stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

Unfortunately, its true. It's a tech company so they can get away with it.

This started when #metoo kicked off so it was initially focused on getting more women into the ranks by any means possible.

---

Sorry but not convinced a fortune 500 company is not longer hiring white employees.

---

I didn't say it was 100% across the board do not hire white people. That isn't possible because you may not have enough diverse candidates for some roles. I will clarify and say that he was told to hire women and blacks above white people. Basically, all else being equal hire the minority.

BusterAg said:

---

Pretty sure I was laughed off this board when I said that this was coming.

I'm just waiting for my required shoulder patch to arrive any day now.

I wonder if Zuckerberg has finished his plan for the "final solution" to the conservative problem.

---

What's Zucker**** going to do to me? I deleted facebook.

Apparently getting ready to tattoo some numbers on your forearm. So username may check out soon

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

Unfortunately, its true. It's a tech company so they can get away with it.

This started when #metoo kicked off so it was initially focused on getting more women into the ranks by any means possible.

---

Sorry but not convinced a fortune 500 company is not longer hiring white employees.

---

I didn't say it was 100% across the board do not hire white people. That isn't possible because you may not have enough diverse candidates for some roles. I will clarify and say that he was told to hire women and blacks above white people. Basically, all else being equal hire the minority.

---

You kind of left out the "basically, all else being equal part" in your initial post. Maybe we now call that the white male loophole. Since I guess your VP friend can still hire who he or she wants but they have to be most qualified? If that is the accurate description of their situation then they have normal hiring practices like most every other business.

BMX Bandit said:

---

Hmmmm.

Can't post on Facebook v sent to gas chambers.

Sounds even.

---

Of course these things are never a progression. Never.

You are incredibly naive then. It is happening. I actually just had a conversation earlier this week about a new role we are creating and that we needed to hire a diverse candidate for it, and here's the real kicker -> since the work this role will do is not as critical/risky, then taking a lesser candidate to ensure the hire is diverse should be fine. No joke. Verbatim from an SVP

BluHorseShu said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Pretty sure I was laughed off this board when I said that this was coming.

I'm just waiting for my required shoulder patch to arrive any day now.

I wonder if Zuckerberg has finished his plan for the "final solution" to the conservative problem.

---

If you're worried about being laughed off the board, I'm not sure this post is helping your cause.
Comparing yourself to Jews during the Holocaust is a bit much. Do you also think you're being "crucified" like Christ?

---

Babies are being crucified every day, all across this country. Does that count?

---

I'm an a conservative and against abortion, but nice non sequitur. So you're in agreement with the crying about "white discrimination"? I assume you've got some anecdotal example about how it exists and has affected you?

---

Conservative huh? I was thinking all this time you seemed more like the "concerned moderate" type.

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Glad I'm Catholic.

---

Don't worry, they'll come for you next.

---

Pretty sure Catholics in this country have been through this before during the past 250 years. Welcome to the party Protestants.

BMX Bandit said:

---

Hmmmm.

Can't post on Facebook v sent to gas chambers.

Sounds even.

---

I'm not saying it will happen one way or another but you do realize censorship was one of the first tools used against the Jews.

Your dismissal of this while funny comes across a little naive.

And censorship of conservatives by social media isn't in the same universe as the final solution.

Would leftists like to silence all conservatives? It's clear they do. Leaping to saying WASPs are the new Jews is the kind of absurd take that would warrant a REEEEE by many posters if the roles were reversed

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

Unfortunately, its true. It's a tech company so they can get away with it.

This started when #metoo kicked off so it was initially focused on getting more women into the ranks by any means possible.

---

Sorry but not convinced a fortune 500 company is not longer hiring white employees.

---

I didn't say it was 100% across the board do not hire white people. That isn't possible because you may not have enough diverse candidates for some roles. I will clarify and say that he was told to hire women and blacks above white people. Basically, all else being equal hire the minority.

---

You kind of left out the "basically, all else being equal part" in your initial post. Maybe we now call that the white male loophole. Since I guess your VP friend can still hire who he or she wants but they have to be most qualified? If that is the accurate description of their situation then they have normal hiring practices like most every other business.

---

Being a woman and/or black person is the tiebreaker in that situation which is sexist and racist, so he doesn't have that choice.

BMX Bandit said:

---

And censorship of conservatives by social media isn't in the same universe as the final solution.

---

No it is not.

But the point you are missing is that the Nazis didn't wake up one day and move immediately to the final solution.

It was a slow boil - censorship, silence opposition, disarm, new laws, colocation, removal, and then the final solution.

Ag CPA said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Glad I'm Catholic.

---

Don't worry, they'll come for you next.

---

Pretty sure Catholics in this country have been through this before during the past 250 years. Welcome to the party Protestants.

---

I get it man. Those 250 years after the Reformation were a cakewalk for us.

BMX Bandit said:

---

And censorship of conservatives by social media isn't in the same universe as the final solution.

Would leftists like to silence all conservatives? It's clear they do. Leaping to saying WASPs are the new Jews is the kind of absurd take that would warrant a REEEEE by many posters if the roles were reversed

---

Its where it leads. They are calling for open persecution of Republican members of Congress, not just radio jocks. We are talking about Congress. Their strongly knit net of collusion has already gotten Hawley's work blackballed. The MSM is trying to make the attack on the Capitol look like it was ordered by Reps and Senators.

Its everywhere and growing. Speech is one of the foremost ways to stave things off. Things go very fast to tyranny once you can no longer communicate easily and with this covid weapon they even have a way to ban physical meetings. How can you not see the trajectory? You are waay over-focusing on the OP's hyperbole--- things can get horrendous and never involve gas chambers or even summary excutions.

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

Unfortunately, its true. It's a tech company so they can get away with it.

This started when #metoo kicked off so it was initially focused on getting more women into the ranks by any means possible.

---

Sorry but not convinced a fortune 500 company is not longer hiring white employees.

---

I didn't say it was 100% across the board do not hire white people. That isn't possible because you may not have enough diverse candidates for some roles. I will clarify and say that he was told to hire women and blacks above white people. Basically, all else being equal hire the minority.

---

You kind of left out the "basically, all else being equal part" in your initial post. Maybe we now call that the white male loophole. Since I guess your VP friend can still hire who he or she wants but they have to be most qualified? If that is the accurate description of their situation then they have normal hiring practices like most every other business.

---

Being a woman and/or black person is the tiebreaker in that situation which is sexist and racist, so he doesn't have that choice.

---

Obviously you have never hired many people. There are no ties.

XXXVII said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Pretty sure I was laughed off this board when I said that this was coming.

I'm just waiting for my required shoulder patch to arrive any day now.

I wonder if Zuckerberg has finished his plan for the "final solution" to the conservative problem.

---

What's Zucker**** going to do to me? I deleted facebook.

---

Pay election officials $150MM to steal the election, that's what.

BMX Bandit said:

---

And censorship of conservatives by social media isn't in the same universe as the final solution.

Would leftists like to silence all conservatives? It's clear they do. Leaping to saying WASPs are the new Jews is the kind of absurd take that would warrant a REEEEE by many posters if the roles were reversed

---

Ok. Maybe we are not the Jews of 1938.

We are definitely the American Jews of 1968.

We are the ones that undeservedly have all of the money, and we're not sorry about it. It's time to punish us for that.

Everyone with money is going to be punished

BMX Bandit said:

---

Everyone with money is going to be punished

---

For sedition?

Deleted off of facebook?

"Purged" from the media?

It's open season on me right now.

For the first time in my life, I am starting to understand victim culture. I feel some small sense of righteous indignation, and it feels really, really good.

BusterAg said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

And censorship of conservatives by social media isn't in the same universe as the final solution.

Would leftists like to silence all conservatives? It's clear they do. Leaping to saying WASPs are the new Jews is the kind of absurd take that would warrant a REEEEE by many posters if the roles were reversed

---

Ok. Maybe we are not the Jews of 1938.

We are definitely the American Jews of 1968.

We are the ones that undeservedly have all of the money, and we're not sorry about it. It's time to punish us for that.

---

Actually its the white left that has most of the institutional power.

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Pretty sure I was laughed off this board when I said that this was coming.

I'm just waiting for my required shoulder patch to arrive any day now.

I wonder if Zuckerberg has finished his plan for the "final solution" to the conservative problem.

---

If you're worried about being laughed off the board, I'm not sure this post is helping your cause.
Comparing yourself to Jews during the Holocaust is a bit much. Do you also think you're being "crucified" like Christ?

---

Babies are being crucified every day, all across this country. Does that count?

---

I'm an a conservative and against abortion, but nice non sequitur. So you're in agreement with the crying about "white discrimination"? I assume you've got some anecdotal example about how it exists and has affected you?

---

Conservative huh? I was thinking all this time you seemed more like the "concerned moderate" type.

---

Well, I guess on F16 the definition of "conservative" is somewhat subjective. I'm sure I come across as goal tending for the Dems but really I am just more compelled to respond to what I see as more of the fringe views. It's too easy to attack libs in F16 bc of the overwhelming presence of the right, but fortunately the far right wing nuts make things more interesting.

How is this thread still up lmao

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

Unfortunately, its true. It's a tech company so they can get away with it.

This started when #metoo kicked off so it was initially focused on getting more women into the ranks by any means possible.

---

Sorry but not convinced a fortune 500 company is not longer hiring white employees.

---

I didn't say it was 100% across the board do not hire white people. That isn't possible because you may not have enough diverse candidates for some roles. I will clarify and say that he was told to hire women and blacks above white people. Basically, all else being equal hire the minority.

---

You kind of left out the "basically, all else being equal part" in your initial post. Maybe we now call that the white male loophole. Since I guess your VP friend can still hire who he or she wants but they have to be most qualified? If that is the accurate description of their situation then they have normal hiring practices like most every other business.

---

Being a woman and/or black person is the tiebreaker in that situation which is sexist and racist, so he doesn't have that choice.

---

Obviously you have never hired many people. There are no ties.

---

I've hired dozens of people. I was senior leader at a Fortune 500 just as yourself. This wasn't a mandate at my company; it was his.

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

Planning on working government contracts? Better make those numbers.

The Fife said:

---

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

Planning on working government contracts? Better make those numbers.

---

I have three USG contracts now. The USG is not going to put gender or ethnicity mandated employe %s in contracts. They will and do give preference for business ownership for certain contracts. They also will and do mandate minimum wage requirements.

ActualTalkingThermos said:

---

Almost 80% of congress is white, and over 75% is male. We have had one nonwhite President and zero female presidents.

This oppressed group sure is massively overrepresented in the government that is apparently out to oppress them, not to mention in the nation's boardrooms, mansions, and every other space occupied by our societal elite. It's still fairly notable when anyone who ISN'T a white male gets elected to high office, made a CEO of a major company, etc.

---

They aren't over represented at all, thats about the make up of white people in this country. People who use words like are just jealous cry babies that want something given to them instead of earning it over several generations like most Congress critters families have. HTH

Carl Hungus said:

---

ActualTalkingThermos said:

---

Almost 80% of congress is white, and over 75% is male. We have had one nonwhite President and zero female presidents.

This oppressed group sure is massively overrepresented in the government that is apparently out to oppress them, not to mention in the nation's boardrooms, mansions, and every other space occupied by our societal elite. It's still fairly notable when anyone who ISN'T a white male gets elected to high office, made a CEO of a major company, etc.

---

They aren't over represented at all, thats about the make up of white people in this country. People who use words like are just jealous cry babies that want something given to them instead of earning it over several generations like most Congress critters families have. HTH

---

Lol - yes 80% of congress is white. That is called the international elite class. They answer only to chinese trillions. Saudi trillions. Euro trillions. Generational trillions.

They dont answer to you, me, or america.

The only threat to them are educated, informed, armed, orgnanized, independent middle class people.

That group is slightly overrepresented white, and all conservative.

That is the battle.

Liberal americans are just useful idiots. Moreso than lenin ever even dreamed.

Thats why white conservatives are the enemy and are being squeezed into oblivion.

Someday you will all understand. Unfortunately.

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

BluHorseShu said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Pretty sure I was laughed off this board when I said that this was coming.

I'm just waiting for my required shoulder patch to arrive any day now.

I wonder if Zuckerberg has finished his plan for the "final solution" to the conservative problem.

---

If you're worried about being laughed off the board, I'm not sure this post is helping your cause.
Comparing yourself to Jews during the Holocaust is a bit much. Do you also think you're being "crucified" like Christ?

---

Babies are being crucified every day, all across this country. Does that count?

---

Having their brains sucked out while they're being removed from the womb is NOT the same as being crucified. Don't be so dramatic /somehorseshoe

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

It's happening at the biggest fortune companies. Openly hiring non-white or females over most qualified. Actively asking current employees and contractors what their ethnicity is in order to actively track current and future race percentages. It's over the top, daily tracking that is easily traceable to the top executives

Dos Tasadores De TAMU said:

---

We are going to have a nasty recession or depression before we get to that point OP.

I try not to worry about that, but it does live in the back of my mind....this country is so fiscally irresponsible it's mind numbing.

---

I could see a scenario where conservative companies start doing business with ONLY other conservative companies then a recession ensues conservatives are blamed...then we get dehumanized by the liberals

ActualTalkingThermos said:

---

Almost 80% of congress is white, and over 75% is male. We have had one nonwhite President and zero female presidents.

This oppressed group sure is massively overrepresented in the government that is apparently out to oppress them, not to mention in the nation's boardrooms, mansions, and every other space occupied by our societal elite. It's still fairly notable when anyone who ISN'T a white male gets elected to high office, made a CEO of a major company, etc.

---

And those numbers line up well with other statistics in education and overall achievement. Nobody's keeping black people from doing those things except their own ****ty culture of dependence and failure.

stallion6 said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Old Tom Morris said:

---

I work for a Fortune 100 that is actively discriminating against white males. We had a layoff in December and our function fired 3 white males in leadership (one SVP and two VPs) who were subsequently replaced by black male, black female, and hispanic male. The discussion and pressure not to hire white folks is out on the open. It's kind of amazing to see how clear and blunt the discussion and direction is. This week will act as an accelerant

---

I have a friend who is a VP at a huge company who was flat out told to backfill all of his future hires with women and/or blacks. In addition, he was told to only invite female and BIPOC clients to extra curricular events they sponsored even if it displaced a C Suite white person. And this was two years ago. I can't even imagine what its like now.

Open racism against whites is a sport now.

---

Sorry but I have a hard time believing that. I can understand having diversity and inclusion goals but no way a for profit company totally chooses to just hire based upon ethnicity.

---

My wife's company instituted a policy a couple of months ago that in order to even interview a "non diverse" candidate for any role required approval from the CEO. Who is a white guy funny enough.

BTW, Asians are now WASPs too in the new diversity rules. White Catholics too.