehend that, or that "breaking the law" did not necessarily constitute calling for a riot. I was called out, and even called a liberal, so take your nonsense somewhere else.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Democrat scum always doing what they claimed Trump was.
If you don't have anything nice to say, then come sit by me.
Onceaggie2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

snowdog90 said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


WRONG!!

Violence, looting and rioting has already been happening,, and Maxine calls for MORE confrontation. How is that not inciting more riots?

Typical. You libs contort yourselves into a pretzel talking about how Trump calling for peace means he initiated a riot, and Maxine calling ror more riots doesn't mean she's calling for riots.

Useful idiots.

Her words will probably cost lives and she will blame racism for it. **** that horrible hag.
And there it is!!!!!!!! B-1 83 is now one of "you libs" because I understand the English language and what it just might mean in a legal sense! Classic F16. Since your reading comprehension obviously sucks, I'll state it again: Neither Trump's call to "fight" nor her call to get "confrontational" is absolutely calling for riots. The terms "fight" and "confrontational" have multiple meanings. One can be "confrontational" (in their face), and one can ignore the police (just stand in the already crowded street/park after curfew) without constituting what any reasonable person would call a "riot".
Trump is no longer in office genius...Mad max is...nice deflection.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


What you are suggesting cannot happen, already does. Liberals do have it both ways.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My Name Is Judge said:

So she's calling to override America's jury system & replace it w blm mob rule

She's really responsible
Sounds like an insurrection!
"In Texas, the GOP would love to claim I am an unfit parent and take my children...You do know that legislation around this EXACT issue was presented in the last legislative session." - ArcticPenguin
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It not a deflection. Either both are criminal actions, or neither is, genius. Virtually every decision we make in life is based on the evidence at hand compared to past experiences.
snowdog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

snowdog90 said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


WRONG!!

Violence, looting and rioting has already been happening,, and Maxine calls for MORE confrontation. How is that not inciting more riots?

Typical. You libs contort yourselves into a pretzel talking about how Trump calling for peace means he initiated a riot, and Maxine calling ror more riots doesn't mean she's calling for riots.

Useful idiots.

Her words will probably cost lives and she will blame racism for it. **** that horrible hag.
And there it is!!!!!!!! B-1 83 is now one of "you libs" because I understand the English language and what it just might mean in a legal sense! Classic F16. Since your reading comprehension obviously sucks, I'll state it again: Neither Trump's call to "fight" nor her call to get "confrontational" is absolutely calling for riots. The terms "fight" and "confrontational" have multiple meanings. One can be "confrontational" (in their face), and one can ignore the police (just stand in the already crowded street/park after curfew) without constituting what any reasonable person would call a "riot".


Forgive me for calling you a lib if you're not. Your response is as intellectual as a typical lib's response, hence my conclusion. I should have remembered that the true libs will avoid this thread, except for Tanya, who as usual avoided the issue and instead laughed at me. Typical.

If you can't see the difference in Trump's words and Witch Maxine's, and the different circumstances, I can't help you.
Onceaggie2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

It not a deflection. Either both are criminal actions, or neither is, genius. Virtually every decision we make in life is based on the evidence at hand compared to past experiences.
again so what deal in the present Trump is no longer in office he is a private citizen..Mad max is a government offical calling for violence.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


What you are suggesting cannot happen, already does. Liberals do have it both ways.
And I'm calling it out, only to be labeled a "liberal". Trump didn't do it, sht head didn't either.
snowdog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

It not a deflection. Either both are criminal actions, or neither is, genius. Virtually every decision we make in life is based on the evidence at hand compared to past experiences.


This is so dumb.
Onceaggie2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


What you are suggesting cannot happen, already does. Liberals do have it both ways.
And I'm calling it out, only to be labeled a "liberal". Trump didn't do it, sht head didn't either.
go start a ****ing thread about Trump then
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
snowdog90 said:

B-1 83 said:

snowdog90 said:

B-1 83 said:

Fascinating...........we can't have it both ways. She didn't call for riots any more than President Trump did. Either both are guilty of inciting riots, or neither is. Both called for protests, not violent riots.


WRONG!!

Violence, looting and rioting has already been happening,, and Maxine calls for MORE confrontation. How is that not inciting more riots?

Typical. You libs contort yourselves into a pretzel talking about how Trump calling for peace means he initiated a riot, and Maxine calling ror more riots doesn't mean she's calling for riots.

Useful idiots.

Her words will probably cost lives and she will blame racism for it. **** that horrible hag.
And there it is!!!!!!!! B-1 83 is now one of "you libs" because I understand the English language and what it just might mean in a legal sense! Classic F16. Since your reading comprehension obviously sucks, I'll state it again: Neither Trump's call to "fight" nor her call to get "confrontational" is absolutely calling for riots. The terms "fight" and "confrontational" have multiple meanings. One can be "confrontational" (in their face), and one can ignore the police (just stand in the already crowded street/park after curfew) without constituting what any reasonable person would call a "riot".


Forgive me for calling you a lib if you're not. Your response is as intellectual as a typical lib's response, hence my conclusion. I should have remembered that the true libs will avoid this thread, except for Tanya, who as usual avoided the issue and instead laughed at me. Typical.

If you can't see the difference in Trump's words and Witch Maxine's, and the different circumstances, I can't help you.
Well it was laughable.

I don't believe Trump should have been impeached.
I don't think from what she did in the OP that she should either.

However, that is not the acceptable answer on this thread.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.