Bretton Gekko said:

---

When you see information that is obscure, unclear, and full of innuendos, its Q, and its fake.

---

No, this is just very in depth info into computers and html. Essentially they have tied in Dominion company registered domains, traffic, SMTP traffic and other services back to all these dark/foreign entities that have been blacklisted by malware blocking program threat lists. That's very bad and obviously indicative of nefarious actions.

I wonder if they used Spacex's Starlink internet. It is currently beta testing. That would connect Musk to all of this. He was a side character in some Q drops.

Yes, yes, its way over my head. Along with the hidden messages being sent by holding a press conference at Four Seasons Landscaping. Ridiculous.

If anyone had any actual evidence that was not going to be presented in a court proceeding, they would blast it everywhere they could.

When you have nothing more than a theory, you obfuscate. You have more than you know

Bretton Gekko said:

---

Yes, yes, its way over my head. Along with the hidden messages being sent by holding a press conference at Four Seasons Landscaping. Ridiculous.

If anyone had any actual evidence that was not going to be presented in a court proceeding, they would blast it everywhere they could.

When you have nothing more than a theory, you obfuscate. You have more than you know

---

And there's the key. Just because they don't blast it out doesn't mean they don't have it.

And yeah, I got the "Q" shot at the end, but ridiculing it doesn't make it any less true.

Bretton Gekko said:

---

Yes, yes, its way over my head. Along with the hidden messages being sent by holding a press conference at Four Seasons Landscaping. Ridiculous.

If anyone had any actual evidence that was not going to be presented in a court proceeding, they would blast it everywhere they could.

When you have nothing more than a theory, you obfuscate. You have more than you know

---

Why was the press conference at Four Seasons Landscaping then? And why is it ridiculous? Do you assume a message, if there is one, has to be for you to understand to make it exist?

What platform should his administration broadcast his claims over? Twitter, Facebook, Fox News? Perhaps the NY Post could drop a headline?

And you conveniently suggest everything is known information, however there is still much to be investigated and to drop "evidence" before you have completed your search, well, that would be stupid.

Edit: Called it hotel

Why was it held at Four Seasons Total Landscaping and not the hotel? Occam's Razor

But, I'm sure the location was a message to the deep state instead

Bretton Gekko said:

---

Why was it held at Four Seasons Total Landscaping and not the hotel? Occam's Razor

But, I'm sure the location was a message to the deep state instead

---

Why would it auto-populate to 'total landscape?' It wasn't a link on the initial tweet, was it?

Mind you, the news went on a 'victory Biden' blitz within hours after the press conference was tweeted out. Very intersting how that happened.

ETA: I don't have an account, but if anyone has Twitter they should attempt to type in Four Seasons, then see what pops up. I assure you it won't be a landscaping company. Trump had to intentionally type it out.

Occam's Razor, huh? So what IS the "simpler explanation" for that choice of location?

Connection to the internet would be very hard, you'd have to have Ethernet cords coming out of the back and into the wall and it would he very obvious.

This is the most recent Arizona update I can find.

I've been following this link, but not sure where the numbers come from.

https://alex.github.io/nyt-2020-election-scraper/battleground-state-changes.html

So much for that!!!

That sure sounds like Trump's odds in GA are going up

Could this all really come down to the SCOTUS ruling on whether PA officials has the authority to make all the changes they made to their rules? Wow if so.

You'd essentially be guaranteeing that NO ONE would agree with who a winner is

As soon as they're done finding ballots...there's going to be a recount anyways

Does anyone know what body in PA said votes could count if they were received after Election Day?

If I'm not mistaken it was the PA Courts. I've seen several tweets claiming that US Constitution says that only the St Leg can make those changes but in this case it was the courts that made the call without any approval from the St Leg.

Thanks. Would like to hear more details from any legal experts who can offer an opinion.

Honestly I'd rather them find completely illegal activity. Even though it'd be legitimate, the cities would burn.

What is unclear is whether these ballots were included in the vote or not. I've heard it both ways. I'm going to guess the answer is somewhere in the middle complicating the issue.

Quote:

---

Wisconsin Statute 6.86 provides that an absentee ballot must be signed by a witness, who is also required to list his or her address. If a witness address is not listed, then the ballot is considered invalid and must be returned to the voter to have the witness correct.

Instead, multiple sources tell "The Dan O'Donnell Show," municipal clerks and vote counters across the state simply filled out witness signatures themselves. Acting on false and unlawful advice from the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), these clerks may have inadvertently invalidated thousands of absentee votes.

"The statute is very, very clear," said retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, who worked as a poll watcher in Milwaukee on Election Day. "If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it's not valid. That ballot is not valid."

The WEC sent uniform instructions to voters with their mail-in ballots that informed them that "your witness must sign and provide their full address (street number, street name, city) in the Certification of Witness section" and warned that "if any of the required information above is missing, your ballot will not be counted."

However, on October 19th, the WEC sent instructions to clerks that they can simply fill in the witness address themselves so that the ballot would not be invalidated.

"Please note that the clerk should attempt to resolve any missing witness address information prior to Election Day if possible, and this can be done through reliable information (personal knowledge, voter registration information, through a phone call with the voter or witness)," WEC wrote. "The witness does not need to appear to add a missing address."

"In defiance of and direct contradiction to the statute, the Wisconsin Elections Commission gave guidance--that is, cover--to all 72 county clerks and turned the statute on his head," Gableman said.

"They said, 'Gee, we know the law says an absentee ballot without the witness address is not valid, but county clerk, you have a duty to go ahead and look up on your own the witness' address if there's no address on the absentee ballot."

Anticipating a legal challenge to this seemingly highly unlawful advice, the WEC instructed clerks to write in these witness addresses in red pen so that they would be easy to find during a recount or audit of the vote.

---

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2020-11-07-wisconsin-clerks-may-have-unlawfully-altered-thousands-of-absentee-ballots/

RedHand said:

---

What is unclear is whether these ballots were included in the vote or not. I've heard it both ways. I'm going to guess the answer is somewhere in the middle complicating the issue.

---

I believe they were the basis of the big shift that took place late that night. Biden received a 140k bump without a single Trump vote.

aggiehawg said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

Thanks. Would like to hear more details from any legal experts who can offer an opinion.

---

PA state supreme court construed a statute that stated "ballots must be received by 8:00 PM on election day" didn't really mean "8:00 PM on election day." Just created the three day extension out of thin air. Go figure.

---

Trump is a rules based guy and will run with this.
No fault to the voter the govt broke the 8pm rule and disenfranchised the vote. The voter will be punished...not seeing this fly

Las Vegas Coin Laundromat and Video Store, Memphis, TN

Good Poster said:

---

---

Somebody decided to get married.

aggiehawg said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

Thanks. Would like to hear more details from any legal experts who can offer an opinion.

---

PA state supreme court construed a statute that stated "ballots must be received by 8:00 PM on election day" didn't really mean "8:00 PM on election day." Just created the three day extension out of thin air. Go figure.

---

I think this is the reason that Trump wanted everyone to vote in person. They had an idea there would be a problem and votes would get tossed. This would give him a commanding lead if no mail in ballots allowed.