*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,700,194 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ravingfans said:

richardag said:

aggiehawg said:

Just an update on the number of states who have decreed no more Zuckerberg Bucks in their elections.

Quote:

Florida became the fifth state in 2021 to enact a law prohibiting the private funding of election administration on Thursday aft.......

My snarking comment

Only 52 more states to go.

I remember


YIKES!!!
I am not sure if Obama was projecting 57 states when he claimed to have visited 57 states. Was he including DC, Puerto Rico and as yet undisclosed future states or just ignorant?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
TxSquarebody
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Spoiler: They're not.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TxSquarebody said:

Spoiler: They're not.
Unfortunately I would have to agree. The Democratic Party leadership, leftist progressives and legacy media are destroying our government.

Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05 said:

It's beyond ridiculous that the major news organizations are not all over this.


If it involved Republicans, they would be. It is pretty amazing that absolutely nobody will touch it. It's a huge story. You would think if there turned out to be fraud, it would have Wooodward and Bernstein type career ramifications for the reporters that broke it. Shows what a tight grip the left has on media. You will report the party line or you won't have a job.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag said:

ravingfans said:

richardag said:

aggiehawg said:

Just an update on the number of states who have decreed no more Zuckerberg Bucks in their elections.

Quote:

Florida became the fifth state in 2021 to enact a law prohibiting the private funding of election administration on Thursday aft.......

My snarking comment

Only 52 more states to go.

I remember


YIKES!!!
I am not sure if Obama was projecting 57 states when he claimed to have visited 57 states. Was he including DC, Puerto Rico and as yet undisclosed future states or just ignorant?
https://www.infoplease.com/askeds/islamic-states

Quote:

We did some research and found a group called the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The OIC has 57 member states
Probably why the Bamster was confused.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get your butts on the stand and explain!!

Quote:

Arizona's Senate told Maricopa County on Friday that it would issue subpoenas for live testimony from the county's Board of Supervisors unless it received the materials that are being withheld.

"We've been asked to relay that the Senate views the County's explanations on the router and passwords issues as inadequate and potentially incorrect," a lawyer for the Senate said in an email to county officials.
The Arizona Senate subpoenaed a slew of election materials, such as ballots, following the 2020 election. Lawmakers also issued subpoenas for election machines, passwords, and other technology.
Quote:

"They've told us that they don't have that second password, or that they've given us all the passwords they have. They've also told us that they now can't, as they promised a couple weeks ago, provide our subcontractors with the virtual access to the routers and hubs and other things at the Maricopa County tabulation and election center, as was part of the subpoenas," Bennett told One America News at the site of the audit in Phoenix.

John Brakey, a Democrat who is serving as an assistant to Bennett, told the broadcaster that he was "blown away" by the password development.

"It's like leasing a car and they refuse to give you the keys. They're supposed to be running the election. You know what's wrong? Sometimes these vendors have too much power, and we're voting on secret software, and that's why this recount down here is very important," he added.
Even the Bernie Bro, Brakey, is highly critical.

Link
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
outofstateaggie said:

aggieforester05 said:

It's beyond ridiculous that the major news organizations are not all over this.


If it involved Republicans, they would be. It is pretty amazing that absolutely nobody will touch it. It's a huge story. You would think if there turned out to be fraud, it would have Wooodward and Bernstein type career ramifications for the reporters that broke it. Shows what a tight grip the left has on media. You will report the party line or you won't have a job.
No profession rating greater contempt today. Much closer to what pimps used to be - and presumably still are-- seen as.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Back to NH.

Quote:

The Windham, NH canvassers are looking for more volunteers to help them canvas the community for legitimate election auditors.

The group is canvassing today in Windham from 9 AM until 7:30 PM.


Quote:

According to NH Integrity Group founder Marylyn Todd, 70% of people are signing the petition requesting valid auditors for the 2020 elections audit.
Quote:

*We need to hire 2 auditors and legal representation. Your generous donations will not go to waste. We will make sure we continue this battle for FREE and FAIR elections for ALL!
If you love this state, country and your God given right to Liberty, please donate and share!
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK! www.facebook.com/nhvoterintegrity
Our group has done extensive research and would like to hire Jovan Pulitzer as our trusted forensic analyst. Our recourse is to hire him ourselves to conduct The Peoples' Audit!
Quote:

The 'WINDHAM INCIDENT' is the largest unexplained voting discrepancy in NH state history and WE NEED ANSWERS!
WHAT HAPPENED?
The State Rep race had four open seats.

On Election Day, Nov. 3, 2020:
All four Republicans won

Winning Margin: 24 Votes (.005%)

Hand Recount Results on Nov. 12, 2020:
All four Republicans GAINED +300 Votes
Leading Democrat LOST (-99) Votes
Link
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Wisconsin issues with CTCL and Zuckerberg.

Quote:

Newly released emails paint a disturbing picture of how the City of Milwaukee ran the 2020 presidential election and again call into question the legality of liberal-leaning interest groups' deep infiltration of municipal procedure.

Under Wisconsin law, "each municipal clerk has charge and supervision of elections and registration in the municipality." This is unambiguous. It is unequivocal. Yet in five of Wisconsin's largest cities, it didn't happen.

In May, Racine Mayor Cory Masona hyper-partisan Democratemailed the mayors of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay and Kenosha to hold a virtual meeting in which "the Elections Administration Planning Grant will be discussed." That grant, from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg's Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) would ostensibly be used to cover the increased costs of running a presidential election during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The mayors met virtually at least four times from May to August to discuss their joint bid for CTCL grant money, but Mason took the lead and even, according to an email from City of Racine attorney Vicky Selkowe, sought to "develop a robust plan for election administration for all five of our communities."

This would, of course, run afoul of state law, as only the municipal clerks or election boards in the other four communities have the authority to plan for and administer elections, but it was clear that these five cities did not have much regard for state law.


Trying to get their own people inserted into election staff.



Actually writing the training instructions for election staff.



Editing the the training instructions

Finally, a clerk wakes up and refuses a request for these outsiders to have direct access to the voter database and the numbers of submitted absentee votes and outstanding absentee votes on a daily basis. This clerk had been providing those reports (why is a great question here) and Spitzer;Rubenstein was overly concerned about her working too hard and wanted a work around so he could do it himself. her reply:



Quote:

According to emails, the Racine Common Council approved the first phase of grant money acceptance on behalf of all five communities, which became known as the Wisconsin Five. All five eventually received CTCL grant money, with Milwaukee getting more than $2.1 million.

It quickly became clear that this money came with strings attached.

According to the agreement the City of Milwaukee signed with CTCL, CTCL set the ground rules for how every penny of the money was to be spent, and Milwaukee was not allowed to "reduce or otherwise modify planned municipal spending on 2020 elections." In addition, the city was not permitted to "use any part of [the] grant to give a grant to another organization unless CTCL agrees to the specific sub-recipient in advance, in writing."

CTCL obviously had its own partner groups in mind and didn't want interference with its vision for how the election would be run.
Quote:

Woodall-Vogg did, and that same day Meagan Wolfe, WEC's administrator, emailed the municipal clerks in Green Bay, Madison, Racine, and Kenosha (the other members of the Wisconsin Five) to let them know about Spitzer-Rubenstein and the Vote at Home Institute "in case you thought this might be a group you are interested in working with or learning about."

Green Bay's clerk might not have wanted to, but its mayor, Eric Genrich, certainly didand Spitzer-Rubenstein and his team so thoroughly (and wholly unlawfully) took over Green Bay's election planning that the clerk, Kris Teske, quit in disgust.

Stunningly, this email chain proves that Wolfe and other members of the Wisconsin Elections Commission staff were aware of Spitzer-Rubenstein's involvement in Milwaukee's election and even wanted him doing more for other cities (notably only heavily Democratic cities).

In the same August 28th email from Spitzer-Rubenstein to Woodall-Vogg in which he requested access to WEC, Spitzer-Rubenstein also asked her to "send the procedures manual and any instructions for ballot reconstruction."
Ballot reconstruction? As materially altering ballots or creating them out of whole cloth?

Quote:

Now why would an outside group need access to ballot reconstruction instructions? And, more importantly, why is the leader of said group demanding this from the executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commissionthe one person in the city with the lawful authority to run elections?

Because Clair Woodall-Vogg was not running this election; CTCL and its front man Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein were.
Quote:

"Here's what I'll need," Spitzer-Rubenstein wrote to her in late October, "1) Number of ballot preparation teams, 2) Number of returned ballots per ward, 3) Number of outstanding ballots per ward."

Even with this private data sharing that no other organization received (or should have received), Spitzer-Rubenstein still wanted more. He wanted access to the Milwaukee Election Commission's voter database.

"We're hoping there's an easier way to get the data out of WisVote than you having to manually export it every day or week," he wrote. "To that end, we have two questions: 1. Would you or someone else on your team be able to do a screen-share so we can see the process for an export? 2. Do you know if WisVote has an API [application programming interface] or anything similar so that it can connect with other software apps? That would be the holy grail (but I'm not expecting it to be that easy)."
Link

I don't know about you folks but my blood is boiling right now.
Truly infuriating. Board CMs - but there isn't any evidence.

I just pray the irrefutable truth keeps coming out between now and next Spring, that it emboldens state legislatures to implement both more audits and new election reforms, Republicans run conservative candidates in the primaries, that there is a groundswell of public outrage against the cheating Democrats, and that Pelosi and Shumer ultimately get a big demotion.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not an endorsement here just FWIW. Mike Lindell has acquired both Dominion and ES&S voting machines and is doing forensic audits, reportedly.

Link
BoerneAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The my pillow guy? Ain't worth much.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


From yesterday.

Here are the formal results.



They ran away into Executive Session.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
outofstateaggie said:

aggieforester05 said:

It's beyond ridiculous that the major news organizations are not all over this.


If it involved Republicans, they would be. It is pretty amazing that absolutely nobody will touch it. It's a huge story. You would think if there turned out to be fraud, it would have Wooodward and Bernstein type career ramifications for the reporters that broke it. Shows what a tight grip the left has on media. You will report the party line or you won't have a job.



Coincidently, I think it was W&B reporting on Watergate(helped by Hollywood) that so romantized the career of journalism for progressives that it created a wave of interest that made the profession almost exclusively progressive.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
policywonk98 said:

outofstateaggie said:

aggieforester05 said:

It's beyond ridiculous that the major news organizations are not all over this.


If it involved Republicans, they would be. It is pretty amazing that absolutely nobody will touch it. It's a huge story. You would think if there turned out to be fraud, it would have Wooodward and Bernstein type career ramifications for the reporters that broke it. Shows what a tight grip the left has on media. You will report the party line or you won't have a job.



Coincidently, I think it was W&B reporting on Watergate(helped by Hollywood) that so romantized the career of journalism for progressives that it created a wave of interest that made the profession almost exclusively progressive.
Nixon, John Mitchell and company were ripe for investigative journalism.

And that carried over until 1988 and Gary Hart. Journalists took him up on his offer to follow him around. We all know how that worked out. Leaving wienie Dukakis as last man standing for the Dems. Against GHW Bush after two terms of Reagan.

To me, that was the pivot for journalists. Protect front runners from any in-depth investigative journalism, while hammering the GOP irrespective of who was the front runner. The press gave Trump unlimited free time believing there was no way he would beat Hillary.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ninjas do not need the password, they will produce the evidence discovered that the legal ballots are fraudulent.

Media will not report, they will distort. FBI will ignore. Protestors will be arrested.

Shame on those casting an actual ballot for Biden.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If anyone has put this one out, I apologize. However, for your edification.

things heating up---supposedly
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From your article:

Quote:

"It's like leasing a car and they refuse to give you the keys. They're supposed to be running the election. You know what's wrong? Sometimes these vendors have too much power, and we're voting on secret software, and that's why this recount down here is very important," Bennett told news reporters.

"The specific password and security tokens Ken Bennett referenced this week provide access to proprietary firmware and source code. Elections administrators do not need to access this information to hold an election, and we do not have it in our custody," Jack Sellers said in a statement, protecting Dominion and the Democrats from the consequences of public scrutiny.
I don't believe that is technically true as the manuals for those machines clearly state how to access those root codes to set up their admin privileges when setting the machine for a new election. Unless I'm mistaken. I have already posted those instructions from the Dominion manuals in this thread.

If I am incorrect on that, please let me know.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Newt on Maria's show this morning.

Quote:

Newt Gingrich: You can actually buy an official Georgia presidential ballot on eBay. And, you can also buy a number of states. So when they tell you they were controlling the ballots, it's just not true. This was a very open system. It was a system where people could cheat, and did. And without getting into an argument about how big the cheating was, it was large enough that every American should expect that they have the right to vote, that they have the right to have their vote counted, they have a right to have their vote held legally and accurately, and they shouldn't have their vote canceled by someone who's cheating. And that's exactly what's been going on In every one of the states that was very close that Trump lost you had those kind of shenanigans and you had state law violated in every single one of those states. In my mind there was no question that those states were in fact stolen. That doesn't make the national media happy but I think as a historian people will find it's absolutely true.
Video is at Link

Wonder if he will be banned again?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Arizona's Senate president on Friday told the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that a plan by election auditors to verify the validity of certain voters is on hold indefinitely.

"If and to the extent the Senate subsequently decides that canvassing is necessary to the successful completion of the audit, its vendor will implement detailed requirements to ensure that the canvassing is conducted in a manner that complies fully with the commands of the United States Constitution and federal and state civil rights laws," Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican, told Pamela Karlan, a DOJ official, in a letter.

Karlan, principal deputy assistant attorney general with the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, raised concerns earlier in the week with the plan by Cyber Ninjas, the company leading the audit for the state Senate, to verify the validity of certain voter registrations with questionable addresses by dispatching people to verify whether the voter lived at the address on the registrations.

Such an effort could constitute voter intimidation, according to Karlan.

"This description of the proposed work of the audit raises concerns regarding potential intimidation of voters," she wrote to Fann, citing the Cyber Ninjas scope of work agreement with the Senate.

Former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, a Republican who the state Senate appointed as a liaison for the audit, said at the audit site in Phoenix on Friday that he was not in on the decision.
Fann also told Karlan that the 2020 election audit is protected by "thorough protocols."
Link
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Link








Link

FWIW.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pathetic that our own DOJ is attempting to inhibit an investigation into voter fraud instead of actively investigating the allegations themselves.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Our own DOJ" is part of the authoritarian left's gestapo.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Uhmm? Not sure how this may turn out. Thinking the standing issue could raise its ugly head again.

Quote:

We reported that the MCBOS would not allow the Arizona Senate to perform an audit of the county's 2020 Election results. The MCBOS sued to Senate to prevent the audit. Then when the Senate updated laws to clarify their right to audit and the courts found that the Senate has every right to audit the county's results, the MCBOS said ok you can do an audit but we want to select the auditors. They then said the only firms they would allow to perform their audit were those certified by the EAS.

The problem for the MCBOS was the choice of auditors that the Senate wanted to employ to perform the audit was not theirs. It was the Senates. Also, the firms the MCBOS said were certified were not certified. They hadn't been for years.
For those who haven't been following this, let me provide background. Pro V&V's certification by EAC (not EAS as stated in the article) expired in 2017. Yet within a few hours of Gateway Pundit revealing that, they were suddenly "certified" again by EAC. Okay so the webmaster sucks at updating? Or did EAC hire a longtime Dominion employee fairly recently? The latter. Jessica Bowers worked for Dominion in their certification of voting systems department for 10 years before she was hired away by EAC in May 2019.

For the math impaired, that means she had been sending Dominion software and hardware to Pro V&V who did not have EAC certification for two years. That also means several people lied under oath in Judge Totenberg's courtroom in October 2020 and before in other hearings, including Sec of State Raffensperger.

The CEO of Pro V&V evaded questions about their own certification process by saying it wasn't his job and he was unfamiliar with the process. He insinuated it was the process his own company used to "certify" voting systems but given the timing, might he have been talking his own company's certification by EAC? A question well deserving of an answer.

Back to the article.

Quote:

Now a group after reviewing Arizona law, claims that the 2018, 2019, and 2020 elections related to this law were out of compliance with state law. Their rationale is because the firms that reviewed their voting machine equipment were not certified by the EAS as Arizona law mandates.

Here is the press release from the group suing Arizona for not being in compliance with their laws concerning elections.
Quote:

Quo Warranto Filed in the Arizona Supreme Court

by We the people of Arizona potentially unseating all state elected officials

As average citizens of Arizona, from all walks of life, we have discovered that our past elections in 2018 thru 2020are out of compliance per the U.S. Election Assistance Commission [EAC]. The Help America Vote Act [HAVA]of 2002 established the EAC and our State of Arizona takes a strict view on this Federal Election Law. Our State of Arizona went out of compliance in February of 2017 (or possibly sooner) and was only recently purported to be re-certified in January 2021. There are multiple problems with the documentation regarding contractor laboratories that invalidate any machine certification. A certification can only last for a maximum of two years, and there are very important reasons for this.

This will either unseat every state level politician in Arizona or declare every Federal Law applied to Arizona as unlawful. The violation of Federal law is due to No Certification of the Voting System Machine, which includes all aspects of machine from hardware to software to add-ons by the Voting System Test Laboratories. The VSTL is accredited and overseen by the EAC per the HAVA act and is critical to the compliance and standards set forth by Law. This accreditation must be thoroughly vetted every two years. Arizona takes a strict view of Federal Elections Law Per A.R.S. 16-442(B):
"
Machines or devices used at any election for federal, state or county offices may only be certified for use in this state and may only be used in this state if they comply with the help America vote act of 2002 and if those machines or devices have been tested and approved by a laboratory that is accredited pursuant to the Help America Vote Act of 2002.
Link
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

The next national experiment needs to abolish the standing dodge, and make it just about whether a case is bringing up something of national impact or not for its high court. Either there is something there needed a final ruling or there isn't. Beside, Mark Levin documented how on some climate change argument the necessary standing was just `conjured' for a less clear-cut case than the ones recently.

But the above approach would make that moot.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:


The next national experiment needs to abolish the standing dodge, and make it just about whether a case is bringing up something of national impact or not for its high court. Either there is something there needed a final ruling or there isn't. Beside, Mark Levin documented how on some climate change argument the necessary standing was just `conjured' for a less clear-cut case than the ones recently.

But the above approach would make that moot.
It's not like the Roe in Roe v. Wade was still pregnant, either. Not saying I am disagreeing with their flexible use of "standing" in that case. I have other objections to that case but that isn't one of them.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Jan Bryant: .and back to my opening, I wanted to tell you that I do have a pretty strong project management technology background. This is not, I would say, everybody, raves about how we'll run and how tight this room is that we were working in. I was in the (MCTEC) tabulation center. You know the glass (wall) and the servers in a glass room. All the computers are on a single cable that you can see. None of that matters because of two things. One, the Dominion employees were the only ones that were running any of that equipment.
Quote:

So I'm, I was in the tabulation center six different days. Day and night shifts. And no county employees, no IT people, no one else was touching any of the software. They (Dominion) did all the training for the adjudicators, they ran all the reports. And so I brought this up on my very first day in the room. I said this doesn't seem right, as a person with my background. Never in a million years would I turn my company's most important things over to someone else. And there's only two guys (Dominion's Bruce & John) and they had whole control of everything.

I also participated in the (2%) random ballot selection for hand audit. Picking the ballots, you know, determining which bins we were going to select. And even with that, Dominion ran the report for it (which bins to pull). So no one, I mean, they (Dominion) knew exactly what was in the hand audit boxes. That made me nervous also. And they also knew when we pulled the last box, which was probably eight days before they quit counting ballots. As a senior manager over big projects, never in a million years would I have allowed some of the stuff that I saw going on there.
Quote:

The other thing that I wanted to make sure. The final week that they were counting ballots, I came in on I think a Tuesday. When I had left the Friday before I did NOT notice there was a laptop in the room behind the (glass) wall, that "John" the Dominion employee was working on. When I came in on Tuesday and walked around where they were doing the hand entry of ballots, I noticed that laptop sitting there and John was working on it. It's not a secure room if you're bringing a laptop in and out of a room. Who knows what happened there. Every one of the 50 desktops that were in there had a row of USB ports on the side of it. So I get very angry when I hear some of our leader here saying "Oh, it's secure, nothing can get in or out.". That's not true. I will tell you that is probably the biggest issue that I had.
Video at Link
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggieforester05 said:

Pathetic that our own DOJ is attempting to inhibit an investigation into voter fraud instead of actively investigating the allegations themselves.
This is the most infuriating and disgusting fact.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think this sums up the whole Maricopa password situation...

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Jan Bryant: .and back to my opening, I wanted to tell you that I do have a pretty strong project management technology background. This is not, I would say, everybody, raves about how we'll run and how tight this room is that we were working in. I was in the (MCTEC) tabulation center. You know the glass (wall) and the servers in a glass room. All the computers are on a single cable that you can see. None of that matters because of two things. One, the Dominion employees were the only ones that were running any of that equipment.
Quote:

So I'm, I was in the tabulation center six different days. Day and night shifts. And no county employees, no IT people, no one else was touching any of the software. They (Dominion) did all the training for the adjudicators, they ran all the reports. And so I brought this up on my very first day in the room. I said this doesn't seem right, as a person with my background. Never in a million years would I turn my company's most important things over to someone else. And there's only two guys (Dominion's Bruce & John) and they had whole control of everything.

I also participated in the (2%) random ballot selection for hand audit. Picking the ballots, you know, determining which bins we were going to select. And even with that, Dominion ran the report for it (which bins to pull). So no one, I mean, they (Dominion) knew exactly what was in the hand audit boxes. That made me nervous also. And they also knew when we pulled the last box, which was probably eight days before they quit counting ballots. As a senior manager over big projects, never in a million years would I have allowed some of the stuff that I saw going on there.
Quote:

The other thing that I wanted to make sure. The final week that they were counting ballots, I came in on I think a Tuesday. When I had left the Friday before I did NOT notice there was a laptop in the room behind the (glass) wall, that "John" the Dominion employee was working on. When I came in on Tuesday and walked around where they were doing the hand entry of ballots, I noticed that laptop sitting there and John was working on it. It's not a secure room if you're bringing a laptop in and out of a room. Who knows what happened there. Every one of the 50 desktops that were in there had a row of USB ports on the side of it. So I get very angry when I hear some of our leader here saying "Oh, it's secure, nothing can get in or out.". That's not true. I will tell you that is probably the biggest issue that I had.
Video at Link
At the 6 hour 43 minute mark, she says she witnessed Dominion resetting the tabulators to zero on three separate occasions. The reason given to her for the resetting was that neither Dominion nor the county workers were sure how many ballots the tabulators could process before they "crashed."

During the Curling v. Raffensperger case, the concern about memory fragmentation after as low as 4,000 ballots was mentioned. And there was a "power down" procedure recommended by Dominion to avoid that problem with the tabulators. I can only assume that a "reset" is the same as a "power down."

IOW, this is a POS system, as Judge Totenberg concluded in late October 2020.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The inimitable Ray Blehar, a retired senior DoD analyst, has just completed a top-level analysis of the Maricopa County results. You may recall that he identified irregularities associated with "missing" write-in and minor party ballots in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and nationally that he believes were manually adjudicated to provide The Hologram's margin of victory, as previously reported at Redstate here. His key findings in Maricopa are earth-shaking:

  • Two massive vote dumps occurred in just over an hour after the Arizona polls closed totally ~625,000 and ~1,473,000 votes, respectively.
  • The total of those two vote dumps (2,098,619) exceeded the official results total of Maricopa County votes cast (2,089,563) by more than 9,000 votes.
  • Biden received more votes in those two vote dumps (1,161,582) than the official vote tally (1,040,774) in Maricopa County. (Was this the reason for that [url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-breaking/2021/03/06/165-000-hens-die-2-barns-destroyed-fire-hickmans-family-farm/4614251001/]suspicious fire[[/url]?)
  • Those dumps could only have been absentee ballot early voting results that were counted legally in the two weeks before Election Day, as late-arriving absentee ballots and election day in-person voting results could not possibly have been included in those two dumps uploaded just over an hour after the polls closed.
  • Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).
  • In-person voting in Maricopa County on Election Day totaled 167,000 votes cast, per multiple sources (here and here); how were those in-person votes accounted for when the two early voter dumps identified above already exceeded the official number of votes cast in the county?

Quote:

Other supporting information Blehar allegedly uncovered illuminates those incredible discrepancies.

According to numbers from Edison Research (used by all major media), Biden earned approximately 249,000 more votes than Trump in Maricopa County, as depicted in the table below. Note the "Biden lead" column is cumulative, whereas the other columns represent discrete numbers for each vote dump.


Quote:

According to the official Arizona government website there are over 100,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats in Maricopa County, as shown in the below table:

The other registered voters (the independents shown in the right-most column) delivered ~226,000 votes to Biden and ~80,000 votes to Trump despite polling showing independents favored Biden by only 9 points (53-44%). Biden receiving nearly three times as many of those votes as Trump is HIGHLY unlikely because even that 9-point split is suspect, as virtually all polls exaggerated Biden's lead among independents nationwide.
Quote:


The absentee/early balloting across the state was almost evenly split, with Democrats having only a 9,000-ballot edge (~923,000 to ~914,000). Interestingly, Maricopa County absentee/early balloting numbers were never made available. If anything, the split in Maricopa would have been tilted in favor of Trump due to the registration advantage enjoyed by Republicans, making it even more unlikely that Biden could have achieved a lead of ~249,000 votes in Maricopa after those two voter dumps.
Link
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

The inimitable Ray Blehar, a retired senior DoD analyst, has just completed a top-level analysis of the Maricopa County results. You may recall that he identified irregularities associated with "missing" write-in and minor party ballots in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and nationally that he believes were manually adjudicated to provide The Hologram's margin of victory, as previously reported at Redstate here. His key findings in Maricopa are earth-shaking:

  • Two massive vote dumps occurred in just over an hour after the Arizona polls closed totally ~625,000 and ~1,473,000 votes, respectively.
  • The total of those two vote dumps (2,098,619) exceeded the official results total of Maricopa County votes cast (2,089,563) by more than 9,000 votes.
  • Biden received more votes in those two vote dumps (1,161,582) than the official vote tally (1,040,774) in Maricopa County. (Was this the reason for that [url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-breaking/2021/03/06/165-000-hens-die-2-barns-destroyed-fire-hickmans-family-farm/4614251001/]suspicious fire[[/url]?)
  • Those dumps could only have been absentee ballot early voting results that were counted legally in the two weeks before Election Day, as late-arriving absentee ballots and election day in-person voting results could not possibly have been included in those two dumps uploaded just over an hour after the polls closed.
  • Those vote dumps were time-stamped making it impossible that those dumps came from any county other than Maricopa, as no other Arizona county delivered more than 525,000 votes, and any two or more counties necessary to contribute to either of those dumps would have had to time their uploads down to the second (an impossibility).
  • In-person voting in Maricopa County on Election Day totaled 167,000 votes cast, per multiple sources (here and here); how were those in-person votes accounted for when the two early voter dumps identified above already exceeded the official number of votes cast in the county?

Quote:

Other supporting information Blehar allegedly uncovered illuminates those incredible discrepancies.

According to numbers from Edison Research (used by all major media), Biden earned approximately 249,000 more votes than Trump in Maricopa County, as depicted in the table below. Note the "Biden lead" column is cumulative, whereas the other columns represent discrete numbers for each vote dump.


Quote:

According to the official Arizona government website there are over 100,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats in Maricopa County, as shown in the below table:

The other registered voters (the independents shown in the right-most column) delivered ~226,000 votes to Biden and ~80,000 votes to Trump despite polling showing independents favored Biden by only 9 points (53-44%). Biden receiving nearly three times as many of those votes as Trump is HIGHLY unlikely because even that 9-point split is suspect, as virtually all polls exaggerated Biden's lead among independents nationwide.
Quote:


The absentee/early balloting across the state was almost evenly split, with Democrats having only a 9,000-ballot edge (~923,000 to ~914,000). Interestingly, Maricopa County absentee/early balloting numbers were never made available. If anything, the split in Maricopa would have been tilted in favor of Trump due to the registration advantage enjoyed by Republicans, making it even more unlikely that Biden could have achieved a lead of ~249,000 votes in Maricopa after those two voter dumps.
Link



Math and statistical analysis are instruments of white supremacy and will henceforth be ignored. Gads.

The algorithm videos are also pretty amazing. R coefficient of .993? How can that be ignored? Just sad where we are right now.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hillary paid for warrant to spy on Trump.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


DePerno back in court today in Antrim County.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:



DePerno back in court today in Antrim County.
Tweet already removed. Can't have the truth getting out there after all.
First Page Last Page
Page 441 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.