I've read about the bubbles being filled in perfectly and understand that that shows something crooked.

But how is that proven? Are the affidavits enough due to experience?

Are they using that to try and get to signature verification?

If they can get copies of the ballots they should be able to do a forensic analysis of the ink to determine if they were hand written or machine generated.

It's about to get real interesting.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't they analyze the ink on those ballots and determine if they were marked by a machine. Printer vs. pen ink has to be different.

SIAP that the dominion machines had ballot marking capabilities. If they were perfect they weren't done by hand no one is sitting down and marking that many ballots over and over perfectly.


Ag87H2O beat me to it .

Verne Lundquist said:

---

I've read about the bubbles being filled in perfectly and understand that that shows something crooked.

But how is that proven? Are the affidavits enough due to experience?

Are they using that to try and get to signature verification?

---

If you can find even one pre-printed ballot, you need to search the whole vote for any such ballot.

That is a serious problem, and easy to identify. Once identified, it's time to start looking at fingerprints, ink sources, etc., and put people in jail.

Ag87H2O said:

---

If they can get copies of the ballots they should be able to do a forensic analysis of the ink to determine if they were hand written or machine generated.

It's about to get real interesting.

---

Not copies. Need originals.

Here is a tally sheet. Should be pretty easy to find these ballots..

Hypnoklown1986 said:

---

Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't they analyze the ink on those ballots and determine if they were marked by a machine. Printer vs. pen ink has to be different.

SIAP that the dominion machines had ballot marking capabilities. If they were perfect they weren't done by hand no one is sitting down and marking that many ballots over and over perfectly.


Ag87H2O beat me to it .

---

You don't even really need to analyze ink. The difference is plain as day.

You have to put pressure on a piece of paper to write on it with a pen, and pen's don't make perfect marks. The naked eye could tell that ballots were pre-printed.

They could possibly match the ink as well as being the same on every ballot I would imagine.

aggiehawg said:

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

If they can get copies of the ballots they should be able to do a forensic analysis of the ink to determine if they were hand written or machine generated.

It's about to get real interesting.

---

Not copies. Need originals.

---

Yeah, that's what I meant. Thanks for the clarification, it is an important distinction.

And a fingerprint does not match anybody in the obvious chain of custody, or anybody in America.

I wanna watch a forensic files 'election' episode

Made in China (aka Chinese Embassy in Houston)

Quote:

---

If they can get copies of the ballots they should be able to do a forensic analysis of the ink to determine if they were hand written or machine generated.

---

You all are living in Lala land. You really think somebody is going to be able to find these ballots out of millions of ballots and also that the democrats aren't currently doing everything to make sure these ballots aren't found?

These people were burning down cities. They do not care about the law and are not going to let this happen.