aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

What alternative would have worked? Blow the whole thing up before the election and before the dems actually committed the crime? I think you almost have to let them walk into the trap, even if you become aware of their intentions beforehand

Texas election fraud

Dallas and Harris Counties


taken down from YouTube
https://www.*****ute.com/video/scUpSRkNoj9g/

www.b i t c h u t e.com

If there must be war, let it be on my watch.

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

Sydney Powell crowing about this too makes me think there is something to this

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

You don't actually believe this happened right? Just checking, because there is no chance this happened.

captkirk said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

What alternative would have worked? Blow the whole thing up before the election and before the dems actually committed the crime? I think you almost have to let them walk into the trap, even if you become aware of their intentions beforehand

---

Exactly. And that is why I think this Dominion stuff might be the smoking gun. Criminal conspiracies have a crime at the center of them. Racketeering requires conspiracy to commit crimes on a larger scale and in a systemic fashion. That's how you get the people at the top and not some poll worker nor a computer geek.

One last data point that could have been at play here. A few days ago AOC was screaming about the heroic efforts of BLM in Georgia, Detroit and Pennsylvania among other states.

Which organization has been on Barr's radar for some time and specifically in relation to RICO? BLM and their handlers.

will25u said:

---

---

Takes one to know one I guess...

Barr hasn't done anything other than give us a few good one-liners.

DTP02 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

You don't actually believe this happened right? Just checking, because there is no chance this happened.

---

No, Barr wouldn't show his hand in that manner.

But in the week after the election after Barr had a chance to run his traps and see if it had worked and they had them nailed? More likely. Barr didn't suddenly reappear for no reason nor change the former DOJ policy requiring UA Attorneys to check with Main Justice before opening files on election fraud. he let them loose.

The connection to some heavy swamp creatures that Dominion maintains looks to be a target rich environment to me.

My three year old can count ballots faster than Alaska can. Can someone please explain what is going on there for it not to be called with Trump ahead by nearly 30 points?

umadbro44 said:

---

My three year old can count ballots faster than Alaska can. Can someone please explain what is going on there for it not to be called with Trump ahead by nearly 30 points?

---

It takes a long time for the pigeons carrying the vote tallies to get to the mainland and back

umadbro44 said:

---

My three year old can count ballots faster than Alaska can. Can someone please explain what is going on there for it not to be called with Trump ahead by nearly 30 points?

---

Dude, it's winter up there now and they only have like 5 hours of daylight!

wbt5845 said:

---

umadbro44 said:

---

My three year old can count ballots faster than Alaska can. Can someone please explain what is going on there for it not to be called with Trump ahead by nearly 30 points?

---

Dude, it's winter up there now and they only have like 5 hours of daylight!

---

If only they had electricity.

umadbro44 said:

---

My three year old can count ballots faster than Alaska can. Can someone please explain what is going on there for it not to be called with Trump ahead by nearly 30 points?

---

They are still counting up how many they will need to generate if Biden loses AZ.

What was the result of Puerto Rico's statehood referendum?

will25u said:

---

---

Yeah, lets make them a state

Biden is not losing AZ and is not losing this election. This election is actively being stolen from HIM

Agvet12 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

They need a big smoking gun. Hope someone finds it.

---

That's just it. I think Dominion is the big smoking gun.

---

Can Dominion be linked to every single state where there are major questions in the authenticity of the vote in this current election?

---

I would think it's verifiable on which states use them? Their records should indicate it - and we know MI, GA use them

Rumors of AZ and NV being 2 others - and the rumor was a total of 30 states?

---

This is a more detailed map. I can't speak to validity.

Notice: Georgia, Maricopa Cnty Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin.

Mr. Fahrenheit said:

---

Biden is not losing AZ and is not losing this election. This election is actively being stolen from HIM

---

Whataboutism?

LOL

aggiehawg said:

---

DTP02 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

You don't actually believe this happened right? Just checking, because there is no chance this happened.

---

No, Barr wouldn't show his hand in that manner.

But in the week after the election after Barr had a chance to run his traps and see if it had worked and they had them nailed? More likely. Barr didn't suddenly reappear for no reason nor change the former DOJ policy requiring UA Attorneys to check with Main Justice before opening files on election fraud. he let them loose.

The connection to some heavy swamp creatures that Dominion maintains looks to be a target rich environment to me.

---

The idea that this was anyone on the R side laying behind the log, or a sting or in any way pre-planned reads like fan fiction.

Rs have been in total reaction mode since Election Day. Maybe they will be able to find something, but there are zero indications that they had anything lined up in advance.

Mr. Fahrenheit said:

---

Biden is not losing AZ and is not losing this election. This election is actively being stolen from HIM

---

LOLOLOLOLOL

DTP02 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

DTP02 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

You don't actually believe this happened right? Just checking, because there is no chance this happened.

---

No, Barr wouldn't show his hand in that manner.

But in the week after the election after Barr had a chance to run his traps and see if it had worked and they had them nailed? More likely. Barr didn't suddenly reappear for no reason nor change the former DOJ policy requiring UA Attorneys to check with Main Justice before opening files on election fraud. he let them loose.

The connection to some heavy swamp creatures that Dominion maintains looks to be a target rich environment to me.

---

The idea that this was anyone on the R side laying behind the log, or a sting or in any way pre-planned reads like fan fiction.

Rs have been in total reaction mode since Election Day. Maybe they will be able to find something, but there are zero indications that they had anything lined up in advance.

---

Reaction mode? They've been telling us what's going to happen for weeks, even months.

Gigemags382 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Mr. Fahrenheit said:

---

Biden is not losing AZ and is not losing this election. This election is actively being stolen from HIM

---

Is that today's new talking point?

Cute.

---

The media has already fully and intentionally set the stage for this narrative if Trump prevails in court. They will burn the country to the ground.

---

Fine by me. Burn the lib hell holes to the ground

That could be a pretty damning map if Dominion scandal is true. I notice Miami-Dade county doesn't use it.

Gigemags382 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Mr. Fahrenheit said:

---

Biden is not losing AZ and is not losing this election. This election is actively being stolen from HIM

---

Is that today's new talking point?

Cute.

---

The media has already fully and intentionally set the stage for this narrative if Trump prevails in court. They will burn the country big cities to the ground.

---

FIFY.

I am only concerned with the ash that might reach me here. That stuff isn't good for the lungs.

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

Considering his biggest objective as President was to drain the swamp I absolutely believe he would take that gamble.

Some of you give these bozos way to much credit.

Gigemags382 said:

---

DTP02 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

DTP02 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Imagine this scenario. Barr and Trump are having a conversation about election security about six months ago.

Barr asks Trump: Mr. President? What would you say if there might be a way to get Soros, and maybe the Clinton Foundation, possibly Pelosi and Feinstein too, but it may cost you the election in the short term?

Do you think Trump would take that gamble? I do.

---

You don't actually believe this happened right? Just checking, because there is no chance this happened.

---

No, Barr wouldn't show his hand in that manner.

But in the week after the election after Barr had a chance to run his traps and see if it had worked and they had them nailed? More likely. Barr didn't suddenly reappear for no reason nor change the former DOJ policy requiring UA Attorneys to check with Main Justice before opening files on election fraud. he let them loose.

The connection to some heavy swamp creatures that Dominion maintains looks to be a target rich environment to me.

---

The idea that this was anyone on the R side laying behind the log, or a sting or in any way pre-planned reads like fan fiction.

Rs have been in total reaction mode since Election Day. Maybe they will be able to find something, but there are zero indications that they had anything lined up in advance.

---

Reaction mode? They've been telling us what's going to happen for weeks, even months.

---

Not in any way that would indicate there was an overarching strategy or plan in place. That's just not accurate.

There wasn't a cohesive drumbeat heading into the election and most of the loud complaints were months ago.

There wasn't a legal team in place and was still being formed as of yesterday. The legal challenges during the critical part of the counting were a day late and a dollar short. There wasn't a war chest in place. The initial court filings relied too heavily on internet rumor level complaints. All of these things make it obvious that they've been reacting, not proceeding according to plan.

And the above observations don't even take into account the unforgiving truth that it's really dang hard to prove election fraud after the fact. You have to fire every bullet you can on the front end because in an election system that provides anonymity and is overseen by partisan local officials, it's very difficult to establish widespread fraud on the back end.

I hope they get their crap together and can come up with something substantive and significant, but y'all are grasping at straws if you think this was all part of some grand plan.