*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,692,876 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
chjoak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because they don't really care how much money Kemp makes. She cares about how much money she has to pay people off for breaking the law.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kickbacks are all important as well!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zuckbucks are back.

Quote:

Zuckerberg says he will now channel $80 million to something called the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence for the 32 states they are still allowed to run riot in.
A check of their FAQ section suggests they are doing the exact same thing they did in the 2020 election that made the word 'Zuckerbucks' stink so bad with voters.
Start with the process of getting the Zuckerbucks:
Quote:

How is the Allianced selecting the Centers for Election Excellence?
All U.S. local election departments are invited to be a Center for Election Excellence. The 2022 cohort will be selected based on their:
  • Excitement and willingness to participate in the program
  • Commitment to improve upon practices and procedures aimed at enhancing the voter, poll worker, and staff experiences
  • Commitment to being part of a learning cohort, sharing materials among cohort members, and providing input into the future of the program


Quote:

What is the process for selecting the Centers?

All U.S. local election departments are invited to be a Center for Election Excellence. Local election departments should let the Alliance know if they are interested in being a Center by Friday, May 6th. After a verification and review process, some election departments may be asked for additional information and receive an invitation to an informational session.
Quote:

Quote:

How will voters benefit?
What is one example of an improvement an election official wishes they could make to better serve their voters, but don't have enough time, staffing, resources, or technology? Local election officials are the expert on what their voters need, and the Alliance will work with each Center to fill in the gaps. This could look like redesigning a form so it's more likely a voter will successfully complete it or updating an election website so it is mobile-friendly and answers voters' top questions.
Still redesigning forms no matter what the county clerk thinks, just like last time.
This operation isn't any different from the last one. They are still doing the same kind of rigging, it's just that their arena of operations has been reduced.
Link
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's **** like this that makes me really go back and think about new cycles prior to the election that pretty much dropped off the face of the earth.

-Some Dem think-tank doing a war game scenario with what the response would be should Trump lose the election and refuse to leave the White House.

-The fact that instead of opening up campaign headquarters in key swing states, Biden's campaign hired an unprecedented number of lawyers to "contest the results, if necessary".

-Mark Zuckerburg on a zoom call trying to message out to his audience that, paraphrased, 'we have to let people know that since there are a lot of mail in ballots, it might take up to two weeks to find out who won the election'. I believe Senator Sanders also echo'd this same thing to Jimmy Fallon.

-The media, seemingly all within a 1 week period, carpet bombed the headlines with the narrative that "Don't be surprised if you go to bed thinking Trump won and then he ends up losing after all the ballots are counted. This should be expected, cuz of the Rona".

This whole thing smells like ****, and with this new Zuck scheme with the Orwellian "Alliance for Election Excellence" thing makes me feel like Zuckerburg is just the running back. The corporate media, establishment pols in DC (both R&D), Hollywood, academia, lawfare firms, and ambulance chasers are all the offensive line giving him the push he needs to get across the plane.



Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

It's **** like this that makes me really go back and think about new cycles prior to the election that pretty much dropped off the face of the earth.

-Some Dem think-tank doing a war game scenario with what the response would be should Trump lose the election and refuse to leave the White House.

-The fact that instead of opening up campaign headquarters in key swing states, Biden's campaign hired an unprecedented number of lawyers to "contest the results, if necessary".

-Mark Zuckerburg on a zoom call trying to message out to his audience that, paraphrased, 'we have to let people know that since there are a lot of mail in ballots, it might take up to two weeks to find out who won the election'. I believe Senator Sanders also echo'd this same thing to Jimmy Fallon.

-The media, seemingly all within a 1 week period, carpet bombed the headlines with the narrative that "Don't be surprised if you go to bed thinking Trump won and then he ends up losing after all the ballots are counted. This should be expected, cuz of the Rona".

This whole thing smells like ****, and with this new Zuck scheme with the Orwellian "Alliance for Election Excellence" thing makes me feel like Zuckerburg is just the running back. The corporate media, establishment pols in DC (both R&D), Hollywood, academia, lawfare firms, and ambulance chasers are all the offensive line giving him the push he needs to get across the plane.




Some people, who were Quite interested in the rise of Facebook, did some digging into its origins and when some other government funded programs ended. The government was very interested in gathering social information about its citizens, but no one would freely give it to them. It is funny that Facebook and this program both started and ended, respectively, on or about the same day.

Makes what Zuck is doing even raise more eyebrows, due to the thought that if it isn't him really running the show and just an arm of the FBI or CIA. Then the Zuckerbucks really start to raise some red flags that one of these arms was actively tampering with the election.

I know, conspiracy laden musings have no bearing on the real events going on currently. But after so many conspiracies continue to appear true, eventually you need to start taking a peek behind the curtain.

It is sad that the Dims have figured out a way to essentially find their party without any sort of oversight. I am glad some states have stepped up to disallow these practices of funding "election activities".
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Line Ate Member said:

BadMoonRisin said:

It's **** like this that makes me really go back and think about new cycles prior to the election that pretty much dropped off the face of the earth.

-Some Dem think-tank doing a war game scenario with what the response would be should Trump lose the election and refuse to leave the White House.

-The fact that instead of opening up campaign headquarters in key swing states, Biden's campaign hired an unprecedented number of lawyers to "contest the results, if necessary".

-Mark Zuckerburg on a zoom call trying to message out to his audience that, paraphrased, 'we have to let people know that since there are a lot of mail in ballots, it might take up to two weeks to find out who won the election'. I believe Senator Sanders also echo'd this same thing to Jimmy Fallon.

-The media, seemingly all within a 1 week period, carpet bombed the headlines with the narrative that "Don't be surprised if you go to bed thinking Trump won and then he ends up losing after all the ballots are counted. This should be expected, cuz of the Rona".

This whole thing smells like ****, and with this new Zuck scheme with the Orwellian "Alliance for Election Excellence" thing makes me feel like Zuckerburg is just the running back. The corporate media, establishment pols in DC (both R&D), Hollywood, academia, lawfare firms, and ambulance chasers are all the offensive line giving him the push he needs to get across the plane.




Some people, who were Quite interested in the rise of Facebook, did some digging into its origins and when some other government funded programs ended. The government was very interested in gathering social information about its citizens, but no one would freely give it to them. It is funny that Facebook and this program both started and ended, respectively, on or about the same day.

Makes what Zuck is doing even raise more eyebrows, due to the thought that if it isn't him really running the show and just an arm of the FBI or CIA. Then the Zuckerbucks really start to raise some red flags that one of these arms was actively tampering with the election.

I know, conspiracy laden musings have no bearing on the real events going on currently. But after so many conspiracies continue to appear true, eventually you need to start taking a peek behind the curtain.

It is sad that the Dims have figured out a way to essentially find their party without any sort of oversight. I am glad some states have stepped up to disallow these practices of funding "election activities".
What you did there... I see it.... Coincidence or not, it is interesting that LifeLog was killed one day, and the next, Facebook was born.

DARPA LifeLog was ended on Feb 3, 2004.




Quote:

LifeLog aimed to compile a massive electronic database of every activity and relationship a person engages in. This was to include credit card purchases, web sites visited, the content of telephone calls and e-mails sent and received, scans of faxes and postal mail sent and received, instant messages sent and received, books and magazines read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors, biomedical data captured through wearable sensors. The high level goal of this data logging was to identify "preferences, plans, goals, and other markers of intentionality".

Another of DARPA's goals for LifeLog had a predictive function. It sought to "find meaningful patterns in the timeline, to infer the user's routines, habits, and relationships with other people, organizations, places, and objects, and to exploit these patterns to ease its task"

The LifeLog program was canceled in February 3rd, 2004, after criticism concerning the privacy implications of the system.

Facebook was founded on Feb. 4, 2004.




Quote:

In January 2004, Zuckerberg coded a new website, known as "TheFacebook", inspired by a Crimson editorial about Facemash, stating, "It is clear that the technology needed to create a centralized Website is readily available ... the benefits are many." Zuckerberg met with Harvard student Eduardo Saverin, and each of them agreed to invest $1,000 in the site. On February 4, 2004, Zuckerberg launched "TheFacebook", originally located at thefacebook.com.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biden didn't even campaign. Had one - two dozen people, usually in their cars honking, at the few "rallies" he had. He yelled about things like needing more plexiglass to combat covid. Camp put a lid on him almost daily after a morning appearance somewhere. Couldn't get more than a couple dozen people at his "rally" in Philadelphia, a 30 minute drive from his mansion in Wilmington. Didn't know the difference between what he had on his website vs what the squad wants to print/spend on "green deals". Told the world he'd phase out fossil fuels. …yet we are supposed to believe he legitimately shattered Obama's and Trump's records at the polls. One of these things is not like the other:

BHO


DJT


FJB





agz win
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You have to include the silent majority wanting Donald to be ousted and not have a second term. Biden was just the placeholder to fill the void.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Been a while since we had someone goal tending for election fraud on this thread.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agz win said:

You have to include the silent majority wanting Donald to be ousted and not have a second term. Biden was just the placeholder to fill the void.
yes we know the approved talking points- suburban women, blah blah blah bull spit
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well done Line Ate and Will25.

There are comments from posters sometimes that may be correct and factual, but just don't have enough information to back it up.

Y'all's comments support your posts, and are almost certainly factual and truthful.

It makes perfect sense.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




I gotta believe that cali number is going up due to all the conservative refugees moving away...
Bondag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ravingfans said:

will25u said:




I gotta believe that cali number is going up due to all the conservative refugees moving away...


And ballots sent to former republicans and returned as democrats.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Certainly. It's why it's foolish to buy the "ALL THESE CALIFORNIA TRANSPLANTS IN MY STATE ARE LIBRULS!!!" line of thinking.

California had six million Trump voters. Given the direction of the state, it's not unreasonable to think a lot of them might want to leave.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's plenty of ethically devoid liberals who will come to our state to enjoy our low cost of living while voting for the same crap that drove them out of California.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those people exist, too. But there is a misguided notion that they represent some supermajority of those leaving the state.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Way to go big Ron
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No really weird shapes there either from the picture
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Governor will just veto.
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Governor will just veto.


Has to still pass the PA house first. Article said the senate passed it 29 to 20. Do they have a 2/3rds requirement to override a veto? If so, they would need to gain 4 more votes to overcome an override...
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Getting a seat in states like NV and NH, along with the 2024 map, is what opens the door for a potential 60-seat GOP Senate in 2025.
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keegan99 said:

Getting a seat in states like NV and NH, along with the 2024 map, is what opens the door for a potential 60-seat GOP Senate in 2025.
Not if the elections don't get fixed...Trump destroyed Biden in 2020 and look where we're at. Have to fix that. Really pretty scary to see where we are at in just 15 months.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agcrock2005 said:

Keegan99 said:

Getting a seat in states like NV and NH, along with the 2024 map, is what opens the door for a potential 60-seat GOP Senate in 2025.
Not if the elections don't get fixed...Trump destroyed Biden in 2020 and look where we're at. Have to fix that. Really pretty scary to see where we are at in just 15 months.

Trump did plenty of destruction on himself and created a needlessly close election that the Dems swung with targeted ballot harvesting.
chjoak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agcrock2005 said:

Keegan99 said:

Getting a seat in states like NV and NH, along with the 2024 map, is what opens the door for a potential 60-seat GOP Senate in 2025.
Not if the elections don't get fixed...Trump destroyed Biden in 2020 and look where we're at. Have to fix that. Really pretty scary to see where we are at in just 15 months.
MUCH easier to cheat in a national election vs local. The methods that they used (MIB, Ballot Harvesting & Zuckerbucks) will be significantly harder to pull off in midterms.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You meant to say the Dems swung the election by breaking the law, correct?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So tired of this shtick. He got 6 million more votes than he did in 2016.

If he got 16 million more, the dems would have printed more illegal ballots to count and he still would have lost.

If we were counting only legal ballots (including chain of custody, sig verification, non-dead people voting, etc), it was not a close election.

If the Koch brothers were caught spending half a billion dollars on helping administer the vote counting process (including provisions to take the money back if the precincts didn't break their own election laws) in multiple swing states around the country and mysteriously, after being blown tf out election night, having Donald Trump win days later, we would never hear the end of it from the dems.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is no evidence that there was some massive number of fabricated ballots. Votes were backed by real voters, though there is strong evidence of targeted harvesting and trafficking. There is an upper bound to what those methods are capable of achieving, and it's likely the Dems were very near it.

You run a candidate that has 50%+ negatives with the electorate and it's going to be needlessly difficult to win, and create opportunities for targeted efforts that will affect the outcome. If Trump had negatives that were just in the 45% range, he wins the election going away, no matter what the Dems do.

Sorry. But that's reality.

I voted for Trump, but you need to interact with persuadable moderate voters more often if you cannot see his considerable warts.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bigger worts than mean tweets are crooked fake news media and globalist big tech platform monopolies running interference for their guy who they thought would be friendlier to China for them.

What are Trump's real bad worts? Being mean and unpresidential to ******* fake news people like Jim Acosta or corrupt career swamp rats? Because record gdp growth, record low unemployment, no new wars, M.E. peace deals, etc. are not worts.

If we don't have fake news Russia Russia Russia for years, which was actually DNC corruption along with media corruption, population division by Marxist groups like blm, Marxist population division by politicizing everything related to the pandemic, censorship of actual proof of Biden's long suspected and obvious corruption, along with the uncontrolled, insecure, un-auditable mass mail-in ballot blasting and harvesting, then we wouldn't be in this mess with an illegitimate decrepit old empty suit in office intentionally destroying this country with America last in every exec order and policy decision.
First Page Last Page
Page 564 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.