aggiehawg said:

---

Thanks for posting that. Hmm.

---

Correction said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Thanks for posting that. Hmm.

---

Roy signed a letter today along with a handful of other GOP reps saying it's not appropriate for Congress to decide that a state's certified electors are improper and will not join in objecting. He's pointing out hypocrisy.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

AgHunter2011 said:

---

Audit the entire election. Why would anyone be against that?

I don't care if D wins every race, just prove it was conducted legally, free, and fair rather than simply defaulting to trust.

---

There is not a lot to actually audit. That's the feature of all of these election systems. Dominion, ES&S, Hart Intercivic all seem to be compromised.

Started with Diebold. And the rest are still using the same source code. I have done enough research that I no longer believe W. actually won an unmanipulated vote in 2004.

That's how bad this is.

---

ClassicAg18 said:

---

AgHunter2011 said:

---

will25u said:

---

Don't know that this will play well with Trump's base.

---

Politicians suck.
Our government is too big.
There are too many looters looking for a handout.

---

This kind of stuff makes me never want to vote for anyone who is a career politician ever again (example: Cornyn). We need to primary out these swamp creatures if the republican party wants to grow a spine

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Can we keep this thread about actual election news and keep the Q-crap in its own thread please?

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Just a reminder of what Eric Coomer said in a 2017 demonstration of ballot adjudication system in Chicago.

https://rumble.com/vbd3s5-2017-dr.-eric-coomer-explains-how-to-alter-votes-in-the-dominion-voting-sys.html

---

Quote:

---

But, even with the new circumstances for why the call took place, I was still perplexed by the commentary in the media reports about President Trump's comments which were portrayed as him urging the Georgia Secretary of State to "find" votes for him and to explain things by saying they had just "recalculated" the outcome.
The context presented was so juvenile and cartoonishly improper from an objective point of view, there had to be more to the call than was being reported.
And there was.
Late on Sunday, I was able to listen to the recording. It begins with Mark Meadows, the President's Chief of Staff, advising the President that everyone is on the line. Meadows's voice is clear and without distortion, and my first reaction is that it is Meadows who is recording the call on his phone. He quickly informs the President who is on the call, using first names only for some. But from what I could discern, the President was on the call, along with Meadows, two attorneys representing the President in Georgia litigation, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and one other person I who I wasn't sure of but I think might have been the Georgia Attorney General.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

More court frickery in Georgia.

The hearing was supposed to be on Jovan Pulitizer's forensic inspection of the ballots counted in Fulton County election night when the observers were sent home.

---