It is done precinct by precinct, and I think in batches of 100.

So, if you have a batch of 100 votes, you are supposed to have 100 envelopes or peoples names that voted in-person tied to those votes, even though you don't know which vote goes to which envelope / person.

If you lose 10 votes out of that batch of 100 for no signature on the envelope, you first try to identify any absentee ballots, which are marked as such as they are filed away. You take those out at random first. If you still have too many ballots compared to envelopes, you take out more at random.

So, the impact should be contained to the precinct that the fraud occurred.

If someone just dropped in 500,000 mail in ballots, you are going to have a lot of ballots with no envelopes.

Here is a link to the latest recount manual in WI: https://elections.wi.gov/manuals/recount

BusterAg said:

---

I will look for the rules tonight.

It is done precinct by precinct, and I think in batches of 100.

So, if you have a batch of 100 votes, you are supposed to have 100 envelopes or peoples names that voted in-person tied to those votes, even though you don't know which vote goes to which envelope / person.

If you lose 10 votes out of that batch of 100 for no signature on the envelope, you first try to identify any absentee ballots, which are marked as such as they are filed away. You take those out at random first. If you still have too many ballots compared to envelopes, you take out more at random.

So, the impact should be contained to the precinct that the fraud occurred.

If someone just dropped in 500,000 mail in ballots, you are going to have a lot of ballots with no envelopes.

---

Regardless of the size of the batches if 100 percent of the fraudulent ballots going in are for one candidate but only 40-60% of the ballots that are removed are for that same candidate then you end up just watering down the fraud, not eliminating it.

https://graphcommons.com/graphs/d208e5f8-aa2a-429b-b576-63e676d9f3e3
Click view graph.

Secolobo said:

---

https://graphcommons.com/graphs/d208e5f8-aa2a-429b-b576-63e676d9f3e3
Click view graph.

---

Click on the link for citing/sources.

will25u said:

---

---

will25u said:

---

I asked this in the Mueller thread a few weeks ago...

Who is more worthless as AG?

AG Barr
or
AG Sessions

---

Both...but I wonder more what is done to control them once there. They all come in guns blazing then suddenly change. The deep state is deeper than anyone even knows.

Only 28 days after election? /s

their families and loved ones are likely threatened with death, imo

daggertx said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

---

Just to add to:
https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/11/20/dominion-voting-systems-was-developed-by-peking-universitys-founder-group/

Gyles Marrett said:

---

will25u said:

---

I asked this in the Mueller thread a few weeks ago...

Who is more worthless as AG?

AG Barr
or
AG Sessions

---

Both...but I wonder more what is done to control them once there. They all come in guns blazing then suddenly change. The deep state is deeper than anyone even knows.

---

Well, if Trump is truly one and done, I hope he has enough evidence to go straight scorched earth on these deep state turds up until he leaves office. This is my New Year's wish.

BobaFettsClone said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

will25u said:

---

I asked this in the Mueller thread a few weeks ago...

Who is more worthless as AG?

AG Barr
or
AG Sessions

---

Both...but I wonder more what is done to control them once there. They all come in guns blazing then suddenly change. The deep state is deeper than anyone even knows.

---

Well, if Trump is truly one and done, I hope he has enough evidence to go straight scorched earth on these deep state turds up until he leaves office. This is my New Year's wish.

---

Let's hope he has the trolliness to tweet out "Execute Order-66"

will25u said:

---

---

will25u said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

---

This is huge. Act of war if true. Amiright?

It seems Project Veritas is still busy. Check this out...starting to release this evening already.

aggieland09 said:

---

will25u said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

---

This is huge. Act of war if true. Amiright?

---

I don't understand the significance of the Edgar filing. What am I missing?

All this guy proves is that the opposite of what he is saying is true.

BusterAg said:

---

aggieland09 said:

---

will25u said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

---

This is huge. Act of war if true. Amiright?

---

I don't understand the significance of the Edgar filing. What am I missing?

---

I may not be understanding correctly but it sounds to me like they are saying a limited partnership investment company (owned 75% by china government) bought $400,000,000 worth of ownership into dominion on Oct 8th 2020. I assume based on the statistic anomalies of fraud that they influenced the dominion in Biden's favor in key states which would be an act of war if true. There's assumption here and I may be missing something.

MostlyHarmless said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

I will look for the rules tonight.

It is done precinct by precinct, and I think in batches of 100.

So, if you have a batch of 100 votes, you are supposed to have 100 envelopes or peoples names that voted in-person tied to those votes, even though you don't know which vote goes to which envelope / person.

If you lose 10 votes out of that batch of 100 for no signature on the envelope, you first try to identify any absentee ballots, which are marked as such as they are filed away. You take those out at random first. If you still have too many ballots compared to envelopes, you take out more at random.

So, the impact should be contained to the precinct that the fraud occurred.

If someone just dropped in 500,000 mail in ballots, you are going to have a lot of ballots with no envelopes.

---

Regardless of the size of the batches if 100 percent of the fraudulent ballots going in are for one candidate but only 40-60% of the ballots that are removed are for that same candidate then you end up just watering down the fraud, not eliminating it.

---

This makes no sense. If 100% of the votes in a batch are for one candidate, then 100% of the votes coming out will be for that same candidate. You pull ballots from the same batch of disallowed votes.

aggieland09 said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

aggieland09 said:

---

will25u said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

---

This is huge. Act of war if true. Amiright?

---

I don't understand the significance of the Edgar filing. What am I missing?

---

I may not be understanding correctly but it sounds to me like they are saying a limited partnership investment company (owned 75% by china government) bought $400,000,000 worth of ownership into dominion on Oct 8th 2020. I assume based on the statistic anomalies of fraud that they influenced the dominion in Biden's favor in key states which would be an act of war if true. There's assumption here and I may be missing something.

---

Yeah. This filing does not show that. At all. Maybe there are more related documents, but this one is nothing stand alone.