Booma94 said:

---

Interesting to see how this ties in with the compromised voter rolls in each state. Were the organizations using the voter rolls to complete ballots for registered voters who hadn't voted, or for those not likely to vote. Surely there is a cross reference to ballots collected from drop boxes and ballots from in-person voting. It would interesting to see how many duplicate voters were discovered in the audit and if they occurred at any of these suspected ballot drop locations.

---

A couple of things to note. In Georgia there are ballots from drop boxes that have no chain of custody documents. By that I mean, there's no way to tell where they even came from.

But you correct that both the entire states voters rolls were stolen or otherwise compromised in Georgia and Arizona before the 2020 election.

And then you have election support companies such as Runbeck in Maricopa County that always have access to the voter rolls for printing, folding and mailing mail in ballots. (Runbeck also had the Fulton County, GA contract for mail in ballots, BTW.) The way Runbeck does their mail in ballots is that they assign a unique bar code to each voter from the voter rolls. When those ballots are mailed back in they are delivered back to Runbeck who rescans them looking for that bar code to match up with the original mailing list. After that, Runbeck delivers the ballots to the counting centers. At any given time, they know who has and hasn't voted yet. (Runbeck also conveniently offers ballot drop box services to monitor and pick up those contents and bring them back to Runbeck to be scanned.)

Now knowing all of that, recall the testimony of election worker, Jan Bryant wo was in the counting center in Maricopa County for the week after the election. She testified that over the course of several days after the election that they thought they were done counting or would be by the next morning, only to have more ballots arrive overnight. When she asked the supervisors how many outstanding ballots were left, they didn't know.

How could they not know? She wondered and then asked where all these late ballots were coming from and she was told they were coming from Runbeck because "they had faster scanners."

How we got to the point where our entire election has been outsourced to private electronic voting companies, printing, mailing, counting, ballot harvesting via drop boxes companies is a scandal.

The private contractor fraud is a feature, not a bug.

JamesE4 said:

---

The private contractor fraud is a feature, not a bug.

---

I'm big fan of the Showtime series Billions. Hedge funds that more often than not have insider info. Being able to accurately predict election outcomes because of the rigging would seem to me to be valuable information, valuable insider information. Like SEC worthy insider information.

But guess what? They are all privately owned companies. Not under SEC purview. They can sell whatever information they want. (Except the actual voter rolls. That's illegal but also likely untraceable as well.)

aggiehawg said:

---

. . . . . . . . .

How could they not know? She wondered and then asked where all these late ballots were coming from and she was told they were coming from Runbeck because "they had faster scanners."
. . . . . . . . . .

---

"they had fast scanners"

Not fast enough if ballots coming in days after the election.

🚨DISCOVERY IN WISCONSIN🚨

1) This is a page of a contract signed by the Green Bay Mayor’s Chief of Staff that directs the Hyatt NOT to let anyone in the room where the absentee ballots are until Michael Spritzer-Rubenstein (an Obama operative) arrives. pic.twitter.com/ZsAZFBsqh2

— Jennifer Asper (@j3669) September 4, 2021

richardag said:

---

oh no said:

---

🚨DISCOVERY IN WISCONSIN🚨

1) This is a page of a contract signed by the Green Bay Mayor’s Chief of Staff that directs the Hyatt NOT to let anyone in the room where the absentee ballots are until Michael Spritzer-Rubenstein (an Obama operative) arrives. pic.twitter.com/ZsAZFBsqh2

— Jennifer Asper (@j3669) September 4, 2021

---

For more information:
Green Bay's Handling of Presidential Election Violated At Least Five Laws
March 12, 2021

Perspective by Dan O'Donnell

Quote:

---

Just how lawless was the City of Green Bay's handling of November's presidential election? It clearly violated at least five state statutes, and Mayor Eric Genrich may have personally committed felony misconduct in public office.

---

---

I counted Four. Must have missed one. When does he start his trial and his Jail Time???


1. "First of all there was no consistency how the various tables were processing absentee ballots," Juno testified. "Opened ballots were face up exposing votes, and poll workers were observed reviewing how the ballots were marked."

This constitutes election fraud under Wis. Stat. 12.13 (2)(b), which provides that "no election official may "observe how an elector has marked a ballot unless the official is requested to assist the elector" or "intentionally permit anyone not authorized to assist in the marking of a ballot to observe how a person is voting or has voted." Doing so is a Class I felony punishable by up to 3 years in prison.

2. "The physical location where they were placed does not meet state statutes. This was in direct violation of election laws. Observers had no opportunity to hear absentee electors' names, observe within legal distance to see ballots being processed, rejected or remade, or challenge questionable electors' ballots."

Wis. Stat. 7.41(2) requires that "observation areas shall be not less than 3 feet from nor more than 8 feet from the table at which electors announce their name and address to be issued a voter number at the polling place, office, or alternate site and not less than 3 feet from nor more than 8 feet from the table at which a person may register to vote at the polling place, office, or alternate site. The observation areas shall be so positioned to permit any election observer to readily observe all public aspects of the voting process."

3. Genrich himself bears the ultimate responsibility for this lawless debacle, and it very well included him personally committing a felony. When he essentially replaced Teske with himself and delegated some of her duties to Spitzer-Rubenstein, Genrich may have committed misconduct in public office, which is defined by Wis. Stat. 946.12(2) as performing an act "which the officer or employee knows is in excess of the officer's or employee's lawful authority."

4. If he did so to in order to help a preferred candidate or candidates, he very well may have violated Wis. Stat. 946.12(3), which prohibits the exercise of "a discretionary power in a manner inconsistent with the duties of the officer's or employee's office or employment or the rights of others and with intent to obtain a dishonest advantage for the officer or employee or another."

ravingfans said:

---

richardag said:

---

oh no said:

---

🚨DISCOVERY IN WISCONSIN🚨

1) This is a page of a contract signed by the Green Bay Mayor’s Chief of Staff that directs the Hyatt NOT to let anyone in the room where the absentee ballots are until Michael Spritzer-Rubenstein (an Obama operative) arrives. pic.twitter.com/ZsAZFBsqh2

— Jennifer Asper (@j3669) September 4, 2021

---

For more information:
Green Bay's Handling of Presidential Election Violated At Least Five Laws
March 12, 2021

Perspective by Dan O'Donnell

Quote:

---

Just how lawless was the City of Green Bay's handling of November's presidential election? It clearly violated at least five state statutes, and Mayor Eric Genrich may have personally committed felony misconduct in public office.

---

---

I counted Four. Must have missed one. When does he start his trial and his Jail Time???


1. "First of all there was no consistency how the various tables were processing absentee ballots," Juno testified. "Opened ballots were face up exposing votes, and poll workers were observed reviewing how the ballots were marked."

This constitutes election fraud under Wis. Stat. 12.13 (2)(b), which provides that "no election official may "observe how an elector has marked a ballot unless the official is requested to assist the elector" or "intentionally permit anyone not authorized to assist in the marking of a ballot to observe how a person is voting or has voted." Doing so is a Class I felony punishable by up to 3 years in prison.

2. "The physical location where they were placed does not meet state statutes. This was in direct violation of election laws. Observers had no opportunity to hear absentee electors' names, observe within legal distance to see ballots being processed, rejected or remade, or challenge questionable electors' ballots."

Wis. Stat. 7.41(2) requires that "observation areas shall be not less than 3 feet from nor more than 8 feet from the table at which electors announce their name and address to be issued a voter number at the polling place, office, or alternate site and not less than 3 feet from nor more than 8 feet from the table at which a person may register to vote at the polling place, office, or alternate site. The observation areas shall be so positioned to permit any election observer to readily observe all public aspects of the voting process."

3. Genrich himself bears the ultimate responsibility for this lawless debacle, and it very well included him personally committing a felony. When he essentially replaced Teske with himself and delegated some of her duties to Spitzer-Rubenstein, Genrich may have committed misconduct in public office, which is defined by Wis. Stat. 946.12(2) as performing an act "which the officer or employee knows is in excess of the officer's or employee's lawful authority."

4. If he did so to in order to help a preferred candidate or candidates, he very well may have violated Wis. Stat. 946.12(3), which prohibits the exercise of "a discretionary power in a manner inconsistent with the duties of the officer's or employee's office or employment or the rights of others and with intent to obtain a dishonest advantage for the officer or employee or another."

---

Emails obtained by the Wisconsin Assembly's Committee on Campaigns and Elections and presented during a hearing Wednesday demonstrate that Genrich usurped the lawful authority of Green Bay City Clerk Kris Teske to run the election, thereby running afoul of Wisconsin Statute 7.15(1)'s requirement that "each municipal clerk has charge and supervision of elections and registration in the municipality."

captkirk said:

---

---

Has this been verified?

Link to the proof?

Keegan99 said:

---

Link to the proof?

---

The proof is the tweet! Just playing by the left's rules that is.

/sarcasm

Keegan99 said:

---

Link to the proof?

---

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3152743/replies/60053755

Bondag said:

---

Keegan99 said:

---

Link to the proof?

---

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3152743/replies/60053755

---

BOOM HEADSHOT

Hadn't seen this:
Audit finds Fulton County elections mismanaged money during 2020 races

Quote:

---

Channel 2 investigative reporter Sophia Choi got her hands on the audit. The county chairman believes it will be a key piece of evidence in the state investigation into Fulton's 2020 elections.
The nine-page review of Fulton County's recent elections by the county auditor includes a review of the much-contested 2020 presidential and Senate races.
It lists nine findings and one concern of misclassification of expenditures.
All of it deals with mismanaging finances and assets during the elections.
"Mismanagement. That's a lot different than malfeasance and wrongdoing on the part of Fulton County elections,' Fulton County Chairman Robb Pitts said.

---

County Chairman Robb Pitts should have said,"Nothing here to see"

I believe many people nationwide are getting tired of no one being held accountable. It's like Urkel saying,"opps, did I do that."

BREAKING HUGE: Results of Canvassing in Arizona Released ELECTION STEAL IS NOW CONFIRMED

HERE IT IS Full Report from Canvassing Work Completed in Arizona's Maricopa County

Quote:

---

• Lost votes are those votes where people voted but their votes were discarded.
• Ghost votes are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
• Dead voters accounted for a significant number of these anomalies.

---

Lost votes = 173,104
Ghost votes = 96,389

Tired of hearing breaking news / huge. There really needs to be accountability.

cover page of the report is a picture of a vacant lot registered to two mail-in votes that were cast.

Quote:

---

An estimated 173,104 votes are missing or lost, as reported to our volunteers who went door to door verifying registration and voting information for thousands of residents. These are American citizens living in Maricopa County who cast a vote, primarily by mail, in the election and yet there is no record of their vote with the county and it was not counted in the reported vote totals for the election. Additionally an estimated 96,389 mail-in votes were cast under the names of registered voters who were either unknown to the residents of the registration address or who were verified as having moved away prior to October 2020. Other irregularities were uncovered during the canvass at a smaller scale, including votes cast by mail from vacant lots, votes recorded from residents who had not actually voted

---

richardag said:

---

BREAKING HUGE: Results of Canvassing in Arizona Released ELECTION STEAL IS NOW CONFIRMED

HERE IT IS Full Report from Canvassing Work Completed in Arizona's Maricopa County

Quote:

---

• Lost votes are those votes where people voted but their votes were discarded.
• Ghost votes are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
• Dead voters accounted for a significant number of these anomalies.

---

Lost votes = 173,104
Ghost votes = 96,389

Tired of hearing breaking news / huge. There really needs to be accountability.

---

This work was done by Liz Harris. Hopefully the audit backs it up.

wasn't AZ's registration data "hacked" or "compromised" within the year before the election as well? Could have gotten into the hands of other bad actors or at least give Runbeck and Dominion someone else to blame. ....or am I thinking of another state (i think there were a few states) that had been hacked?

Can we start sending the guilty into exile or hanging them please?

oh no said:

---

wasn't AZ's registration data "hacked" or "compromised" within the year before the election as well? Could have gotten into the hands of other bad actors or at least give Runbeck and Dominion someone else to blame. ....or am I thinking of another state (i think there were a few states) that had been hacked?

---

Yes, voter rolls were compromised. But having done a deep dive into exactly what Runbeck does, their procedures as listed should have weeded those anomalous ballots out. Every mail in ballot is assigned a bar code on the outer envelope that is unique to each voter on the voter rolls. Duplications in addresses are also supposed to be flagged and double checked. Runbeck sends the ballots out and USPS returns them to Runbeck who then scan the entire ballot in their envelopes looking for the unique bar codes. They then have the list of which ballots were sent out and know down to the voter, which ballots have been returned.

All of that is before any signature validation takes place as well.

Point being even if there were rogue agents fabricating mail in ballots and putting them into the system, Runbeck should definitely be in position to detect it. (They also weigh all of the outgoing and incoming ballots. Any filled envelope that is outside of the stated parameters is supposed to be kicked out for further attention.)

Catching up on today's posts on the thread reminded me of this H.L. Mencken quote for some reason:

"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."

Prognightmare said:

---

You know, if this were to push some people over the edge and they exacted revenge, then I'd hang a jury before I'd convict them. This is where we're at now in America.

---

Alot of places would be better off if we could revise the practice of tarring and feather people who do crap like there before we ran them out of town on a rail.

agcrock2005 said:

---

What sucks is how huge this news is, and .10% of American's will hear about it.

---

fify

txags92 said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

You know, if this were to push some people over the edge and they exacted revenge, then I'd hang a jury before I'd convict them. This is where we're at now in America.

---

Alot of places would be better off if we could revise the practice of tarring and feather people who do crap like there before we ran them out of town on a rail.

---

We're past that now. There's no longer a real judicial system to settle grievances. That being said, should people snap and go postal, I wouldn't condemn them.

Prognightmare said:

---

txags92 said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

You know, if this were to push some people over the edge and they exacted revenge, then I'd hang a jury before I'd convict them. This is where we're at now in America.

---

Alot of places would be better off if we could revise the practice of tarring and feather people who do crap like there before we ran them out of town on a rail.

---

We're past that now. There's no longer a real judicial system to settle grievances. That being said, should people snap and go postal, I wouldn't condemn them.

---

they are baiting and waiting for this. Marxism 101. they need to use the next angry political opponent uprising to do ANYTHING, so they can point fingers and continue the division, vilification, and destruction of this country... they will first use it to take away guns from all political opponents and make them powerless. they wish some angry trump voters had guns on 1/6 or it would have already happened.