It only takes one and it is done.........forever.......
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ
Gap said:
Americans owe President Donald Trump an enormous thank you for giving back to us the founding principles of our nation and government via his appointments to the Supreme Court.
TheCurl84 said:Gap said:
Americans owe President Donald Trump an enormous thank you for giving back to us the founding principles of our nation and government via his appointments to the Supreme Court.
And it's time to flame W for making a horrible selection. At least the liberal justices are consistent with their principles. Robert's seems to have no principles. His record makes no logical sense whatsoever.
TheCurl84 said:Gap said:
Americans owe President Donald Trump an enormous thank you for giving back to us the founding principles of our nation and government via his appointments to the Supreme Court.
He is a scourge on justice..... he will meet his maker
And it's time to flame W for making a horrible selection. At least the liberal justices are consistent with their principles. Robert's seems to have no principles. His record makes no logical sense whatsoever.
AgShaun00 said:
He is compromised
FCBlitz said:TheCurl84 said:Gap said:
Americans owe President Donald Trump an enormous thank you for giving back to us the founding principles of our nation and government via his appointments to the Supreme Court.
And it's time to flame W for making a horrible selection. At least the liberal justices are consistent with their principles. Robert's seems to have no principles. His record makes no logical sense whatsoever.
W has turned out to be a Globalist. He needs to join the Democratic Party.
lcraggie said:AgShaun00 said:
He is compromised
Yes...in many ways
Cactus Jack said:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf
That's the actual ruling. It was a motion to grant an injunction while awaiting appellate review which was granted. The reason Roberts voted against it was because New York amended the policy and he felt there was no need for an injunction as the harm had been essentially eliminated.
Here's what he wrote:Quote:
Numerical capacity limits of 10 and 25 people, depending on the applicable zone, do seem unduly restrictive. And it may well be that such restrictions violate the Free Exercise Clause. It is not necessary, however, for us to rule on that serious and difficult question at this time. The Governor might reinstate the restrictions. But he also might not. And it is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is neces- sary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic. If the Governor does reinstate the numerical restrictions the applicants can return to this Court, and we could act quickly on their renewed applications.
Leather Tuscadero said:
I think Robert is hellbent in trying to push the appearance of the court being non-political. What he doesn't seem to get is that in doing so he's make the court political. Rule based on law and how you perceive it. Let the chips fall where they may.
are you serious?Captain Pablo said:lcraggie said:AgShaun00 said:
He is compromised
Yes...in many ways
Like what?
EDIT ... inadvertent blue parachute.
tFast said:
I hate the expectation that conservative and progressive judges on the Supreme Court are supposed to vote a certain way on certain issues. Judges should be apolitical and we shouldn't see one "side" always vote one way while the other "side" votes the other way. That's partisanship. The Constitution doesn't change just because we want to disagree with it.
Kozmozag said:
Will the dem propaganda media ever stop calling him a conservative. At some point he is just one of the liberals.
Leather Tuscadero said:
Most have wanted civil war well before this and it was because of the left's ever increasing run to communism.
tFast said:
I hate the expectation that conservative and progressive judges on the Supreme Court are supposed to vote a certain way on certain issues. Judges should be apolitical and we shouldn't see one "side" always vote one way while the other "side" votes the other way. That's partisanship. The Constitution doesn't change just because we want to disagree with it.
Roberts is emblematic of W's legacy for sure. Everything W tried to do was with an olive branch in hand to the democratic party. He wanted to be a centrist so badly and still the Dems hated him and called him a war criminal. It should have been a warning to Romney and every Republican going forward.Reno Hightower said:
He IS W's legacy.
He's wrong. He should rule immediately to lift restrictions that violate the free exercise clause the second he gets the chance. Every time.Cactus Jack said:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf
That's the actual ruling. It was a motion to grant an injunction while awaiting appellate review which was granted. The reason Roberts voted against it was because New York amended the policy and he felt there was no need for an injunction as the harm had been essentially eliminated.
Here's what he wrote:Quote:
Numerical capacity limits of 10 and 25 people, depending on the applicable zone, do seem unduly restrictive. And it may well be that such restrictions violate the Free Exercise Clause. It is not necessary, however, for us to rule on that serious and difficult question at this time. The Governor might reinstate the restrictions. But he also might not. And it is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is neces- sary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic. If the Governor does reinstate the numerical restrictions the applicants can return to this Court, and we could act quickly on their renewed applications.
Freeze Frame said:He's wrong. He should rule immediately to lift restrictions that violate the free exercise clause the second he gets the chance. Every time.Cactus Jack said:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf
That's the actual ruling. It was a motion to grant an injunction while awaiting appellate review which was granted. The reason Roberts voted against it was because New York amended the policy and he felt there was no need for an injunction as the harm had been essentially eliminated.
Here's what he wrote:Quote:
Numerical capacity limits of 10 and 25 people, depending on the applicable zone, do seem unduly restrictive. And it may well be that such restrictions violate the Free Exercise Clause. It is not necessary, however, for us to rule on that serious and difficult question at this time. The Governor might reinstate the restrictions. But he also might not. And it is a significant matter to override determinations made by public health officials concerning what is neces- sary for public safety in the midst of a deadly pandemic. If the Governor does reinstate the numerical restrictions the applicants can return to this Court, and we could act quickly on their renewed applications.
Then he shouldn't worry because the current set of judges either follow constitutional or left positions.YouBet said:
He seems deathly afraid of the SC being perceived as a group that rules based on right and left positions.
That_Guy_Moose said:
Imagine being this upset over a case conservatives won.
Waffledynamics said:This. John Roberts needs to have his career in shame.Ag87H2O said:
Roberts was on the losing side. He better get used to it.
Couldn't happen to a more deserving swamp creature.
lcraggie said:are you serious?Captain Pablo said:lcraggie said:AgShaun00 said:
He is compromised
Yes...in many ways
Like what?
EDIT ... inadvertent blue parachute.
inoffensive username said:Faustus said:
Fun fact - Supreme Court justice has no education, age, profession, or citizenship requirement.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx
If you really want someone that there's no chance will infuriate with intellectual independence after taking the bench - stop nominating Judges.
POTUS would be a hilarious choice you know would never be on the wrong side of a decision.
I think The Pirate would be a bad ass Supreme Court judge.
The best thing he went for was shot down, unfortunately. SS reform.WBBQ74 said:
The farther away W is in the rear view mirror, the worse his tenure at POTUS looks. Putting this Roberts guy on the SC is just one of those poor choices. I voted for him twice. Not like I would have voted for algore or Kerry instead but the GOP should have given us a better choice. 20/20 hindsight thing.
At least he doesn't run his mouth off as much as Obama does. Gonna be a fun couple of months.
Does he like to hunt?Gap said:
Thomas is only 72 and isn't going anywhere if a D is president.
Gap said:
Americans owe President Donald Trump an enormous thank you for giving back to us the founding principles of our nation and government via his appointments to the Supreme Court.