CNN already justifying expanding the Supreme Court of

4,203 Views | 50 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 91AggieLawyer
ANSC Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biden wins "because they deserve it."
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fine, go ahead and create plenty of new court openings for Trump to fill in his second term.
Picard
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does Biden get to see his family now?

EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

1 judge is not packing the court...


It's John Dean. What do you expect?
Maroon and White always! EKU/TAMU
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S


Quote:

CNN already justifying expanding the Supreme Court if Biden wins
SEE? Covid already on the way off the radar. Already scheming about the SCOTUS.


"As I have Fore-seen"

(BigRobSA voice) Open all back up!
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
agsquirrel97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Replacing a judge is not packing the court, adding new judges with an eye towards politics is packing the court.

And spare me the "depoliticizing" rhetoric, if we were getting politics out of courts then every judge would be a textualist and defer to the constitution.
Fishin Texas Aggie 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is the court being packed when one of the judges is replaced?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
tigooner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The argument for putting off Merrick Garland's hearing was 'the Constitution doesn't say we can't'. The argument for pushing a nominee through with less than two months till the election is 'the Constitution doesn't say we can't'.

You know what the Constitution also doesn't say? How many justices sit on the Supreme Court.
APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:



Depoliticize the federal judiciary means voting in one way only like all of the liberal judges have voted.
98Ag99Grad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL...he will depoliticise the court by adding more? GTFO here. Pick the most conservative black female judge who loves guns and hates abortion and watch the world burn the next 8 weeks.
IDaggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
APHIS AG said:

Rapier108 said:



Depoliticize the federal judiciary means voting in one way only like all of the liberal judges have voted.


No kidding... So the liberals added 100 of their own new judges and adding 2 new liberal justices depolitices things? These people are lunatics. Straight up lunatics.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
mirose
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Dems are going to pack the court either way if Biden wins. Already part of their master plan. Trump needs to push it through.
Verne Lundquist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If POTUS wins he should use this and put more conservatives
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fishin Texas Aggie 05 said:

How is the court being packed when one of the judges is replaced?


It is President Trump doing his DUTY on his watch!
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
jteAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BanderaAg956 said:

Fishin Texas Aggie 05 said:

How is the court being packed when one of the judges is replaced?


It is President Trump doing his DUTY on his watch!
Like Obama was doing his DUTY on his watch, with over a year left, only to have McConnell say we need to wait for the next president. Will republicans employ this same logic this time. I highly doubt it.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:



I'm sure there are other ways to read this, but the way I read it is a one party state.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jteAg said:

BanderaAg956 said:

Fishin Texas Aggie 05 said:

How is the court being packed when one of the judges is replaced?


It is President Trump doing his DUTY on his watch!
Like Obama was doing his DUTY on his watch, with over a year left, only to have McConnell say we need to wait for the next president. Will republicans employ this same logic this time. I highly doubt it.
Republican President. Republican Senate.

Looking for someone to blame?



Take a close look at the man who took away the blocker the Democrats would have had on this now.

Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aezmvp said:

Rapier108 said:



I'm sure there are other ways to read this, but the way I read it is a one party state.


And if Biden announces this, Mitch should go ahead and preemptively push through 3 Trump nominees.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tigooner said:

The argument for putting off Merrick Garland's hearing was 'the Constitution doesn't say we can't'. The argument for pushing a nominee through with less than two months till the election is 'the Constitution doesn't say we can't'.

You know what the Constitution also doesn't say? How many justices sit on the Supreme Court.


It also doesn't say the Supreme Court, or other courts, explicitly have the power of judicial review either...
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteAg said:

BanderaAg956 said:

Fishin Texas Aggie 05 said:

How is the court being packed when one of the judges is replaced?


It is President Trump doing his DUTY on his watch!
Like Obama was doing his DUTY on his watch, with over a year left, only to have McConnell say we need to wait for the next president. Will republicans employ this same logic this time. I highly doubt it.



Elections have consequences. Dems should have won the senate.
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That is a particularly dumb tweet in what is sure to be a deluge of overwrought stupid tweets for the next 4 months.

The courts not being "packed", you have to control the Senate to expand SCOTUS and the federal judiciary, and his whole statement is a childish emotional temper tantrum.

In short, I love it. This is how I feel when we beat tu in football.

In Austin.

By a lot.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteAg said:

BanderaAg956 said:

Fishin Texas Aggie 05 said:

How is the court being packed when one of the judges is replaced?


It is President Trump doing his DUTY on his watch!
Like Obama was doing his DUTY on his watch, with over a year left, only to have McConnell say we need to wait for the next president. Will republicans employ this same logic this time. I highly doubt it.
Obama did indeed fulfill his duty to nominate. It is then the decision of the Senate and the Senate alone to choose to confirm or not. Confrontation is a CHOICE of the Senate, not a duty.

No Longer Subsribed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems, you still have Roberts. Why you so upset?
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EKUAg said:

C@LAg said:

1 judge is not packing the court...


It's John Dean. What do you expect?
A burglary to protect his call girl wife?
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Picard said:

Does Biden get to see his family now?


Only if they decide to wake him up...

Joe's team is asleep - just like Joe.

Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Congress not the President decides how many justices. Holding the Senate would be enough to stop the "depoliticization" of the court.

How very 2020 of John Dean to use a word that is exactly opposite of what it means. Smh
98Ag99Grad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Premium said:

aezmvp said:

Rapier108 said:



I'm sure there are other ways to read this, but the way I read it is a one party state.


And if Biden announces this, Mitch should go ahead and preemptively push through 3 Trump nominees.


Amen! I don't get all this talk about Dems packing the court and cheating with mail in ballots. F it! R's should do the same while they can. This is war.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Premium said:

aezmvp said:

Rapier108 said:



I'm sure there are other ways to read this, but the way I read it is a one party state.


And if Biden announces this, Mitch should go ahead and preemptively push through 3 Trump nominees.
Accept his proposal and then nominate 3 more immediately? LOL.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
mirose said:

The Dems are going to pack the court either way if Biden wins. Already part of their master plan. Trump needs to push it through.
Exactly. Are people already forgetting the 3.5 year long resistance-coup launched in January 2017 by Schumer and Pelosi? The Dems have proven they will not accept not having full power any more. So next time they get it they will seek to pack the court anyway. May as well have some buffers in place.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't.Stop.LAUGHING.....
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.