*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,694,024 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
peacedude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here's some info on the ex WI Supreme Court judge that will be looking into this case. There are some good things in his Wiki profile (hates criminals and pedos):

In 2009 the Wisconsin Judicial Commission brought an ethics charge against Gableman.[5] The charge alleged that a campaign advertisement in which he accused Butler of working "to put criminals on the street" and accusing Butler of finding a "loophole" that resulted in the release of a child molester, was false and misleading.[6] Gableman claimed in his defense that his free speech rights are violated by the judicial conduct rule he is accused of breaking.[7][8] A three-judge panel was charged with the preliminary investigation into whether the campaign ad violated the Wisconsin Code of Judicial Conduct.[9] In November 2009, the panel unanimously recommended that the complaint against Gableman be dismissed.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Gableman
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
" Sometimes voters leave without scanning their ballots called 'fleeing voters'. Because of this, the number of ballots scanned can be lower than the number of voters who check in. But the number of ballots scanned is not ever supposed to be more than the number of voters who check in,"
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
~700 extra ballots is not trivial..
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Question..Does registered voters mean all who are registered to vote, or those that signed in at the polls to vote?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troutslime said:

Question..Does registered voters mean all who are registered to vote, or those that signed in at the polls to vote?
In this instance, it is people signing in to vote at that location. Can't have nearly 700 more ballots scanned that day than voters signing in.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Troutslime said:

Question..Does registered voters mean all who are registered to vote, or those that signed in at the polls to vote?
In this instance, it is people signing in to vote at that location. Can't have nearly 700 more ballots scanned that day than voters signing in.
Well apparently in a Democrat's world, you can...and their eyebrows don't even move.
RulesForTheeNotForMe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dead people usually have issues with the "Checking-In" part, the rest of the voting process is pretty straight forward.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure in this case it would be racist to ask questions about any of those 700 extra ballots
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


This is the norm in places like Philly, Chicago, and other Democrat controlled cities.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


If you click on the link in the tweet there is a more complete explanation of what occurred.
JUNE 2021 BROOKLYN NY PRIMARY
from the article:
Quote:

We have discovered discrepancies that raise concerns and deserve further exploration. These were reported to the coordinators at each poll site and directly to the Board of Elections. The Board of Elections responded by removing our project leader as a poll watcher and changing the information our poll watchers were allowed to view. Now we cannot collect the data necessary for the successful completion of the project[url=/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:1300,h:800][/url]
A more complete picture about the over votes
/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:1300,h:800

Quote:

Board of Elections Response
We told the coordinator about the discrepancy. In our opinion, she showed no concern. It was subsequently reported to the Board of Elections, in person, and also via an email thread that included members of the Campaign Finance Board and the Chief Democracy Officer from the Mayor's office.

The Board of Elections responded with an email that our "concerns may stem from the public count on scanners vs. pieces of paper. Public counter counts the first sheet of a ballot as it is representative of the number of voters, not the number of ballots."

We are aware that with a 2-page ballot, the public counter counts one ballot, but the protective counter counts two. If the discrepancy were due to that, then there would be 480 voters and 960 ballots scanned. But that is not the number that we found. Furthermore, at other polling locations, the number of voters checked in and the number of ballots scanned was very close. So from our experience, this does not explain the problem.
This stinks to the high heavens.

The Democratic Party leadership is corrupt.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That excuse of "counting paper versus ballots" creates even more issues. Whose to say that there weren't the correct number of votes counted (aka 500 people votes and counted 1000) but certain pages were removed from being scanned (500 people voted but only 800 pages - 200 pages missing).

That is on top of the issue of there appearing to be less people voting than ballots processed. Pretty crazy that this kind of stuff is happening in the 21st century.
FLATOUT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is the audit team releasing any information today?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FLATOUT said:

Is the audit team releasing any information today?
No. Senator Fann stated no results today. They are still doing some double and triple checking before they are completely out of the venue by Wednesday.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
even though he auditors have finished up fieldwork on some parts of the audit plan and they are wrapping up on others, they will need some time to put together and finalize the audit report.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Chief Democracy Officer from the Mayor's office.
Ridiculous. It's like Dems are going out of their way to come off as Orwellian.
buzzardb267
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
93MarineHorn said:

Quote:

Chief Democracy Officer from the Mayor's office.
Ridiculous. It's like Dems are going out of their way to come off as Orwellian.
"Idiocracy" I tell you.....

"ROGER - OUT"
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
According to this Link Mahoning County used ES&S.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:


Doesn't matter, no channel that anyone left of center pays attention to will ever air it or if they did they'd spin it against conservatives. Brainless liberals will go on believing that a "Democracy was attacked" while ignoring the death and destruction caused by their degenerate ideological brethren.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
neil88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As a resident of and taxpayer to Maricopa County, I intend to let my voice be heard by the officials over their frivolous use of my tax dollars. Ridiculous that they believe the machines must be replaced (rather than their incompetent selves!)
Trek Strategy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
neil88 said:

As a resident of and taxpayer to Maricopa County, I intend to let my voice be heard by the officials over their frivolous use of my tax dollars. Ridiculous that they believe the machines must be replaced (rather than their incompetent selves!)


Dude, how else are the politicians going to get paid twice?
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow, the level of derangement in that Twitter thread is frightening! The left is so brainwashed by propaganda that it seems they'll never grasp reality.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
neil88 said:

As a resident of and taxpayer to Maricopa County, I intend to let my voice be heard by the officials over their frivolous use of my tax dollars. Ridiculous that they believe the machines must be replaced (rather than their incompetent selves!)
While I understand the frustration for you, the biggest problem here is still using Dominion. Getting rid of the machines is pretty pointless if they will still be using the flawed software and Runbeck Election Services for printing ballots plus mailing and receiving back all of the mail in votes in Maricopa County before they went to the counting center.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So which is it? The voting machine system can't be manipulated and the election is totally legit so there is no point in buying a new system, or the voting machine system can be manipulated by the audit team such that you can't trust the results of future elections so the system must be replaced. You can't have it both ways Maricopa.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't you understand? It can't be manipulated when in the hands of "certified" Democrat operatives, but it can be during a highly scrutinized and supervised audit.
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:


This is dumb, Every single one of the *******s up on capital hill knows full well the 6th was planned event that had nothing to do with Trump.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pookers said:

captkirk said:


This is dumb, Every single one of the *******s up on capital hill knows full well the 6th was planned event that had nothing to do with Trump.
I'm willing to bet a lot of money, maybe not everything, but close, that a significant portion of what happened was instigated or encouraged by FBI informants/plants seeking to entrap people.

I'll double down and say not a single one will ever be prosecuted for instigating a riot or any other crime either.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood said:

So which is it? The voting machine system can't be manipulated and the election is totally legit so there is no point in buying a new system, or the voting machine system can be manipulated by the audit team such that you can't trust the results of future elections so the system must be replaced. You can't have it both ways Maricopa.
So much this, thank you. If these things are so vulnerable they can never be re-certified, then how can anyone trust results captured from them? Especially in instances where they aren't even in control of the administrator login/credentials?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We fixed the keg said:

American Hardwood said:

So which is it? The voting machine system can't be manipulated and the election is totally legit so there is no point in buying a new system, or the voting machine system can be manipulated by the audit team such that you can't trust the results of future elections so the system must be replaced. You can't have it both ways Maricopa.
So much this, thank you. If these things are so vulnerable they can never be re-certified, then how can anyone trust results captured from them? Especially in instances where they aren't even in control of the administrator login/credentials?
Would love to see the Legislature just turn around and ban the use of Dominion machines since they are so fragile and insecure that an audit makes them unusable.
First Page Last Page
Page 475 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.