will25u said:

---

Here are Democrats in 2018 saying everything Mike Lindell says about voting machines pic.twitter.com/IFZ2sEhmZ9

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) July 19, 2021

---

To our liberal friends, do you now see how deceptive your party is?

Do you now think the "conspiracy theory" has merit?

If you don't, you should.

Troutslime said:

---

will25u said:

---

Here are Democrats in 2018 saying everything Mike Lindell says about voting machines pic.twitter.com/IFZ2sEhmZ9

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) July 19, 2021

---

To our liberal friends, do you now see how deceptive your party is?

Do you now think the "conspiracy theory" has merit?

If you don't, you should.

---

They don't care as long as their side wins. It's been pretty clear that "win at all costs" is their goal.

will25u said:

---

Here are Democrats in 2018 saying everything Mike Lindell says about voting machines pic.twitter.com/IFZ2sEhmZ9

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) July 19, 2021

---

The added irony here is that it is largely speculated that the 2018 mid terms in which the Dems won a ton of Senate & House seats was the trial run for much of the cheating that occurred during the 2020 election.

NEW: Press release from @VoterGA says the group has obtained new evidence that the election discrepancies in other Georgia counties may be worse than those it uncovered in Fulton County. pic.twitter.com/6RyZoBXF9S

— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) July 19, 2021

will25u said:

---

NEW: Press release from @VoterGA says the group has obtained new evidence that the election discrepancies in other Georgia counties may be worse than those it uncovered in Fulton County. pic.twitter.com/6RyZoBXF9S

— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) July 19, 2021

---

Main takeaway here, Favorito does not want the Georgia Bureau of Investigations involved in audits. He doesn't trust them.

More on PA.

Quote:

---

• Here are excerpts from a 31 March article that summarized anomalies associated with write-in and minor party ballots analyzed by retired senior DoD analyst Ray Blehar:
  

  • Quote:

    ---

    After Election Day votes were tabulated, President Trump led Biden by 1.3 million votes.

    ---

  • Quote:

    ---

    Biden needed to win 76% of the mail-in votes not counted in order to achieve his 80,555-vote victory margin.

    ---

  • Quote:

    ---

    Democrats made up 64% of those mail-in votes; another 11% (293,000) were needed for victory.

    ---

  • Quote:

    ---

    GOP and Democrat voters had similar disloyalty percentages at 8% and 7% respectively, as confirmed by exit polls. That meant that Biden actually needed 352,000 mail-in votes from independents to get to his purported total of 1.995 million (after removing Democrats and Republicans from the mix.)] Approximately 303,000 independent mail-in votes were cast, therefore there was no legitimate way Biden could have gotten to the 76% of mail-in votes needed to squeeze by Trump.

    ---

  • Quote:

    ---

    The end result is that it was impossible for Biden to have gotten the mail-in votes necessary to win without adjudication manipulation.

    ---

• Based on the above and other "anomalies and evidence," including from a USPS whistleblower, as well as direct observation of the in-process Arizona audit, on 7 July, State Sen. Doug Mastriano (R) announced a full forensic audit in three counties in Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, York, and Tioga).

---

Link

This is shaping to be a top 3 story during our existence as a nation and 95% of the country has no clue and the media is scared of it. Not good.

I now have a strong suspicion that just about everyone in DC knows who to call if they want to buy votes. What i don't know is how rampant the practice really is.
Though i wouldn't expect Dan Crenshaw to buy votes, i wouldn't be surprised if he came across someone who proposed the idea to him or to his staff. I use his name solely as an example - i doubt he bought a single vote but i would expect someone may have pitched a deal to his team. Now imagine what happens at the big table - does Mitch McConnel play the game? Did AOC play, or someone on her behalf? Did a D senator in a republican state? Or a republican governor of a D state?
I wouldn't be surprised at anything now - so audit the whole damn thing.

Ag In Ok said:

---

I now have a strong suspicion that just about everyone in DC knows who to call if they want to buy votes. What i don't know is how rampant the practice really is.
Though i wouldn't expect Dan Crenshaw to buy votes, i wouldn't be surprised if he came across someone who proposed the idea to him or to his staff. I use his name solely as an example - i doubt he bought a single vote but i would expect someone may have pitched a deal to his team. Now imagine what happens at the big table - does Mitch McConnel play the game? Did AOC play, or someone on her behalf? Did a D senator in a republican state? Or a republican governor of a D state?
I wouldn't be surprised at anything now - so audit the whole damn thing.

---

You know if some D's are doing it, there are damn sure some R's playing the game as well. The lust for power/control exists across the spectrum and the average politician trades in 'moral flexibility'.

I think both sides have people in 3 categories: crooked, indifferent, and 'clean' (so-to-speak). For example: I vehemently disagree with almost everything Bernie says, but I don't think he is in the "crooked" column. If he was, he would have been the nominee instead of Hillary. He isn't clean either. He falls in the 'indifferent' category because he puts ideology over honesty.

This is why I support the judges ruling about opening the books on the AZ auditors. Although its sole purpose is to do everything to discredit the auditors and not the results, it is necessary for complete transparency. Just as they should open the books on the SoS, Sheriff, and members of the MCB. All facts on the table and let them speak for themself. R,D or I.....break the law, go to jail.

I doubt the politicians even know but their staff probably talks to the PACs and donors to keep at least 3 levels of connection between a Ballot Name and the money in these deals

I.e. the politicians know it's happening but the conversation goes like this:
Dem Candidate: "Are we good?"
Campaign Mgr: "Let me check"
Sr. Staffer: "I'll get right back to you"
Go between: "One minute"
Donor/PAC: "Got you covered"
Go between: "Good to go"
Sr. Staffer: "Green light"
Campaign Mgr: "Your numbers are looking great!"
Dem Candidate: "Democracy in action!"



1 month later
Dem Candidate: "Most secure election ever!" (For me)

12 months later
Dem Candidate: "I have never directly paid anyone for a vote, no"

We fixed the keg said:

---

Ag In Ok said:

---

I now have a strong suspicion that just about everyone in DC knows who to call if they want to buy votes. What i don't know is how rampant the practice really is.
Though i wouldn't expect Dan Crenshaw to buy votes, i wouldn't be surprised if he came across someone who proposed the idea to him or to his staff. I use his name solely as an example - i doubt he bought a single vote but i would expect someone may have pitched a deal to his team. Now imagine what happens at the big table - does Mitch McConnel play the game? Did AOC play, or someone on her behalf? Did a D senator in a republican state? Or a republican governor of a D state?
I wouldn't be surprised at anything now - so audit the whole damn thing.

---

You know if some D's are doing it, there are damn sure some R's playing the game as well. The lust for power/control exists across the spectrum and the average politician trades in 'moral flexibility'.

I think both sides have people in 3 categories: crooked, indifferent, and 'clean' (so-to-speak). For example: I vehemently disagree with almost everything Bernie says, but I don't think he is in the "crooked" column. If he was, he would have been the nominee instead of Hillary. He isn't clean either. He falls in the 'indifferent' category because he puts ideology over honesty.

This is why I support the judges ruling about opening the books on the AZ auditors. Although its sole purpose is to do everything to discredit the auditors and not the results, it is necessary for complete transparency. Just as they should open the books on the SoS, Sheriff, and members of the MCB. All facts on the table and let them speak for themself. R,D or I.....break the law, go to jail.

---

I think the whole damn system is corrupt. Even the Repubs play the game. They are clearly OK playing the role of minority party as long as they get to keep their jobs IMO. I believe many get started with the right reason but are convinced to play the game. Go along to get along and we make sure everyone pretty much gets re-elected. They either chose to facilitate the process or someone has dirt on them to keep them in line.

I know - pretty cynical view but I don't trust ANYONE in Washington.

Brett Baier is lying through his teeth about what has been found in Maricopa County. Just reciting what Maricopa County has says are an explanation of why the numbers don't add up on the 74,000 MIBs for which there is no record ever being mailed out.

Basically Maricopa County has said they don't keep track of who votes early in person and who votes early by dropping off a completed MIB at a voting center during early voting. I call BS on that one. Doesn't make sense that a poll worker would accept that ballot without any record of it for chain of custody.

Then again, Maricopa County heavily outsourced every aspect of their election, so how the hell would they know anyway?