will25u said:

---

It is widely expected that SCOTUS will uphold Arizona's election integrity laws, which ban ballot harvesting and the counting of ballots that were cast in the wrong precinct.

We shall see...

— Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) June 29, 2021

---

I don't trust this Court at all. Anything that is "widely expected" to be their actions have been just the opposite recently.

Alito was pissed in his dissent on a case that was factually a lot like the George Floyd case.

Quote:

---

Appeals court ruled no excessive force where arrestee suffocated after being held face down. Rather than deny petition, leaving ruling in place, or taking the case and ruling itself, SCOTUS summarily vacated and remanded. Alito Dissent: "The Court, unfortunately, is unwilling to face up to the choice between denying the petition (and bearing the criticism that would inevitably elicit) and granting plenary review."

---

Link

aggiehawg said:

---

will25u said:

---

It is widely expected that SCOTUS will uphold Arizona's election integrity laws, which ban ballot harvesting and the counting of ballots that were cast in the wrong precinct.

We shall see...

— Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) June 29, 2021

---

I don't trust this Court at all. Anything that is "widely expected" to be their actions have been just the opposite recently.

Alito was pissed in his dissent on a case that was factually a lot like the George Floyd case.

Quote:

---

Appeals court ruled no excessive force where arrestee suffocated after being held face down. Rather than deny petition, leaving ruling in place, or taking the case and ruling itself, SCOTUS summarily vacated and remanded. Alito Dissent: "The Court, unfortunately, is unwilling to face up to the choice between denying the petition (and bearing the criticism that would inevitably elicit) and granting plenary review."

---

Link

---

Roberts is gutless and compromised.

SCOTUS Blog thinks Alito has the opinion of the AZ voting rights case. Who knows...

TRM said:

---

SCOTUS Blog thinks Alito has the opinion of the AZ voting rights case. Who knows...

---

Thanks, did not know that. If Alito is writing the majority opinion, that is a good indication.

Key phrase,"we shall see".

I am not confident justice will prevail.

Quote:

---

A lawsuit filed by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry in October 2020 alleged that an obscure nonprofit organization operated as part of a larger nonprofit founded and largely funded by Silicon Valley billionaire Pierre Omidyar attempted to recruit local election officials to apply for grants from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL).

Landry filed the lawsuit on behalf of the State of Louisiana against CTCL, New Venture Fund DBA Center for Secure and Modern Elections, Dawn Maisel Cole, a private individual; and Full Circle Strategies LLC, "to prevent the injection of unregulated private money into the Louisiana election system."

---

Pre-election law suit.

Quote:

---

The lawsuit alleged:

• The New Venture Fund, operating in Louisiana under the trade name Center for Secure and Modern Elections (CSME), partnered with CTCL to solicit applications and information from Louisiana officials in connection with proposed grants [from CTCL as part of the $350 million in grants made nationwide in the 2020 election].
• CTCL and CSME worked their grant scheme in the State of Louisiana through a lobbyist by the name of Dawn Maisel Cole, owner and operator of Full Circle Strategies, LLC, as their Louisiana representative and agent to target registrars of voters, clerks of court, and local election officials.
• The scheme targeted 13 parishes, some to receive contributions of more than $500,000, accompanied by a request for detailed information about the operations, conduct and expenses of the registrars/clerk's office.
• Ms. Cole directly solicited registrars and clerks of courts to accept contributions from CTCL and New Venture Fund for the operation of their respective offices.

These practices were prohibited, the lawsuit argued, because:

Quote:

---

private contributions to local election officials are unlawful and contrary to the methods for election funding established by law in the State of Louisiana, and such contributions by these defendants should be declared illegal and permanently enjoined.

---

---

Quote:

---

The lawsuit was significant in part because it highlighted the role an obscure organization called the Center for Secure and Modern Elections, which describes itself as a "fiscally sponsored project of the New Venture Fund," played in advancing the efforts of the Mark Zuckerberg-funded CTCL in privately funding the administration of the 2020 election.

The New Venture Fund, in turn, is part of Democracy Fund, whose website says it is "an independent and nonpartisan, private foundation that confronts deep-rooted challenges in American democracy while defending against new threats."

Pierre Omidyar, a Silicon Valley billionaire who founded Ebay, also founded and financially backs Democracy Fund:

Quote:

---

Democracy Fund has committed more than $150 million to support a healthy democracy. Established by philanthropist and eBay founder Pierre Omidyar in 2011 and incubated inside Omidyar Network, Democracy Fund launched as an independent foundation in July 2014 and is a part of The Omidyar Group.

---

---

Quote:

---

In late October, a Louisiana judge ruled against Landry and in favor of the defendants, as The Advocate reported:

Quote:

---

Judge Lewis Pitman, of the 16th Judicial District in St. Martin Parish, ruled against Landry in the lawsuit last week. Landry said in an interview he would appeal the ruling. .
.
In Louisiana, the clerks of court and registrars of voters had applied for around $7.8 million [in CTCL grant money], which the local officials said they would use to help pay for additional costs brought on by the pandemic. That includes equipment, personal protective gear and wages for election workers staffing early voting sites for longer hours.

The local officials have since backed off the grant money and won't be tapping into the funds before the Nov. 3 election. Early voting is already underway.

---

---

Of course it was dismissed before discovery was allowed. So infuriating.

Link

Hispanic Woman Facing 20-Years in Prison For "Illegal Voting" in Texas Election

Quote:

---

Tyler Morning Telegraph reported that Monica Rene Mendez, 36, of Port Lavaca, was charged with three counts of illegal voting, seven counts of unlawful voter assistance, eight counts of returning marked ballots without consent, and eight counts of election fraud, according to jail records.

Further details, including the jurisdiction, timing, or specific nature of the alleged violations, as well as the number of ballots potentially affected, remained unclear Thursday.

---

aezmvp said:

---

Pookers said:

---

captkirk said:

---

---

This is dumb, Every single one of the *******s up on capital hill knows full well the 6th was planned event that had nothing to do with Trump.

---

I'm willing to bet a lot of money, maybe not everything, but close, that a significant portion of what happened was instigated or encouraged by FBI informants/plants seeking to entrap people.

I'll double down and say not a single one will ever be prosecuted for instigating a riot or any other crime either.

---

If she did commit the alleged crimes she should get the maximum sentence.

When people are never held to account, this behavior will continue.

Let me get this straight; they were ordered to turn over the machines. They turned over machines.

Then at the 11th hour, admitted they only turned over a little over HALF of the machines?

Do I have this right>

— Rosie's Delta Blues (@DarnelSugarfoo) June 29, 2021

will25u said:

---

No fraud, nuh uh....

AUDIO: BIDEN CAMPAIGN OVERSAW THEFT OF LIVING AND DEAD IDENTITIES FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS IN 2020 ELECTION. You will find in this article: Audio recordings, financial records, undercover video, absentee ballot applications, affidavits, and more! 🚨🚨🚨https://t.co/fPUHbFapZk

— Patrick Howley (@HowleyReporter) June 29, 2021

---

Um... wow!

This should be huge. I doubt it will be, but, again, wow.

Wasn't there someone involved with SJL that they already reported voter fraud about? Is this the same person or someone else?

snowdog90 said:

---

will25u said:

---

No fraud, nuh uh....

AUDIO: BIDEN CAMPAIGN OVERSAW THEFT OF LIVING AND DEAD IDENTITIES FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS IN 2020 ELECTION. You will find in this article: Audio recordings, financial records, undercover video, absentee ballot applications, affidavits, and more! 🚨🚨🚨https://t.co/fPUHbFapZk

— Patrick Howley (@HowleyReporter) June 29, 2021

---

Um... wow!

This should be huge. I doubt it will be, but, again, wow.

---

If you are expecting the MSM to get the word out, dont hold your breath.

Its time for you to do YOUR part and spread this around.

TRM said:

---

Wasn't there someone involved with SJL that they already reported voter fraud about? Is this the same person or someone else?

---

I think this is the same person. But the link is worth checking out as it puts together a bunch of information into one package. I think the audio might be the only 'new' thing about the story but I'm not 100% sure.

aggiehawg said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

Amazing how it never occurs to them, that they are being ignored because of their own malfeasance. Instead of taking constructive criticism and trying to improve at their job of being a political watchdog, they double down on Democrat propaganda. There really needs to be a mechanism within the journalism industry to police their own, or they will go the way of the buggy driver. Crackheads have better credibility than the average journalist these days.

---

It's not just their reporting, it is the way in which they inject opinion into what should be straight reporting, who, what, when, where. That should be it.

---

And don't forget the selective reporting. They just ignore the stories they are not aligned with ideologically.

will25u said:

---

No fraud, nuh uh....

AUDIO: BIDEN CAMPAIGN OVERSAW THEFT OF LIVING AND DEAD IDENTITIES FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS IN 2020 ELECTION. You will find in this article: Audio recordings, financial records, undercover video, absentee ballot applications, affidavits, and more! 🚨🚨🚨https://t.co/fPUHbFapZk

— Patrick Howley (@HowleyReporter) June 29, 2021

---

why are we surprised? In perhaps a moment of honesty/Freudian slip/utter stupidity, Biden discussed having the greatest voter fraud team this nation has ever seen. Yep. 81 million votes is impressive for a vegetable.

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.

Sterling82 said:

---

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.

---

Sarcasm? Your posting history seems 360 degrees in opposition to that unless I did not go back far enough.

Sterling82 said:

---

But when is someone going to provide evidence? Where is the evidence of fraud? You people are an affront to our democracy for continuing to perpetuate these debunked conspiracy theories.

---

There's video/audio linked above. Project Veritas released a video during the election of some woman harvesting votes in San Antonio, and she was arrested. There are hundreds of cases pending in Texas for voter fraud. We dont get to see evidence until trial. I'm sure they are trying to investigate all of this simultaneously before revealing methods used to prevent others from covering their tracks. And nothing has been debunked, since all the investigations and audits are just now beginning. Don Lemon doesnt get to determine when a crime is debunked, and neither do you. Don't be an idiot. There's way more evidence with voter fraud in this election than there ever was with Muh Russia. Sit back, shut up, quit trolling, and read a little. You may educate yourself on something you were completely blind to, and end up learning that weve been lied to and cheated for years if not decades.

will25u said:

---

When people are never held to account, this behavior will continue.
.

---

It is beyond time these people be held in contempt of a court order and criminally charged. First the router BS, now ~ 40% of the machines withheld.

Completely unethical and corrupt.

edit spelling

will25u said:

---

No fraud, nuh uh....

---

These people need to be criminally charged, indicted and brought to trial. If guilty sentenced to the very maximum. This BS has got to stop.

Putting the 2016 Hillary crowd to shame....train wreck getting old, put a lid on this voting fraud.