Breaking: looks like NY Dems are proposing a 22D-4R map, a bit less aggressive gerrymander than the 23D-3R DCCC/Marc Elias had pushed for, but likely more secure in a "red wave."
— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) January 30, 2022
*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****
2,694,380 Views |
20889 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
NYTimes thread/article.
Donors and allies of the Democratic Party, spurred by opposition to President Trump, embraced dark money with fresh zeal in 2020, surpassing Republicans in spending by some measures, according to a New York Times analysis.https://t.co/acSVoSwgHM pic.twitter.com/SuRRvbgpcf
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 29, 2022
58% say cheating was likely in the 2020 elections
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) January 30, 2022
69% against Zuckerbucks type private election spending
76% say Photo ID is reasonable to prevent cheating
90% say it is important to prevent cheating
ALL of these results are exclusively f/ INDEPENDENTShttps://t.co/sTGQoPrfno
** BREAKING BOMBSHELL** Dinesh D'Souza Releases Movie Trailer for "2000 Mules" Exposing Ballot Traffickers Who Stole the 2020 Election https://t.co/PolW4qMMpB
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) January 31, 2022
This would be a game changer if the MSM would pick it up, and if social media wouldn't censor it.will25u said:** BREAKING BOMBSHELL** Dinesh D'Souza Releases Movie Trailer for "2000 Mules" Exposing Ballot Traffickers Who Stole the 2020 Election https://t.co/PolW4qMMpB
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) January 31, 2022
It's been widely reported PA Court struck no-fault mail-in voting, but that PA S.Ct. will likely overturn. But not covered is the WHY. Here's your lawsplainer & why a non-partisan PA S.Ct. would affirm. @FDRLST https://t.co/HavhjD8rLl
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) January 31, 2022
Right...like that's going to happen! There will be calls for censorship incoming in 3..2..1...agcrock2005 said:This would be a game changer if the MSM would pick it up, and if social media wouldn't censor it.will25u said:** BREAKING BOMBSHELL** Dinesh D'Souza Releases Movie Trailer for "2000 Mules" Exposing Ballot Traffickers Who Stole the 2020 Election https://t.co/PolW4qMMpB
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) January 31, 2022
It'll be labeled as misinformation just like everything a liberal disagrees with. Facts are inconsequential .
From 1,600 UOCAVA ballots in 2016 to 9,600 UOCAVA ballots in 2020.
will25u
More evidence of massive fraud.
More evidence of massive fraud.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
aggiehawg
And more evidence of massive fraud. These state legislators need to enact laws preventing this BS way before the 2022 midterms. Any legislation passed will be immediately taken to court by the Democratic Party leadership and most likely injunctions given.
Anyone voting for any Democratic candidate should reconsider their voting preferences immediately.
And more evidence of massive fraud. These state legislators need to enact laws preventing this BS way before the 2022 midterms. Any legislation passed will be immediately taken to court by the Democratic Party leadership and most likely injunctions given.
Anyone voting for any Democratic candidate should reconsider their voting preferences immediately.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
aggiehawg said:
From 1,600 UOCAVA ballots in 2016 to 9,600 UOCAVA ballots in 2020.
The statistic that stood out to me as bizarre was that the 9600 UOCAVA ballots from Maricopa accounted for more than 20% of all UOCAVA ballots NATIONWIDE.
WTH?
Just remember how quickly the Gore campaign dissed military ballots in 2000, that is until Lieberman spoke up and said that was wrong.richardag said:
aggiehawg
And more evidence of massive fraud. These state legislators need to enact laws preventing this BS way before the 2022 midterms. Any legislation passed will be immediately taken to court by the Democratic Party leadership and most likely injunctions given.
Anyone voting for any Democratic candidate should reconsider their voting preferences immediately.
But what is confusing to me here is that there is contradictory evidence. For those votes to be scanned, they are supposed to be duplicated with matching numbers. IOW, when a ballot is emailed to SoS' office, email printed out, and then forwarded to the applicable county. At the county level, they match the name of the service member to registered voter to verify, then assign an unique number and transpose the votes on the email to an actual ballot, again with an identifying number so they can be matched.
Very early on in the Maricopa audit, they were complaining that they could not match up duplicated ballots with either spoiled or UOCAVA or even the Braille ballots with their duplicates because the identifying numbers were missing. As those ballots in their original form could not be scanned, thus the need to transpose them onto an actual ballot that could be scanned. Especially the Braille ballots as those are actual thick binders.
Didn't he also say that almost all of the 8x11 ballots with no chain of custody were for one candidate?aggiehawg said:Just remember how quickly the Gore campaign dissed military ballots in 2000, that is until Lieberman spoke up and said that was wrong.richardag said:
aggiehawg
And more evidence of massive fraud. These state legislators need to enact laws preventing this BS way before the 2022 midterms. Any legislation passed will be immediately taken to court by the Democratic Party leadership and most likely injunctions given.
Anyone voting for any Democratic candidate should reconsider their voting preferences immediately.
But what is confusing to me here is that there is contradictory evidence. For those votes to be scanned, they are supposed to be duplicated with matching numbers. IOW, when a ballot is emailed to SoS' office, email printed out, and then forwarded to the applicable county. At the county level, they match the name of the service member to registered voter to verify, then assign an unique number and transpose the votes on the email to an actual ballot, again with an identifying number so they can be matched.
Very early on in the Maricopa audit, they were complaining that they could not match up duplicated ballots with either spoiled or UOCAVA or even the Braille ballots with their duplicates because the identifying numbers were missing. As those ballots in their original form could not be scanned, thus the need to transpose them onto an actual ballot that could be scanned. Especially the Braille ballots as those are actual thick binders.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Yes, he did. Same thing happened in Fulton County in Georgia, according to Suzi Voyles. She said those ballots appeared to have been printed with ovals "stamped" in rather than filled in by hand. Which is what you expect for UOCAVA ballots to be duplicated by hand onto a scannable ballot.Quote:
Didn't he also say that almost all of the 8x11 ballots with no chain of custody were for one candidate?
it will be telling if AZ gets voter confidence bills passed - to see that UOCAVA number in Maricopa Cty drop back closer to 2016 levels. That's crazy it went from 1500 to almost 10,000 from 16 to '20.
Also, 1,600 ballots in 2016. 9,600 ballots in 2020
Quote:
Paul Harris: The UOCAVA is the Uniform Overseas Civilian Absentee Voting Act ballot. That ballot is sent out to men and women who work overseas and the people who work overseas to get a chance to work in the election. This is what a ballot looks like that goes out, an 11 1/2 X 19 ballot. When I opened up a box of ballots this is what a ballot looks like that's a UOCAVA ballot. You know what that is? It's an 8 1/2 X 11 sheet of copy paper.
https://djhjmedia.com/steven/testimony-claims-that-democrats-were-stealing-overseas-and-military-ballots-from-michigan-georgia-and-now-arizona-video/Quote:
Paul Harris continued: "Did you all know that our ballots come back like this from our overseas people? Did any of you know this? It is such a sham that I had people everyday at my table taking pictures of these ballots that were scanned down. It took my team three complete days to count all of the UOCAVA ballots. You know why? Because in 2016 the numbers were apparently 1,600 UOCAVA ballots that came back in the most significant election in our lifetime. In 2020 the numbers were close to 9,600 ballots that came back. And I will tell you as an eye-witness, 95%… all went towards one candidate. And in a state where a candidate won by 10,000 votes that is 8,000 new votes during an election where people were brought home because there was a pandemic… No chain of custody. There's nothing to identify where this piece of paper came from.
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/25000-counterfeit-ballots-included-in-maricopa-audit/
"World Renowned Forensic Document Analyst Erich Speckin who has testified in over 2,000 cases spanning 33 states and 5 continents claims that 25,000 counterfeit ballots were counted in the Maricopa audit."
P.S. ARIZONA - Democratic votes - 10,457 winning votes
The guy in the 10min clip throws Runbeck Election Services under the bus. For those that may not remember who they are, look at the first page of links to see what their story is (highly questionable firm): https://duckduckgo.com/?q=runbeck+election+services&t=brave&ia=web
"World Renowned Forensic Document Analyst Erich Speckin who has testified in over 2,000 cases spanning 33 states and 5 continents claims that 25,000 counterfeit ballots were counted in the Maricopa audit."
P.S. ARIZONA - Democratic votes - 10,457 winning votes
The guy in the 10min clip throws Runbeck Election Services under the bus. For those that may not remember who they are, look at the first page of links to see what their story is (highly questionable firm): https://duckduckgo.com/?q=runbeck+election+services&t=brave&ia=web
I know many people that would rather have COVID than President Biden.
I would love to see the breakdown of who each vote was casted for as well as all down ticket votes.peacedude said:
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/25000-counterfeit-ballots-included-in-maricopa-audit/
"World Renowned Forensic Document Analyst Erich Speckin who has testified in over 2,000 cases spanning 33 states and 5 continents claims that 25,000 counterfeit ballots were counted in the Maricopa audit."
P.S. ARIZONA - Democratic votes - 10,457 winning votes
The guy in the 10min clip throws Runbeck Election Services under the bus. For those that may not remember who they are, look at the first page of links to see what their story is (highly questionable firm): https://duckduckgo.com/?q=runbeck+election+services&t=brave&ia=web
it would be racist jim crow 2.0 to have an audit trail for every ballot to ensure they were legal votes though.
More shenanigans with nearly 800,000 ballots (of the mail in kind) at the last second in Fulton County being requested from Runbeck.
Link
Link
It *would* surprise me if 20% of the ballots were 100% aligned with whom the voter actually voted for. The mindset was Biden or bust when it comes to Rubneck's services, so hardly anything would've been copacetic.
On top of that (per hawg's link above), they had hundreds of thousands of spare ballots laying around in GA. They were apparently just-in-case ballots (no pun), so nothing to see there, either...
"Fortified," as Time put it.
On top of that (per hawg's link above), they had hundreds of thousands of spare ballots laying around in GA. They were apparently just-in-case ballots (no pun), so nothing to see there, either...
"Fortified," as Time put it.
Anybody remember Mesa County CO clerk, Tina Peters? The one who took a forensic image of her election equipment both before and after the state mandated an overhaul? And those images showed election records from the 2020 election were missing in the after image. Illegal under both state and federal law.
Here's another.
Here's another.
Quote:
On Monday, January 24, 2022, Jena Griswold was having a very bad day.
As everyone should know by now, Jena is facing a pretty explosive lawsuit from elected officials around the state of Colorado. If you need to catch up, you can read about that here: Griswold is in Hot Water
A big part of that case is the saga of Tina Peters and Mesa County, so you should read up on that as well, especially if you're new to Colorado's role in the stolen election on November 3, 2020.
The case, Hanks et al v. Griswold was filed in November of 2021 in the City and County of Denver District Court, and Griswold's lawyers recently filed a motion to dismiss, on standing, what they cannot defend, on substance.
In response to Griswold's motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs filed new evidence in the case, disclosing the existence of a second forensic image in Elbert County, Colorado, and requesting a court order to have it forensically examined to confirm what cyber experts found in Mesa: destruction of election records, an uncertifiable, non-compliant voting system, and a coffin-nail in the unwarranted "gold standard" refrain. :
Quote:
n an affidavit signed by Clerk Schroeder, he explains his actions:Elbert County Clerk & Recorder Dallas Schroeder, January 7, 2022 said:
"I was told that there was evidence that the 'trusted build' process that was performed on Mesa County's Dominion voting system during May of 2021, had erased electronic files that were part of the 2020 election records. This information was concerning, because I have a legal duty to retain election records for 25 months after every election. The purpose of retaining the records is so that a proper audit of an election can be performed. I was concerned that the 'trusted build' process might erase electronic election records from the Elbert County elections systems, which would violate state law."
LinkQuote:
The basis of the plaintiffs' claims is filed with the court and has been provided to Secretary Griswold's counsel, and directly to her before that. It's a stack of government documents, either publicly posted or obtained through open records requests. And it's damning.
In other words, not only ought Griswold to know better, she DOES know better. But this isn't her first time making false statements to the public. More on that in a minute.
For the Clerk to take a forensic image of the machines, particularly when there are concerns that the updates the vendor is conducting will destroy election records and evidence, is not a violation of any security protocol or, more importantly, legal statute. It is, in fact, the Clerk's statutory responsibility to preserve election records for 25 months according to Colorado law. Clerk Schroeder, like Clerk Peters, was doing his job.
The map gives Dems a 22-4 advantage for NY's 26 seats. The voter breakdown in New York in 2020 (62% for Dems) would have predicted just a 16-10 advantage. In case you thought they cared about election integrity https://t.co/KGpPYA1uzJ
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 4, 2022
Holds Breath (2s):will25u said:The map gives Dems a 22-4 advantage for NY's 26 seats. The voter breakdown in New York in 2020 (62% for Dems) would have predicted just a 16-10 advantage. In case you thought they cared about election integrity https://t.co/KGpPYA1uzJ
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 4, 2022
Emails + docs obtained @CBSNews suggest there were multiple versions of draft orders calling for the seizure of voting machines after the presidential election that were not acted on. A December 17, 2020 draft order would have empowered the DHS Secretary. pic.twitter.com/OzOxuAgQCv
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) February 4, 2022
will25u said:The map gives Dems a 22-4 advantage for NY's 26 seats. The voter breakdown in New York in 2020 (62% for Dems) would have predicted just a 16-10 advantage. In case you thought they cared about election integrity https://t.co/KGpPYA1uzJ
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 4, 2022
New York state Constitution Article III, § 4(c)(5) is quite clear. Districts shall not be drawn to discourage competition or for the purposes of favoring or disfavoring political parties. pic.twitter.com/xmTu9csVCx
— RRH Elections (@RRHElections) February 4, 2022
will25u said:Emails + docs obtained @CBSNews suggest there were multiple versions of draft orders calling for the seizure of voting machines after the presidential election that were not acted on. A December 17, 2020 draft order would have empowered the DHS Secretary. pic.twitter.com/OzOxuAgQCv
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) February 4, 2022
I'm kind of torn between two types of corruption, although like most things, it's probably a combination.
In the last six years, government employees have been acting on their own with genuine malice for all policies they despise, or there is a shot caller who is not elected.
I don't doubt 90% of government employees despise conservatives and feel reasonably safe acting on their own, but there have been , at least 100 of these types acts (that we know of) in the last 6 years across all areas of our government, there HAS to be one, or maybe two, shot callers atop the corruption pyramid.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
This is backed by data.
This doesn't matter for any state not afflicted by the various Federal voting acts. Those were once necessary, but clearly haven't been since at least the 90's.will25u said:will25u said:The map gives Dems a 22-4 advantage for NY's 26 seats. The voter breakdown in New York in 2020 (62% for Dems) would have predicted just a 16-10 advantage. In case you thought they cared about election integrity https://t.co/KGpPYA1uzJ
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 4, 2022New York state Constitution Article III, § 4(c)(5) is quite clear. Districts shall not be drawn to discourage competition or for the purposes of favoring or disfavoring political parties. pic.twitter.com/xmTu9csVCx
— RRH Elections (@RRHElections) February 4, 2022
fasthorse05 said:will25u said:Emails + docs obtained @CBSNews suggest there were multiple versions of draft orders calling for the seizure of voting machines after the presidential election that were not acted on. A December 17, 2020 draft order would have empowered the DHS Secretary. pic.twitter.com/OzOxuAgQCv
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) February 4, 2022
I'm kind of torn between two types of corruption, although like most things, it's probably a combination.
In the last six years, government employees have been acting on their own with genuine malice for all policies they despise, or there is a shot caller who is not elected.
I don't doubt 90% of government employees despise conservatives and feel reasonably safe acting on their own, but there have been , at least 100 of these types acts (that we know of) in the last 6 years across all areas of our government, there HAS to be one, or maybe two, shot callers atop the corruption pyramid.
Careful there… accusations like that can get you Arkancided.
The CBS guy behind the desk seems appalled that the federal government considered getting involved in "states' elections". Bet his reporting on Biden's election bill is a complete 180.
that ****ing cbs guy... "of course, there was NO evidence of fraud".
It's (D)ifferent.Sterling82 said:
The CBS guy behind the desk seems appalled that the federal government considered getting involved in "states' elections". Bet his reporting on Biden's election bill is a complete 180.
There's few things that make me loathe the corrupt Democrat party, their propagandists. and their brainless voters, more than their hypocritical acceptance of double standards.
I've always wondered how many of the talking heads actually know anything about the information their producers tell them to report.
Those looks of "shock" are probably genuine, I'm sorry to say.
Those looks of "shock" are probably genuine, I'm sorry to say.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
This is backed by data.
And the lefties will all get the vapors because someones wrote some memos.will25u said:Emails + docs obtained @CBSNews suggest there were multiple versions of draft orders calling for the seizure of voting machines after the presidential election that were not acted on. A December 17, 2020 draft order would have empowered the DHS Secretary. pic.twitter.com/OzOxuAgQCv
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) February 4, 2022
I'm sure we'll be treated to a couple of Act Blue threads over it.
Featured Stories
See All
Presenting Texas Aggies United's 'Florida Slam Dunk' Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
'Pretty Aggressive': Trisha Ford aims to build on success in 2025
by Kolton Becker
68:03
1d ago
8.0k
31:42
7h ago
934