"Former D.C. bureau chief for Investor's Business Daily, Hoover Institution media fellow, author of several books, including bestseller INFILTRATION"UncleNateFitch said:
Who's Paul Sperry?
He has bragged on camera about pressuring Ukraine to fire a prosecutor. There is also no question that Hunter Biden was paid millions of dollars by Burisma for "work" he had no expertise in. Of course, you know that. Guess you're OK with corruption as long as it's your guys doing the illegal things.JCRebel13 said:
Under investigation from who? Trump crony Barr?
I wouldn't be surprised if the Dems willingly throw Joe under the bus to get Kamala as their Presidential nominee.Maroon Dawn said:
I seem to remember Dems saying a candidate under investigation should be ineligible
We all know Kamala's the face of the ticket already.Shakes the Clown said:I wouldn't be surprised if the Dems willingly throw Joe under the bus to get Kamala as their Presidential nominee.Maroon Dawn said:
I seem to remember Dems saying a candidate under investigation should be ineligible
Maroon Dawn said:
I seem to remember Dems saying a candidate under investigation should be ineligible
Or you know, more details and information?Ellis Wyatt said:Why are you interested in hearing from the same folks who have been lying to us all since 2016?boboguitar said:
Any news sources?
boboguitar said:Or you know, more details and information?Ellis Wyatt said:Why are you interested in hearing from the same folks who have been lying to us all since 2016?boboguitar said:
Any news sources?
boboguitar said:Or you know, more details and information?Ellis Wyatt said:Why are you interested in hearing from the same folks who have been lying to us all since 2016?boboguitar said:
Any news sources?
DOJ usually will not comment on ongoing investigations preferring instead to let indictments speak for them.nortex97 said:
I have zero faith this news makes it to the public prior to Nov 3.
I again admire your optimism but...see no empirical reasons to agree. This still amounts to 'hoping' for something that has had 4-5 years to happen.aggiehawg said:DOJ usually will not comment on ongoing investigations preferring instead to let indictments speak for them.nortex97 said:
I have zero faith this news makes it to the public prior to Nov 3.
Thus, I wonder if an indictment is about to be announced and Biden is called an "unindicted co-conspirator"??
Maybe?
Again, from the fake news media? They don't report any democrat crimes, no matter how heinous.boboguitar said:Or you know, more details and information?Ellis Wyatt said:Why are you interested in hearing from the same folks who have been lying to us all since 2016?boboguitar said:
Any news sources?
You do that when Trump gets accused of something too, right?boboguitar said:Or you know, more details and information?Ellis Wyatt said:Why are you interested in hearing from the same folks who have been lying to us all since 2016?boboguitar said:
Any news sources?
Barr said there would be none before the election.aggiehawg said:DOJ usually will not comment on ongoing investigations preferring instead to let indictments speak for them.nortex97 said:
I have zero faith this news makes it to the public prior to Nov 3.
Thus, I wonder if an indictment is about to be announced and Biden is called an "unindicted co-conspirator"??
Maybe?
Biden as an unnamed unindicted co-conspirator wouldn't violate that comment by Barr. Not from his POV, anyway.FriscoKid said:Barr said there would be none before the election.aggiehawg said:DOJ usually will not comment on ongoing investigations preferring instead to let indictments speak for them.nortex97 said:
I have zero faith this news makes it to the public prior to Nov 3.
Thus, I wonder if an indictment is about to be announced and Biden is called an "unindicted co-conspirator"??
Maybe?
I don't think something like this will appear on the big networks for a while. Only "broke" a few hours ago.txaggie_08 said:
How reputable is Sperry? I know his tweets are posted a lot on the Mueller thread, and he always has these "breaking" stories, but I'm trying to remember if anything ever comes of them. I don't see a mention of this at all on Fox News.
Maroon Dawn said:
I seem to remember Dems saying a candidate under investigation should be ineligible