4 days after election, 95% illegible signatures.
4 weeks before election 5% illegible signatures.
4 weeks before election 5% illegible signatures.
*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****
2,701,003 Views |
20889 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
Signiture legibility flipped from 95/5 legible sig/illegible sigs 4 weeks prior to election to to 5/95 leg/il in 4 days after the election.
53% More EVB's in 2020 over 2016
56% Fewer bad signatures reported in 2020 than in 2016
In every scenario, ever, error rates are cut in half when you increase total count by over 50%......
56% Fewer bad signatures reported in 2020 than in 2016
In every scenario, ever, error rates are cut in half when you increase total count by over 50%......
When you are signing thousands at a time, your handwriting tends to get a bit sloppy...will25u said:
4 days after election, 95% illegible signatures.
4 weeks before election 5% illegible signatures.
96% of ballots that came in nov8-9 were duplicates.
This alone is enough to decertify.will25u said:
96% of ballots that came in nov8-9 were duplicates.
BadMoonRisin said:
Signiture legibility flipped from 95/5 legible sig/illegible sigs 4 weeks prior to election to to 5/95 leg/il in 4 days after the election.
bad signatures in the red line over time
Pure signature blanks being approved for ballots coming in after the election. Runbeck again.
Wow.aggiehawg said:
Pure signature blanks being approved for ballots coming in after the election. Runbeck again.
How did the approval stamps get behind the printed ballot?
Oh ****, these "Verified / Approved " stamps are photoshopped? ballot image tampering?
How the hell do you rubber stamp something UNDER the printed surface?
Now I want to know who the bad actors were and I want them shot ... dead!
He's not saying they were photoshopped. But he's not saying they weren't photoshopped either.BadMoonRisin said:
Oh ****, these "Verified / Approved " stamps are photoshopped? ballot image tampering?
~10% of all ballots had approval stamps.
you can't triple stamp a no eraseyAmerican Hardwood said:
How the hell do you rubber stamp something UNDER the printed surface?
That's suspect af!We fixed the keg said:
How did the approval stamps get behind the printed ballot?
This is infuriating.
DAMN...THEY WERE SLOPPY
....and yet there are so many who don't care, disgusting, infuriating, sad, {Insert synonym here}Tom Kazansky 2012 said:
This is infuriating.
Didn't he say this was found on ballots after Nov 4th? Could it be mailed before election day but Maricopa didn't get it from Runbeck until afterwards? Seems sketchy though.We fixed the keg said:
~10% of all ballots had approval stamps.
Yeah, this guy couldn't pass super-poster's math test....
he did. Something to the effect of "most", but yeah, sketchy. I think that is why he mentioned "SOP" multiple times. As in, if there is a process that supports this data....provide it.TRM said:Didn't he say this was found on ballots after Nov 4th? Could it be mailed before election day but Maricopa didn't get it from Runbeck until afterwards? Seems sketchy though.We fixed the keg said:
~10% of all ballots had approval stamps.
So, what you're saying is you're good at Excel.We fixed the keg said:
Yeah, this guy couldn't pass super-poster's math test....
Jan Bryant was an observer in the counting center for six days after the election. Several times they were told they were nearly done with counting only to have more boxes of ballots arriving overnight. When she asked where those ballots were coming, she was told by the supervisors that they were coming from Runbeck because they had "faster scanners."TRM said:Didn't he say this was found on ballots after Nov 4th? Could it be mailed before election day but Maricopa didn't get it from Runbeck until afterwards? Seems sketchy though.We fixed the keg said:
~10% of all ballots had approval stamps.
Well, nobody had ever done a forensic audit before. They weren't worried about getting caught.Whitetail said:
DAMN...THEY WERE SLOPPY
Compared to this guys background, I would even be nervous to make that claim.Whitetail said:So, what you're saying is you're good at Excel.We fixed the keg said:
Yeah, this guy couldn't pass super-poster's math test....
Here comes Logan from Cyber Ninjas.
They didn't consider that smart people would get to take a look.Whitetail said:
DAMN...THEY WERE SLOPPY
Maricopa county Twitter has been silent since the start of this proceeding. Wonder what they have to say about Dr Shiva testimony.
But Dr Shiva has receipts so I bet they keep their mouth shut about his testimony
But Dr Shiva has receipts so I bet they keep their mouth shut about his testimony
I bet they will pull a Kamala and answer the question they imagined they would be asked.
Well, Part I was eye opening. So the rest should be equally as informative.
2 petabytes of data collected by Cyber Ninjas
2e+15
22,000 4k movies or 5 years of non-stop, binge watching of 4k movies according to the intrawebz.
2e+15
22,000 4k movies or 5 years of non-stop, binge watching of 4k movies according to the intrawebz.
Well they're f***ing democrats and they know nothing will ever happen to them and that the ends justify the means so....they're right. Why be clean about it?Whitetail said:
DAMN...THEY WERE SLOPPY
Say this audit keeps revealing blatant cheating on a grand scale and numerous conspiracies...so what? If I was an evil godless democrat, I'd be quick and sloppy too...no reason to waste time.
Agnes Moffitt Rollin 60's - RIP Casper and Lil Ricky - FREE GOOFY AND LUCKY!
Featured Stories
See All
33:11
3h ago
1.7k
Happy Valentine's Day from TexAgs
by Stewart Wade
39:06
4h ago
2.2k
Series Preview: Top-ranked Aggies host Elon for Opening Weekend
by Richard Zane
Scouting Report: No. 8 Texas A&M vs. Arkansas
by Tom Schuberth
Ford & Co. crush UCF on second day of Clearwater Invitational, 9-1
by Kolton Becker