John Roberts

15,942 Views | 130 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by 96AgGrad
FbgTxAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:00a, 11/26/20
AG
You heard it from me the minute RBG died and it became clear ACB would be appointed and confirmed. John Roberts will NEVER side in a 5-4 or 6-3 verdict with the conservatives.

Anyone still saying the Supreme Court is 6-3 Conservative is a lying dog-faced pony soldier.

The greatest argument ever made against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter.
Reply Quote
130
That_Guy_Moose
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:01a, 11/26/20
AG
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.
Reply Quote
63
JamesBREI06
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FbgTxAg • 12:01a, 11/26/20
AG
FbgTxAg said:
You heard it from me the minute RBG died and it became clear ACB would be appointed and confirmed. John Roberts will NEVER side in a 5-4 or 6-3 verdict with the conservatives.

Anyone still saying the Supreme Court is 6-3 Conservative is a lying dog-faced pony soldier.



Good thing we only need five!
Whoop!
Reply Quote
68
lb3
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:02a, 11/26/20
AG
I agree 100%. Roberts is a POS and votes based on desired outcomes and perceptions of the court and not on the basis of law.
Reply Quote
219
Sid Farkas
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:04a, 11/26/20
AG
this is the beginning of the end for government's pandemic overreach
Reply Quote
70
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:05a, 11/26/20
AG
Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
Reply Quote
200
1 edit
hbtheduce
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to That_Guy_Moose • 12:06a, 11/26/20
AG
That_Guy_Moose said:
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.
Reply Quote
41
Gap
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:10a, 11/26/20
AG
Americans owe President Donald Trump an enormous thank you for giving back to us the founding principles of our nation and government via his appointments to the Supreme Court.
Reply Quote
204
1 edit
Not a Bot
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:13a, 11/26/20
AG
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf

That's the actual ruling. It was a motion to grant an injunction while awaiting appellate review which was granted. The reason Roberts voted against it was because New York amended the policy and he felt there was no need for an injunction as the harm had been essentially eliminated.

Here's what he wrote:
Quote:

Numerical capacity limits of 10 and 25 people, depending on the applicable zone, do seem unduly restrictive. And it may well be that such restrictions violate the Free Exercise Clause. It is not necessary, however, for us to rule on that serious and difficult question at this time. The Governor might reinstate the restrictions. But he also might not. And it is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is neces- sary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic. If the Governor does reinstate the numerical restrictions the applicants can return to this Court, and we could act quickly on their renewed applications.
Reply Quote
9
2 edits
Conservative Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:17a, 11/26/20
Roberts is such a *****. He's a terrible justice.
Reply Quote
102
HarryJ33tamu
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hbtheduce • 12:17a, 11/26/20
hbtheduce said:
That_Guy_Moose said:
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.


An election dims stole*****

They almost got away with it. Almost.
Reply Quote
19
Gap
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Not a Bot • 12:20a, 11/26/20
AG
The Supreme Court made a firm ruling based on the religious liberty protections in the Constitution so that all Governors and county administrators understand the law of the land. Judge Roberts wanted to withhold that from us saying the case doesn't matter any longer because of "x". This is common practice to avoid taking a L on an issue that has now is Supreme Court precedent that you wanted to avoid.

Roberts is a toad.
Reply Quote
83
Marvin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:20a, 11/26/20
AG
His flip flop will matter if Thomas decides to hang it up in the next four years.
Reply Quote
16
Gap
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Marvin • 12:21a, 11/26/20
AG
Thomas is only 72 and isn't going anywhere if a D is president.
Reply Quote
13
Sailor
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lb3 • 12:36a, 11/26/20
lb3 said:
I agree 100%. Roberts is a POS and votes based on how the deep state tells him to vote because they have leverage on him either through bribes or blackmail.
FIFY.
Reply Quote
6
lb3
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag87H2O • 12:56a, 11/26/20
AG
Ag87H2O said:
Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
Roberts will join the majority frequently for the sole purpose of watering down the opinions.
Reply Quote
3
#Mke
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:57a, 11/26/20
AG
Roberts is useless, brought to you courtesy of the RINOs!
Reply Quote
32
Waffledynamics
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag87H2O • 1:11a, 11/26/20
AG
Ag87H2O said:
Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
This. John Roberts needs to have his career in shame.
Reply Quote
23
TexAgs91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:18a, 11/26/20
AG
Thanks a lot Bush
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Reply Quote
41
Old Sarge
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:22a, 11/26/20
AG
You never hear about a SCOTUS or other Judge turning "conservative" once appointed. It is always the other way around. Appointed by a "conservative" but turning left upon appointment "when it counts". Roberts, case in point.

It is one of two things:

A case of a leftist at heart waiting patiently, acting conservative, to get to the highest point they can, then turn left to affect all they can. A true believer in the leftist cause that is "hide" to get as high as they can be, before legislating from the bench.

Or, a judge that has something in his life that is so devastating, it would wreck EVERYTHING in his personal life beyond repair if it got out and he would vote against his understanding of the law to preserve his life as he knew it.

Roberts is one of the two. Pick one.

Nobody turns like that otherwise.
"Green" is the new RED.
Reply Quote
47
Faustus
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Conservative Ag • 1:43a, 11/26/20
Conservative Ag said:
Roberts is such a *****. He's a terrible justice.


He thinks you're a fine fledgling attorney though, so the universe has balance.
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
dBoy99
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gap • 1:45a, 11/26/20
AG
Gap said:
Thomas is only 72 and isn't going anywhere if a D is president.


Odds Thomas lives 28 more years?
Reply Quote
Faustus
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Old Sarge • 1:55a, 11/26/20
Old Sarge said:
You never hear about a SCOTUS or other Judge turning "conservative" once appointed. It is always the other way around. Appointed by a "conservative" but turning left upon appointment "when it counts". Roberts, case in point.

It is one of two things:

A case of a leftist at heart waiting patiently, acting conservative, to get to the highest point they can, then turn left to affect all they can. A true believer in the leftist cause that is "hide" to get as high as they can be, before legislating from the bench.

Or, a judge that has something in his life that is so devastating, it would wreck EVERYTHING in his personal life beyond repair if it got out and he would vote against his understanding of the law to preserve his life as he knew it.

Roberts is one of the two. Pick one.

Nobody turns like that otherwise.


Fun fact - Supreme Court justice has no education, age, profession, or citizenship requirement.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx

If you really want someone that there's no chance will infuriate with intellectual independence after taking the bench - stop nominating Judges.

POTUS would be a hilarious choice you know would never be on the wrong side of a decision.

Reply Quote
2
3 edits
Teslag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Old Sarge • 2:11a, 11/26/20
AG
I think Robert is hellbent in trying to push the appearance of the court being non-political. What he doesn't seem to get is that in doing so he's make the court political. Rule based on law and how you perceive it. Let the chips fall where they may.
Reply Quote
27
jhn109
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hbtheduce • 3:31a, 11/26/20
hbtheduce said:
That_Guy_Moose said:
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.


The only people I've seen being hysterical here are [supporters of President Trump] who are literally hoping for civil war because Trump CLAIMS there is fraud. Thankfully Trump, Giuliani, and the rest of the super elite legal squad are just embarrassing themselves over and over and over again.

[vulgar and broadly aimed insults at large swathes of this community are not welcome. Happy Thanksgiving - Staff]
Reply Quote
9
Edited by Staff
Teslag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jhn109 • 4:31a, 11/26/20
AG
Most have wanted civil war well before this and it was because of the left's ever increasing run to communism.
Reply Quote
29
MaroonStain
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:53a, 11/26/20
AG
Controlled judges...
Reply Quote
7
JamesBREI06
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Faustus • 6:17a, 11/26/20
AG
Faustus said:


Fun fact - Supreme Court justice has no education, age, profession, or citizenship requirement.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx

If you really want someone that there's no chance will infuriate with intellectual independence after taking the bench - stop nominating Judges.

POTUS would be a hilarious choice you know would never be on the wrong side of a decision.



I think The Pirate would be a bad ass Supreme Court judge.
Whoop!
Reply Quote
8
Banks Monkey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FbgTxAg • 6:20a, 11/26/20
AG
FbgTxAg said:
You heard it from me the minute RBG died and it became clear ACB would be appointed and confirmed. John Roberts will NEVER side in a 5-4 or 6-3 verdict with the conservatives.

Anyone still saying the Supreme Court is 6-3 Conservative is a lying dog-faced pony soldier.

Thankful for him.

God bless America. Love it or leave it.
Reply Quote
3
spider96
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lb3 • 6:27a, 11/26/20
AG
lb3 said:
Ag87H2O said:
Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
Roberts will join the majority frequently for the sole purpose of watering down the opinions.


It would be funny to see Roberts writing the 6-3 majority opinion and seeing the other 4 justices writing a concurring opinion.
Reply Quote
FCBlitz
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:32a, 11/26/20
They must have a whole set of porn video's on Roberts.
Reply Quote
1
BanderaAg956
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:33a, 11/26/20
Lib in Rino clothing.
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
Reply Quote
4
Muy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to That_Guy_Moose • 6:35a, 11/26/20
AG
That_Guy_Moose said:
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


Imagine having a point.
Reply Quote
19
BanderaAg956
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jhn109 • 6:35a, 11/26/20
jhn109 said:
hbtheduce said:
That_Guy_Moose said:
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.


A small glimpse into how we feel about watching libs hysterics over a election dems won.


The only people I've seen being hysterical here are the Trump pole shiners. Some Trumpers are literally hoping for civil war because Trump CLAIMS there is fraud. Thankfully Trump, Ghouliani, and the rest of the super elite legal squad are just embarrassing themselves over and over and over again.


What a bunch of manure! I smell liberal moron who is going to regret voting for a vegetable!
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
Reply Quote
9
Drahknor03
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to spider96 • 6:36a, 11/26/20
AG
spider96 said:
lb3 said:
Ag87H2O said:
Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
Roberts will join the majority frequently for the sole purpose of watering down the opinions.


It would be funny to see Roberts writing the 6-3 majority opinion and seeing the other 4 justices writing a concurring opinion.


You're going to see a lot of that.
Reply Quote
Last Page
Page 1 of 4 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.