*****State of MN v. Derek Chauvin Trial*****

784,898 Views | 8794 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by titan
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Martin Cash said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

Floyd is a criminal
Then arrest and try him. Extrajudicial killings bad.


There was an attempt to arrest and Floyd resisted. Again.
Resist is very subjective, people also have a first amendment right to protest their arrest.
Protest? Yes. Resist? No.
He was in cuffs so he wasn't very successful in resisting the arrest.
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree it's sloppy, but that's how the prosecution closed opening argument.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
REMINDER: There is still ZERO evidence that the death of George Floyd was caused by racism.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

Martin Cash said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

Floyd is a criminal
Then arrest and try him. Extrajudicial killings bad.


There was an attempt to arrest and Floyd resisted. Again.
Resist is very subjective, people also have a first amendment right to protest their arrest.
Protest? Yes. Resist? No.
He was in cuffs so he wasn't very successful in resisting the arrest.
It's not the severity of the punishment that deters crime; it's the certainty of it.
HtownAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Ugh! 50,000 Bates Stamped pieces of evidence? Hate to be the document organizer.
We went over 300k in a class action case.

I'll bet a good 75% of the 50k in this case are irrelevant or barely relevant personnel and service records and historical procedural manuals that won't even be considered.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aahh! I wondered why they didn't even attempt resuscitation at the scene. It was a load and go because of the crowd problems.
tallgrant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nelson sounds like he's going to rely on what the ME told the FBI in the 302s from the prior thread.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Missed the tumor that increased his adrenaline flow in the autopsy.
tallgrant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Direct quote from Nelson on the position of ME Baker
"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechanical asphyxiate death."

That's where the defense is going to go. I think the real hinge is going to be the day the medical examiner testifies.

Edit: spelling error
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Recess until 11:15.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tallgrant said:

"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechancail asphyxiate death."
"Mr. Chauvin, you're free to go."
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well he was clearly just protesting his arrest verbally! LOL, as though that's a right, anyway.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tallgrant said:

Direct quote from Nelson on the position of ME Baker
"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechancail asphyxiate death."

That's where the defense is going to go. I think the real hinge is going to be the day the medical examiner testifies.
Which is why I'm surprised the prosecution is going with that theory.
astros4545
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enviroag02 said:

I totally agree...not only was it excessive, but both officers repeatedly ignored valid comments from bystanders about Mr. Floyd's appearance when he went from responsive to non-responsive. The knee wasn't lifted and the other officer was told about 30 times his condition was worsening and he ignored it all.


Damn

Didn't listen to the bystanders, bystanders are known to be extremely smart
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

2PacShakur said:

Martin Cash said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

Floyd is a criminal
Then arrest and try him. Extrajudicial killings bad.


There was an attempt to arrest and Floyd resisted. Again.
Resist is very subjective, people also have a first amendment right to protest their arrest.
Protest? Yes. Resist? No.
He was in cuffs so he wasn't very successful in resisting the arrest.

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Kool
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tallgrant said:

Direct quote from Nelson on the position of ME Baker
"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechanical asphyxiate death."

That's where the defense is going to go. I think the real hinge is going to be the day the medical examiner testifies.

Edit: spelling error
100%. I think it is going to be VERY interesting to watch the pathologists and the toxicologist(s) go back and forth on the effects the drugs had on Floyd's ability to maintain his own airway vs any external component from Chauvin's knee. Cross examination is going to be key.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

BadMoonRisin said:

2PacShakur said:

Martin Cash said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

Floyd is a criminal
Then arrest and try him. Extrajudicial killings bad.


There was an attempt to arrest and Floyd resisted. Again.
Resist is very subjective, people also have a first amendment right to protest their arrest.
Protest? Yes. Resist? No.
He was in cuffs so he wasn't very successful in resisting the arrest.

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
wasn't there a reason the officer was there though and walked up to his car? likely the gun was drawn for other factors as well??
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

tallgrant said:

Direct quote from Nelson on the position of ME Baker
"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechancail asphyxiate death."

That's where the defense is going to go. I think the real hinge is going to be the day the medical examiner testifies.
Which is why I'm surprised the prosecution is going with that theory.


The state went beyond the medical examiner and hired their own experts for second opinions. They are going to bring in a cardiac specialist, a pulmonologist, an emergency specialist, and another pathologist to testify. They are sparing no expense in this prosecution. Going to try to bludgeon the defense with experts.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kool said:

tallgrant said:

Direct quote from Nelson on the position of ME Baker
"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechanical asphyxiate death."

That's where the defense is going to go. I think the real hinge is going to be the day the medical examiner testifies.

Edit: spelling error
100%. I think it is going to be VERY interesting to watch the pathologists and the toxicologist(s) go back and forth on the effects the drugs had on Floyd's ability to maintain his own airway vs any external component from Chauvin's knee. Cross examination is going to be key.
State has already brought up the fact that Floyd was a junkie and thus his tolerance for speedballing was much higher than the average first time user.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?


Quite a bit of resisting when getting placed into the squad car.
tallgrant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One other quote, this one from Mr. Blackwell (I wasn't able to catch the first part live and had to go back and watch it):

"You will see in the videos, ladies and gentlemen, that Mr. Floyd from time to time was heaving up his right shoulder. There's a reason for that. Mr. Chauvin was on his left side- his back and his neck. He can't move that- his hands are behind his back. He's heaving up the right should so he can get room for his rib cage to expand to breathe, because at this point you will learn he is pancaked, with the hard pavement beneath him and Mr. Chauvin on top of him. In order to breathe, you have to have room for the lungs to expand in and out, and you'll see Mr. Floyd doing his best to kind of crank his right shoulder up, having to lift up his weight and Mr. Chauvin's weight on top of him to get a breath for as long as he could get a breath."

So that's the prosecution's theory of the crime.

Edited to fix a mistake in the quote
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?
I don't know what qualifies as resistance but he does have a right to protest his arrest. If they thought he was resisting arrest then please add the charge.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cactus Jack said:

aggiehawg said:

tallgrant said:

Direct quote from Nelson on the position of ME Baker
"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechancail asphyxiate death."

That's where the defense is going to go. I think the real hinge is going to be the day the medical examiner testifies.
Which is why I'm surprised the prosecution is going with that theory.


The state went beyond the medical examiner and hired their own experts for second opinions. They are going to bring in a cardiac specialist, a pulmonologist, an emergency specialist, and another pathologist to testify. They are sparing no expense in this prosecution. Going to try to bludgeon the defense with experts.
Smooth maneuver. Employing outside experts to torpedo your own Medical Examiner's testimony. Can you say reasonable doubt?
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
aggiehawg said:

Kool said:

tallgrant said:

Direct quote from Nelson on the position of ME Baker
"There was no evidence that Mr. Floyd's airflow was restricted, and he did not determine to be a positional or mechanical asphyxiate death."

That's where the defense is going to go. I think the real hinge is going to be the day the medical examiner testifies.

Edit: spelling error
100%. I think it is going to be VERY interesting to watch the pathologists and the toxicologist(s) go back and forth on the effects the drugs had on Floyd's ability to maintain his own airway vs any external component from Chauvin's knee. Cross examination is going to be key.
State has already brought up the fact that Floyd was a junkie and thus his tolerance for speedballing was much higher than the average first time user.
The State also brought up that Floyd "stayed in shape" by playing "hoops." In shape junkies all over the country cheered...

I appreciate your observations aggiehawg - really helps us non-lawyers make sense of things...
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
astros4545 said:

Enviroag02 said:

I totally agree...not only was it excessive, but both officers repeatedly ignored valid comments from bystanders about Mr. Floyd's appearance when he went from responsive to non-responsive. The knee wasn't lifted and the other officer was told about 30 times his condition was worsening and he ignored it all.


Damn

Didn't listen to the bystanders, bystanders are known to be extremely smart


Don't have to be smart to recognize when a body goes from responsive to unresponsive and a knee to neck is no longer needed. So what does that say about the cops if stupid bystanders had to repeatedly make that obvious point to the cops?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?
I don't know what qualifies as resistance but he does have a right to protest his arrest. If they thought he was resisting arrest then please add the charge.
Good grief! You want to charge and try a dead guy for resisting arrest? You should really read your post a few times before you hit that button.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

BadMoonRisin said:

2PacShakur said:

Martin Cash said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

2PacShakur said:

Good Poster said:

Floyd is a criminal
Then arrest and try him. Extrajudicial killings bad.


There was an attempt to arrest and Floyd resisted. Again.
Resist is very subjective, people also have a first amendment right to protest their arrest.
Protest? Yes. Resist? No.
He was in cuffs so he wasn't very successful in resisting the arrest.

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Then you clearly haven't seen the full bodycam footage, because they couldn't even get him in the squad car because he was throwing his body around so erratically. There's also a point in there well before being on the ground where he states having difficulty breathing. Seems like he was reacting to an overdose and his body was beginning to shut down.

Very sad situation. Chemical addiction can absolutely destroy people's lives and put them in the worst situations.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I too would be upset if someone already had their gun out on me in fewer than 15 seconds. He was in cuffs and under arrest in like 2 mins. Not much of a resistance.
Are you actually arguing that a suspect in cuffs can't resist arrest?
I don't know what qualifies as resistance but he does have a right to protest his arrest. If they thought he was resisting arrest then please add the charge.
Yes. He has a right to protest his arrest. In a court of law. Too bad he was high out of his mind on fentanyl and meth. Things might have turned out a little different if he was in his right mind.

He has a history of doing stupid things -- like robbing a pregnant woman by holding a gun within inches of her child -- while he is on drugs.
It's not the severity of the punishment that deters crime; it's the certainty of it.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
that was a quick edit.

edit: now 2 edits?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
State calls Jenna Scurry (sp?) to the stand.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
City of Minneapolis dispatcher.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
she spells her name "jena"
First Page Last Page
Page 5 of 252
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.