captkirk said:

---

---

Those guys are frik'n smart.

will25u said:

---

---

This needs to be a much bigger problem! When does the GA legislature step in? How does Stacy Strahan have this much power?!? They're committing crimes against we the people in our faces.

Amazing Moves said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

This needs to be a much bigger problem! When does the GA legislature step in? How does Stacy Strahan have this much power?!? They're committing crimes against we the people in our faces.

---

Because Republicans roll over and take it and won't man the F up and realize they are competing against a criminal enterprise so claiming moral high ground victories won't win anything.

richardag said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

SIAP.

Quote:

---

Don't think there are voter issues in Georgia? I have 57,793 reasons to reconsider that.
I've personally spent the last several days painstakingly analyzing 580,226 registered Georgia voters from current state-provided voter rolls who submitted a US Postal Service Mail Forwarding Change of Address request at least 30 days PRIOR TO the November 3rd election.

FACT: at least 57,793 Georgia voters cast their vote in a county that is DIFFERENT than where they previously instructed the USPS to forward their mail.

FACT: 43,507 (75%) of these individuals DID NOT vote in person on election day.

FACT: 17,514 of these voters asked the USPS to forward their mail OUT OF STATE to non-APO/DPO/FPO military addresses. 89% are over the age of 25 and likely not college students.

It's been a few years, but most of you know I'm a former FBI Special Agent. Prior to that I worked in the US intelligence community. I'm a trained federal investigator who was assigned to Public Corruption cases. There are others more experienced than me, but this if far from my first rodeo.

With few exceptions, a person submits a USPS Change of Address request because they have permanently moved and want their mail rerouted to their new address. Under the 1993 National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), states may use that USPS Change of Address request to "identify registrants who may have changed residences" and "remove the registrant from the voter rolls after satisfying all requirements of the (NVRA)".

Many of these incidents can be legitimately explained. Not all reveal nefarious intent or coordinated efforts. Some voted Republican. Some voted Democrat. But after investigating a random sample of these voters, it's abundantly clear that thousands, if not tens of thousands, voted in our election who do not reside in the county in which they votedor even in Georgia.

Demand officials investigate these 57,793 and, if warranted, remove their votes from the November 3rd general election and remove them from the voter rolls before the upcoming Senate run-off.

---

LINK

---

To all the deniers, does this count as evidence?

I am sick of the there is no evidence bull ***** There is a ton of evidence that should have triggered a wide scale investigation by law enforcement either in the cities, counties, states or federal levels.

---

To the deniers, Joe having a press conference saying he cheated and laying out how he did so wouldn't count as evidence. You are talking about people who do not care one bit if they won legitimately or illegitimately.

Guy is not GOP but he was trained by GOP to be a poll challenger so his lanyard was marked GOP. He was harassed the entire time he was there. Witnessed multiple instances of ballot fraud where number on envelopes didn't match the numbers on the ballots, flagged ballots that have pink stickies on them because they weren't registered voters and the poll workers entering them into the system anyway with a 1/1/1900 birthdate, etc.

Covid was used as the excuse for why he was routinely yelled at to step back. At 8:30 that evening (November 4) a Black guy who was a supervisor repeatedly threatened to kick his ass, summoned a cop over and he was escorted out by the police who didn't ask a single question. The front doors had been locked earlier in the day and the windows covered in the TCF counting center in Detroit. Throughout the day only GOP poll challengers were kicked out, no Dem poll challengers so by evening they were incredibly shorthanded to watch over 160+ counting stations.

That doesn't sound very likely to me.

aggiehawg said:

---

That doesn't sound very likely to me.

---

Not at all. Statistically, getting 95% of the Democrat vote is virtually impossible. The more personal testimony, number anomilies, "glitches", other statistical evidence, along with the stonewalling by public officials, the more this whole election stinks to high heaven.

will25u said:

---

---

I mean is there any legitimate reason for the SoS to resist auditing signatures for verification? I can't think of any honest reason.

Gyles Marrett said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

I mean is there any legitimate reason for the SoS to resist auditing signatures for verification? I can't think of any honest reason.

---

They didn't save the envelopes with the signatures like they were supposed to, making such an audit physically, yet conveniently, impossible?

FireAg said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

I mean is there any legitimate reason for the SoS to resist auditing signatures for verification? I can't think of any honest reason.

---

They didn't save the envelopes with the signatures like they were supposed to, making such an audit physically, yet conveniently, impossible?

---

Well that's not a legitimate reason. It's like a taking your drivers test, throwing it in the trash, then telling them you passed and they have to accept it because you said it's true and you can't find the test anymore.

FireAg said:

---

Gyles Marrett said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

I mean is there any legitimate reason for the SoS to resist auditing signatures for verification? I can't think of any honest reason.

---

They didn't save the envelopes with the signatures like they were supposed to, making such an audit physically, yet conveniently, impossible?

---

And I think that is why we keep making the request. We want them to 100% admit that they are incapable of auditing the ballots because they did not follow proper procedures. Give them enough rope.

Dominion contract with Georgia

Quote:

---

3.2 Delivery and Use of Source Code. No later than thirty calendar days from State of Georgia certification, Contractor shall, at its sole expense, (i) place in escrow with NCC Group, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the "Escrow Agent"), pursuant to the NCC Group Sourceone Escrow Agreement (Agreement# 46286) by and between Escrow Agent and Contractor dated November 4, 2010 (the "Escrow Agreement"), a copy of the Source Code incorporated within the Solution provided to the State Entities under this Agreement and (ii) cause the State to be enrolled as a "Licensee" under the Escrow Agreement. Delivery of such Contractor Licensed Programs under this Agreement will be deemed to include and require delivery of a copy of the Source Code to the Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement, together with any updates thereto. State shall be entitled to receive a copy of such Source Code and to use such Source Code to support and maintain the State Entities' authorized use of the Contractor Licensed Programs, upon the occurrence of a "Release Event" set forth in the Escrow Agreement. If Contractor makes any update to any escrowed Contractor Licensed Program, Contractor shall furnish the Escrow Agent with a corrected or revised copy of the Source Code for such Contractor Licensed Program within the timeframe required by Section 1.2 of the Escrow Agreement. 3.3 Third Party Source Code. Contractor shall identify to State in writing prior to the Effective Date and from time to time thereafter as often as required, any source code for Third Party Licensed Programs that Contractor is not authorized to deliver as part of the Source Code hereunder and for all such source code.

---

Up to 23 cosponsors now.

Thinice said:

---

I don't think it's really the issue of matching the signatures.

Do you really think they took the time to create an envelope for every fake ballot that's been run through the post office?

---

That's why a count of envelopes compared to votes counted may shed some light on fraud.

If more mail in ballots are counted than the number of envelopes you now have fraud.

txags92 said:

---

Thinice said:

---

richardag said:

---

Thinice said:

---

I don't think it's really the issue of matching the signatures.

Do you really think they took the time to create an envelope for every fake ballot that's been run through the post office?

---

That's why a count of envelopes compared to votes counted may shed some light on fraud.

If more mail in ballots are counted than the number of envelopes you now have fraud.

---

Agree, think their excuse is "they've been separated so we can't audit" but the envelopes are required to be kept as part of the record, would think this would be case of all states with "mail-in ballot spikes".

---

I remember reading a claim that some election official in some other state...maybe WI or PA had ordered them to ditch the envelopes after they were initially "verified". That makes it easy to claim "We can't determine which of the 150,000 votes were fraudulent and which were actual voters when somebody points out they reported more mail in ballots than were sent to voters.

---

This hurts them; if I were judge, I would toss them all out then. Voters, blame your incompetent election officials, not me.

You cannot disenfranchise 4,785,000 voters so that you don't disenfranchise 150,000 voters (4.935 MM total votes in GA for example). You have to protect the larger amount from incompetence / fraud of the subset.

richardag said:

---

Thinice said:

---

I don't think it's really the issue of matching the signatures.

Do you really think they took the time to create an envelope for every fake ballot that's been run through the post office?

---

That's why a count of envelopes compared to votes counted may shed some light on fraud.

If more mail in ballots are counted than the number of envelopes you now have fraud.

---

Absolutely this. It would be a simple, sure way to make sure every mail-in ballot was legit. And if they didn't save the envelopes then all the mail-ins should be declared invalid.

If the election workers were incompetent - or crooked - enough not to save the evidence then it's on them, not those that are seeking to ensure a fair election.