It takes a while to get an audit report finalized. A lot of back and forth on wording and presentation. Timing for this one doesn't concern me yet.
My prediction is that this report will be long on security weaknesses and control design gaps in every process, interface, and transmission, but short on hard evidence of actual fraud. Tracks are covered, evidence long gone (which will be addressed in the gaps noted in the report), certain logs and admin passwords weren't provided (which will also be addressed). The list will be long, though. The main findings with the design gaps and weaknesses deal with it being too easy to commit fraud and impossible to prevent or detect certain fraud schemes.
There are a lot of things that need to be fixed in order to restore some confidence so voters aren't so disenfranchised. Security of registration records, security of voting machines, tabulation machines, and transmissions, software design and configurations that allow way too much fraud risk, chain of custody logs and records, ballot design, signature verification for mailed-in ballots, adjudication records/logs and accountability -- there is fraud risk all over the place. The report will highlight the risks and gaps, and make some recommendations.
My first hope is that there actually is a ton of indisputable fraud evidence, heads roll, people revolt, MSM can't ignore it or brush it off as Russian disinformation, big tech can't censor it, and states start auditing counties and precincts across the country so elections become more secure before the 2022 mid-terms.
My more probable and realistic hope is that this thing at least spurs similar forensic audits as a catalyst for change and improving the systems and processes across the country.