Atlanta Suitcase Votes

11,005 Views | 153 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by richardag
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pacecar02 said:

The thing that makes this difficult for Trump is that he has to be the cops or a private investigator in all cases

No one in GA or anywhere else seems to be doing any real investigative work with repect to local and state officials.

So team Trump has limited access and limited things to argue in court because he cant clearly see everything and unless he is granted access through the courts or there are state audits. He relies on witness affidavits and data experts to convince a judge who thinks their process they've used for how ever many years is uncorruptible.

Politicians and both sides are ready to just say "time to move on and protect our election integrity " because they know its rife with fraudulent exposure and have probably used it in their favor or know someone who has

You heard the term 50 ft paint job, thats our election process. The paint looks great from afar, get up on it and the truth is revealed.

You nailed it...I think Trump should have used the military in whatever capacity he could to investigate the fraud/ treason from the jump. He would probably be a lot further along by now..The FBI/ DOJ and local authorities are either to corrupt or to chicken sh*t to do anything..
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ExPeterKeating said:

I can't speak to his motives but An old fashioned liberal is someone who desires liberty and freedom from a tyrannical gvmt. For sure the democrats have been hi jacked by Leftist marxists who, knowing their ideas are not marketable, will resort to control. They know this. True conservatives and genuine liberals should be united in fighting the tyranny we see from the Marxist left. It is all around you.
wildcat08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/about-the-suitcase-video/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JP_Losman said:

Ask yourself why would ballots, at any time or place, be stored and hidden under a table.

Nothing at any time during an election w thousands of paper ballots should be hidden from sight.

There is no reasonable explanation for what is in that recording especially given the larger context involving testimony from dozens of election workers in the state


And why would you count them after clearing the room and announcing a cease to vote counting.
mesocosm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wildcat08 said:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/about-the-suitcase-video/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first
Nobody already drenched in this lie will change their mind. They are convinced this video showing routine ballot processing is fraud. You can't reason fools out of something that they were not reasoned into.
Religion is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world - Bertrand Russell
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wildcat08 said:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/about-the-suitcase-video/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first


TLDR: Under table ballot suitcase counted by only 4 people in the closed room IS ALL NORMAL. This fraud does not even require debunking!
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wildcat08 said:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/about-the-suitcase-video/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first


They won't even believe the National Review, the Washington Examiner, or Republican election officials. They prefer the story as told by the Twitter narrator with sirens.
wildcat08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mesocosm said:

wildcat08 said:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/about-the-suitcase-video/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first
Nobody already drenched in this lie will change their mind. They are convinced this video showing routine ballot processing is fraud. You can't reason fools out of something that they were not reasoned into.


True.
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. Not suitcases
2. Yes totally normal, they didn't know twitter morons would misinterpret camera footage
3. Nobody was told to leave
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1). Who cares? You think suit cases is a the issue here?
2 and 3). Eye witnesses say otherwise.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's not a liberal on this board that gives 2 ****s if there's cheating or not, yet we are supposed to believe the liberals counting the votes are ethical.

This election doesn't pass the smell test.
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Philip J Fry said:

1). Who cares? You think suit cases is a the issue here?
2 and 3). Eye witnesses say otherwise.

There was an investigation, they assumed it was time to go and got confused. Everything was on camera, those were valid ballots sitting there all day waiting to be counted. Folks are zaprudering this thing to death.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maury Ballstein said:

1. Not suitcases
2. Yes totally normal, they didn't know twitter morons would misinterpret camera footage
3. Nobody was told to leave


1. Correct: Hence 'ballot suitcases'
2. Correct, that is the point of the article.
3. Correct, that is why 4 were counting.

...and the fraud still exists like miracles do
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troutslime said:

There's not a Trumper on this board that gives 2 ****s if there's cheating or not, if we can't find fraud we'll will it in to existence on the flimsiest evidence


FIFY
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maury Ballstein said:

Philip J Fry said:

1). Who cares? You think suit cases is a the issue here?
2 and 3). Eye witnesses say otherwise.

There was an investigation, they assumed it was time to go and got confused. Everything was on camera, those were valid ballots sitting there all day waiting to be counted. Folks are zaprudering this thing to death.


Yeah. The media live streaming the counting for hours as well as the observers were magically confused. That's why the observers came back 2 hours later and had to fight through security to get access to the room again.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maury Ballstein said:

1. Not suitcases
  • true
2. Yes totally normal, they didn't know twitter morons would misinterpret camera footage
  • Lie, not normal not following procedures
3. Nobody was told to leave
  • Lie, people were told to leave

The budget should be balanced, the treasury should be refilled, npublic debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed, lest Rome become bankrupt.
People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.
-- Cicero, 55 B.C.
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poll watchers had unlimited access. "Observers" are just Yahoos that stand behind ropes.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maury Ballstein said:

Poll watchers had unlimited access. "Observers" are just Yahoos that stand behind ropes.


Case in point
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag said:

Maury Ballstein said:

1. Not suitcases
  • true
2. Yes totally normal, they didn't know twitter morons would misinterpret camera footage
  • Lie, not normal not following procedures
3. Nobody was told to leave
  • Lie, people were told to leave



Not according to the official government investigation that interviewed everybody and watched the tape. Sorry your security video lost.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not according to the corrupt government official in charge of the rigged election?
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maury Ballstein said:

1. Not suitcases
2. Yes totally normal, they didn't know twitter morons would misinterpret camera footage
3. Nobody was told to leave


Hey Trump supporters, you didnt see what you saw on that video...The protests are "mostly" peaceful (as car burns in the background, business being looted, windows being smashed, bricks thrown at Police)...The kid in Kenosha was commiting murder, not self defense (as we see people chasing attacking him on video).

So sick of stupid M'fers thinking we are dumb enough to believe their crap when the truth is staring us in the face...It's like the old saying, "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining."
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's where I was trying to get you to admit you'd go. The grand conspiracy includes hundreds of Republican government officials. You're welcome to get on the train to crazy town, but we're not going with you.

Did you watch all 10 hours of tape and interview everybody? They did.

HoustonAggie37713
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The media is just ignoring all of the cheating evidence. It seems to be working.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maury Ballstein said:

Poll watchers had unlimited access. "Observers" are just Yahoos that stand behind ropes.


"observers" = "poll watchers" = yahoos

This is psyops department work of the debunking honeybadger CNN.

Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Suitcase or ballot box is irrelevant. The votes were counted illegally because there were no GOP observers. End of story.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maury Ballstein said:

That's where I was trying to get you to admit you'd go. The grand conspiracy includes hundreds of Republican government officials. You're welcome to get on the train to crazy town, but we're not going with you.

Did you watch all 10 hours of tape and interview everybody? They did.




Not really a grand conspiracy. The investigation simply covered one side of the story and considered it fact. Hardly an investigation.
Satellite of Love
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maury Ballstein said:

Why has he not referred to the FBI? Why is he telling Republicans not to vote?

Connect the dots. Wood is a Deep State false flag double agent.


So was Trump big guy. Is Trump a deep state false flag double agent too?
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troutslime said:

Suitcase or ballot box is irrelevant. The votes were counted illegally because there were no GOP observers. End of story.


Yes! 'Observers'! because 'poll watchers' are the yahoos!

...and the law, the law should matter.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
15 hours into this discussion and no one can explain the perfectly normal reason for what happened in Atlanta with the "wheeled election totes" stored under a table that were removed and counted after all the 3rd party watchers had been told things were done for the night.

I think everyone knows this is a smoking gun.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

You can see the pivotal images, below, which I've sharpened slightly and to which I've added arrows. I've made no other changes.

The first image, taken shortly before 10:00 P.M., comes from the lower-right-hand video monitor. The red arrow points to the Republican observers in the far corner of a large room. Not only do they have, at best, an extremely limited view of the tables near them, but they are also nowhere near the tables where the real action Is taking place. The green arrow points in the direction of the pivotal tables, which aren't visible on this shot:

Quote:

Shortly before 10:00, a woman with long blond braids, and wearing black pants and a white shirt, heads to the observers. She tells the observers that the counting has to stop and that everyone has to leave:

Quote:

Shortly before 11:00, the observers are gone, and the tables seen in the lower right-hand image are cleared:


Quote:

The action shifts to the upper right-hand corner of the video. At 10:57, these desks are still piled with paper. You can see people clustered in the upper-right-hand corner, presumably getting directions from the lady with the blond braids:

Quote:

At 11:00, everyone gets busy. A woman with a yellow shirt drags to her desk a rolling suitcase that she had just retrieved from under the long, black table:


Quote:

Immediately after that, the woman with the blond braids retrieves another suitcase from under the table:


Quote:

And next, a man in the red shirt retrieves a third suitcase from under the table:


Quote:

Someone drags a fourth suitcase out from under the table, but I was not able to capture the image.

The video shows that, for almost two hours, these workers counted the ballots they'd retrieved from the suitcases. The machines can process roughly 3,000 ballots per hour, and there were multiple machines at work during those two unsupervised hours.
LINK
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

15 hours into this discussion and no one can explain the perfectly normal reason for what happened in Atlanta with the "wheeled election totes" stored under a table that were removed and counted after all the 3rd party watchers had been told things were done for the night.

I think everyone knows this is a smoking gun.


Wouldn't a properly run chain of custody identity what ballots were under the table?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troutslime said:

Gap said:

15 hours into this discussion and no one can explain the perfectly normal reason for what happened in Atlanta with the "wheeled election totes" stored under a table that were removed and counted after all the 3rd party watchers had been told things were done for the night.

I think everyone knows this is a smoking gun.


Wouldn't a properly run chain of custody identity what ballots were under the table?
Yes.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maury Ballstein said:

1. Not suitcases
2. Yes totally normal, they didn't know twitter morons would misinterpret camera footage
3. Nobody was told to leave
Wait I thought Twitter was mostly a lib thing. You never say anything specific just BS. Nothing but a troll
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maury is a troll. His info is BS.

We can see the video and they have affidavits corroborating everything we have seen.

Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Republican appointed government investigation agrees with reality, not random Twitter narration. They watched all 10 hours and interviewed witnesses.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/georgia-recertifies-election-results-fulton-county-video
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.