Favorito says the recount/audit did not have monitors from each party, instead Dem counters were at one table while GOP counters were at another table.

Also there was no procedure given for when the recounters encountered counterfeit ballots, they were questioning why should they count them (that was actually on a video that has probably been memory holed by now) and they were instructed to count them anyway and that issue would be addressed at a later time.

Hey! David Cross, the guy whose twitter account I have been posting about is there with Favorito! He's explaining every thing he has been doing.

Won't have much time to check in today until later, but instead of disabling any kind of wifi hardware, let's disable the company itself. Just a thought.

Actually, I'm still trying to find out if our ex-Dominion operator in Tarrant County is still on the payroll. Y'all go take down Dominion/ES&S. You have my FULL support.

We fixed the keg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Watching a rumble with Stephanie Lambert, Michigan attorney (she's also up on sanction charges) and she is talking about how a letter went out (not sure from whom) that directed local election officials that the election servicer would be coming to "change out batteries" and that the local election officials did NOT need to be present during this "routine servicing."

But she called one of her cyber experts (former NSA cyber guy) to ask what effects, if any would changing out the batteries on the machines have? His response was that there are other functions including memory devices that are solely on the battery power so removal and replacement of them would wipe those memories from those functions.

You are my IT go-to guy here. Could that be correct?

rumble link at bottom of the page HERE

---

Holy cow. Hit $2 Milagro shot night so I just saw this.

I will do some digging into the Michigan machines, but what he said could be correct. Just like a PC, anything being stored in RAM would be lost unless written to internal storage first. I would think there would be a process for this prior to shutting down a system. (similar to saving changes to your spreadsheet before shutting your PC down).

If this was done during the election, why? Why wouldn't these machines all be fully serviced and ready prior to go-time. If not, you still have the issue of how would this pass certification but anyone performing an audit invalidates that machine from ever being used again.

---

From what I know and understand, in devices like this removal of the battery would likely wipe anything including history that is not part of the basic hardware and OS set up.

The people who filled out the wrong totals on tally sheets, names are redacted but the Sec of State has the names. Favorito and Cross did not have access to that information.

Favorito referenced Judge Totenberg's October 2020 opinion stating that using QR codes on ballots that the voter cannot verify that ballot properly recorded their vote is against Georgia law.

What that portends is that Dominion's machines were out of certification for the state of Georgia.

Cross just said that Tucker will be covering the duplicate ballots in different batches on his show tonight.

aggiehawg said:

---

Favorito presser from yesterday.

---

Love it, paraphrasing from the video.
You go to the bank with $2000 in $100 bills, the teller has a machine that counts it gives a total kicks out counterfeits and the machine costs $300.
Brutal destruction of Dominion

David Cross is still working through images.

Set your politics aside and look at the facts.

Scanner 1 Batch 18 duplicated https://t.co/16oSr3oRgQ

— David Cross (@GAballots) July 14, 2021

I have begun posting some of the more interesting things we have found at https://t.co/tXutbgGnfe - keep the criticism to yourself, I'm an investment manager not an expert at websites :-)

— David Cross (@GAballots) July 14, 2021

BTW, Cross only started doing his comparisons and counts on July 9th. He's already found so much.

If the RLA was a hand count, then the number of physical ballots should match the images.

Here are 80 instances where the number of PHYSICALLY counted ballots for Trump was higher than the images reported & Biden physical ballots was less than the image count. #auditgeorgia pic.twitter.com/4PSQVEZdJC

— David Cross (@GAballots) July 10, 2021

It can't. Everything I am finding validates that the images do not match ballots. This is what happens when people say it's time to "fu<K s7it up".

It's messed up. #auditgeorgia pic.twitter.com/nUYpJObd18

— David Cross (@GAballots) July 10, 2021

Anyone else having issues getting to gaballots.com ?

MR Gadsden said:

---

Anyone else having issues getting to gaballots.com ?

---

Works for me.

In case this is getting too confusing one thing now stands out, the election day count was very, very wrong. That is not the starting point here. Between the same batches being scanned multiple times but the images are not even backing up the election day count. That means the ballots were using the QR codes to register the votes for the scanners to read, doesn't it? And not the actual bubbles?

That implicates Dominion machines, right?

Happening status: It's

Quote:

---

That's what Senate President Karen Fann said in an interview on Tuesday in which she also noted that the discrepancy prompted the legislature to acquire new machines "not Dominion's, separate ones" to again count the ballots.

An official canvass report released by the county, which includes Phoenix, said 2,089,563 ballots were cast in November's election. Fann said she did not know the size of the discrepancy.
"They haven't released a number yet," Fann told conservative radio host Mike Broomhead on KTAR. "However, we do know that those numbers do not match with Maricopa County at this point."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/arizona-senate-president-says-2020-election-audits-ballot-count-differs-from-maricopa-tally/ar-AAM7zFK

---

The Arizona Democratic Party is hosting a Maricopa Election Audit Briefing with Arizona attorney Jim Barton on Wednesday, July 21 at 4pm on Zoom. You may RSVP and make a donation at https://t.co/1eO2jIlsXl pic.twitter.com/6AsHFMUgrW

— LD23 Democrats (@LD23dems) July 14, 2021

Got to get in front of the story that's breaking soon. Spin it good and hope that people believe you. Maybe Twitter and Facebook can block for you too.

FriscoKid said:

---

Quote:

---

That's what Senate President Karen Fann said in an interview on Tuesday in which she also noted that the discrepancy prompted the legislature to acquire new machines "not Dominion's, separate ones" to again count the ballots.

An official canvass report released by the county, which includes Phoenix, said 2,089,563 ballots were cast in November's election. Fann said she did not know the size of the discrepancy.
"They haven't released a number yet," Fann told conservative radio host Mike Broomhead on KTAR. "However, we do know that those numbers do not match with Maricopa County at this point."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/arizona-senate-president-says-2020-election-audits-ballot-count-differs-from-maricopa-tally/ar-AAM7zFK

---

---

Have to wonder if the Dominion machines in Maricopa County also used the QR codes and not the actual bubbles on the ballots?

aggiehawg said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Quote:

---

That's what Senate President Karen Fann said in an interview on Tuesday in which she also noted that the discrepancy prompted the legislature to acquire new machines "not Dominion's, separate ones" to again count the ballots.

An official canvass report released by the county, which includes Phoenix, said 2,089,563 ballots were cast in November's election. Fann said she did not know the size of the discrepancy.
"They haven't released a number yet," Fann told conservative radio host Mike Broomhead on KTAR. "However, we do know that those numbers do not match with Maricopa County at this point."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/arizona-senate-president-says-2020-election-audits-ballot-count-differs-from-maricopa-tally/ar-AAM7zFK

---

---

Have to wonder if the Dominion machines in Maricopa County also used the QR codes and not the actual bubbles on the ballots?

---

Sounds lower tech than that. It sounds like they really did just run the same ballots multiple times. We'll have to see.

Like I said last November I believe that the dems cheated. I just didn't know if we would ever find out how they did it. Hope we are getting closer because this can not happen in our elections. If our voice doesn't matter then we are done as a country.

FriscoKid said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Quote:

---

That's what Senate President Karen Fann said in an interview on Tuesday in which she also noted that the discrepancy prompted the legislature to acquire new machines "not Dominion's, separate ones" to again count the ballots.

An official canvass report released by the county, which includes Phoenix, said 2,089,563 ballots were cast in November's election. Fann said she did not know the size of the discrepancy.
"They haven't released a number yet," Fann told conservative radio host Mike Broomhead on KTAR. "However, we do know that those numbers do not match with Maricopa County at this point."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/arizona-senate-president-says-2020-election-audits-ballot-count-differs-from-maricopa-tally/ar-AAM7zFK

---

---

Have to wonder if the Dominion machines in Maricopa County also used the QR codes and not the actual bubbles on the ballots?

---

Sounds lower tech than that. It sounds like they really did just run the same ballots multiple times. We'll have to see.

Like I said last November I believe that the dems cheated. I just didn't know if we would ever find out how they did it. Hope we are getting closer because this can not happen in our elections. If our voice doesn't matter then we are done as a country.

---

But the images of the ballots tell a different story than those of the original count. That was one of the point Garland was making in the presser yesterday. Don't consider the election night (week, whatever) original counting of the votes as the starting point. It's the ballots themselves that should be the starting point.

Something was causing those ballots to be misread and mistabulated on election night. The only thing that makes sense is the QR code, in my view.

FriscoKid said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Quote:

---

That's what Senate President Karen Fann said in an interview on Tuesday in which she also noted that the discrepancy prompted the legislature to acquire new machines "not Dominion's, separate ones" to again count the ballots.

An official canvass report released by the county, which includes Phoenix, said 2,089,563 ballots were cast in November's election. Fann said she did not know the size of the discrepancy.
"They haven't released a number yet," Fann told conservative radio host Mike Broomhead on KTAR. "However, we do know that those numbers do not match with Maricopa County at this point."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/arizona-senate-president-says-2020-election-audits-ballot-count-differs-from-maricopa-tally/ar-AAM7zFK

---

---

Have to wonder if the Dominion machines in Maricopa County also used the QR codes and not the actual bubbles on the ballots?

---

Sounds lower tech than that. It sounds like they really did just run the same ballots multiple times. We'll have to see.

Like I said last November I believe that the dems cheated. I just didn't know if we would ever find out how they did it. Hope we are getting closer because this can not happen in our elections. If our voice doesn't matter then we are done as a country.

---

Sounds like a good time to start a gofundme to entice whistleblowers to come forward and blow the lid off this scheme.

aggiehawg said:

---

Please note that battery removal is not specified in this "Preventative Maintenance Checklist". Clearly, the "maintenance" visit to Michigan counties was not consistent with their checklist. This begs the question, why did they refer to the visits as "preventative maintenance?"
CONCLUSION
Election officials are required to secure election records for 22 months per federal law. It is clear from the memo above that Election Source intends to modify the configuration of election equipment prior to the end of this period (September 3, 2021) which is a clear violation of federal law. As the momentum builds for a forensic audit of the election in Michigan, it is clear that attempts to tamper with the integrity of election records will ramp up as well.

---

wouldn't that be Sept 3rd, 2022?

I get the image, but what is RLA?

FriscoKid said:

---

We fixed the keg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Watching a rumble with Stephanie Lambert, Michigan attorney (she's also up on sanction charges) and she is talking about how a letter went out (not sure from whom) that directed local election officials that the election servicer would be coming to "change out batteries" and that the local election officials did NOT need to be present during this "routine servicing."

But she called one of her cyber experts (former NSA cyber guy) to ask what effects, if any would changing out the batteries on the machines have? His response was that there are other functions including memory devices that are solely on the battery power so removal and replacement of them would wipe those memories from those functions.

You are my IT go-to guy here. Could that be correct?

rumble link at bottom of the page HERE

---

Holy cow. Hit $2 Milagro shot night so I just saw this.

I will do some digging into the Michigan machines, but what he said could be correct. Just like a PC, anything being stored in RAM would be lost unless written to internal storage first. I would think there would be a process for this prior to shutting down a system. (similar to saving changes to your spreadsheet before shutting your PC down).

If this was done during the election, why? Why wouldn't these machines all be fully serviced and ready prior to go-time. If not, you still have the issue of how would this pass certification but anyone performing an audit invalidates that machine from ever being used again.

---

I don't think it's about the battery at all. They are talking about a battery that would power the printer. That's a UPS kind of battery (not a coin cell for RAM or real-time clocks). They also said a clerk doesn't need to be there.

It sounds like they want access to the machines to load new code, delete some files, remove other hardware (like M2M modems), or something else that they are trying to cover up. The batteries are a red herring IMO. They are after something else.

And electronics don't need "servicing". It's not like a car with mechanical pieces that wear out.

---

Going back to this, if your notion that the battery in question is a UPS and not the internal battery, why would you need to replace ALL of the batteries in every county? I have handled a few UPS's in my lifetime and I can assume that these, if they are backing up just one or a small number of devices as is suggested by the data provided, they are likely not much more than a consumer grade UPS. They don't need 'maintenance' and you don't replace batteries on them. If one goes bad, you throw the whole UPS away and plug in a new one. And there certainly isn't a need to do that wholesale statewide. That's ridiculous.

will25u said:

---

I get the image, but what is RLA?

---

Risk Limiting Audit.

Quote:

---

wouldn't that be Sept 3rd, 2022?

---

Agree. Typo I assume.

FriscoKid said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Customer Off The Shelf= COTS as specified in Dominion contracts. But there is also a category for "Modified COTS" within the same contract (talking Georgia here). What that means is Dominion could still use off the shelf machine components but modify them and still have those modifications certified.

Disable the internet features on them is not an option?

---

Don't disable it in software. Have the board populated without the IC's or remove the module from the assembly. Easy to do with what they are paying for the equipment.

---

Am I correct in understanding that they use off the shelf components like the motherboards? Because nearly ever manufacturer of motherboards has versions of motherboards with or without wifi and they are all readily available. How is this supposed to make it more expensive to not have wifi hardware?

Quote:

---

We looked everywhere for this tally sheet but the tally sheet file provided by the Secretary of State is a jumbled mess of over 3,000 pages. In this batch, you can see the Risk Limiting Count in peach and the actual image count in green. This particular batch resulted in 3 more votes for Trump but and overcount of 59 too many for Biden. It seems obvious that we need a real audit.

---

Link

BadMoonRisin said:

---

Today seems a little spicier and more concrete/substantiative than the last few weeks. Anyone else feel it or is it just me?

---

Someone posted somewhere that it was going to be on Tucker tonight as well so even Fox is letting it get on the air.

From the David Cross tweet:



From Wikipedia:

Quote:

---

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger appointed Sterling the COO of the Secretary of State's office after winning the 2018 election. He became an independent contractor in November 2019, and worked to roll out the use of new voting machines purchased from Dominion Voting Systems for the 2020 Georgia state elections. Sterling publicly rejected President Donald Trump's allegations of voter fraud after Joe Biden won Georgia in the 2020 United States presidential election, saying they were "all easily, provably false," and warned that statements by Trump and other leading Republicans would result in deaths.

---

His motivation to bury this? His lucrative role:

Quote:

---

The man who oversees Georgia's voting system, Gabriel Sterling, negotiated a $200,000 per year contract for himself last year, quit his state government job and has worked as an independent contractor ever since.
Under the arrangement, Sterling's pay increased from his $114,000 government salary since November 2019, when he took on the role of project manager for the purchase and rollout of the state's new voting equipment. State election officials say as a contractor, the government didn't have to pay benefits, such as health insurance.
Though he's a contractor, Sterling has become the face of Georgia elections, leading press conferences debunking election conspiracy theories, criticizing mistakes by county election officials and calling out President Donald Trump for inciting threats against election workers, proclaiming "this has to stop."

---

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/georgias-dominion-voting-system-implementation-manager-gabe-sterling-negotiated-144000-salary-increase-last-year/

Georgia GOP needs to seriously clean house.

Wouldn't it be refreshing if democrats would call to clean house too?

richardag said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Favorito presser from yesterday.

---

Love it, paraphrasing from the video.
You go to the bank with $2000 in $100 bills, the teller has a machine that counts it gives a total kicks out counterfeits and the machine costs $300.
Brutal destruction of Dominion

---

"Trump got over 94% of the vote 4 times. That is statistically impossible. Now when we look at the amount of times Biden got over 94% of the vote, it was 204 times."

Not to mention as an independent contractor wouldn't he be free to be on someone else's payroll, like say Dominion?

Look at the handwriting. Seem similar to you?

American Hardwood said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Customer Off The Shelf= COTS as specified in Dominion contracts. But there is also a category for "Modified COTS" within the same contract (talking Georgia here). What that means is Dominion could still use off the shelf machine components but modify them and still have those modifications certified.

Disable the internet features on them is not an option?

---

Don't disable it in software. Have the board populated without the IC's or remove the module from the assembly. Easy to do with what they are paying for the equipment.

---

Am I correct in understanding that they use off the shelf components like the motherboards? Because nearly ever manufacturer of motherboards has versions of motherboards with or without wifi and they are all readily available. How is this supposed to make it more expensive to not have wifi hardware?

---

Probably, but I'm still a little surprised they are using completely generic "motherboards " in the first place. I would have assumed custom boards from the beginning.

But, if it's not available as a stuffing option for WiFi then you could find another manufacturer or model that didn't have WiFi.