What if the MI Rep leads for the state house and senate were called to Washington so Trumps team can show them evidence?

HumpitPuryear said:

---

What if the MI Rep leads for the state house and senate were called to Washington so Trumps team can show them evidence?

---

Why in your scenario doesn't the public get to see it?

No one can claim Poso isn't a Trump guy

Bankeraggie said:

---

If there was election fraud, every person involved should go to prison. Period.

If there was so much fraud that Trump won, that's fine with me. I am not a Trump fan but the integrity of the country is more important.

That said, it's time for proof. The time for tweets is over.

And the idea of summoning legislatures to DC to pressure them to change the lawful vote for their state from Biden to Trump. I have to tell you, I personally believe that is perilously close to the line of treason.

I don't use that word lightly, especially since so many of you served honorably in the armed forces. But trying to subvert the process is abhorrent.

---

If they don't provide proof. The EC will vote and this will be over. Trump conceding or not conceding doesn't matter, and the people demanding it want submission, not "unity", "decency" or "normalcy".

I can accept the results, I'll tell those losers to suck some scroat every step of the way.

Maacus said:

---

geoag58 said:

---

unmade bed said:

---

geoag58 said:

---

Since you CM's are so convinced there is nothing there do you have a problem with Rudy seeing these court cases through?

---

I have a big problem with Rudy seeing the court cases through. I would have no problem with Trump hiring a semi competent attorney and Trump exercising all options available through the judicial system to address whatever claims of wrongdoing there may be.

Based on Rudy and his teams track record so far, that is not happening and what is going to be left is nothing but unanswered questions and innuendo.

---

Listening to Rudy's press conference it sounds like they have seen things so egregious they had no idea were there. This is a huge criminal enterprise whose crime was election fraud and with Rudy's experience going after organized crime I think this is right in Rudy's wheelhouse. When he was prosecuting the criminal enterprises the criminals he faced were experts at their crimes. Rudy is going after a bunch of criminal enterprise rookies. All you people calling for this to stop, are you scared he has found something?

Rudy said today his group has filed four lawsuits and withdrew one of those because the issue was decided in his favor. Rudy hasn't lost anything. You guys need to get a new news source or more likely quit spreading your evil propaganda.

---

And Sidney Powell sounded like she was going to break out bawling at any moment. Does she normally talk like that, as a high powered attorney? She literally sounded like she was crying as she spoke, with her voice cracking and quivering.

---

That's her voice dude. Not a good way to go.

94chem said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Nailed it

---

I have actually been a witness in case wherein I had death threats. Had FBI protection. (Back when I trusted the FBI.)

My late brother was a banker who discovered cartel related bank fraud. He had protection too.

Leftist are killing people in the street for carrying American flags or wearing a MAGA hat.

I know you can't support that. Anything useful to suggest?

---

Yes. If Powell doesn't have real evidence, she should be tried for treason. It's that simple at this point.

---

Does the line form behind Schiff? Nadler?

Good grief.

Verne Lundquist said:

---

No one can claim Poso isn't a Trump guy

---

It's a good point.

tsuag10 said:

---

If they don't come through with some solid evidence, I'm going to be furious.

I'm almost done with all this BS.

---

What would be the motivation for flogging this on all the shows with no evidence? I'd think that would open Sidney up to civil action from Dominion

The PR battle and the Legal battle are both necessary, but run on different timelines.

The media was talking about a disputed election all day today. That's a short-term win for Trump, even if they don't tell it fairly, or the evidence isn't disclosed, yet and they're making fun of Rudy's hair. The details fade but the narrative sticks.


Trump has to keep the public engaged that there is a real dispute, while waiting for the slower legal side to unfold. If you let the Biden narrative go uncontested and crystallize for 3 weeks then it won't matter what evidence you drop in court in December.

And they have to keep hammering basic talking points over and over to soak through the media firewalls. Half the public still doesn't even knew about Biden's China and Ukraine dealings or the laptop. They're not just trying to satisfy the news junkies on message boards.

AgBMF42 said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

What if the MI Rep leads for the state house and senate were called to Washington so Trumps team can show them evidence?

---

Why in your scenario doesn't the public get to see it?

---

Public ALWAYS gets to see evidence of upcoming or pending high profile cases lol. Legal system has always worked that way.

Boo Weekley said:

---

AgBMF42 said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

What if the MI Rep leads for the state house and senate were called to Washington so Trumps team can show them evidence?

---

Why in your scenario doesn't the public get to see it?

---

Public ALWAYS gets to see evidence of upcoming or pending high profile cases lol. Legal system has always worked that way.

---

That's not a case or a trial...

AgBMF42 said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

What if the MI Rep leads for the state house and senate were called to Washington so Trumps team can show them evidence?

---

Why in your scenario doesn't the public get to see it?

---

Are you serious? You think the public should get the same briefing as the guys that are tasked with certifying a state election. What if Barr is there to provide an update on what and who FBI and DOJ are investigating in MI? That should be public right now?

captkirk said:

---

tsuag10 said:

---

If they don't come through with some solid evidence, I'm going to be furious.

I'm almost done with all this BS.

---

What would be the motivation for flogging this on all the shows with no evidence? I'd think that would open Sidney up to civil action from Dominion

---

It would have to be a team of absolute brainwashed psychos to come this heavy with out any grounds whatsoever (seized servers etc).

Or Trump is paying them tens of millions to lie and destroy their reputations and they'll likely golden parachute to some exotic country with no extradition.

"We the legislature of Mi have see the evidence and determined we are awarding the electoral votes to Trump. No you can't see any evidence"

That's how you start the bugalooo. (Yes I know how it's spelled)

AgBMF42 said:

---

Boo Weekley said:

---

AgBMF42 said:

---

HumpitPuryear said:

---

What if the MI Rep leads for the state house and senate were called to Washington so Trumps team can show them evidence?

---

Why in your scenario doesn't the public get to see it?

---

Public ALWAYS gets to see evidence of upcoming or pending high profile cases lol. Legal system has always worked that way.

---

That's not a case or a trial...

---

Why would they unload evidence of seized German servers etc? What is the benefit this soon? Again, assuming claims of seized servers are legit.

black_ice said:

---

Verne Lundquist said:

---

No one can claim Poso isn't a Trump guy

---

It's a good point.

---

If it isn't, shouldn't Dominion be suing the campaign?

Boo Weekley said:

---

captkirk said:

---

tsuag10 said:

---

If they don't come through with some solid evidence, I'm going to be furious.

I'm almost done with all this BS.

---

What would be the motivation for flogging this on all the shows with no evidence? I'd think that would open Sidney up to civil action from Dominion

---

It would have to be a team of absolute brainwashed psychos to come this heavy with out any grounds whatsoever (seized servers etc).

Or Trump is paying them tens of millions to lie and destroy their reputations and they'll likely golden parachute to some exotic country with no extradition.

---

Makes no sense. Sidney's reputation is very important to her. She isn't Roger Stone

captkirk said:

---

black_ice said:

---

Verne Lundquist said:

---

No one can claim Poso isn't a Trump guy

---

It's a good point.

---

If it isn't, shouldn't Dominion be suing the campaign?

---

Yep. And what if they're going after string pullers above dominion and they have what they need on dominion.

Yes I smoked weed tonight, feeling conspiratorial. And only legal exposure is from Hollywood.

AgBMF42 said:

---

"We the legislature of Mi have see the evidence and determined we are awarding the electoral votes to Trump. No you can't see any evidence"

That's how you start the bugalooo. (Yes I know how it's spelled)

---

Bless your heart, child.

Dance monkeys dance to the lib fiddlers !

Boo Weekley said:

---

Public ALWAYS gets to see evidence of upcoming or pending high profile cases lol. Legal system has always worked that way.

---

Public ALWAYS gets to see evidence that votes are validly cast, chain of custody, signatures match, observe counting, lol. Election system has always worked that way.

unmade bed said:

---

geoag58 said:

---

Since you CM's are so convinced there is nothing there do you have a problem with Rudy seeing these court cases through?

---

I have a big problem with Rudy seeing the court cases through. I would have no problem with Trump hiring a semi competent attorney and Trump exercising all options available through the judicial system to address whatever claims of wrongdoing there may be.

Based on Rudy and his teams track record so far, that is not happening and what is going to be left is nothing but unanswered questions and innuendo.

---

Which works out great if you know you lost, but want to keep the train going.

They wanted Tucker to talk about Hunter, so they gave him evidence so that when he did he wasn't going out on a limb and simply parroting someone else's line.

When he asked for similar evidence regarding the current election fraud claims clearly they didn't have anything as concrete as a scan of a hard drive that had been in third party hands for a year, and told him to **** off if he was going to insist on anything that verified the claims.

Too bad he's not POTUS' paid counsel, because he'd be singing a different tune then.

Ag87H2O said:

---

As much as I like Carleson, he doesn't get to dictate the vehicle or the timing of the presentation of evidence. I want to see it as much as everyone else, but it entirely up to Trump and his legal team as to when the appropriate time for release might be. Why would any good attorney lay out their cards for the enemy to see before they were ready to attack and give them time to prepare?

I expect the evidence will be presented in full in a courtroom in front of a judge, not on a national talk show.

---

I agree with everything you wrote ^^ above. Yet, you need to add to it the need to convince the public. PR is likely bigger than the law right now.

• Powell's strategy seems to be high level bombing, not specific instances of touching the election data Tuesday night, Nov. 3.
• She has the affidavit from a contractor(?) who helped build Dominion for Chavez and can explain how the software/hardware has features designed to flip elections.
• She has some kind of statistical data. Hence, she makes the claim that Trump received 7 million more votes than recorded.

Does she need specific evidence from the Nov.. 3 timeframe during the count? I think for PR purposes she does. Legally she better have it as well.

Man, I hope this ragtag group of attorneys get a break! Otherwise, the drama competes on the level of Netflix Narcos.

Tucker has excepted Fox's bribe. As he said, his "allegiance" is to Fox.

jagged said:

---

thirdcoast said:

---

This may end up being really good. With all these libs referencing Tucker right now, it will add credibility when he acknowledges evidence in near future. If Tucker was lock step with Rudy G. now, his future acknowledgment of fraud would be diluted.

---

two more weeks?

---

Till Dec 14.
So 3-4 weeks.

Did Tucker ever follow up with all those people in Michigan that he claimed were dead and that they had casted ballots? What ever happened with that?

(((They))) finally got to Tucker. Damn shame.

Tucker is a sellout. Can't trust anything from him going forward. Walk away from Fox and its liberal pandering. OANN, Newsmax, Brietbart are the only places you're going to get clear cut, unbiased news and commentary going forward.

Rossticus said:

---

Tucker is a sellout. Can't trust anything from him going forward. Walk away from Fox and its liberal pandering. OANN, Newsmax, Brietbart are the only places you're going to get clear cut, unbiased news and commentary going forward.

---

Just wanted to frame this one in all its glory

HoustonAggie37713 said:

---

He's not wrong. The press conference didn't have a purpose.

---

Disagree. The MSM will not report factually.

So, the conference was to explain how the administration is exploring fraud and that it intends to seek judicial relief.

See, simple.

Tucker was clearly po'd that she refused to go on his show. I have seen it before. He takes it personal, and so does the network when they see her going on Newsmax and OAN. Screw Tucker for not realizing the presser they did was about scolding the media for not doing their job. Instead of mentioning that, Tucker did exactly what they predicted the media would do.

Tucker is one of the few remaining "journalists," but dropping the Biden story and lashing out at Powell and supporting Fox is suspect.

I think his ego was bruised with the Powell incident, but who knows.

I wonder if they have actual evidence.