***** Barr and the Destruction of the House Oversight Cmte *****

48,306 Views | 522 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by will25u
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
ScottishFire said:

Raise your hand, if you're surprised about this one.
Reclaiming his nap time...

Recovering from his commute this morning...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jerry-nadler-car-crash-william-barr-testimony-hearing-delay-trump-ag-a9641956.html


"Top Democrat Jerry Nadler's car crash delays testimony of William Barr"

"A car accident involving Jerry Nadler, Democratic chairman of the House judiciary committee, has delayed the start of testimony by William Barr, Donald Trump's attorney general.

A spokesman for the senior Democrat said he was not injured in the accident. The hearing was put back by 45 minutes to 10.45am. No details of the accident were immediately available."

And the morning got off to such a promising start.
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ScottishFire said:


Noticed how Nadler backed the **** off when Barr and Jordan pushed back? They weren't having any of it and stood up to that wannabe bully. This is how you treat these people.
oldcrow91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenColderHere said:

This is a good example of how to effectively question a hostile witness. It's unfortunate so many members of Congress in both parties lack this skill.






If it's so great, why not include Barr not being able to answer or giving up.
I was interested to see how he answered this but it cut off. Makes me think he must have had a good response if it got cutoff.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've skimmed thru about 30 minutes of the testimony. About as planned, but somehow the Dems were even ruder and dumber than I expected toward the end, even though SJL and Hank Johnson went early.


My takeaway was just that Guam should name some part of the island after Johnson, and that that Barr has tremendous patience.
oldcrow91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ScottishFire said:

Swalwell sounds like a pompous brat.


Yep. He never gave an inch.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oldcrow91 said:

ScottishFire said:

Swalwell sounds like a pompous brat.


Yep. He never gave an inch.
And some moron actually thought fart boy did a good job...wow.
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pookers said:

Tex117 said:

ScottishFire said:

The sip of the coffee at the end and the smirk makes this pure gold.

http://imgur.com/gallery/2XlB6g6
The coffee sip is a nice touch.


Hilarious!!!!

They've waited for him to come there for a long time, but they won't let him talk.... and she keeps saying the time is mine... to ask a question that you won't wait for the answer to or or allow an answer to be given, even though you've waited a long time for him to come appear and give the answers.

This is such a sham. And a joke! He made them all look like idiots!!!!
houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, it was BenColder, so......
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Separated at birth?


Christine Blasey Ford
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LDA9336 said:

BenColderHere said:

This is a good example of how to effectively question a hostile witness.

Is that why the video cuts off early? lololol
oh Jesus tell me beNcolderhere isn't a licensed attorney.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hot or cold - you get what you pay for in an attorney?
Staff - take out the trash.
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lib's didn't want any answers, they wanted an echo chamber what lying crying dog-faced pony solders for Marxist Biden they have become
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rhetoric now on social media is that Barr refuses to answer simple yes or no questions and disrupted the proceedings, destroying justice.

So, there's your media blast for the next few days on repeat.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know my posts are stupid and typically skipped over, but this one was money!

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3127347/replies/57042892

Staff - take out the trash.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ciboag96 said:

Rhetoric now on social media is that Barr refuses to answer simple yes or no questions and disrupted the proceedings, destroying justice.

So, there's your media blast for the next few days on repeat.
Throughout the hours of questioning, I don't remember many Dems asking "simple yes or no questions."
Tex117
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dem: Yes or No.
Barr: I will follow the law
Dem: That is disappointing.

CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Garrelli 5000 said:

I know my posts are stupid and typically skipped over, but this one was money!

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3127347/replies/57042892


Acknowledged and starred
riverrataggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I loved it when he told fart boy if I used your logic to open an investigation there would be a lot more people on his list as he swiveled his head from side to side.
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Ciboag96 said:

Rhetoric now on social media is that Barr refuses to answer simple yes or no questions and disrupted the proceedings, destroying justice.

So, there's your media blast for the next few days on repeat.
Throughout the hours of questioning, I don't remember many Dems asking "simple yes or no questions."


Yeah, I don't either. But I don't think that matters.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonGoodAg77!
Staff - take out the trash.
Echoes97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FaceMask said:

BenColderHere said:

This is a good example of how to effectively question a hostile witness. It's unfortunate so many members of Congress in both parties lack this skill.






Are you ******ed? As a true Independent that didn't vote for Trump (or a Republican ever) the Democrats are an embarrassment. You'll see a true voter turnout in favor of Trump this go around.
This is me 100%. Not to belabor the point, but I also did not vote for Trump in 2016 (nor Hillary), and was going to abstain from voting this time around as well up until about the last 6 months or so. This display by the Dems has been an absolute and total embarrassment to any rational thinking person. It is a disgrace to our nation and our institutions. I will hold my nose a bit, but will without question be pulling the lever for Trump this go-round. The Dems have lost all touch with the true concepts of classical liberalism and have embraced the infantile emotional temper tantrum methods of the unhinged leftists. It is pathetic, and I can only hope that at some point we can stop regressing as a republic.
ScottishFire
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Twitter Gold, coming in.
"No one cuts me with impunity."
Harry Stone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
valvemonkey91 said:

I HATE democrats with every fiber of my being. They are subhuman scum.


1. dems
2. ccp
3. terrorists

Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oldcrow91 said:

ScottishFire said:

Swalwell sounds like a pompous brat.


Yep. He never gave an inch.
It is beautiful how Barr slow plays his full answer to Stalwell. He answers the question and then when Stalwell starts talking Barr hits him again, then when Stalwell starts talking a second time Barr swoops in for the knockout. Stalwell was like a prize fighter that got punched three times square in the face and threw him completely off balance. Barr is damn good.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This appears to be the full ten minute video offered by Jordan at the beginning of the hearing which Nadler cut short.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
mslags97 said:

Pookers said:

Tex117 said:

ScottishFire said:

The sip of the coffee at the end and the smirk makes this pure gold.

http://imgur.com/gallery/2XlB6g6
The coffee sip is a nice touch.


Hilarious!!!!

They've waited for him to come there for a long time, but they won't let him talk.... and she keeps saying the time is mine... to ask a question that you won't wait for the answer to or or allow an answer to be given, even though you've waited a long time for him to come appear and give the answers.

This is such a sham. And a joke! He made them all look like idiots!!!!
It was absolutely disgusting. National Democrats are absolutely loathsome in their transparent tactics enabling the destruction of the national fiber. It was incredible how they kept cutting off his answers. I wouldn't have minded if he had stood up at the end and done a half hour long rant that cut over all their chatter like a filibuster lambasting their cultural treason and self-serving agendas. Nadler's having the gaul to call the Portland riots a myth is symptomatic of the party. And those are blue cities suffering from their regressive Democratic leadership and promotion of Maoist-Marxist lies.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

oldcrow91 said:

ScottishFire said:

Swalwell sounds like a pompous brat.


Yep. He never gave an inch.
It is beautiful how Barr slow plays his full answer to Stalwell. He answers the question and then when Stalwell starts talking Barr hits him again, then when Stalwell starts talking a second time Barr swoops in for the knockout. Stalwell was like a prize fighter that got punched three times square in the face and threw him completely off balance. Barr is damn good.


To whom did Barr turn his gaze when he said that using those standards a lot more people would be under investigation?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

It will interesting to see Tucker's monologue tonight covers this.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BuddysBud said:


To whom did Barr turn his gaze when he said that using those standards a lot more people would be under investigation?
All of them.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
BuddysBud said:

Ag87H2O said:

oldcrow91 said:

ScottishFire said:

Swalwell sounds like a pompous brat.


Yep. He never gave an inch.
It is beautiful how Barr slow plays his full answer to Stalwell. He answers the question and then when Stalwell starts talking Barr hits him again, then when Stalwell starts talking a second time Barr swoops in for the knockout. Stalwell was like a prize fighter that got punched three times square in the face and threw him completely off balance. Barr is damn good.


To whom did Barr turn his gaze when he said that using those standards a lot more people would be under investigation?
You would have to have a camera view from behind Barr to have some idea. It would mean someone's cell phone film would be needed.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:


It will interesting to see Tucker's monologue tonight covers this.
Covering the Doctors who were pulled from social media.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
barnyard1996 said:

titan said:


It will interesting to see Tucker's monologue tonight covers this.
Covering the Doctors who were pulled from social media.
Ah, I see. Usually wait for the 10pm repeat to watch if do. I guess it makes sense--he will want to watch it all again and evaluate it before preparing a monologue. This would have meant just sounding off off the cuff for him to cover it tonight.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:

barnyard1996 said:

titan said:


It will interesting to see Tucker's monologue tonight covers this.
Covering the Doctors who were pulled from social media.
Ah, I see. Usually wait for the 10pm repeat to watch if do. I guess it makes sense--he will want to watch it all again and evaluate it before preparing a monologue. This would have meant just sounding off off the cuff for him to cover it tonight.
Honestly, he loathes congress and thinks they are all useless.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
barnyard1996 said:

titan said:

barnyard1996 said:

titan said:


It will interesting to see Tucker's monologue tonight covers this.
Covering the Doctors who were pulled from social media.
Ah, I see. Usually wait for the 10pm repeat to watch if do. I guess it makes sense--he will want to watch it all again and evaluate it before preparing a monologue. This would have meant just sounding off off the cuff for him to cover it tonight.
Honestly, he loathes congress and thinks they are all useless.
Well that is absolutely correct. A good number on both sides have even betrayed the country.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

I've skimmed thru about 30 minutes of the testimony. About as planned, but somehow the Dems were even ruder and dumber than I expected toward the end, even though SJL and Hank Johnson went early.


My takeaway was just that Guam should name some part of the island after Johnson, and that that Barr has tremendous patience.
He has almost infinite patience.

I would have cracked and on several occasions yelled," if you would just shut the hell up and stop your blathering I would respond to your irrational incoherent bull *****".

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.