*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,693,281 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for the screenshot? Happen to have an actual link?
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FrioAg 00 said:

Facebook literally funded the fraudulent election on American soil. Real life now resembles a Tom Clancy novel.
They also censored opposing thought.

Zucker***** needs prison time.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The fraud is real & the numbers are significant. That is all I am comfortable saying
I really hope this is the crack that breaks the dam.
Keegan99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FriscoKid said:

Quote:

The fraud is real & the numbers are significant. That is all I am comfortable saying
I really hope this is the crack that breaks the dam.


You can be sure that Big Tech will fully censor anything that "undermines confidence in elections".
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keegan99 said:

Thanks for the screenshot? Happen to have an actual link?
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keegan99 said:

FriscoKid said:

Quote:

The fraud is real & the numbers are significant. That is all I am comfortable saying
I really hope this is the crack that breaks the dam.


You can be sure that Big Tech will fully censor anything that "undermines confidence in elections".
Facebook and Twitter can ignore it, but the state legislatures won't ignore it. It needs to be rock solid proof though.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here's an interesting find. This is from the DNC's 2020 Party Platform. Note the use of "mandatory."

Quote:

We must give voters the confidence that their ballot was counted as cast by supporting mandatory, statistically meaningful post-election audits and full transparency of all election results and data. To ensure every eligible ballot is counted, vote by mail voters must be informed of and provided a meaningful opportunity to fix any problem with their ballot. A professional and well-trained election workforce is critical to the administration of elections, we support ongoing federal and state funding for local elections offices.
Link
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


PA Sec of State threatening county election boards to keep them from cooperating with the state senate audit.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a F-ing racket!

Dominion
"Our systems are totally secure and you can trust our machines!"

Counties
"Ok but i am going to open one up and make sure it is actually as secure as you claim."

Dominion
"Ok, but if you open it, we won't certify it and you can't use it again until you replace it with another one that you haven't opened to verify that it is secure."

Basically, just trust us. Sure we started out helping Hugo Chavez steal elections in Venezuela, but we have changed names a few times so we are totally trustworthy now.
M-K-TAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:



PA Sec of State threatening county election boards to keep them from cooperating with the state senate audit.
Just continued delay delay delay,,, stonewall, block, obfuscate.... Nothing to see here no reason to do any audits.... Most secure election in history. Its despicable. This new secy of state and the previous one- Boockvar both need to have their asses put in Jail.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:


Would wish they kept their knowledge to themselves until the final report is given.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troutslime said:

FrioAg 00 said:

Facebook literally funded the fraudulent election on American soil. Real life now resembles a Tom Clancy novel.
They also censored opposing thought.

Zucker***** needs prison time.
Agreed
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
stetson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

Keegan99 said:

Thanks for the screenshot? Happen to have an actual link?


Democrats survive as a party solely by deceit. They are Satan's minions.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:



PA Sec of State threatening county election boards to keep them from cooperating with the state senate audit.
Blocking a Senate Legislative ruling, hope the courts rule in favor of transparency. Need to act expeditiously mid terms coming up rapidly.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really love how Mrs. Cleveland breaks stuff down.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

Troutslime said:

FrioAg 00 said:

Facebook literally funded the fraudulent election on American soil. Real life now resembles a Tom Clancy novel.
They also censored opposing thought.

Zucker***** needs prison time.
Agreed
Ironically, the corrupt Arizona Sec of State may have just given the impetus for that to happen.

Quote:

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D) is calling on state Attorney General Mark Brnovich (R) to look into reports that former President Trump and his allies attempted to make contact with election supervisors in Maricopa County in the weeks following the November election.

Hobbs, in a request sent via email Wednesday and shared on Twitter, cited reporting by the Arizona Republic, which detailed attempts by the former president to contact Republican Maricopa Supervisor Clint Hickman on two separate occasions following the election.

According to the Republic, attempts to contact election supervisors were also made by Trump allies, including Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward, Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and lawyer Sidney Powell.
Quote:

The Arizona secretary of state urged Brnovich to "investigate and take appropriate enforcement action" against what she called "potential violations of Arizona's election laws."

She added that a person can be charged with a felony for "knowingly" interfering "in any manner with an officer of such election in the discharge of the officer's duty," or influencing an election officer "to violate or refuse to comply with the officer's duty or any law regulating the election."

Link

Quote:

While CTCL has not yet disclosed full details about how much was distributed to each grantee during the 2020 election, publicly available data shows that CTCL funneled more than $5 million into nine Arizona jurisdictions.8 Based on the preliminary numbers, a large share of that money was spent in counties carried by President Biden.9 Unsurprisingly, Maricopa County, the fourth most populous county in America and home to more than 60 percent of Arizona's voters, received more than half of all Zuckerbucks distributed in the state.10
Link

Brnovich seems like a straight shooter. Seems to me he has enough legitimate reason to open an investigation into that "grant" to Maricopa County and what the claw back provisions say.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From shipwrecked crew.

Quote:

The implications are now clear: A large number of Georgia voters cast ballots after having moved from one county more than 30 days prior to the election. A significant number of those same voters have since re-registered as voters at their new home addresses, which match the addresses given to the USPS more than 30 days ahead of the November 2020 election. This validates that their move more than 30 days ahead of the election was not "temporary", and they cast votes illegally under Georgia law.

The only question is whether that number of Georgia voters is greater than 12,760. Based on the data as it has come in over the past six months, the answer seems to be that it will soon be as more and more of these "suspect" voters update their registration information.

This issue is emblematic of the problem with the ability of any Presidential candidate to mount an election contest in Georgia or any other state.

The obligation to investigate illegal voting by ineligible voters rests with the Georgia Secretary of State.
The evidence the Trump Campaign needed to contest the outcome of the election was in the possession of the Georgia Secretary of State.

The lawsuit filed by the Trump Campaign was the only avenue it had to access the evidence within the control of the Georgia election officials. The Complaint alleged that there were approximately 40,000 people who cast votes after moving from their registered address to a different county. That allegation was made one month after the election. Davis' data analysis pinned that number down to 35,000, and now 10,300 have verified it by re-registering at their new address.

But the Georgia Secretary of State opposed the lawsuit and denied the accuracy of the allegations without conducting an investigation using the data that only it possessed.

The fundamental problem was that the Georgia Secretary of State was not prepared to engage in such a substantial investigation in the immediate aftermath of the election. Never before had 1.3 million absentee votes been cast where the mailed-in ballots could have originated anywhere in the United States from voters registered to vote in a particular Georgia county. There was no mechanism or investigative resources to confirm the eligibility of a particular voter as a resident of the county reflected on their voter registration.

Further, what the Georgia Secretary of State knew to be true was that IF he pursued the investigation, and IF it turned out that 13,000 or more votes had been cast by voters who had moved and not re-registered, the outcome of the election based on the electronic count could not be certified, and under Georgia law the remedy specified was a new election.
Quote:

(d) Whenever the court trying a contest shall determine that the primary, election, or runoff is so defective as to the nomination, office, or eligibility in contest as to place in doubt the result of the entire primary, election, or runoff for such nomination, office, or eligibility, such court shall declare the primary, election, or runoff to be invalids with regard to such nomination, office, or eligibility and shall call for a second primary, election, or runoff to be conducted among all of the same candidates who participated in the primary, election, or runoff to fill such nomination or office which was declared invalid and shall set the date for such second primary, election, or runoff.
O.C.G.A. 21-2-527 (2010).
Quote:

The Federalist Story, with the new data from the Georgia Secretary of State on voter registration, shows that had the Secretary of State's office pursued the investigation into the votes cast by individuals who had filed "Change of Address" notices with the USPS, it would have discovered that the number of ineligible votes cast exceeded the margin of Biden's win. It was not necessary for the Trump Campaign to prove those were votes cast for Biden only that the number of illegal votes called into question the outcome of the contest.

Had the Georgia Secretary of State done his job, the truth would have been known. Instead, he stonewalled the claims made by the Trump campaign, simply assumed every vote was cast by an eligible voter and ignored the data given to his office and the allegations made by the Trump Campaign in its lawsuit.

Georgia election contest statutes required that a judge be named to the case without delay, that discovery of relevant materials be exchanged, and that disposition of the matter be handled on an expedited basis.

But no judge had even been assigned to the lawsuit on the day the Electoral College Votes were certified and cast for Joe Biden.
Had forgotten about that. No judge appointed? Case comes to a standstill until after it was rendered moot.

Link
stetson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

While CTCL has not yet disclosed full details about how much was distributed to each grantee during the 2020 election, publicly available data shows that CTCL funneled more than $5 million into nine Arizona jurisdictions.8 Based on the preliminary numbers, a large share of that money was spent in counties carried by President Biden.9 Unsurprisingly, Maricopa County, the fourth most populous county in America and home to more than 60 percent of Arizona's voters, received more than half of all Zuckerbucks distributed in the state.

Now we know why campaign funding is so important. Did you think that campaign money Is used primarily for television and radio ads, on the road campaigning, rallies and yard signs? Biden did very little of that. No, it is used to bribe officials and that cumulatively takes a LOT of cash.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From the same CTCL/Zuckerberg link I posted supra.

Quote:

While data is limited due to CTCL's unwillingness to make full reports on grant allocations and spending public, initial analysis points to Zuckerbucks having an influence on election outcomes in Arizona. On average, counties that received Zuckerbucks saw the Democratic presidential candidate's share of the vote increase compared to the 2016 election.18

For example, in Maricopa County, the only county in the state to flip in the 2020 election, President Trump increased his vote total by more than 248,000 votes yet lost the county to Biden.19

In 2020, Biden improved on Hillary Clinton's 2016 vote total in the county by more than 337,000 votes.20

This nearly 90,000-vote difference cannot be explained by registration increases. While Democratic voter registration in Maricopa County has grown more than Republican registration since the 2016 election, the net increase was fewer than 50,000 votes and registered Republicans still outnumber registered Democrats by more than 100,000 voters.21 In counties that went for Biden in 2020,

Zuckerbucks seem to have helped boost Democratic turnout.

Remember, Jan Bryant saw additional ballots arriving at the Maricopa County Counting Center for up to a week after the election, possibly longer since she stopped after that week.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The ballots cast in Arizona's largest county in the 2020 election will be counted for a third time on orders from the state's Senate.

Nearly 2.1 million ballots submitted in Maricopa County for the presidential contest were tabulated, as normal, by election officials. They were recounted by hand by audit teams hired by the Arizona Senate in a process that was completed late last month.

Now the Senate will do its own recount that will provide a number to compare to those from the county and from the auditors.

"Maricopa County says there's 2,089,563 ballots. We did the hand count, and they're finalizing that number, but we just wanted a third number to tie everything together, make sure we have morethe more data points, the better," former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, the Senate's audit liaison, told The Epoch Times.

The new count will focus on the number of ballots and will not count the actual votes, unlike the first two tabulations.

The Senate will use two counting machines that it purchased to complete the count, Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican, told the Arizona Republic.

"We're going to run all the ballots through to see how they match up," she said. "If there ends up being a difference, we'd have another count.
Link
Stupid@17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean. Are we in "It's happening, isn't it?" Territory here?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stupid@17 said:

I mean. Are we in "It's happening, isn't it?" Territory here?
Not quite. But if there was nothing there, they would have folded up shop already, it seems to me.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The irony would be epic.

As Troutslime said Zuckerberg needs jail time.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
Thanks for the link. That letter is more reason to hope.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NO.

Just another step.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger should resign in disgrace.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

aggiehawg said:



PA Sec of State threatening county election boards to keep them from cooperating with the state senate audit.
Blocking a Senate Legislative ruling, hope the courts rule in favor of transparency. Need to act expeditiously mid terms coming up rapidly.
Response to that pronouncement is HERE
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:



PA Sec of State threatening county election boards to keep them from cooperating with the state senate audit.
not to worry--plenty of zuckerbucks available to buy brandy new ones!

/sarcasm
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

richardag said:

aggiehawg said:



PA Sec of State threatening county election boards to keep them from cooperating with the state senate audit.
Blocking a Senate Legislative ruling, hope the courts rule in favor of transparency. Need to act expeditiously mid terms coming up rapidly.
Response to that pronouncement is HERE

really powerful response from Sen Mastriano!




Here is my transcription
Quote:

And I ask also what about transparency and accountability? What's wrong with trying to find out what worked with our election and what did not?

So as to the authority to conduct the forensic investigation, as set forth in Pennsylvania Senate Order(?) 14D, each standing committee is empowered with the authority to inspect and investigate the books records papers documents data operation of physical plant of any public agency in this Commonlaw including county election boards.

The supreme court of Pennsylvania has consistently recognized that the legislative power to investigate is an essential part of the power of the legislature.

The scope is this power of inquiry extends to every proper subject of legislative action
--that's a quote from Perocy vs Brandenmore.

Furthermore as was stated in Mcginley vs Scott

and I quote once again:

The right to investigate in order to acquire factual knowledge concerning particular subjects which will or may aid the legislators in their efforts to determine if or in what manner they should exercise their powers is an inherent right of a legislative body.

end quote

it's very clear, as the chair of a committee, I am empowered by our constitution and the rules of our legislative body to conduct and lead, with all transparency, a forensic investigation.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for the transcript. Very helpful.
Aggie1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2021/07/10/twitter-thread-that-explains-why-trump-supporters-feel-the-way-they-do-about-the-2020-election-n2592322?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=07/10/2021&bcid=f87a7911520e3c5edf621f146086b146&recip=5340403

Quote:

'MartyrMade' is a Twitter account that posted a lengthy thread that was featured on Tucker Carlson's show. He nails why conservatives feel the way they do about the 2020 election which has its roots in the Russian collusion hoax and the liberal media's nauseating behavior over the past four years. It also highlighted something rather disturbing which is that a nation cannot function if half of it feels like its governing institutions work to exclude them from the process. For conservative families that are patriotic, give their kids copies of the Constitution, and encourage them to enlist to serve in our armed forces, you can see why there's such an intense reaction to when liberals trash the country, burn the flag, and don't stand for the national anthem. Also, this account notes how intelligence agencies using fake evidence to spy on a presidential campaign would be received horribly by normal patriots.

It's a lengthy thread that summarizes everything. How the FBI lied about the Steele Dossier, how they knew it was Democratic opposition research, how Comey knew the document's originsand how everyone lied about it until they couldn't do so anymore. Then, there's the media's pervasive gaslighting on the issue, coupled with their mob-like behavior concerning anything they find disagreeable, like painting Brett Kavanaugh as a gang rapist with zero evidence. To make matters worse, the media doesn't care that they lie. When cornered, they don't admit defeatthey double-down. And now with Big Tech censoring news, more gas has been poured on this fire. The thread noted how the media would react if the contents of Donald Trump Jr.'s laptop were revealed. I think you all know what the conclusion would be. The main point is that it's the liberal media, the Democrats, and our intelligence agencies' pervasive lying that's provided the tinder for this firestorm. But the mean tweets, folks. That was the real problem. If anything, we're reminded with each day how it's the Left that's the true rot of America, one that's eaten our institutions from the inside out. They've reached a new, odious level of evolution in that feat.
You can read the full exchange here

We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do you know when this was written? My first problem is, regardless of when, the SoS doesn't set election laws. If this is something she decided after the election, well, she can **** right off. If this existed before the election, in any form, this points to a much larger problem.

Pro V&V and SLI Compliance are 3rd party companies used to certify so all systems they touched before and after the election should be null and void. Even better than that, what a very oddly specific set of text. . . .almost like someone knew what would be needed to find the footprints of a coordinated fraud.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stetson said:

captkirk said:

Keegan99 said:

Thanks for the screenshot? Happen to have an actual link?


Democrats survive as a party solely by deceit. They are Satan's minions.


Loki's legion.
First Page Last Page
Page 484 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.