If you're curious, I originally wrote "crank up his right shoulder up" and I missed the quotation mark in front of the statement.NPH- said:
that was a quick edit.
*****State of MN v. Derek Chauvin Trial*****
785,449 Views |
8794 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by titan
I've seen this guy before for the state but can't remember his name. He didn't do any of the voir dire but did handle some pretrial motion arguments.
thirdcoast said:astros4545 said:Enviroag02 said:
I totally agree...not only was it excessive, but both officers repeatedly ignored valid comments from bystanders about Mr. Floyd's appearance when he went from responsive to non-responsive. The knee wasn't lifted and the other officer was told about 30 times his condition was worsening and he ignored it all.
Damn
Didn't listen to the bystanders, bystanders are known to be extremely smart
Don't have to be smart to recognize when a body goes from responsive to unresponsive and a knee to neck is no longer needed. So what does that say about the cops if stupid bystanders had to repeatedly make that obvious point to the cops?
I think the defense response to this would be that the technique being applied was taught to police specifically because it did not restrict breathing or blood flow like the old-fashioned chokehold.
lol, i wasn't, just thought I'd point it out.tallgrant said:If you're curious, I originally wrote "crank up his right shoulder up" and I missed the quotation mark in front of the statement.NPH- said:
that was a quick edit.
you could have said you wanted a large butterfinger blizzard and I wouldn't have known what was originally said.
edit: plus my comment was directed to you tallgrant, but you're more than welcome to get criticized on here if you want.
Blocked
You know the only constitutional right one has upon being arrested is the right to remain silent. Period.2PacShakur said:Obviously they're not going to charge a dead man. Are you saying anyone protesting their arrest deserves to die?aggiehawg said:Good grief! You want to charge and try a dead guy for resisting arrest? You should really read your post a few times before you hit that button.2PacShakur said:I don't know what qualifies as resistance but he does have a right to protest his arrest. If they thought he was resisting arrest then please add the charge.aggiehawg said:Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?Quote:
I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,849
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
it would be awesome if there was a common sense or iq test in order to post on this thread. that way this one doesn't also get constantly derailed by a certain poster spinning around in circles doing their best harry caray impersonation.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,849
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
astros4545 said:
Blocked
yeah...i try not to block people but holy **** that guy is dense and completely clogs up each thread with absolute gibberish.
That comes after arraignment, counselor.Bregxit said:aggiehawg said:You know the only constitutional right one has upon being arrested is the right to remain silent. Period.2PacShakur said:Obviously they're not going to charge a dead man. Are you saying anyone protesting their arrest deserves to die?aggiehawg said:Good grief! You want to charge and try a dead guy for resisting arrest? You should really read your post a few times before you hit that button.2PacShakur said:I don't know what qualifies as resistance but he does have a right to protest his arrest. If they thought he was resisting arrest then please add the charge.aggiehawg said:Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?Quote:
I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Objection: Fair and speedy trial.
Print out version of a 911 call. State's Exhibit 151. Cahill allows 151 to be admitted.
Soros might fund a lot of mayhem, depends on his investments for or against the US economy.Maroon Dawn said:third coast.. said:Old McDonald said:dems are in power now so less incentive to stoke the riots like they did last yearaezmvp said:
Riots incoming either way.
Their blm creation has a mind of its own now.
True
But it won't be funded by National Dems or tolerated by local Dems this time
Riots aren't useful when the Dems are in power
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Is the original call from the store regarding the counterfeit bill.
To me it's so obvious he's not guilty. You can't find the guy guilty beyond doubt when there exists an autopsy indicating he died from overdose.
He's only guilty for being a dewsh and keeping his knee on the guy after it was clear he wasn't much of a threat anymore.
He's only guilty for being a dewsh and keeping his knee on the guy after it was clear he wasn't much of a threat anymore.
This is a really simplistic and straight-forward take. Need more of this instead of the B.S. in this thread.Dan Scott said:
To me it's so obvious he's not guilty. You can't find the guy guilty beyond doubt when there exists an autopsy indicating he died from overdose.
He's only guilty for being a dewsh and keeping his knee on the guy after it was clear he wasn't much of a threat anymore.
She used that info from the 911 call talker to dispatch to Sector 330 because Sector 320 officers were busy. Sector 320 was that actual location.
Dan Scott said:
To me it's so obvious he's not guilty. You can't find the guy guilty beyond doubt when there exists an autopsy indicating he died from overdose.
He's only guilty for being a dewsh and keeping his knee on the guy after it was clear he wasn't much of a threat anymore.
Yep.
The autopsy doesn't indicate that and that's not how fentanyl OD's work. The only person that concluded it was an overdose was Tucker Carlson.Dan Scott said:
To me it's so obvious he's not guilty. You can't find the guy guilty beyond doubt when there exists an autopsy indicating he died from overdose.
He's only guilty for being a dewsh and keeping his knee on the guy after it was clear he wasn't much of a threat anymore.
aggiehawg said:
She used that info from the 911 call talker to dispatch to Sector 330 because Sector 320 officers were busy. Sector 320 was that actual location.
Interesting butterfly effect there.
2PacShakur said:The autopsy doesn't indicate that and that's not how fentanyl OD's work. The only person that concluded it was an overdose was Tucker Carlson.Dan Scott said:
To me it's so obvious he's not guilty. You can't find the guy guilty beyond doubt when there exists an autopsy indicating he died from overdose.
He's only guilty for being a dewsh and keeping his knee on the guy after it was clear he wasn't much of a threat anymore.
Perhaps you could educate us as to normal toxicology and autopsy findings of someone dying of a fentanyl overdose.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
who implied that 2pacShakur? not a single poster ever said that. you're really reaching here man.2PacShakur said:My last reply was edited out, but again, does not exercising that right deserve an extrajudicial killing?aggiehawg said:You know the only constitutional right one has upon being arrested is the right to remain silent. Period.2PacShakur said:Obviously they're not going to charge a dead man. Are you saying anyone protesting their arrest deserves to die?aggiehawg said:Good grief! You want to charge and try a dead guy for resisting arrest? You should really read your post a few times before you hit that button.2PacShakur said:I don't know what qualifies as resistance but he does have a right to protest his arrest. If they thought he was resisting arrest then please add the charge.aggiehawg said:Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?Quote:
I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
I use real dollar bills when I purchase items and the cops have never been called on me. Amazing.
Never mind, self imposed ban for feeding the troll. Reported the troll for misinformation by mis-quoting the law.
Have to wonder about that. Is that why EMS and firefighters were delayed in their response?Bondag said:aggiehawg said:
She used that info from the 911 call talker to dispatch to Sector 330 because Sector 320 officers were busy. Sector 320 was that actual location.
Interesting butterfly effect there.
2PacShakur said:My last reply was edited out, but again, does not exercising that right deserve an extrajudicial killing?aggiehawg said:You know the only constitutional right one has upon being arrested is the right to remain silent. Period.2PacShakur said:Obviously they're not going to charge a dead man. Are you saying anyone protesting their arrest deserves to die?aggiehawg said:Good grief! You want to charge and try a dead guy for resisting arrest? You should really read your post a few times before you hit that button.2PacShakur said:I don't know what qualifies as resistance but he does have a right to protest his arrest. If they thought he was resisting arrest then please add the charge.aggiehawg said:Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?Quote:
I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
I encourage you to start your own thread and ask all these questions.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
I actually received a counterfeit $20 from a store one time. the only way I caught it was I originally stuffed the change in my pocket, then I was folding the bills to put back in my wallet in my car.Good Poster said:
I use real dollar bills when I purchase items and the cops have never been called on me. Amazing.
store apologized and gave me a replacement $20.
aggiehawg said:Have to wonder about that. Is that why EMS and firefighters were delayed in their response?Bondag said:aggiehawg said:
She used that info from the 911 call talker to dispatch to Sector 330 because Sector 320 officers were busy. Sector 320 was that actual location.
Interesting butterfly effect there.
And does that make the dispatcher guilty of a crime since it's basically her fault EMS didn't get to the right place?
The world needs another Pinochet.
They were advised with the second officer originated call for EMS upping the Code to 3 for emergent care and advised that the suspect was being restrained on the ground. Per the manual when MRT is deployed.
No. But it increases reasonable doubt.OldArmyBrent said:aggiehawg said:Have to wonder about that. Is that why EMS and firefighters were delayed in their response?Bondag said:aggiehawg said:
She used that info from the 911 call talker to dispatch to Sector 330 because Sector 320 officers were busy. Sector 320 was that actual location.
Interesting butterfly effect there.
And does that make the dispatcher guilty of a crime since it's basically her fault EMS didn't get to the right place?
Clearly, this type of situation will be resolved once police and first responders are sufficiently defunded.aggiehawg said:No. But it increases reasonable doubt.OldArmyBrent said:aggiehawg said:Have to wonder about that. Is that why EMS and firefighters were delayed in their response?Bondag said:aggiehawg said:
She used that info from the 911 call talker to dispatch to Sector 330 because Sector 320 officers were busy. Sector 320 was that actual location.
Interesting butterfly effect there.
And does that make the dispatcher guilty of a crime since it's basically her fault EMS didn't get to the right place?
Police didn't use lethal force here
Featured Stories
See All
SEC Round-Up: Dawgs facing possible playoff elimination this week
by Olin Buchanan
33:59
18h ago
1.7k
Pick 'Em & Rip 'Em sponsored by PrizePicks: Week 12
by Matthew Dawson
29:44
30m ago
289
23:22
40m ago
328
ElkoSZN
Instead of scheduling tough non-conference games like ND...
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
50
Cm214
Thoughts Thread - Dan Campbell for College Gameday Guest Picker?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
37
LosAngelesAg00
Instead of scheduling tough non-conference games like ND...
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
37
Redbeard85
Thoughts Thread - Dan Campbell for College Gameday Guest Picker?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
30