titan said:

---

He said around the 18 minute mark that in addition to the economy, among many that there is indeed a large subset concern about November being trustworthy elections. He thinks the Democrats are underestimating the degree of doubt. He said the Republican Party has done a record job this time to have some polling places oversight. (all this presumably applies to Wisconsin) Then he went on to talk about doubled homicide rates, and directions there.

---

Underestimating doubt is a light touch on the election was flat out stolen by Democrat swine. Zero trust for November, the doubt is whether Republicans can fix. We shall see.

Believe history will regard him indeed as an * administration. There are precedents in empires and kingdoms and won't provoke much controversy as compared to now. Think of how Pharaoh Akenaten ended up being seen. (for different reasons)

In fact, on this sober subject-- it is also not out of the realm that early 21st C will be called a period of Anti-popes in the Catholic Church, just like the Great Schism. Have a suspicion some of this will not age well.

The Colorado Sun: Judge orders arrest of indicted Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters for bond violations.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) July 15, 2022

will25u said:

---

The Colorado Sun: Judge orders arrest of indicted Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters for bond violations.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) July 15, 2022

---

She filed suit to challenge the primary election...so of course they arrest her, again.

Here's the real deal. Let's assume Tina Peters is 100% nutjob and made everything up. Lied repeatedly.

So what? Compared to the other crimes happening in the Dem state of Colorado, no armed robbery, no rape, no burglary, no assault, nothing that the DAs will prosecute.

But a woman making a forensic copy of a hard drive is the most dangerous person of all?

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

The Colorado Sun: Judge orders arrest of indicted Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters for bond violations.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) July 15, 2022

---

She filed suit to challenge the primary election...so of course they arrest her, again.

Here's the real deal. Let's assume Tina Peters is 100% nutjob and made everything up. Lied repeatedly.

So what? Compared to the other crimes happening in the Dem state of Colorado, no armed robbery, no rape, no burglary, no assault, nothing that the DAs will prosecute.

But a woman making a forensic copy of a hard drive is the most dangerous person of all?

---

If you don't prosecute people who violate the conditions of a bond release, then there is no incentive for people released on bond to obey the conditions of bond release.

If you don't prosecute people for violating election laws, then there is no incentive or people to obey election laws.

Yep. It is hard to think where the church leadership has gone since John Paul II. The historians of the future will hopefully look at this time as a huge turning point in the world, from a globalist elite monarchy to each individual country.

I just hope that in the end, the right wins since history is written by the victors…

Exclusive: Gregg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht Tell Gateway Pundit They Have Identified Individuals and Operatives Linked to TCF Center Late Night Ballot Drops https://t.co/hCZMPuHPJe

— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) July 14, 2022

Watermelon Man said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

The Colorado Sun: Judge orders arrest of indicted Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters for bond violations.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) July 15, 2022

---

She filed suit to challenge the primary election...so of course they arrest her, again.

Here's the real deal. Let's assume Tina Peters is 100% nutjob and made everything up. Lied repeatedly.

So what? Compared to the other crimes happening in the Dem state of Colorado, no armed robbery, no rape, no burglary, no assault, nothing that the DAs will prosecute.

But a woman making a forensic copy of a hard drive is the most dangerous person of all?

---

If you don't prosecute people who violate the conditions of a bond release, then there is no incentive for people released on bond to obey the conditions of bond release.

If you don't prosecute people for violating election laws, then there is no incentive or people to obey election laws.

---

Agreed, when people break the law they should be tried in a court of law.
Waiting on:

• Hillary's trial for destroying evidence that was under subpoenas
• Comey for lying to Congress and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Peter Paul Strzok to be tried for false testimony and and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Ray Epps to be arrested for inciting a riot.
• There's plenty more, but you should understand we live in a two tiered justice system.

richardag said:

---

Watermelon Man said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

The Colorado Sun: Judge orders arrest of indicted Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters for bond violations.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) July 15, 2022

---

She filed suit to challenge the primary election...so of course they arrest her, again.

Here's the real deal. Let's assume Tina Peters is 100% nutjob and made everything up. Lied repeatedly.

So what? Compared to the other crimes happening in the Dem state of Colorado, no armed robbery, no rape, no burglary, no assault, nothing that the DAs will prosecute.

But a woman making a forensic copy of a hard drive is the most dangerous person of all?

---

If you don't prosecute people who violate the conditions of a bond release, then there is no incentive for people released on bond to obey the conditions of bond release.

If you don't prosecute people for violating election laws, then there is no incentive or people to obey election laws.

---

Agreed, when people break the law they should be tried in a court of law.
Waiting on:

• Hillary's trial for destroying evidence that was under subpoenas
• Comey for lying to Congress and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Peter Paul Strzok to be tried for false testimony and and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Ray Epps to be arrested for inciting a riot.
• There's plenty more, but you should understand we live in a two tiered justice system.

---

So, you're saying it's OK to violate conditions of a legal bond if they're a Republican Trump Supporter*.

And, violating election laws are not a problem, provided those who do the violation are Republicans Trump Supporters*.

*Just want to point out that Tina Peters lost a Republican Primary, and lost to a fully vetted Colorado Republican.

Local citizens at each facility - it's going to take local citizens stepping up.

Watermelon Man said:

---

richardag said:

---

Watermelon Man said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

The Colorado Sun: Judge orders arrest of indicted Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters for bond violations.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) July 15, 2022

---

She filed suit to challenge the primary election...so of course they arrest her, again.

Here's the real deal. Let's assume Tina Peters is 100% nutjob and made everything up. Lied repeatedly.

So what? Compared to the other crimes happening in the Dem state of Colorado, no armed robbery, no rape, no burglary, no assault, nothing that the DAs will prosecute.

But a woman making a forensic copy of a hard drive is the most dangerous person of all?

---

If you don't prosecute people who violate the conditions of a bond release, then there is no incentive for people released on bond to obey the conditions of bond release.

If you don't prosecute people for violating election laws, then there is no incentive or people to obey election laws.

---

Agreed, when people break the law they should be tried in a court of law.
Waiting on:

• Hillary's trial for destroying evidence that was under subpoenas
• Comey for lying to Congress and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Peter Paul Strzok to be tried for false testimony and and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Ray Epps to be arrested for inciting a riot.
• There's plenty more, but you should understand we live in a two tiered justice system.

---

So, you're saying it's OK to violate conditions of a legal bond if they're a Republican Trump Supporter*.

And, violating election laws are not a problem, provided those who do the violation are Republicans Trump Supporters*.

*Just want to point out that Tina Peters lost a Republican Primary, and lost to a fully vetted Colorado Republican.

---

No, you need to reread my post. You are flying off the handle and are completely wrong.

richardag said:

---

Watermelon Man said:

---

richardag said:

---

Watermelon Man said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

The Colorado Sun: Judge orders arrest of indicted Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters for bond violations.

— The Bias (@thebias_news) July 15, 2022

---

She filed suit to challenge the primary election...so of course they arrest her, again.

Here's the real deal. Let's assume Tina Peters is 100% nutjob and made everything up. Lied repeatedly.

So what? Compared to the other crimes happening in the Dem state of Colorado, no armed robbery, no rape, no burglary, no assault, nothing that the DAs will prosecute.

But a woman making a forensic copy of a hard drive is the most dangerous person of all?

---

If you don't prosecute people who violate the conditions of a bond release, then there is no incentive for people released on bond to obey the conditions of bond release.

If you don't prosecute people for violating election laws, then there is no incentive or people to obey election laws.

---

Agreed, when people break the law they should be tried in a court of law.
Waiting on:

• Hillary's trial for destroying evidence that was under subpoenas
• Comey for lying to Congress and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Peter Paul Strzok to be tried for false testimony and and failure to uphold his oath of office.
• Ray Epps to be arrested for inciting a riot.
• There's plenty more, but you should understand we live in a two tiered justice system.

---

So, you're saying it's OK to violate conditions of a legal bond if they're a Republican Trump Supporter*.

And, violating election laws are not a problem, provided those who do the violation are Republicans Trump Supporters*.

*Just want to point out that Tina Peters lost a Republican Primary, and lost to a fully vetted Colorado Republican.

---

No, you need to reread my post. You are flying off the handle like every other lib on earth.

---

FIFY. Nut jobs.

Brian Kemp is running to be the Governor of Georgia. Stacey Abrams is running to be the Governor of resist libs pic.twitter.com/zQf8DTicSy

— Political Election Projections (@tencor_7144) July 15, 2022

Wow

will25u said:

---

Brian Kemp is running to be the Governor of Georgia. Stacey Abrams is running to be the Governor of resist libs pic.twitter.com/zQf8DTicSy

— Political Election Projections (@tencor_7144) July 15, 2022

---

Same for Beta and the lib running for Lt. Gov.

How is D'Souza claim that two people "tell Gateway Pundit" any different than Cassidy Hutchinson saying, she heard from a secret service agent something about Trump?

Give it some time and wait to see if they are willing to submit a sworn statement. If anything, it has to be entered into the record officially or it means nothing. Just juicy gossip.

There is a report out of Mesa County, Colorado about Dominion voting systems EMS integrity during 2020 general election and the 2021 primary. ETA: local election.

Gets too technical for me to summarize other than saying databases of ballot images were created, deleted and then recreated. None of the county election workers did this, nor is it clear they even had the passwords and codes in which to do it. The forensic review has identified the dates and times of the changes to the databases, but not who and how.

Anyway for our tech folks on this thread, I would like your assessment of the information in the report.

Link

Hutchins was under oath in a public hearing using hearsay as evidence? Evidence that would not be admitted in a real trial. D'Souza is a talking head that can say anything. Even if it is a lie (I have no idea), it wouldn't be any different than the thousands of lies spewed daily at MSNBC, CNN, etc.

2020 was the preseason run and showed them what to do and how to do it - every election from now on will be stolen the same as 2020 unless people are brought up on charges and convicted - but I do not realistically see that happening

I will take a look between calls this morning.

Thanks.

aggiehawg said:

---

There is a report out of Mesa County, Colorado about Dominion voting systems EMS integrity during 2020 general election and the 2021 primary. ETA: local election.

Gets too technical for me to summarize other than saying databases of ballot images were created, deleted and then recreated. None of the county election workers did this, nor is it clear they even had the passwords and codes in which to do it. The forensic review has identified the dates and times of the changes to the databases, but not who and how.

Anyway for our tech folks on this thread, I would like your assessment of the information in the report.

Link

---

If this is investigated and found to be illegal activity, not only should perpetrators be jailed for years, consider all the areas across the country where these vulnerabilities exist and are not being investigated.

Probably nothing they can do in Michigan, Pennsylvania etc., not sure about NM, NV, others, but if enough states with R-controlled state legislatures (TX, FL, GA, AZ, etc.) pass some election integrity laws and implement them properly -outlawing insecure drop boxes, requiring ID, securing and updating registration rolls, ensuring an audit trail can exist, outlawing zuckerbucks that fund harvest campaigns, outlawing the outsourcing of local election work to NGO's, severe punishments for voter fraud, etc. then maybe there's a chance for conservatives to take control of both chambers of Congress.

Then, they will need to make sure there can't be a way for the authoritarian left to nationalize / federalize elections in the future. They openly call for federalizing it and if that happens, authoritarian left will win every election for forever in a new one-party system the same way Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro, and Hugo Chvez always won their elections and the same way Biden was placed in his position.

aggieforester05 said:

---

Hutchins was under oath in a public hearing using hearsay as evidence? Evidence that would not be admitted in a real trial. D'Souza is a talking head that can say anything. Even if it is a lie (I have no idea), it wouldn't be any different than the thousands of lies spewed daily at MSNBC, CNN, etc.

---

The last thing any election denier would want to see is Bannon testify in front of Liz...with Dinesh's team (Catherine/Gregg), Navarro, Poso, Boris, Beattie, Flynn, Clements, and Julie Kelly & Tina Peters' teams.

Biden would order a tacticle nuke it would be so bad for the dims.

81M* would be dwindled to ~58M in less than a day.

peacedude said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

Hutchins was under oath in a public hearing using hearsay as evidence? Evidence that would not be admitted in a real trial. D'Souza is a talking head that can say anything. Even if it is a lie (I have no idea), it wouldn't be any different than the thousands of lies spewed daily at MSNBC, CNN, etc.

---

The last thing any election denier would want to see is Bannon testify in front of Liz...with Dinesh's team (Catherine/Gregg), Navarro, Poso, Boris, Beattie, Flynn, Clements, and Julie Kelly & Tina Peters' teams.

Biden would order a tacticle nuke it would be so bad for the dims.

81M* would be dwindled to ~58M in less than a day.

---

This committee has zero credibility and are clearly not looking for the truth. Their rejection of non Rhino Republicans and requirement of closed door sessions (Bannon for example), prove that they are crafting a narrative and have no interest in seeking the truth. That is undeniable for anyone paying attention to the events surrounding these hearings.

That being said, their credibility does not matter. This is all about generating headlines that will sway low information moderates to believe that Trump masterminded an insurrection. Unfortunately many will believe that just based on the headlines they see carefully crafted by the DNC propaganda outlets. The truth no longer matters when journalistic integrity is dead, the populace in grossly uninformed, and Democrats have no accountability.

The liberals that pay attention and see what the Democrats are doing, do not care because they are ethically devoid and happy with whatever it takes to keep Democrats in office. The moderates that pay attention are probably a lost cause for the Democrats anyway because their policy positions and behavior are untenable.

aggiehawg said:

---

Thanks.

---

88 pages, and some of it is insane enough I am having to re-read to make sure I actually read what I just read.

Only a few pages in, and I am wondering WTF these people were doing if it was NOT malicious.

• Why are you exporting/importing blocks of data into a database you are supposed to maintain for 22 months after an election?
• Why are you exporting/importing blocks of data into a database that is going to be overwritten when you upgrade the software?
• Is there no option to upgrade the software without wiping the database?
• If you are changing schema and need to start fresh, why is there not a process by which to export/backup the database as a read-only copy before the update?
• Why are you exporting data, re-importing it, and not including the hash (sha) information? The only reason I can come up with is you changed the data or didn't re-import the original data as it was before.

Going to read through more after next two meetings, but OH BOY, the hits keep coming. This goes well beyond the "carrier grade router" and "DHCP" crap we were talking about 1.5 years ago.

Obviously you understand a lot of that better than I do but it was pretty alarming not only that it happened but that it could even happen in the first place. When Judge Totenberg called Dominion's voting system "deeply flawed" it was a vast understatement.

It is a deliberately written piece of crap software that should have never passed any accreditation for use in elections.

The goal is to have all of those willing participants be able get their side of the story told under oath, and recorded on audio/video/transcribed. Receipts, as Steve and Navarro like to say.

Then, if Nov isn't completely rigged and we have majorities, it's about time for Doc and Wyatt to gear up, because we have all the proof anyone could ever want/need to send these people away forever.

Note: The NIH, the Sec Svc, and fed agencies involved with 1/6 are having increased numbers of defectors (potential star witnesses) coming forward every day, so if the rigging isn't enough to overcome our red tsunami, most of the folks on the left will be relegated to street sweeping duties by 2030. Note 2: Most on the left will be dead from VAIDS before 2030, anyway.

aggiehawg said:

---

Obviously you understand a lot of that better than I do but it was pretty alarming not only that it happened but that it could even happen in the first place. When Judge Totenberg called Dominion's voting system "deeply flawed" it was a vast understatement.

It is a deliberately written piece of crap software that should have never passed any accreditation for use in elections.

---

Let's forget all the 'tech talk' and look at this from a common sense, logical approach.

• What is the point of processes if you don't follow them?
• Why certify a voting ecosystem if it is going to be changed between certification and the election?
• Why use voting equipment that is so readily/easily manipulated?

I don't care if it was human error, bad actor, or whatever. Your only job is to design, develop, and deliver a solution to process and secure election results. They want to ***** and moan about "proprietary software" when people want to see WTF is going on, but they apparently give two ****s about allowing anyone and everyone to perform administrative functions with zero way to audit that activity.

Even if you, for whatever reason, have to "reset" or "reactivate" any of the systems, the original data should be marked as read-only and left intact in its current state. Then a separate database marked as the 2nd iteration....and so on.

Nothing with the election process follows any sort of compliance, governance, or auditable process. It is disgusting.

One other thing I thought about was whether any numbers were being sent to the Sec of State's office during the early voting period? Wouldn't they have noticed these issues?

Lara Logan has a documentary coming out soon about Tina Peters (the left hate that she's a gold star mom and good person), and it's supposed to delve deep into the whole Colorado story.

That said, I hope Tina outlines how all of their processes are supposed to work, and how the various state's SoS's seemed to be working in conjunction with one another out of a developed playbook for machine fraud.