*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,704,292 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's the twerpy kid in high school that was picked on by everyone and he developed a grudge to make others pay.
#FJB
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


I'm so glad that liberals are content with the ability of billionaires to purchase presidential elections in the United States. What could go wrong? How will they react when the purchase doesn't go the way they think it should? I don't see how one can be both an ethical person and a supporter of the current Democrat party.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Democrats have always been that way. It's just that now they are out of the closet for everybody to see and they don't care.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Volume up

Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We need more men like him.
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

Volume up


Shocked that I haven't seen that all over the MSM...
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damn!
Booma94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

Volume up


Is this in Harris County Commissioners Court? Weird, because Lina assures everyone Harris County voting is completely free of fraud.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We NEED more people like this
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good point. From Occupy Wallstreet in 2011 to cheering Zuckerbucks to defeat orange man in favor of a corrupt wall street puppet
Reload8098
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can anyone imagine a time, until the these last 10-15 years when a video like this wouldn't cause outrage across the whole country? We have sunk to a level where integrity is just a word in a dictionary.
The Justice department doesn't deserve to be called the "justice" department. What a laugher.. just department, FBI etc. are all corrupt.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


FWIW. Green Bay is in Brown County.
Aggieland Proud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just want to start seeing this snowball start rolling downhill. Tired of the shuffling around. I am getting impatient!!
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggieland Proud said:

I just want to start seeing this snowball start rolling downhill. Tired of the shuffling around. I am getting impatient!!
Me too, but worried that the swamp is too big.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Unearthed Paper Shows Biden-Linked Group Demanding 'Robust' Audits & Admitting Machines Are Hackable Even Without Internet Access.
https://thenationalpulse.com/news/biden-linked-group-backed-audits/
Quote:

"Voting machines that record votes and tally them are run on software that is vulnerable to cyberintrusions. Well-resourced hackers, whether funded by foreign governments or criminal syndicates, have the access, ability, and motivation to infect computerized voting machines and tallying systems across America. This can occur even if the machines are not connected to the internet. Attackers, for example, can deploy software such as Stuxnet and Brutal Kangaroo to target offline voting machines."
Gonna need some more info here, but did raise an eyebrow.

:Edit: If you don't know about "Stuxnet" it is a pretty damn impressive set of code and planned hack.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Democrats are hypocrites. Hope that helps.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WTH?

aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well there goes all the Californian Republican Representatives.
Cepe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This ****s getting ridiculous. . .
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


So more evidence of intentional fraud. People need to be indicted and charged with felonies.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


The grinding gears of justice are slow to nonexistent.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

will25u said:


The grinding gears of justice are slow to nonexistent.
Because of the media's narrative...

I just googled "Trump" and top 2 headlines:

- "New revelations expose future thread Trump poses" - CNN
- "Trump Sails Away as Rudy Giuliani Drowns in Legal Bills" - Daily Beast

Top 3 video headlines:
- "They predicted a Trump coup attempt if he lost..."
- "Here's why Trump's attempted coup still matters"
" What Jailing Trump Would Say About America"

They're so scared of him I bet they start trying harder to get him thrown in jail due to some bogus tax crap.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Daily Beast one looked interesting. Thanks for the heads up.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-sails-away-as-rudy-giuliani-drowns-in-legal-bills

Quote:

. . .
As Rudy Giuliani's legal bills have piled up in recent months and as federal investigators intensify their probe into Donald Trump's longtime associate the former president appears willing to provide just as much help as he usually does when his friends are in need: next to nothing.

For months now, Trump has consistently ignored or rejected Giuliani's pleas for assistance. And it's not just that Trump and other prominent Republicans have been unwilling to open up their wallets or war chests to help offset Giuliani's mounting legal costs; in many cases, Giuliani's former Trumpworld comrades have declined to even acknowledge the existence of his legal defense fund, which has struggled to raise much of anything from the public.
. . .
Naturally, Trump's sporadic public sympathy hasn't extended to amplification of Giuliani's legal defense fund, much less a check from the former president's well-stocked campaign fund.

According to three sources familiar with the matter, there have been several fruitless attempts this year by Giuliani's camp to convince Trump to swoop in and provide significant financial support and other forms of assistance to Giuliani. After all, a primary reason Giuliani is even under the investigative gaze of the feds is because of what he did largely at the former president's behest during the Trump-Ukraine scandal.

To Giuliani and his remaining confidants, Trump's glaring (if predictable) refusal to come to his loyalist's rescue has been a borderline betrayal of a lawyer who's landed in legal jeopardy precisely because of how zealously he worked to please Trump.

Still, Giuliani and his advisers are going out of their way to not publicly voice their displeasure with the ex-president's lack of action or financial relief.

According to a person with knowledge of the matter, Giuliani has reminded those close to him to not name Trump when complaining in public or on social media about how top Republicans have abandoned Giuliani in his time of distress.

"We are allowed to call out the RNC and other Republican leaders," this source said. "But not Donald Trump."
. . .
Rudy is still loyal.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Daily Beast is about as grounded in reality as a Dr. Suess book.
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




So... the state treasurer might withhold some money from MCBOS once the investigation is complete? Was hoping for some criminal charges..
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggieforester05 said:

The Daily Beast is about as grounded in reality as a Dr. Suess book.
Agreed. It was a pretty crappy article, but the headline grabbed me.

Lindell's three day cyber symposium on how the steal was accomplished (with a 72 hour live feed) began this morning. It's being broadcast on Right Side Broadcast Network.

agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Faustus said:

aggieforester05 said:

The Daily Beast is about as grounded in reality as a Dr. Suess book.
Agreed. It was a pretty crappy article, but the headline grabbed me.

Lindell's three day cyber symposium on how the steal was accomplished (with a 72 hour live feed) began this morning. It's being broadcast on Right Side Broadcast Network.


I don't quite understand your posts...is this your laughing at how he's being cancelled/censored?
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How's he being cancelled with regard to this event?

He's live airing a 72 hour cyber symposium as we speak. Moreover there were no posts here about it, so I brought it to your attention on the appropriate thread. That's not cancelling or censoring him.

The glasses are just a state of mind, and something I've posted with for two decades here.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So a crazy guy is broadcasting on a network no one has ever heard of, and this is somehow supposed to make conservatives look stupid?

What's next Micheal Avenatti speaking on behalf of all liberals on a commiesrus.com live feed?
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't say he spoke for all conservatives. I said he was hosting a 72 hour live feed cyber symposium on RSBN and linked a screenshot.

He's been referenced many a time on this very thread (including a couple of times by AggieHawg noting that Lindell had acquired both Dominion and ES&S voting machines and was doing forensic audits, reportedly, and that Lindell posted a two hour video on YouTube (for now) on the election, FWIW).

I guess I missed the missive in the last thirty days that he was no longer to be mentioned.

Links to Lindell info on this thread:

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3152743/replies/59409964

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3152743/replies/59265237

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3152743/replies/58691100


aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How does this happen?

Quote:

Colorado state officials are investigating a county election office after passwords for its voting systems were posted online, the Secretary of State announced Monday.

The breach included specific passwords from Mesa County's voting equipment, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said in a statement.

The passwords were posted on a far-right blog, according to a spokesperson from Griswold's office.
Griswold called it a "a serious breach" in a statement, but said it did not happen during the past election or create any risk to state elections.

It is likely that the passwords were collected during software updates to voting equipment in Mesa County on May 25, 2021, Griswold said.
Quote:

Officials have asked to inspect the county's election equipment and other relevant materials from the county clerk and recorder. If violations are found, it could lead to a decertification of the county's voting machines

The Colorado County Clerks Association said it is aware of the inquiry by Griswold's office "into a potential chain-of-custody and security protocol breach for Mesa County's voting system components to be used for the upcoming 2021 Coordinated Election."

"We take any credible information that questions the integrity of the conduct of our elections seriously," said Matt Crane, who leads the association. "We offer our full support to this inquiry and hope that a thorough investigation will provide clear answers to the concerns raised by the Secretary of State's Office."
FTR, Crane's wife works for Dominion.

Link

First Page Last Page
Page 504 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.