1 PM Arizona Time (which this time of year means PDT)
No proof. Ergo, most secure election EVER!!! Now, stop being a conspiracy theorist domestic terrorist threat to democracy by asking questions.American Hardwood said:
I'd like to see one you number crunchers please tell me what the odds are that 10,000+ people out of the 2.1 million in Maricopa County share the same first, middle, and last names as well as birth year against the Arizona total population.
LinkQuote:
Attorney General Mark Brnovich released the following statement regarding the Arizona Senate's draft report regarding the 2020 Election Audit in Maricopa County:The Arizona Attorney General's Office (AGO) has an Election Integrity Unit (EIU) that will thoroughly review the Senate's information and evidence. The AGO cannot comment on specific allegations until its review is complete. For more on EIU actions, click here.Quote:
"I will take all necessary actions that are supported by the evidence and where I have legal authority. Arizonans deserve to have their votes accurately counted and protected." Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich
Attorney General Brnovich has taken numerous actions over the past year fighting for election integrity in Arizona, recently winning at the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Brnovich v. DNC. General Brnovich also consistently supported the Senate's authority to conduct the audit, and in December 2020 the AGO filed an amicus brief supporting the Senate's subpoena authority. General Brnovich also called for an increase in the hand count audit by Maricopa County back in November of 2020 to increase voter confidence in the results.
will25u said:
About to start.
Open the link directly in youtube.will25u said:
Truth is Truth, numbers are numbers.
ETA: Is TexAgs running slow for anyone else? Or is it just me?
Texas begins full forensic audit of 2020 election results in FOUR counties, including Dallas 🚨🚨🚨https://t.co/dZrW1yBVYa
— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) September 24, 2021
I have the youtube opened in a new window. I was talking about TexAgs in general.dubi said:Open the link directly in youtube.will25u said:
Truth is Truth, numbers are numbers.
ETA: Is TexAgs running slow for anyone else? Or is it just me?
will25u said:Texas begins full forensic audit of 2020 election results in FOUR counties, including Dallas 🚨🚨🚨https://t.co/dZrW1yBVYa
— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) September 24, 2021
Fork over millions of $ and send in your NY, DC, and CA attorneys Dems. You've got another audit to fight and discredit because you're so sure of the most secure election EVER!!!Quote:
Although Trump supporters and fellow Republicans are standing by the governor and his commitment to the audit, the state's Democrat party isn't as supportive.
the numbers you were asking about....aggiehawg said:
Dr. Shiva is first. Ballot envelopes is his topic.
Hard to believe that out of 1,917,008 ballots going through signature verification only 587 were tossed for bad signatures. And that was in only Maricopa County.We fixed the keg said:the numbers you were asking about....aggiehawg said:
Dr. Shiva is first. Ballot envelopes is his topic.
I love to watch stuff live, but 2X is partially why I don't schedule my life around such events anymore. Much nicer to catch this all in half the time.We fixed the keg said:
anyone else wish they could 1.5x the live feed?
34,448 duplicates from17,322 unique voters. How the hell would that get past Runbeck?We fixed the keg said:
duplicates alone larger than the margin of victory.
over 17,000
I may be wrong, but I believe they were duplicated AFTER Runbeck....As in received by MCBE and scanned multiple times (the 2x, 3x, and 4x slide)aggiehawg said:34,448 duplicates from17,322 unique voters. How the hell would that get past Runbeck?We fixed the keg said:
duplicates alone larger than the margin of victory.
over 17,000
Point being, the bar codes assigned to unique voters on the outer envelope, scanned before mailing and then scanned when returned. By scanned I don't mean images are made just the check for the weight and the bar codes.We fixed the keg said:I may be wrong, but I believe they were duplicated AFTER Runbeck....As in received by MCBE and scanned multiple times (the 2x, 3x, and 4x slide)aggiehawg said:34,448 duplicates from17,322 unique voters. How the hell would that get past Runbeck?We fixed the keg said:
duplicates alone larger than the margin of victory.
over 17,000
Gotcha. I have another question....how do the duplicates end up with one having a signature and the other no signature? Were there blanks being used to manually duplicated?aggiehawg said:Point being, the bar codes assigned to unique voters on the outer envelope, scanned before mailing and then scanned when returned. By scanned I don't mean images are made just the check for the weight and the bar codes.We fixed the keg said:I may be wrong, but I believe they were duplicated AFTER Runbeck....As in received by MCBE and scanned multiple times (the 2x, 3x, and 4x slide)aggiehawg said:34,448 duplicates from17,322 unique voters. How the hell would that get past Runbeck?We fixed the keg said:
duplicates alone larger than the margin of victory.
over 17,000
No idea.We fixed the keg said:Gotcha. I have another question....how do the duplicates end up with one having a signature and the other no signature? Were there blanks being used to manually duplicated?aggiehawg said:Point being, the bar codes assigned to unique voters on the outer envelope, scanned before mailing and then scanned when returned. By scanned I don't mean images are made just the check for the weight and the bar codes.We fixed the keg said:I may be wrong, but I believe they were duplicated AFTER Runbeck....As in received by MCBE and scanned multiple times (the 2x, 3x, and 4x slide)aggiehawg said:34,448 duplicates from17,322 unique voters. How the hell would that get past Runbeck?We fixed the keg said:
duplicates alone larger than the margin of victory.
over 17,000