SpaceX and other space news updates

2,507,511 Views | 22197 Replies | Last: 5 min ago by nortex97
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some of those semi-submersible ships are amazing:

Maximus_Meridius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's probably an ABC "writer" using AI image detection or something. God forbid anyone actually look at what they're doing...
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who would have ever guessed the Raptor would double as a good tow hook? Gotta love that SpaceX shade tree engineering.

I don't know man. Let's tie a tow strap on it and see if it holds.
"Well, doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic, if you can keep it" - Benjamin Franklin
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I suspect the drag penalty towing it backwards must be substantial. Seems they should have yoked both fins on the nose and towed it from the front.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We may get a wakeup call if China's Chang'e 7 successfully lands at Shackleton Crater near the lunar south pole.

It launches Sunday.

Time to get boots on the ground, and a base there

https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/08/the-united-states-is-about-to-wake-up-to-the-threat-from-chinas-space-program/
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

I suspect the drag penalty towing it backwards must be substantial. Seems they should have yoked both fins on the nose and towed it from the front.

There is nothing on the craft they can actually tie off on. All the speculation I've seen was that when you saw the large fenders around the vehicle the tow was tied to those.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:

lb3 said:

I suspect the drag penalty towing it backwards must be substantial. Seems they should have yoked both fins on the nose and towed it from the front.

There is nothing on the craft they can actually tie off on. All the speculation I've seen was that when you saw the large fenders around the vehicle the tow was tied to those.

I thought they had lifting/catch lugs near the top? Presumably they could tow it by those, but they may have been worried about collapsing the nosecone pulling at angles in rough seas.
Centerpole90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't know how many of you follow Sal, but he has a solid channel on all things shipping...

hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wonder if they just launch this thing over populated areas back and forth between landing pads.

.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is that pad made of bamboo?
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And glue!
.
OnlyForNow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just beach it at Boca Chica.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Of course, some of them have fallen back down. Graphic is for illustration purposes only.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now show all the cars with dots the size of large cites
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:



Of course, some of them have fallen back down. Graphic is for illustration purposes only.

15k seems a lot lower than I'd think we'd have up there right now.
I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

It wound up falling over as they couldn't extinguish the fire at the base/around the engines afterward. Re-usability is still a ways off for them imho (6-12 months I'd swag).
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ship test tonight. Probably at about 10:40-10:45 pm

Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hph6203 said:




This feels out of the blue. Why over there?
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

hph6203 said:




This feels out of the blue. Why over there?

Elon likes the gambling boats in Lake Charles....
I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

hph6203 said:




This feels out of the blue. Why over there?

Easy access to the intercoastal waterway. Nobody around to get mad about frequent launches, easy southerly launches, cheap labor, cheap land, and easy to work with environmental agencies. Same general things that attracted them to Texas.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

Ship test tonight. Probably at about 10:40-10:45 pm



Apparently successful 15s single engine static fire at 11:05 pm.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Access to launching polar orbit satellites. That is supposed to be the majority of their future launches and can't generally do that from Florida or Starbase, because it would have the rocket flying over populated areas.

They applied for one million satellites in orbit. At 5 year useful life that's 9 launches every day. Plus one Starlink launch per day. People in South Texas would go from "wow cool, rockets." To "I'm going to murder Elon Musk it is loud all the time." Very quickly.
.
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For the polar launches they also have SLC 4 and are slated to build out the old SLC 6 at Vandenberg
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Best I can tell SLC-6 is still going to be developed for Falcon/Heavy launches. They're also currently limited to 100 annual launches and the California Coastal Commission has been a pain in the ass even if they're incapable of actually influencing the going ons at Vandenberg.

Only thing SpaceX is going to upset in Louisiana is the turtles and they probably prefer dodging rockets to dodging the coonass trying to eat them.
.
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This sounds like regulatory approval for a ship catch may not happen fast enough for flight 14. It'll be interesting to see what that flight profile looks like without a ship catch.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Berger says SpaceX decision not regulatory.
.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He really looks like he's on something there. Hope not. 319 million shares unlocked today and stock is down toward 130, I picked up a few. Hopefully some good news out about Pecan Island as that is anticipated, though it will inevitably require massive capex also.
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

He really looks like he's on something there. Hope not. 319 million shares unlocked today and stock is down toward 130, I picked up a few. Hopefully some good news out about Pecan Island as that is anticipated, though it will inevitably require massive capex also.

The spectrum. So much spectrum.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hph6203 said:



Berger says SpaceX decision not regulatory.

As much cutting and other work as they have been doing on the tower and chopsticks the last few days, wouldn't surprise me if it is a tower issue and not an issue with ship.

But I also wonder if it goes back to not wanting to potentially put their only functional launch site out of service if they have a catastrophic failure. In a couple of months, they should have extra launch pads and towers ready at the Cape and at Starbase.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tower 1 should be pretty close to ready in a month or so. But I found Elon's comment about 'if we had a tower out at sea in the gulf' pretty telling. I hope we see work on that commence in short order.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There should still be no reason for flight 14 not to do several orbits though right?
Chemistry happens and eventually the rocks get opinions...
Ad Lunam
Maximus_Meridius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shouldn't be...the last major obstacle that was public knowledge was the demonstration of Raptor relight in space, which was accomplished on Flight 13. So I would think they're going orbital this time unless there was something in the Raptor data that's concerning, they're concerned about tank pressures with respect to time, or they don't think there's an advantage/reason to do so without ship catch.
First Page Last Page
Page 625 of 635
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.