***** Barr and the Destruction of the House Oversight Cmte *****

48,269 Views | 522 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by will25u
B2Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:

B2Ag05 said:

Ms. Dean is by far the worst person today. Hand down.
Who is that? I'm behind but this Ms. McBath women talking about the ACA is killing me.

And if Ms. Dean is by far the worst person today then that is quite a feat.
I invite your analysis when you get to here. Although Ms. Mucarsel-Powell gave them all a good run as well.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They walked right into the REEEEclaiming time jokes
I'm not sure if people genuinely believe someone is going to say, "Wow, if some people say I'm a moron for not believing this, it clearly must be true."

It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do the dems actually think this is helping their cause? This is laughable on their part.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Until people start going to jail, clown shows like this and all over DC will not only continue, but breed.
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why can't Antifa firebomb congress in sessions like this?
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So how dumb are the Democrats? They create this sham and at the same time put Sleepy out there to hold a press conference. Good Job there guys.
TwelveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a good example of how to effectively question a hostile witness. It's unfortunate so many members of Congress in both parties lack this skill.



ANSC Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biden taking questions. It's planned. Less eyes on him when he glitches. Just a test run.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ANSC Ag said:

Nadler. "Witness ability to respond to accusations is irrelevant."
Even Nadler can't be that stupid, .... but a guess he is.
strbrst777
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Annoying speeches by rude Dempols. They do not give Barr a chance to answer. This is shameful. What a disgusting waste.
The TC Jester
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our country is a joke, this is beyond a disgrace.
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. Didn't realize he was taking questions. Prepared questions I'm sure.
The TC Jester
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"I'm running out of time sir, one more question (that I won't allow you to even try to answer)!"
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mercifully over and Barr no longer has to be berated by a bunch of hypocrites.
ANSC Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just said hasn't been tested for COVID. That's gonna take some wind out of his accusations about Trump who is tested weekly.
B2Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That appeared to be bordering on congenial between Barr and SJL. I wonder what that was about.
PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenColderHere said:

This is a good example of how to effectively question a hostile witness.

Is that why the video cuts off early? lololol
I'm not sure if people genuinely believe someone is going to say, "Wow, if some people say I'm a moron for not believing this, it clearly must be true."

It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow, sleepy.
Layne Staley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
must be nice to be able to call "reporters" from the list you have in front of you......
B2Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenColderHere said:

This is a good example of how to effectively question a hostile witness. It's unfortunate so many members of Congress in both parties lack this skill.




This somehow seems to be a compliment to Swalwell. I'm not sure we saw the same video.
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sleepy is calling out the names of the reporters to come ask their question. Hahaha. Wow. Tell me he didn't already have the questions.
The TC Jester
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B2Ag05 said:

That appeared to be bordering on congenial between Barr and SJL. I wonder what that was about.


It was all about her weaseling in for cheap and easy camera time. It's what she always does. Her own staff loathes her as they are treated like sh**. But she tries to appear stoic and diplomatic for the cameras.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B2Ag05 said:

That appeared to be bordering on congenial between Barr and SJL. I wonder what that was about.


She was probably proving to Barr that she could list the other oceans by name.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't been watching this travesty the whole time, but when able it seems the Democrats relentlessly call these events peaceful.

Has AJ Barr responded asking how come Minneapolis is requesting over half a BILLION DOLLARS from the federal government for repairs caused by said PEACEFUL PROTESTERS.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sleepy has the teleprompters in between him and the reporters who ask questions.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Swalwell told a flat out Documented lie in his statement I'm the video. There was never any evidence that Stone actually communicated with an actual Russian agent. Stone lied about communicating with Wikileaks as if he had a pipeline to them, when he did not, as a matter of being an insider with prestige. It turns out I think that he was texted twice by someone associated with Wikileaks and I think he gave them a two word reply once amounting to that's nice, to paraphrase.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

I haven't been watching this travesty the whole time, but when able it seems the Democrats relentlessly call these events peaceful.

Has AJ Barr responded asking how come Minneapolis is requesting over half a BILLION DOLLARS from the federal government for repairs caused by said PEACEFUL PROTESTERS.
If he had been allowed to answer many more questions, he likely would have. But he did ask twice why it is suddenly okay for federal courthouses to be vandalized and set on fire?? Dems were like crickets.
B2Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I Have Spoken said:

B2Ag05 said:

That appeared to be bordering on congenial between Barr and SJL. I wonder what that was about.


She was probably proving to Barr that she could list the other oceans by name.
"...Atlantic, Arctic, Southern, and Native American"
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That entire hearing was an embarrassment. Is there NOTHING that can be done about that? Surely Nadler was violating multiple rules? Is there a way to file a grievance or complaint or something and have him be sanctioned for that garbage?
Flying Crowbar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B2Ag05 said:

I Have Spoken said:

B2Ag05 said:

That appeared to be bordering on congenial between Barr and SJL. I wonder what that was about.


She was probably proving to Barr that she could list the other oceans by name.
"...Atlantic, Arctic, Southern, and Native American"
You forgot the Specific Ocean.
ScottishFire
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The sip of the coffee at the end and the smirk makes this pure gold.
"No one cuts me with impunity."
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope this lights a fire under Barr to go full bore with Durham. These Dems are losing their temper and poking the hornet's nest.
Paradise Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenColderHere said:

This is a good example of how to effectively question a hostile witness. It's unfortunate so many members of Congress in both parties lack this skill.





You conveniently left out the part where Swalwell never followed up with any pointed questions on the topic of investigating the President after his "let's talk about it" comment.

So actually a very ineffective way to question a hostile witness when you have nothing to support your self-righteous bluster.

Not surprising - very typical of all the Dem Reps, that's why they interrupted so much since Barr would eat their lunch if allowed to respond.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

richardag said:

I haven't been watching this travesty the whole time, but when able it seems the Democrats relentlessly call these events peaceful.

Has AJ Barr responded asking how come Minneapolis is requesting over half a BILLION DOLLARS from the federal government for repairs caused by said PEACEFUL PROTESTERS.
If he had been allowed to answer many more questions, he likely would have. But he did ask twice why it is suddenly okay for federal courthouses to be vandalized and set on fire?? Dems were like crickets.
Yes, very infuriating Democrats cut him off from answering, kind of like a third world kangaroo court.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B2Ag05 said:

johnnyblaze36 said:

B2Ag05 said:

Ms. Dean is by far the worst person today. Hand down.
Who is that? I'm behind but this Ms. McBath women talking about the ACA is killing me.

And if Ms. Dean is by far the worst person today then that is quite a feat.
I invite your analysis when you get to here. Although Ms. Mucarsel-Powell gave them all a good run as well.
Yeah, Dean is definitely the worst. What a nasty woman.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.