oh no said:

---

The Atlantic is already talking about over-turning ("fortifying") the 2024 election

According to The Atlantic, the 2024 election has already been won by the Democrats (seemingly because they 'won' in 2020 and trends never change?). It's already been won, and it's already being 'overturned' https://t.co/PSUrB2yOYl

— Quite Frankly (@PoliticalOrgy) July 29, 2022

---

If the mid-terms are rigged there may not be a 2024 cycle.

titan said:

---

oh no said:

---

The Atlantic is already talking about over-turning ("fortifying") the 2024 election

According to The Atlantic, the 2024 election has already been won by the Democrats (seemingly because they 'won' in 2020 and trends never change?). It's already been won, and it's already being 'overturned' https://t.co/PSUrB2yOYl

— Quite Frankly (@PoliticalOrgy) July 29, 2022

---

If the mid-terms are rigged there may not be a 2024 cycle.

---

Colorado primary challenge news. Mesa and El Paso counties.

Just left the Clerk's office, with a lot of interesting new thoughts. Peter Lupia (clerk candidate) explained why the adjudication was so high. Apparently half of the ballots being tested were blank and the machines were reprogrammed for this test recount before the real recount pic.twitter.com/IOEqiJ293b

— George (@BehizyTweets) July 29, 2022

Kind of unclear wording here. When he says "computer generated ballots" I believe his is referring to the piece of paper that is produced by a ballot marking devices, or BMDs. The tweeter saying the ballots are "blank" is misleading as what the tabulators actually are reading is the QR code. Not sure why there would be a change in parameters for adjudication though.

Will have to watch this one to get further clarification.

Quote:

---

Dominion Voting machines in El Paso County, Co. have reportedly produced large numbers of adjudications in their Logic and Accuracy test for the upcoming hand recount of the 2022 Primary election. The recount was ordered (and paid for) by some of the candidates, including Mesa Clerk Tina Peters and El Paso senate candidate Linda Zamora Wilson, who had her election inexplicably overturned AFTER it had been called by local news without any explanation.

---

Quote:

---

According to Jim Wiley of ColoradoRecount.com:
The L&A consisted of 4,000 ballots. 2,200, around 60%, were reportedly kicked out for adjudication. Two Dominion employees were present and it still can't be run correctly. Teams of judges are reviewing the ballots as part of the adjudication process.
The candidates were required to pay for the cost of the recount, including $10,000 allocated to "vendor programming/support"

---

Link

I do recall a very high level of adjudications in Fulton County during that recount in 2020. "Recount" is kind of a misnomer as it was being used in Fulton County in 2020, though. Logic and Accuracy tests are supposed to be done before the electronic voting systems are put in use for each election. That is not the same as every BMD and tabulator being tested, it is a statistical sampling.

Getting a better picture of what is happening in Colorado.

Quote:

---

Four candidates have paid the money for a machine recount of the Colorado Primary Election, including Secretary of State candidate Tina Peters whose inclusion means the recount will take place in all 64 counties.

The recount jurisdiction for two of the other candidates, County Clerk and Recorder candidate Peter Lupia and Coroner candidate Dr. Rae Ann Weber are under the purview of current El Paso Clerk and Recorder Chuck Broerman. Recounts for State Senate candidate Lynda Zamora Wilson, along with Peters, will be overseen by Secretary of State Jena Griswold.

---

I am beginning to think that having Sec of State's office check their own work on how they conducted the election is a bad idea. A very bad one. But I digress.

Quote:

---

According to a source who attended the Secretary of State's call on the recount process this morning, Colorado rules state that the recount must adjudicate every ballot with an "undervote."

An undervote is when the entire ballot is not filled out completely some races are left blank. This rule does not apply to the primary or general elections so, the narrative goes, in a recount the result of the high error rate "is expected."

---

Okay, that answers that question about "blank ballots."

Quote:

---

According to people in the room, the high error rate was not expected.

Officials scrambled to call in additional judges and watchers given the high volume of rejected ballots, all of which need to be adjudicated for each of seven machines being tested. The reported estimate is that the Logic and Accuracy Testing is going to take 26 hours to complete given the high error rate.

At press time, I am told they've only completed three of seven scanners, and they will attempt one more before calling it a night and continuing tomorrow. Original expectations were that this test would take only a few hours.

---

Quote:

---

Since they're such sticklers for rules a good thing until the rule maker is a tyrant let's talk about the rules and statutes governing this process.

According to the Colorado Revised Statute:

Quote:

---

"Prior to any recount, the canvass board shall choose at random and test voting devices used in the candidate race, ballot issue, or ballot question that is the subject of the recount. The board shall use the voting devices it has selected to conduct a comparison of the machine count of the ballots counted on each such voting device for the candidate race, ballot issue, or ballot question to the corresponding manual count of the VOTER VERIFIED paper records." (Emphasis added)

---

---

Quote:

---

According to people closely watching this upside clown rodeo, this statute is being violated.
First, they are not manually counting the ballots and, according to a source watching this process like a hawk, "Ashe, everything they are doing is on a computer screen."

Second, and equally egregious, they are not counting manual or otherwise VOTER VERIFIED PAPER RECORDS. They are counting test ballots.

They are counting the SAME "deck" of test ballots that they used for Logic and Accuracy Testing prior to the Primary. That activity that test is prescribed in the Colorado Election Rules 8 CCR 1505-1 (11.3) as the methodology for testing the machines prior to an election. But today's activities are not testing the machines prior to an election.

They are testing prior to a recount.

---

Yeah, what I said about having the Sec of State check their own work? Not good. It was a mess in Georgia in 2020. It was thwarting efforts to audit in Arizona in 2021. And now the Sec of State in Colorado is into monkey business.

Quote:

---

As stated in the above statue (the one that governs recounts which should take precedent over the rules where the test ballots are found), that test must be conducted using VOTER VERIFIED PAPER RECORDS with the counts compared to a manual recount. According to the people watching, none of that is happening.

"the canvass board shall choose"

Since the statue mentions the Canvass Board, let's check in with the Canvass Board in El Paso County. I obtained a copy of the "Minority Report" from one of the Canvass Board members in El Paso, and it doesn't yield a whole lot of confidence. Here's an inside glimpse of the nation's "Gold Standard of Elections."

---

We have seen this movie before.

Link

Back to Maricopa County in 2020.

🚨#2020Election QUESTION🚨

Hey @stephen_richer @Adrian_Fontes @Garrett_Archer

Can I please get your spin on this article? I'm sure you'll have some "reasonable" explanation for this just like everything else.

cc:@gayla415 pic.twitter.com/YgxOexw8sy

— 🇺🇸AZ West Deplorable 🌟🌟🌟🇺🇸 (@AZRed65) July 29, 2022

Quote:

---

Dominion Voting machines in El Paso County, Co. have reportedly...

---

captkirk said:

---

Sums it up

---

And who were bribed by Zuckbucks to do so.

PANIC! MSNBC just had two corrupt Secretaries of State on to discuss election integrity 🙄

Jena Griswold (Colorado) brags that she has “increased drop boxes by over 65%!”

The fact that they feel the need to go on TV and defend drop boxes means we are winning! pic.twitter.com/ryPsg65ESY

— haukes (@haukes6) July 31, 2022

Well it's a good thing we're using computerized systems to increase speed, efficiency and accuracy in the voting process. From the sound of it, they could go to each individual voter, ask them to fill out a new ballot and hand count them in less time. What a disgrace!

A number of Wisconsin municipalities got creative with how they spent their CTCL Zuck Bucks Grant money. The City of Racine spent $222,045 on an RV to serve as a mobile voting booth.

Are Mobile Voting Booths Legal? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/ujrhelcmIw

— Agent Rebecca (@GadgetCan2) August 2, 2021

👀 WISCONSIN ELECTIONS 👀

👇👇MOBILE VOTING VAN 👇👇

W T F ? ? pic.twitter.com/OyLbV9dehQ

— ミR0BINETTE$ REVENGE ™ (@BuydensREM0RSE) July 30, 2022

Video of ballot mules, Detroit, November 2, 2020.

Link

wish they would not blur their faces. These people need to be exposed.

MR Gadsden said:

---

wish they would not blur their faces. These people need to be exposed.

---

Law enforcement have had these videos (non-blurred) for a long time. They don't care or if they do, their bosses won't allow them to do anything about it.

Maybe some light at the end of the tunnel here?

Quote:

---

The Republican National Committee (RNC) has hit multiple election integrity milestones with 100 days left before midterm election night when millions of voters will go to the polls, Breitbart News has learned.

The RNC, the central committee for the Republican Party responsible for various actions such as fundraising and election strategy, has continued its multi-million-dollar investment into election integrity for the midterm elections.

---

Quote:

---

These investments include 17 state election integrity directors and 28 in-state election integrity councils, who have recruited tens of thousands of poll watchers and workers in battleground states across the country.

With 100 days left before the election, the RNC has surpassed a significant milestone with over 32,000 poll watchers in primary, general, and special elections so far this cycle. In addition, they have made over 65,000 unique volunteer engagements and have held over 2,700 Election Integrity trainings.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel told Breitbart News, "Since the start of the cycle, we've made a multi-million dollar investment in our Election Integrity program, from engaging in over 50 lawsuits to recruiting thousands of poll watchers and poll workers to ensure transparency at the ballot box."

---

Quote:

---

The chairwoman added that the committee is "firing on all cylinders to make it easier to vote and harder to cheat," as the RNC was able to have 100 percent coverage of all the key polling locations in battleground states throughout the primary season, where elections have run smoothly and turnout has increased.
Since the start of the midterm election cycle, the RNC has executed its election integrity operation in states that have already held elections, such as Ohio, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and New Jersey, as well as others.

• Georgia's May primary elections ran smoothly, with turnout rising by approximately 300 percent in May early voting compared to 2018. There were poll watchers in 100 percent of the precincts the RNC believed to be key.
• In Texas's March primary, the RNC also secured 100 percent coverage in the precincts they believed to be key. With the exception of Democrat-run Harris County, elections ran smoothly statewide, and voter turnout skyrocketed.
• In Virginia's 2021 gubernatorial elections, the RNC also had 100 percent coverage in the precincts they believed to be key, with thousands of poll watchers spread across 37 key counties.
• The committee also successfully intervened and defended against Democrat and DOJ lawsuits challenging key recent election reforms in states such as Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, and Texas.

---

Will it be near enough?

Link

Now we are cooking with gas!

Quote:

---

On July 21, 2022, there was a hearing for Lake v Hobbs in Phoenix. A witness by the name of Clay Parikh was called for the plaintiff. Parikh is the lead information systems security officer for the ground missile defense system for Northrop Grumman. Prior to that, he worked for Lockheed Martin and Leidos through their merger as the deputy cyber manager for the Army Corps of Engineers.

But it's his prior work that is of particular relevance to this case: from 2008 to 2017, he worked as a security tester and a security subject matter expert for Wiley Laboratories and Pro V&V. Parikh claims to have tested hundreds of voting systems, including the Dominion and ES&S voting machines throughout his career as part of the certification process for the EAC and Secretaries of State. He holds a CISSP certification (Certified Information System Security Professional), as well as certification as an ethical hacker and a certified hacking forensics investigator.

---

Quote:

---

Parikh later went on to say that his "best time" hacking the ES&S machines was "two and a half minutes, but averaged five to ten minutes. It really didn't matter to the vendor."

---

Quote:

---

So not only did Parikh confirm that "some" machines were connected to the internet, he also confirmed that even the ones that seemingly weren't still had available ports open to allow connection.

---

Quote:

---

LaRue also got Parikh to confess that the testing laboratories he worked for would not let him run certain tests: "…the point I'm trying to get to is…the labs told me not to do certain tests. They will not allow me to do certain tests." Why would the testing labs try to restrict a certified tester from doing certain tests? You would think a testing lab paid by the state or local government would definitely want to ensure the machines were safe and secure no matter what testing was necessary! But that would imply that the state funds these testing labs.

They don't. The voting machine vendors pay them. You read that correctly: the voting machine companies pay the testing companies to certify that the voting machine companies software is safe and secure.

And lastly, for LaRue in his gift of a cross examination chock full of "conspiracy theory" busting truths, we find another absolute gem: Dominion updated their Democracy Suite code in 2018!
No…scratch that: it was rewritten!

---

Quote:

---

And in the final redirect, plaintiff's attorney asked about the ES&S DS200 machines. He specifically inquired if he was able to hack them and how long it took. Parikh said that he was "stopped from going further." He said he wanted to continue and "actually get in and control the software because you can actually manipulate [sic] the statistical data on the system."

---

Quote:

---

In a 20 minute testimony with two attorneys on the cross-examination and a redirect, Clay Parikh revealed that the testing labs:

• Restrict testers from showing vulnerabilities
• Stop testers from going further into the machines in a way that could allow for software manipulation of the statistical data.
• The EAC has been sent reports of all of Parikh's hackings, which took minutes, and were done in a professional testing environment.
• The voting machines can connect to the internet and that even the ones that aren't connected still have open ports and means by which to connect.
• Dominion rewrote their Democracy Suite software in 2018

---

More transcripts of testimony at the Link

Upshot here is that is no true oversight by anyone on electronic voting systems. None at all. Even the labs testing for the EAC don't get access to source code. And they are very hackable within mere minutes. EAC has known this all along and lied.

Identity of the election worker who deleted the server logs with a query script in Maricopa County is revealed. He had help as he was not authorized to access the server room on his own.

Quote:

---

This data was deleted before the voting machines were delivered to Senate auditors in compliance with a subpoena.
Federal law requires these files to be kept for 22 months.
Maricopa County officials previously admitted that these files were "deleted" in a Congressional hearing but later walked it back and said that the files were "archived."

---

Quote:

---

On Saturday, it was revealed by Vanbibber that Maricopa County election Database Administrator Brian Ramirez was granted unauthorized entry to the server room on multiple occasions, and he deleted the files.

---

Quote:

---

Ramirez does not have the required credentials to access the server room. However, Vanbibber discovered that he falsely used the identities of individuals who were authorized access.

Vanbibber matched the server room entry logs to the video footage and found Brian Ramirez using others' cards to access the room.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Vanbibber: So basically, you have Brian entering the server room, and remember I told you he does not have badge access. We The People actually collected server room logs from Maricopa. So I went through all this video footage and matched it with the logs. What you see is Brian has Passarelli's card in the server room, and he also has Charles Cooley's badge as well.
Logan: So, Brian is accessing the server room using the identities and cards of other people.

---

Maricopa County policies also require two people in the server room whenever someone is using the keyboard video monitor, however, Brian was alone on multiple occasions.

---

Quote:

---

Vanbibber then played the video of Brian Ramirez accessing the server room after he was let in by Assistant Elections Director Kristi Passarelli, at the same time that the server logs were deleted.

---

Link

They should both be in jail

chjoak said:

---

They should both be in jail

---

State Attorney General in Arizona has known about this and who did it for nearly a year now.

but the cyber security auditors that AZ senate hired to audit Maricopa County weren't the approved auditing firm run by former v&v and dominion people. therefore, every scope limitation from the county, every policy not followed properly by the county, and every weakness in design or effectiveness of controls reported by those auditors was supposed to be ignored. See? most secure election evvaaar!

aggiehawg said:

---

chjoak said:

---

They should both be in jail

---

State Attorney General in Arizona has known about this and who did it for nearly a year now.

---

is that Hobbs, who is running for governor now?

Where is "Captain DHCP"? I, for one, would love to revisit the conversations where his/her "extensive" IT experience has a answer for this.

1) Did not have access, but did so anyway
2) Used credentials which were not his own
3) Disregard for rule to not enter server room alone
4) Disregard for rule of being accompanied by another person when using a crash cart to console into servers

....and before anyone tries to explain this as just someone trying to do their job without the red tape.....

If, this guy essentially had unfettered access to the server room then why, when he "legitimately" needed to overwrite the log files, was his only/best option to do so remotely using an anonymous account....and to do so by a "failed login" script bot?

None of this was accidental, and what was a DB Admin doing performing network administration tasks anyway? For that matter, what is the purpose of a db admin even being around election equipment? Isn't all of this supposed to be proprietary code? Were we not told Dominion was the sole owner of admin access?

People need to start losing jobs and going to jail. I would love to hear someone explain this as anything other than malicious.

oh no said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

chjoak said:

---

They should both be in jail

---

State Attorney General in Arizona has known about this and who did it for nearly a year now.

---

is that Hobbs, who is running for governor now?

---

Hobbs is Sec of State. Mark Brnovich is AG and he's running for the US Senate for Kelly's seat. He's way down in the polls though.

aggiehawg said:

---

oh no said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

chjoak said:

---

They should both be in jail

---

State Attorney General in Arizona has known about this and who did it for nearly a year now.

---

is that Hobbs, who is running for governor now?

---

Hobbs is Sec of State. Mark Brnovich is AG and he's running for the US Senate for Kelly's seat. He's way down in the polls though.

---

Like that matters...

agcrock2005 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

oh no said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

chjoak said:

---

They should both be in jail

---

State Attorney General in Arizona has known about this and who did it for nearly a year now.

---

is that Hobbs, who is running for governor now?

---

Hobbs is Sec of State. Mark Brnovich is AG and he's running for the US Senate for Kelly's seat. He's way down in the polls though.

---

Like that matters...

---

It's a crowded GOP primary. Trump has endorsed Blake Masters and he has a double digit lead. Had Brnovich taken the election fraud seriously, Trump would likely have endorsed him.

The Manchin mood the last few days has cemented a thought I've had for quite a while now: They're all just trying to stay alive in an evil, mob-boss-run DC world.

From Jayapal's black eye, the recent SCOTUS plot, to the many arm slings in the first 90 days of this dictatorship, it's a survival of the "most elusive" for dissenters these days.

We're a rotten banana republic...until liberals are liberated from decision-making for the masses.

Prepare for massive dem cheating operations in November in Senate races. There has always been some cheating but it has been taken to a scorched earth level. When fair elections are lost, the only thing standing between Liberty and tyranny is a bullet. We are there.

Quote:

---

None of this was accidental, and what was a DB Admin doing performing network administration tasks anyway? For that matter, what is the purpose of a db admin even being around election equipment? Isn't all of this supposed to be proprietary code? Were we not told Dominion was the sole owner of admin access?

---

Good point. Even when the so-called audits were done by Pro V&V and SLI, they said they had to have Dominion people to enter the password authority for their "audit" team.

Couple that with the testimony of expert who routinely hacked into ES&S and Dominion specifically for EAC for years and telling EAC the machines were unsecured, why the hell were they ever certified?

MagnumLoad said:

---

When fair elections are lost,

---

but they are valiant heroes doing it to protect "our democracy".

Here's something new. Virginia election irregularities

Quote:

---

This wasn't all that is concerning with Virginia. In a recent meeting with Virginia's Attorney General, Robert Pressler (Scott Pressler's father) and individuals connected to Joe Flynn's organization (TAP), and others gave a presentation sharing their concerns with recent election results and actions that may relate to fraud.

They discussed the above issues from the 2020 Election with unbelievable and impossible ballot drops. They also discussed problems with the recent purchase and implementation of poll pads throughout the state. (Note that Voter System Testing Lab SLI performed a review of these poll pads and they were not certified.)

---

Quote:

---

Despite our outreach for follow-up twice, we have had no response. This is particularly concerning since the required 22-month preservation of 2020 election records expires on 3 September, allowing the full destruction of all records and papers as of midnight. We are left to believe with their silence that Governor Youngkin and his team are trying to "run out the clock" to evade questioning on the integrity of Virginia's 2020 and 2021 elections.

What did the briefing include?
Troubling results of statewide canvassing operations for the 2020 and 2021 elections. (1) VFAF's 2020 canvassing demonstrated a 31% registration error-rate and a 7% votes-cast error-rate. (2) The 2021 canvas (conducted in real-time) demonstrated a 5.7% absentee-ballot error-rate, which equates to an estimated 68,000 votes (inconveniently greater than the margin of victory for Governor Youngkin).
The wrongful certification of 2020 electronic poll books. In September 2020, just one day before the start of early voting, the State Board of Elections certified DemTech Centerpoint ePollTab electronic poll books for use, ignoring the testing laboratory's report and Technical Data Package that included an extraordinary, legally-specific NON-COMPLIANCE disclaimer. These poll books were in wide-use throughout the state for the 2020 and 2021 elections, and are planned for use this November. Have they ever been properly certified?
Serious concerns with state data and records. (1) There are multiple, irreconcilable discrepancies between state voter databases, including the Registered Voter List, the Voter History List, and the Daily Absentee List. (2) There is no ability to attribute 2020 absentee votes back to their "home" precincts, which would have served as a "firewall" and check against excess ballots. (3) There have been recurring changes made to public historical turnout data without any explanation, database snapshots, or error documentation. (4) Statistical analysis of election "fingerprint" data shows patterns that do not agree with the expected distributions found in free and fair elections, as specified by the published literature of USAID and research of the National Academy of Sciences.
Statistically impossible voter registration rates. In October 2020, Judicial Watch reported that Virginia had 24 counties with 100%, and higher, voter registration rates, yielding a statewide average rate of 95.6% (the national average was 67%). This excess registration was confirmed through VFAF canvassing, and followed a 2019 statutory notice to Virginia of similar violations of the National Voter Registration Act. Have these unreasonable rates been mitigated for the coming midterms?
2020 voting irregularities that defy nature, logic and probability. (1) Lean-batch analysis of central absentee precinct returns shows marked, abnormal, discontinuities consistent with known election anomalies in other states. (2) During live tabulation, there were FIVE large-batch events (over 300,000 votes-in, votes-out, votes-in, votes-out, and votes-in) with varying, improbable proportions of Biden-to-Trump votes that effectively reversed the lead in Virginia from 52% Trump to 52% Biden. (3) Subsequent live tabulation shows nearly every batch, regardless of size, contained the EXACT SAME proportion of Biden-to-Trump votes: 55% to 45%.
Suspicious and unexplained activities. (1) There are over 900,000 voters statewide who were coded in the voter database as "active" voters, despite not having voted for 5 or more years, and in two federal elections. (2) Records from the state Board of Elections indicate almost 64,000 more ballots than voters in the 2020 election!

• Don't these election irregularities and potential fraud mechanisms merit investigation?!?
• If not, what possible justification can you offer?
• Given these egregious departures from standards, practices and state election law, how can We The People be confident that our coming midterm election will be secure, free and fair?

---

Link

Arizona citizens hold ballot box watch parties

Quote:

---

In an effort to prevent fraudulent activity in the upcoming primaries across the nation, individuals are holding drop box tailgate parties. The patriots are watching over the drop boxes . They are preventing mules from stealing the election this time around.

---

Link

Police show up in 3.....2.....1

"VOTER INTIMIDATION!!!!"

Technically that would be correct, but it would be "illegal voter intimidation"

We fixed the keg said:

---

Police show up in 3.....2.....1

"VOTER INTIMIDATION!!!!"

Technically that would be correct, but it would be "illegal voter intimidation"

---

As long as they are on public property, can't be removed for trespassing. But I'm sure Garland's DOJ will make something up to try to stop it anyway.

damn.. some crazy intimidation like that might convince a voter who requested a mail-in absentee ballot to actually put their ballot in the mail instead of using those random insecure drop boxes. That would be crazy to put a mail-in ballot in the mail these days. Can they trust the post office? The USPS is run by the federal government overlords who some think are good at running everything. Should be better than drop boxes.

oh no said:

---

damn.. some crazy intimidation like that might convince a voter who requested a mail-in absentee ballot to actually put their ballot in the mail instead of using those random insecure drop boxes. That would be crazy to put a mail-in ballot in the mail these days. Can they trust the post office? The USPS is run by the federal government overlords who some think are good at running everything. Should be better than drop boxes.

---

In Maricopa County, at a minimum, not just the postal center but also have to trust Runbeck. They take the ballots from the postal center, scan them and then supposedly deliver them to the counting center.