How can cops be so ignorant of something as simple as Texas's Failure to ID law?
Blinky has stripes on his sleeve. Don't ask me how...Aggiemike96 said:
Blinky looking for a new job. Doubt he'd qualify as a mall cop at this point.
Starts at the top and it floats downhill.padreislandagfan said:
Damn, hate to see that.
SAPD is a pretty good Dept.
If ya call and raise hell with the chief be nice.
He's my BIL and a really solid guy.
third coast.. said:
Fat moron cop does fat moron thing. Unfortunately with the lack of support cops get these days and the relaxation of standards due to fewer competent people wanting the job, we are going to get more and more of these absolute dolts in positions of power.
Hard to believe these days, but overall it's a training issue. Every cop should be able to explain the ID laws and filming laws, otherwise their is a failure in training. There are lots of laws, but these are so basic. Probably the questions they got wrong on their multiple choice test, but they still passed. Some things need to be essay/ short answer.Gateman said:
How can cops be so ignorant of something as simple as Texas's Failure to ID law?
Resigning from a Texas PD because of "BLM/ANTIFA nonsense" or fears of defunding is like resigning from Hawaii PD because you're afraid of snow.Cassius said:
I saw a post yesterday on this board from a cop saying he as leaving and so were other decent cops. Getting out because of lack of support and all this blm/antifa nonsense.
They have the law on their side.Quote:
Hard to believe these days, but overall it's a training issue. Every cop should be able to explain the ID laws and filming laws, otherwise their is a failure in training. There are lots of laws, but these are so basic. Probably the questions they got wrong on their multiple choice test, but they still passed. Some things need to be essay/ short answer.
Quote:
So you think it's generally a good idea to attack police officers? Are you from Texas? Did you have parents?
-aginlakeway
Quote:
Provide your ID or at least your name! I've been asked to identify myself in front of my own home due to a call the cops got about a random person up to no good. I gave them my ID and- holy **** - the police were able to assure themselves I actually lived there. This is not a race issue, it's a respect issue.
-texan12
We get it, you hate all police.TxTarpon said:
Careful.....
"We get it bro, you hate cops."
-Texags.com back the blue poster
RiskManager93 said:
Kudos to Mr. Miller for 1) knowing his rights and 2) exercising them.
That depends on where you work. Rule of thumb is to avoid large city departments. Portland is, of course experiencing this because of its ongoing problems. You may dismiss them as freaks, but when they fire your diversity recruiter, then cut your budget, then say don't expect any new hires for the next year, it degrades the performance and morale of your personnel. And good police officers have a wide skill set to translate to the marketplace; they don't need the aggravation of identity politics at work.Quote:
Resigning from a Texas PD because of "BLM/ANTIFA nonsense" or fears of defunding is like resigning from Hawaii PD because you're afraid of snow.
Thank you for your contribution to this thread....TxTarpon said:
Good luck with that.
bad_teammate said:Resigning from a Texas PD because of "BLM/ANTIFA nonsense" or fears of defunding is like resigning from Hawaii PD because you're afraid of snow.Cassius said:
I saw a post yesterday on this board from a cop saying he as leaving and so were other decent cops. Getting out because of lack of support and all this blm/antifa nonsense.
This take is dumb on a couple of levels. Yes, Mr. Miller was wronged by Blinky and is rightfully POed. Blinky should face disciplinary consequences, including termination if he's has a record of exercising poor judgment or not following the law. But no, Mr. Miller is not owed a life on easy street for the next 50-60 years by the fellow tax payers of SA. Monetary compensation should be commiserate with the injury, and 7-figures+ is in no way proportional to being manhandled during an arrest/detained for a couple of hours (or witnessing the same happen to your parent for that matter). Should the rest of the police force be laid off and the people of SA go without law enforcement because of Blinky's relatively-minor error? I guess the Portlandia mentality is spreading.AgHunter2011 said:
Sue the department/city for all they are worth. Hopefully he never has to work again in his life.
The reason that the awards in lawsuits like this should be high is to keep this **** in check. If it is a slap on the wrist and a bump on a gnat's ass in terms of fiscal 'pain' inflicted on the city/PD, what is to stop them from continuing with their lax training and unlawful use of force? Punitive damages are necessary to have some semblance or reigning in the power that some of these dumbass cops THINK they have.Mr. AGSPRT04 said:This take is dumb on a couple of levels. Yes, Mr. Miller was wronged by Blinky and is rightfully POed. Blinky should face disciplinary consequences, including termination if he's has a record of exercising poor judgment or not following the law. But no, Mr. Miller is not owed a life on easy street for the next 50-60 years by the fellow tax payers of SA. Monetary compensation should be commiserate with the injury, and 7-figures+ is in no way proportional to being manhandled during an arrest/detained for a couple of hours (or witnessing the same happen to your parent for that matter). Should the rest of the police force be laid off and the people of SA go without law enforcement because of Blinky's relatively-minor error? I guess the Portlandia mentality is spreading.AgHunter2011 said:
Sue the department/city for all they are worth. Hopefully he never has to work again in his life.
I know a couple people in SA that should have to pay a bigger chunk than others, namely my exbil and his crackhead brotherIrish 2.0 said:The reason that the awards in lawsuits like this should be high is to keep this **** in check. If it is a slap on the wrist and a bump on a gnat's ass in terms of fiscal 'pain' inflicted on the city/PD, what is to stop them from continuing with their lax training and unlawful use of force? Punitive damages are necessary to have some semblance or reigning in the power that some of these dumbass cops THINK they have.Mr. AGSPRT04 said:This take is dumb on a couple of levels. Yes, Mr. Miller was wronged by Blinky and is rightfully POed. Blinky should face disciplinary consequences, including termination if he's has a record of exercising poor judgment or not following the law. But no, Mr. Miller is not owed a life on easy street for the next 50-60 years by the fellow tax payers of SA. Monetary compensation should be commiserate with the injury, and 7-figures+ is in no way proportional to being manhandled during an arrest/detained for a couple of hours (or witnessing the same happen to your parent for that matter). Should the rest of the police force be laid off and the people of SA go without law enforcement because of Blinky's relatively-minor error? I guess the Portlandia mentality is spreading.AgHunter2011 said:
Sue the department/city for all they are worth. Hopefully he never has to work again in his life.
So, how do you stop it then if their is no accountability?Mr. AGSPRT04 said:
The "dumbass" and his supervisors won't be paying those punitive damages, the tax payers of SA will. If department personnel were personally liable for a judgment, then that would be different. But then you really would have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find your police force.