Quote:

---

The DHS-CISA claim toward the security of the Dominion system is predicated on the assertion that in order to modify the voting results, the local election officials would have to be participating in the election manipulation, therefore the systems are safe. Seriously, that's the statement.
Think about what is already known about local election officials in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Michigan and Wisconsin. All of the voting manipulation was done on a county and local level. Maricopa County Arizona was a key focus point for these exact voting issues during their audit. Now consider when DHS-CISA says:

Exploitation of these [Dominion Voting System] vulnerabilities would require:

physical access to individual ImageCast X devices,
access to the Election Management System (EMS), or
the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices.

We can check each of these three points affirmatively against what is known about the voting manipulation. Yes, local election officials had "physical access" to the devices. Yes, local election officials had "access to the EMS," and yes, local election officials have "the ability to modify files."

---

Quote:

---

The bottom line is this…. If local election officials want to manipulate the election outcome, they can.

The Dominion electronic voting system gives local officials the ability to manipulate the voting outcome.
DHS-CISA saying the Dominion vulnerability is not a problem because the local officials would have to be participating in the electronic manipulation is not anywhere close to claiming there has been no voting manipulation. Exactly the opposite is true.

Consider this truthful statement:
'If local election officials wanted to manipulate the outcome of electronic voting, the Dominion voting system is the specific system that gives them the ability to do so.'

Read the CISA advisory carefully and you will see exactly what I mean [SOURCE]

SUMMARY This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. The ImageCast X can be configured to allow a voter to produce a paper record or to record votes electronically. While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.
Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices [], access to the Election Management System (EMS) [], or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices [].

Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems. Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities. {LINK}

---

Link

"How are you gonna keep it from us being able to be in a position where you can manipulate the machines, manipulate the records?... I think we should pass a federal law mandating that the same machines with paper trails be mandatory for every federal election"

-Joe Biden, 2007 pic.twitter.com/0fWOVRHXFX

— Essential Fleccas 🇺🇸 (@fleccas) December 15, 2020

Hypocrite much?

AZ Rep Blackman says that they need to move forward with HB2289, based on #2000Mules evidence clearly stated.

Blackman previously opposed the bill.

The bill makes elections in AZ 1 day, 1 vote, paper ballots, & drop box restrictions.

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/7Rtky7iJYK

— 🇺🇸 Michael 2022 🇺🇸 (@Michael20224) June 1, 2022

Really getting tired of the "physical access" red herring. They use this as if it is some near impossible set of compensating controls to overcome. We know, because we have video, groups of election workers were using these machines every day of the process. We know, because it has been proven, these devices didn't follow even the most basic security guidelines (shared accounts, weak or no passwords, etc). We know election workers were using external drives as part of their processes. We also know these devices were not air-gapped as they were supposed to be and, in some cases, we have been provided evidence of non-election devices connected to these networks.

The only way these devices were not hacked is if nobody tried. It damn sure wasn't because there no way they could have been hacked. Hell, these machines were like a wallet in the street.

Quote:

---

The only way these devices were not hacked is if nobody tried. It damn sure wasn't because there no way they could have been hacked. Hell, these machines were like a wallet in the street.

---

Indeed.

Quote:

---

Time Magazine Details the 'Shadow Campaign' Against Trump
February 8, 2021 by Jeff Carlson, CFA
"They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it," Time magazine says

In a surprisingly brazen article, "The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election," Time magazine chronicles a myriad of pre- and post-election actions taken by a loose coalition of Democratic operatives, grassroots activists, mainstream media, tech companies, and corporate CEOs before and after the 2020 presidential election.

According to the article, the effort consisted of "a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information."

In the post-election days, the author refers to this disparate grouping of players as a "conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs" resulting in an "informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans."

Although the words "cabal" and "conspiracy" are used to describe the sweeping activities of these groups, collectively referred to as the Shadow Campaign, the article's author takes pains to note that these efforts weren't aimed at "rigging the election; they were fortifying it."

---

Link

That huge of a concerted effort and no one touched the voting machines? Never even thought about it?

Have you watched to documentary on HBO called "Kill Chain"? Here is the trailer....



...before that, there was one called "Hacking Democracy." Every damn time, the same thing. "Not connected to the Internet." "Must have physical access." "Controls in place to prevent." Yet every time it is just a flat out lie. The company changes names, the software is called something else, but we are right back in the same spot. Voting needs to happen on one day and in person. Declare it a federal holiday and mandate through law employers have to give essential employees time off to vote. If there is a hardship, you must provide reason in advance, get an absentee ballot, and then it must be signed, post marked by, or received by election day.

In the event the difference between the winner and loser is less than the amount of absentee votes, then you count them. If the difference is greater than the number of absentee ballots, no need.

ETA: In the first 10 minutes of Kill Chain, they do a live demonstration with the old Diebold equipment and show 8 votes get submitted with a 2-6 vote total changed to 1-7.

Quote:

---

The company changes names, the software is called something else, but we are right back in the same spot.

---

When I was doing my deep dive on the history of electronic voting, I was surprised by how incestuous the industry is, almost a monopoly with different players engaged in concerted activity.

Which wouldn't be as big of an issue if elections were still run by the states but everything has been outsourced to these private and non-transparent companies.

Quote:

---

ETA: In the first 10 minutes of Kill Chain, they do a live demonstration with the old Diebold equipment and show 8 votes get submitted with a 2-6 vote total changed to 1-7.

---

It may be "old Diebold" equipment but I guarantee you many of those are still in use in one form or another. Many in the northeast, for instance. Only now they are used under either Dominion's or the ES&S name.

HBO documentary.

You misspelled propaganda.

You people. Wake up already.

redsquirrelAG said:

---

HBO documentary.

You misspelled propaganda.

You people. Wake up already.

---

If you haven't watched it, you should. Propaganda is a funny term in this case. Both Kill Chain, released before the 2020 election and Hacking Democracy released in 2006 in the lead up to the 2008 election were absolutely intended to be pro-democrat propaganda. What makes it funny is watching the same people crying "the most secure election in history" today are on these films crying about how insecure these systems are and have always been.

The vulnerabilities in the most recent reports are oddly similar to what they found/did in the films.

Quote:

---

APT Actors Chaining Vulnerabilities Against SLTT, Critical Infrastructure, and Elections Organizations

SUMMARY This joint cybersecurity advisory uses the MITRE Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge (ATT&CK) framework. See the ATT&CK for Enterprise framework for all referenced threat actor techniques. Note: the analysis in this joint cybersecurity advisory is ongoing, and the information provided should not be considered comprehensive. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) will update this advisory as new information is available.

This joint cybersecurity advisory was written by CISA with contributions from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). CISA has recently observed advanced persistent threat (APT) actors exploiting multiple legacy vulnerabilities in combination with a newer privilege escalation vulnerabilityCVE-2020-1472in Windows Netlogon. The commonly used tactic, known as vulnerability chaining, exploits multiple vulnerabilities in the course of a single intrusion to compromise a network or application.

This recent malicious activity has often, but not exclusively, been directed at federal and state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) government networks. Although it does not appear these targets are being selected because of their proximity to elections information, there may be some risk to elections information housed on government networks. CISA is aware of some instances where this activity resulted in unauthorized access to elections support systems; however, CISA has no evidence to date that integrity of elections data has been compromised. There are steps that election officials, their supporting SLTT IT staff, and vendors can take to help defend against this malicious cyber activity

---

That was October 9, 2020.
More HERE.

Less than a month later:


The most secure election evah!

Alex Halderman gave a presentation in 2019 on electronic voting machine vulnerabilities.

Video at Link

Don’t buy into the media gaslighting…they should look at New York or Delaware’s laws!

— Greater Georgia (@GreaterGeorgia) June 6, 2022

.... so I have been told.

Quote:

---

In the counties where CTCL made its 50 largest grants in terms of per capita spending, the average partisan lean in favor of Democrat Joe Biden over Republican Donald Trump was 33 points meaning the aid could be expected to stimulate more Democratic votes. Twenty-five of the top 50 grants per capita went to just five states Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, and Texas (the latter two where "Democrats were optimistic about Biden's chances," the authors write). Seven of the top ten largest grants per capita went to counties in Georgia and Wisconsin, states that Biden narrowly won by 12,000 and 21,000 respectively. (Along with the report, Evolving Strategies has put together an online map and visualization app that tracks CTCL's top 100 grants on a per capita basis.)

---

Quote:

---

"The distribution of the CTCL program's grant amounts both in absolute and per capita terms shows, unequivocally, a systematic bias in favor of Democratic jurisdictions," they write. The larger grants revealed a "partisan pattern of funding [that] was especially apparent in swing states. Regardless of intention, CTCL's geographic allocation of larger grants is prima facie and de facto partisan."

Before 2020, the private funding of election administration was virtually unheard of. Against positive coverage of the development in liberal news media, conservative activists sounded the alarm about CTCL's efforts. "Privatizing the management of elections undermines the integrity of our elections because private donors may dictate where and how hundreds of millions of dollars will be managed in these states," Phill Kline of the Thomas More Society told the Washington Post. Since 2020, 17 states have effectively banned the private funding of local election offices either through new laws or regulations. Two other states, Alabama and Missouri, are awaiting for the governor's signature on similar bills.

---

Quote:

---

The center and its defenders have argued that it is only logical that urban areas, which tend to support Democrats, would get more grant money, simply because they have more voters. But Doyle and Oliver's analysis shows that those areas received more funding on a per capita basis. While the grant size for urban areas might naturally be larger overall, they said, areas with high concentrations of voters should result in economic efficiencies where "substantial fixed cost of election administration is spread out over a relatively larger population, decreasing the per capita cost." If anything, they said, per capita costs of running an election should be higher in more rural Republican areas.

---

Quote:

---

The report showed that Georgia alone received 10 of the top 50 grants per capita, totaling $41 million more than 10% of the $332 million CTCL spent across the country. Nine of those grants went to counties with an average partisan lean of 35 points in favor of Joe Biden.

The center awarded a total of $10.1 million in grants in Wisconsin, but $8.5 million of that went to the cities of Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee, and Racine cities where Biden's average margin of victory was over 37 points. All five cities ranked on CTCL's top 50 per capita grants. Similarly, Pennsylvania had four of the top 50 per capita grants, amounting to $16 million. Some $15 million of those grants went to Philadelphia and to Delaware and Chester counties in the Philadelphia metro area. The Philadelphia vote favored Biden by 64 points, and Delaware and Chester voted Biden by 27 and 17 points respectively. Biden won Pennsylvania by just 1.2 points, so the victory might have been sealed by the influx of cash from private sources to the Philadelphia region, the state's biggest cache of votes, which also has a history of corruption and electoral fraud.

---

Quote:

---

The center did not just award money to counties and cities that applied for grants in many cases it embedded progressive activists into key local election offices to shape how elections were run. In Green Bay, Wisconsin, emails to the mayor's office from the center touted its "network of current and former election administrations and election experts available" to build up "vote by mail processes" and "ensure forms, envelopes, and other materials are understood and completed correctly by voters." In a July 13, 2020 email to the center, Celestine Jeffreys, chief of staff for Green Bay Mayor Eric Genrich, wrote, "As far as I'm concerned I am taking all of my cues from CTCL and work with those you recommend."

---

Quote:

---

Though technically considered a nonpartisan organization, CTCL's leadership team has an extensive history of working with the Democratic Party and progressive causes. Epps-Johnson founded the organization with Whitney May and Donny Bridges. All three previously worked together at the New Organizing Institute, which the Washington Post described as "the Democratic Party's Hogwarts for digital wizardry" and the "left's think tank for campaign know-how."

A further Democratic-Zuckerberg intersection: Former Obama campaign manager David Plouffe is listed as head of policy and advocacy at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the power couple's philanthropy. In his 2020 book, "A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump," Plouffe wrote that the 2020 election "may come down to block-by-block street fights in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee."

---

Link

Quote:

---

Georgia election integrity advocate VoterGa will hold another press conference outlining the continuing election fraud run by the Republican Party in the peach state. You can read the entire announcement below.
Who needs Stacey Abrams to steal elections when you've got Kemp, Raffensperger, and Carr?

What: VoterGA will announce an election challenge, expose several electronic vote counting failures in the 2022 Georgia primaries and provide details on the refusal of counties to abide by Open Records Request (ORR) law in fulfilling requests for copies of ballots
When: Thursday, June 9 , 2022, 11 a.m. noon
Live Stream posted at VoterGA.org Events tab

---

Link

will25u said:

---

PHILADELPHIA – DOJ announces former Congressman Michael “Ozzie” Myers has pleaded guilty to “orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates in the 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 Pennsylvania elections.” https://t.co/XhwKqiPo0N

— Election Wizard 🇺🇸 (@ElectionWiz) June 8, 2022

---

Former Congressman Michael "Ozzie" Myers needs to spend years, if not decades behind bars. We'll see what kind of justice is meted out.

richardag said:

---

will25u said:

---

PHILADELPHIA – DOJ announces former Congressman Michael “Ozzie” Myers has pleaded guilty to “orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates in the 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 Pennsylvania elections.” https://t.co/XhwKqiPo0N

— Election Wizard 🇺🇸 (@ElectionWiz) June 8, 2022

---

Former Congressman Michael "Ozzie" Myers needs to spend years, if not decades behind bars. We'll see what kind of justice is meted out.

---

He needs to bring down everyone associated with it in the process.

Most secure election ever..

will25u said:

---

PHILADELPHIA – DOJ announces former Congressman Michael “Ozzie” Myers has pleaded guilty to “orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates in the 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 Pennsylvania elections.” https://t.co/XhwKqiPo0N

— Election Wizard 🇺🇸 (@ElectionWiz) June 8, 2022

---

Ozzie must not have paid off the right people.

Biden DOJ doing work.

Chuckle at paying "$300 to $5,000 per election". That sort of chicanery seems remarkably affordable for all.

I'm glad he's being prosecuted.

ProgN said:

---

Has anyone else noticed how the smarmy posters that were on here mocking us and declaring the election was legit have disappeared?

---

Like a nightmare for their little world of beliefs.

Troy City Council Member Kimberly McPherson Pleads Guilty to Identity Theft in Connection with Ballot Fraud, Agrees to Resign https://t.co/ZeRcDmq66Z

— U.S. Attorney NDNY (@NDNYnews) June 8, 2022

Yes, 85% is the three Standard Dev marker, so they used the exact same algo for the 2020 general, 2020 runoff, and Brad's little 2022 fiasco.

None of these liberals are legit, so just ignore them completely. You have the 2A backing you up for a reason.

/15% + 85% = 100% of whatever fairy-tale total vote count they came up with. The 15% was the assigned negatively weighted value to skew the totals away from the challenger. You lose 15%, Brad gains 15%.

peacedude said:

---

Yes, 85% is the three Standard Dev marker, so they used the exact same algo for the 2020 general, 2020 runoff, and Brad's little 2022 fiasco.

None of these liberals are legit, so just ignore them completely. You have the 2A backing you up for a reason.

---

Thanks.

I knew that rat was dirty from the first day he opened his mouth about the election.

ProgN said:

---

Has anyone else noticed how the smarmy posters that were on here mocking us and declaring the election was legit have disappeared?

---

Just like our old pals "Safe, Effective, and Free" .... ah the days of arguing with the smartest man in IT....the day he learned you didn't need a carrier grade router to provide DCHP was fun.

ProgN said:

---

Has anyone else noticed how the smarmy posters that were on here mocking us and declaring the election was legit have disappeared?

---

They are just laying low, waiting for another trolling oppty...