John Roberts

12,172 Views | 131 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by 96AgGrad
FbgTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You heard it from me the minute RBG died and it became clear ACB would be appointed and confirmed. John Roberts will NEVER side in a 5-4 or 6-3 verdict with the conservatives.

Anyone still saying the Supreme Court is 6-3 Conservative is a lying dog-faced pony soldier.

The greatest argument ever made against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter.
That_Guy_Moose
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.
JamesBREI06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FbgTxAg said:

You heard it from me the minute RBG died and it became clear ACB would be appointed and confirmed. John Roberts will NEVER side in a 5-4 or 6-3 verdict with the conservatives.

Anyone still saying the Supreme Court is 6-3 Conservative is a lying dog-faced pony soldier.




Good thing we only need five!
Whoop!
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree 100%. Roberts is a POS and votes based on desired outcomes and perceptions of the court and not on the basis of law.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this is the beginning of the end for government's pandemic overreach
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That_Guy_Moose said:

Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Americans owe President Donald Trump an enormous thank you for giving back to us the founding principles of our nation and government via his appointments to the Supreme Court.
Captain Positivity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf

That's the actual ruling. It was a motion to grant an injunction while awaiting appellate review which was granted. The reason Roberts voted against it was because New York amended the policy and he felt there was no need for an injunction as the harm had been essentially eliminated.

Here's what he wrote:
Quote:


Numerical capacity limits of 10 and 25 people, depending on the applicable zone, do seem unduly restrictive. And it may well be that such restrictions violate the Free Exercise Clause. It is not necessary, however, for us to rule on that serious and difficult question at this time. The Governor might reinstate the restrictions. But he also might not. And it is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is neces- sary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic. If the Governor does reinstate the numerical restrictions the applicants can return to this Court, and we could act quickly on their renewed applications.
Conservative Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Roberts is such a *****. He's a terrible justice.
HarryJ33tamu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

That_Guy_Moose said:

Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.


An election dims stole*****

They almost got away with it. Almost.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Supreme Court made a firm ruling based on the religious liberty protections in the Constitution so that all Governors and county administrators understand the law of the land. Judge Roberts wanted to withhold that from us saying the case doesn't matter any longer because of "x". This is common practice to avoid taking a L on an issue that has now is Supreme Court precedent that you wanted to avoid.

Roberts is a toad.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
His flip flop will matter if Thomas decides to hang it up in the next four years.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thomas is only 72 and isn't going anywhere if a D is president.
Sailor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lb3 said:

I agree 100%. Roberts is a POS and votes based on how the deep state tells him to vote because they have leverage on him either through bribes or blackmail.
FIFY.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
Roberts will join the majority frequently for the sole purpose of watering down the opinions.
#Mke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Roberts is useless, brought to you courtesy of the RINOs!
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
This. John Roberts needs to have his career in shame.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks a lot Bush
Donald J Trump is my President
Old Sarge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You never hear about a SCOTUS or other Judge turning "conservative" once appointed. It is always the other way around. Appointed by a "conservative" but turning left upon appointment "when it counts". Roberts, case in point.

It is one of two things:

A case of a leftist at heart waiting patiently, acting conservative, to get to the highest point they can, then turn left to affect all they can. A true believer in the leftist cause that is "hide" to get as high as they can be, before legislating from the bench.

Or, a judge that has something in his life that is so devastating, it would wreck EVERYTHING in his personal life beyond repair if it got out and he would vote against his understanding of the law to preserve his life as he knew it.

Roberts is one of the two. Pick one.

Nobody turns like that otherwise.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Conservative Ag said:

Roberts is such a *****. He's a terrible justice.


He thinks you're a fine fledgling attorney though, so the universe has balance.
dBoy99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

Thomas is only 72 and isn't going anywhere if a D is president.


Odds Thomas lives 28 more years?
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old Sarge said:

You never hear about a SCOTUS or other Judge turning "conservative" once appointed. It is always the other way around. Appointed by a "conservative" but turning left upon appointment "when it counts". Roberts, case in point.

It is one of two things:

A case of a leftist at heart waiting patiently, acting conservative, to get to the highest point they can, then turn left to affect all they can. A true believer in the leftist cause that is "hide" to get as high as they can be, before legislating from the bench.

Or, a judge that has something in his life that is so devastating, it would wreck EVERYTHING in his personal life beyond repair if it got out and he would vote against his understanding of the law to preserve his life as he knew it.

Roberts is one of the two. Pick one.

Nobody turns like that otherwise.



Fun fact - Supreme Court justice has no education, age, profession, or citizenship requirement.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx

If you really want someone that there's no chance will infuriate with intellectual independence after taking the bench - stop nominating Judges.

POTUS would be a hilarious choice you know would never be on the wrong side of a decision.

Salute The Marines
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Robert is hellbent in trying to push the appearance of the court being non-political. What he doesn't seem to get is that in doing so he's make the court political. Rule based on law and how you perceive it. Let the chips fall where they may.
jhn109
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

That_Guy_Moose said:

Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.


The only people I've seen being hysterical here are [supporters of President Trump] who are literally hoping for civil war because Trump CLAIMS there is fraud. Thankfully Trump, Giuliani, and the rest of the super elite legal squad are just embarrassing themselves over and over and over again.

[vulgar and broadly aimed insults at large swathes of this community are not welcome. Happy Thanksgiving - Staff]
Salute The Marines
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most have wanted civil war well before this and it was because of the left's ever increasing run to communism.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Controlled judges...
JamesBREI06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Faustus said:



Fun fact - Supreme Court justice has no education, age, profession, or citizenship requirement.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx

If you really want someone that there's no chance will infuriate with intellectual independence after taking the bench - stop nominating Judges.

POTUS would be a hilarious choice you know would never be on the wrong side of a decision.




I think The Pirate would be a bad ass Supreme Court judge.
Whoop!
Banks Monkey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FbgTxAg said:

You heard it from me the minute RBG died and it became clear ACB would be appointed and confirmed. John Roberts will NEVER side in a 5-4 or 6-3 verdict with the conservatives.

Anyone still saying the Supreme Court is 6-3 Conservative is a lying dog-faced pony soldier.


Thankful for him.

God bless America. Love it or leave it.
spider96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

Ag87H2O said:

Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
Roberts will join the majority frequently for the sole purpose of watering down the opinions.


It would be funny to see Roberts writing the 6-3 majority opinion and seeing the other 4 justices writing a concurring opinion.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They must have a whole set of porn video's on Roberts.
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lib in Rino clothing.
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That_Guy_Moose said:

Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


Imagine having a point.
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jhn109 said:

hbtheduce said:

That_Guy_Moose said:

Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.


The only people I've seen being hysterical here are the Trump pole shiners. Some Trumpers are literally hoping for civil war because Trump CLAIMS there is fraud. Thankfully Trump, Ghouliani, and the rest of the super elite legal squad are just embarrassing themselves over and over and over again.


What a bunch of manure! I smell liberal moron who is going to regret voting for a vegetable!
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
Drahknor03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
spider96 said:

lb3 said:

Ag87H2O said:

Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
Roberts will join the majority frequently for the sole purpose of watering down the opinions.


It would be funny to see Roberts writing the 6-3 majority opinion and seeing the other 4 justices writing a concurring opinion.


You're going to see a lot of that.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.