Tucker on Sidney Powell

16,613 Views | 166 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by BMX Bandit
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Nailed it
AgsMnn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's right you know GIF inserted here.
Rip*91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
**** ***
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Today's press conference was not an evidentiary hearing
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Poster said:

Today's press conference was not an evidentiary hearing


I see the taking points have been distributed

Tucker didn't claim this was an evidentiary hearing.
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would be nice if Tucker could talk about his bombshell info on Hunter Bidens laptop... that, without copies being made, got lost in the mail, found again, and then he just stopped talking about it.
Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll watch it later, but to assume the prosecuting case will lay out all of the facts in public is moronic. Love Tucker too!
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did you see his explanation?
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's right.

It's past time for Sidney to stop talking and take action.
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they don't come through with some solid evidence, I'm going to be furious.

I'm almost done with all this BS.
“Progressivism is the b@stard child of Marxism.” — Mark Levin

“Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts…” — CS Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:



Nailed it
I have actually been a witness in case wherein I had death threats. Had FBI protection. (Back when I trusted the FBI.)

My late brother was a banker who discovered cartel related bank fraud. He had protection too.

Leftist are killing people in the street for carrying American flags or wearing a MAGA hat.

I know you can't support that. Anything useful to suggest?
Bankeraggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If there was election fraud, every person involved should go to prison. Period.

If there was so much fraud that Trump won, that's fine with me. I am not a Trump fan but the integrity of the country is more important.

That said, it's time for proof. The time for tweets is over.

And the idea of summoning legislatures to DC to pressure them to change the lawful vote for their state from Biden to Trump. I have to tell you, I personally believe that is perilously close to the line of treason.

I don't use that word lightly, especially since so many of you served honorably in the armed forces. But trying to subvert the process is abhorrent.
HoustonAggie37713
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's not wrong. The press conference didn't have a purpose.
Ag4coal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Slams"

So tired of these stupid descriptors. He did do a good job of laying out the facts. At the very least give a freaking timeline. I'm trump all the way and would love to see him win, but the bloviating is starting to make me think what the left us said all along and these people are crazy. These are MASSIVE claims. You can't keep just repeating them. That said, if it turns out they do have the evidence, I will eat all the crow.
Verne Lundquist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A lot of MAGA people are pissed after this but he is 100% right

I've started two threads here asking how the hell they're going to prove it.

No one on texags can claim to be a bigger Trump guy than me but I'm getting pretty tired of all these claims without evidence.

I KNOW the socialists cheated and stole these elections. Either start proving it or get off the pot.

Today's court ruling in PA is a start...dismissing some ballots
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As much as I like Carleson, he doesn't get to dictate the vehicle or the timing of the presentation of evidence. I want to see it as much as everyone else, but it entirely up to Trump and his legal team as to when the appropriate time for release might be. Why would any good attorney lay out their cards for the enemy to see before they were ready to attack and give them time to prepare?

I expect the evidence will be presented in full in a courtroom in front of a judge, not on a national talk show.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly I'd prefer they didn't have the press conference. Nothing good could come if it. Let the cases speak for themselves and focus on that. If you lose the cases then go to the press with whatever evidence you have to try to enact change going forward. Winning the court of public opinion does nothing at this point. No legislative action will win Trump the presidency and judges won't be swayed by oratory persuasion.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
who am i, as an f16 conservative, supposed to side with?

tucker, who as everyone tells me every night is nails and must see tv, and the only reason they still watch fox?

or powell, the unquestionably qualified lawyer who wouldn't dare risk her impeccable reputation on bs and who is telling me trump can still win an election he definitely lost, which i desperately want to be true?
Verne Lundquist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HoustonAggie37713 said:

He's not wrong. The press conference didn't have a purpose.
Disagree. A lot of good stuff on how one PA county allowed curing while others didn't. Equal protection violation. Powell was a whiff since she didn't give anything
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

As much as I like Carleson, he doesn't get to dictate the vehicle or the timing of the presentation of evidence. I want to see it as much as everyone else, but it entirely up to Trump and his legal team as to when the appropriate time for release might be. Why would any good attorney lay out their cards for the enemy to see before they were ready to attack and give them time to prepare?

I expect the evidence will be presented in full in a courtroom in front of a judge, not on a national talk show.


Except for the part where he said that people in Trump's camp haven't seen any of the proof, either.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not following your question. Powell can go on shows she knows won't challenge her, but won't go on Tucker. Are you saying she's afraid to speak because democrats may harm her? She certainly does not seem afraid to me.

HoustonAggie37713
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tucker's new audience is RINO's and moderates. Smart move.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why would they present evidence during opening statements OP? Would you lay any of your cases out publicly before they were filed?
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So glad Tucker is not getting suckered into Trump and Powell's political games. Has been getting likelier and likelier every day that the 'evidence' on Dominion is a bunch of made up B.S.
HoustonAggie37713
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Verne Lundquist said:

HoustonAggie37713 said:

He's not wrong. The press conference didn't have a purpose.
Disagree. A lot of good stuff on how one PA county allowed curing while others didn't. Equal protection violation. Powell was a whiff since she didn't give anything


Agree to disagree. Too much of a clown show to be taken seriously. Rudy had hair dye pouring down his face for Pete's sake.
milner79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CondensedFoggyAggie said:

Would be nice if Tucker could talk about his bombshell info on Hunter Bidens laptop... that, without copies being made, got lost in the mail, found again, and then he just stopped talking about it.
Exactly. Who has lost credibility here?
littlebigman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is this President Biden she is talking about? We ain't never had a president named Biden.
SirLurksALot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
littlebigman said:

Who is this President Biden she is talking about? We ain't never had a president named Biden.


Not until January 20th 2021.
jagged
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Uh oh. Without tucker this echo chamber is getting a little snug!
dBoy99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tsuag10 said:

If they don't come through with some solid evidence, I'm going to be furious.

I'm almost done with all this BS.
Get ready to be done.

Being a true conservative is like being an Aggie fan, disappointment is a part of life.
chap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Look, she may or may not (all of a sudden) be an idiot and be making baseless claims. But spending a day or a week on Tucker's show is not the best way to present evidence. Do you really believe that? Does Tucker?
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pumpkinhead said:

So glad Tucker is not getting suckered into Trump and Powell's political games. Has been getting likelier and likelier every day that the 'evidence' on Dominion is a bunch of made up B.S.


Tells you everything you need to know about Fox when libs praise Tucker.
Verne Lundquist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From Poso

thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, its super easy to prove Dominion fraud. These companies are experts in hiding entity shells and covering tracks. She has affidavits from Dominion employees and multiple whistle-blowers to support. That's hella more than Vindman and Peter Schiff staffer.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Verne Lundquist said:

A lot of MAGA people are pissed after this but he is 100% right

I've started two threads here asking how the hell they're going to prove it.

No one on texags can claim to be a bigger Trump guy than me but I'm getting pretty tired of all these claims without evidence.

I KNOW the socialists cheated and stole these elections. Either start proving it or get off the pot.

Today's court ruling in PA is a start...dismissing some ballots

I'm pretty much 100% with you.

Do I believe the D's stole the election - a resounding YES!

Can it be proven? No freaking idea. I "feel" liberals would allow it , and did it, n the spirit of "whatever it takes".

How I "feel' thought doesn't count. Side note - life would be better if the left took the same philosophy.

S*** or get off the pot with the evidence claims.

I briefly caught the PC when someone from CNN (I assume Gump?) listened to all he said rather than asking questions about the info presented, instead asked something to the effect of "Is this an attempt to get Republican election officials put in charge of recounts"?

He asked where she worked, she said CNN, I heard laughs on the radio.

Therein lay the biggest issue - the MSM is full of people that go into every PC or begin every article w/pre-determined root cause.

If every network security professional went into every single suspect incident with the mindset that "Someone from Oklahoma did this!" and wouldn't investigate anything that didn't originate in Oklahoma, we wouldn't have an internet.

- No offense to Oklahoma, I live close therefore it is an easy joke.

Take the trash out staff.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.