That's what Barnes would say!Doctor51 said:
No idea who MFbarns is.
Seabreeze said:
Did you just post a MF Barns Twitter link?
All I can say right now is, "Ugh."HillcountryAg97 said:
Hawg is by a mile the best source of information I have found anywhere. Hawg, is it time to get our hopes up a bit yet? Thanks so much for your contributions to this board.
I would try and help but only took one law class, Business Law as an undergrad at East Texas State. Got a C, kept getting tripped up because I confused justice with the law.aggiehawg said:I'll do my best, until my eyes start to cross.HumpitPuryear said:As one of many on here that don't speak legal mumbo jumbo I certainly appreciate your summaries and opinions. I hope you will have another cup o joe and carry on.aggiehawg said:Maybe that's why AZ was not included in the suit by the State of Texas? Perhaps? So much is going on it is hard to keep up. Getting pretty tired of reading 100+ page court filings though.barnyard1996 said:
I guess we will see what pigs squeal.
What does this mean?Red Fishing Ag93 said:
Thank you for the link, this is very enlightening. Should be required viewing in all schools Junior High through College and Graduate school EVERY YEAR. And required annual viewing before voting.munch96 said:
I just pictured you being either Texas Jack Vermillion or Turkey Creek Jack Johnson when they come flying out of the saloon during a shootout in Tombstone. Sorry for the derail, just thought it was funny.richardag said:I would try and help but only took one law class, Business Law as an undergrad at East Texas State. Got a C, kept getting tripped up because I confused justice with the law.aggiehawg said:I'll do my best, until my eyes start to cross.HumpitPuryear said:As one of many on here that don't speak legal mumbo jumbo I certainly appreciate your summaries and opinions. I hope you will have another cup o joe and carry on.aggiehawg said:Maybe that's why AZ was not included in the suit by the State of Texas? Perhaps? So much is going on it is hard to keep up. Getting pretty tired of reading 100+ page court filings though.barnyard1996 said:
I guess we will see what pigs squeal.
munch96 said:
agdaddy04 said:munch96 said:
Great link! What's interesting is you can't pull it up directly if searching for it in YouTube app. I tried to pull it up outside of TexAgs to like it and save it. And couldn't.
McCarthy will make a great Speaker in a couple years.We fixed the keg said:
100% Grade A.....SAVAGE!!!!!!
Texas is leading the charge, being the largest Red State and lover of the Constitution. Other states are falling in and joining the fight.BobaFettsClone said:Shouldn't other states, such as those that decided to band together early on in the investigation, do the same? Why just Texas? Or did I miss where other states are suing swing states, just the same?Premium said:Is it surprising that Texas is having to clean up the mess of other States?ClutchCityAg said:
The Supreme Court has Original Jurisdiction in the Texas case and can hear and see the evidence directly instead of being limited to Appellate Jurisdiction where they would be dependent on whether the State Courts followed procedures. Remedies in Appellate would be to require the State Courts to behave differently than they have the last 5 weeks.ClutchCityAg said:Nitro Power said:
I am not an attorney, but it seems to me with the Texas case on the horizon it wasn't necessary to hear this case. I wouldn't think you would want to hear this case alone and incidentally set precedent for the other pending cases. But what do I know.
Given what Hawg said about under Biden not hearing it anymore, make Battle Hymn of the Republic the movement's national anthem.MooreTrucker said:SEC SEC SEC SECrgag12 said:
Looks almost like a civil war, but in the court room
Oh, and SD
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1336429988317421570.htmlravingfans said:The Supreme Court has Original Jurisdiction in the Texas case and can hear and see the evidence directly instead of being limited to Appellate Jurisdiction where they would be dependent on whether the State Courts followed procedures. Remedies in Appellate would be to require the State Courts to behave differently than they have the last 5 weeks.ClutchCityAg said:Nitro Power said:
I am not an attorney, but it seems to me with the Texas case on the horizon it wasn't necessary to hear this case. I wouldn't think you would want to hear this case alone and incidentally set precedent for the other pending cases. But what do I know.