SLAM said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

"Guys it's simple. You have to stop in Georgia, keep going in Arizona, stop in Pennsylvania, keep going in Nevada, stop in North Carolina, recount Wisconsin, and ultimately let Brett Kavanaugh weigh in on all of it. That's what the Founders would have wanted."

---

Arizona appears to have no voter fraud. Nevada does and will be looked at. North Carolina looks like Arizona but there are some weird issues there. Wisconsin has massive issues and so does Pennsylvania.

Not all states are equal. Florida and Ohio had no problems this election because they have robust systems in place. The above states do not.

---

Has SharpieGate been resolved? Numerous people on twitter (including Gary Sheffield Jr) claiming they voted in person but AZ website says their ballot is invalid.

FbgTxAg said:

---

Correction said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

Trump needed probably 60% on this batch. That ain't gonna cut it.

---

Small batch.

Remember, this is going to a recount also.

---

Recounts aren't the magic bullet people on here appear to think they are. If you lose a close race by 0.5% or something you don't just win by having a recount.

chjoak said:

---

SLAM said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

"Guys it's simple. You have to stop in Georgia, keep going in Arizona, stop in Pennsylvania, keep going in Nevada, stop in North Carolina, recount Wisconsin, and ultimately let Brett Kavanaugh weigh in on all of it. That's what the Founders would have wanted."

---

Arizona appears to have no voter fraud. Nevada does and will be looked at. North Carolina looks like Arizona but there are some weird issues there. Wisconsin has massive issues and so does Pennsylvania.

Not all states are equal. Florida and Ohio had no problems this election because they have robust systems in place. The above states do not.

---

Has SharpieGate been resolved? Numerous people on twitter (including Gary Sheffield Jr) claiming they voted in person but AZ website says their ballot is invalid.

---

Well that's definitely an issue but that's more election interference level fraud than voter fraud since it screwed with the system itself rather than the actual counting of votes. I was more talking about how Arizona's process appears a lot more smooth than the other states with regards to how spread out the votes are and that they are not all concentrated in one specific area.

chase128 said:

---

Doesn't Trump need to win 56% or something

---

I think it was 55% but he can make up the amount in later votes, potentially.

Correction said:

---

FbgTxAg said:

---

Correction said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

Trump needed probably 60% on this batch. That ain't gonna cut it.

---

Small batch.

Remember, this is going to a recount also.

---

Recounts aren't the magic bullet people on here appear to think they are. If you lose a close race by 0.5% or something you don't just win by having a recount.

---

If you only count legal ballots the second go around

chjoak said:

---

SLAM said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

"Guys it's simple. You have to stop in Georgia, keep going in Arizona, stop in Pennsylvania, keep going in Nevada, stop in North Carolina, recount Wisconsin, and ultimately let Brett Kavanaugh weigh in on all of it. That's what the Founders would have wanted."

---

Arizona appears to have no voter fraud. Nevada does and will be looked at. North Carolina looks like Arizona but there are some weird issues there. Wisconsin has massive issues and so does Pennsylvania.

Not all states are equal. Florida and Ohio had no problems this election because they have robust systems in place. The above states do not.

---

Has SharpieGate been resolved? Numerous people on twitter (including Gary Sheffield Jr) claiming they voted in person but AZ website says their ballot is invalid.

---

Quote:

---

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced Thursday evening his office found no issues with the use of Sharpies at ballot polls. This comes after talking with Maricopa County election officials and the County Attorney's Office throughout the day.

---

https://www.azfamily.com/news/politics/election_headquarters/arizona-attorney-general-no-issues-with-sharpie-usage-at-polls/article_c455054e-1fae-11eb-bf69-37b265e135e6.html

Correction said:

---

FbgTxAg said:

---

Correction said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

Trump needed probably 60% on this batch. That ain't gonna cut it.

---

Small batch.

Remember, this is going to a recount also.

---

Recounts aren't the magic bullet people on here appear to think they are. If you lose a close race by 0.5% or something you don't just win by having a recount.

---

Not gonna need much in AZ if he doesn't catch him initially. We're talking a couple hundred votes.

Sharpies seriously in 2020 ?

FbgTxAg said:

---

Correction said:

---

FbgTxAg said:

---

Correction said:

---

Good Poster said:

---

---

Trump needed probably 60% on this batch. That ain't gonna cut it.

---

Small batch.

Remember, this is going to a recount also.

---

Recounts aren't the magic bullet people on here appear to think they are. If you lose a close race by 0.5% or something you don't just win by having a recount.

---

Not gonna need much in AZ if he doesn't catch him initially. We're talking a couple hundred votes.

---

Based on that last Maricopa batch, I don't think the 2nd sentence is particularly obvious at this moment.

Also, are you under the impression the challenging party always gains votes in a recount?

FPS_Dough said:

---

Sharpies seriously in 2020 ?

---

I know, right.

My county used those newfangled #2 Pencils to bubble in the scan-tron.

This is Buck Rogers level stuff.


Edit: Oh, and since I mentioned Buck Rogers....obligatory

Saint Pablo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

The road to dictatorship was just closed with Cheeto fingers catching that L. The man is still trying to undermine democracy.

---

What're the odds this guy would give Chris Cuomo a handy?

---

In your dreams

Roster4Ag said:

---

What has Trump done that was so bad. I just don't get it.

---

There are lots of policy concerns I had with Trump, however I don't understand people not voting for him because he's a big meanie head on twitter.

Correction said:

---

FbgTxAg said:

---

Small batch.

Remember, this is going to a recount also.

---

Recounts aren't the magic bullet people on here appear to think they are. If you lose a close race by 0.5% or something you don't just win by having a recount.

---

If the recount exposes more mistakes or fraud, different story.

MooreTrucker said:

---

Correction said:

---

FbgTxAg said:

---

Small batch.

Remember, this is going to a recount also.

---

Recounts aren't the magic bullet people on here appear to think they are. If you lose a close race by 0.5% or something you don't just win by having a recount.

---

If the recount exposes more mistakes or fraud, different story.

---

Generally he isn't wrong, but these recounts and court battles have the potential to be somewhat unprecedented. This is where it would actually get really interesting.

I just can't believe the party of endless lockdowns and mandatory masks, while also encouraging constant in-person protesting, wasn't punished harder at the polls.

Voter fraud didn't put the numbers close enough for voter fraud to matter. America willingly pissing away its freedom did.

Not that NV matters at this point, but Biden just doubled his lead from 11k to 22k

SJEAg said:

---

Need more than a recount...don't see what recounting a bunch of fraudulent ballots does. Will anyone actually audit these things?

---

You would hope so. The Georgia SOS said the recount of all "legal" ballots.

Are there any votes out there to push Perdue above 50% in GA senate race?

barnyard1996 said:

---

Are there any votes out there to push Perdue above 50% in GA senate race?

---

He'd need about 5,000 and there are not that many out there

Wow pretty bold claim!!

They're on the rolls, but did they "vote"? That's the question.

Good Poster said:

---

---

So Trump potentially...loses by less.

Saint Pablo said:

---

Roster4Ag said:

---

What has Trump done that was so bad. I just don't get it.

---

He was bad and orange and orange and bad!

---

You forgot his tiny hands.

PJYoung said:

---

I personally think if mail-in ballots were counted first in every state this election would have had a completely different narrative.

Just an opinion.

---

Probably.

Narrative would also be different if AZ had not been called for Biden.

Narrative would be different if highly inaccurate polling hadn't created a false expectation of Biden support and likelihood of victory.

And not just narrative, but election, would be very different if the left hadn't used CoVID as cover to implement this mass mail-in ballot cluster.

FbgTxAg said:

---

FPS_Dough said:

---

Sharpies seriously in 2020 ?

---

I know, right.

My county used those newfangled #2 Pencils to bubble in the scan-tron.

This is Buck Rogers level stuff.


Edit: Oh, and since I mentioned Buck Rogers....obligatory

---

She was my first ever crush as a youngster in that tight, futuristic uniform.

So....is Arizona RED?

OKCAg2002 said:

---

They're on the roles, but did they "vote"? That's the question.

---

They're also on the rolls. But good point. All of these twitter links and talk of finding registered dead people. Even if someone did submit a vote for a dead person, it has to be validated by two bi partisan counters (at least). None of these links/articles state that their vote was actually tallied. I have two family members in other states that work on this election counting votes. I guarantee they'd scream holy heck if they thought fraud was afoot. But maybe the fraud just happens to be in what ended up being the battleground states.