Boo Weekley said:

---

Fauci was literally telling people they could get HIV/AIDS from sharing a house with someone. That is f'n INSANE. I'm not a big gay pride guy but damn think of how many gay people that hurt.

Then I heard there were drug shenanigans the gay people wanted his head for.

Man gays have short memories if they like/trust this guy now. Bet most of em do because of the stupid (D) by his name.

Maybe he's contributed in some way, so what. Hitler and his scientists contributed some too.

---

Fits his mode of operation. Distract people from factors actually spreading the virus in the hopes that it will actually become a pandemic so you can conduct research on it.

The man should be underneath the prison.

Great article at The Federalist about Fauci's role in changing the gain-of-function definition, and oversight of grants, plus how they got the Wuhan Inst. Virology Ecohealth one around/avoided any review.

Quote:

---

Committee Members Say They Lack Power

A member of the grant review committee has said the definition of the research the committee reviews needs broadening. Another member told the Post that from 2017 to 2020, no more than "three or four" projects were forwarded to the review committee. "They were grading their own homework," said Robert Kadlec, who also served as the Trump administration's assistant HHS secretary for preparedness and response.

Twenty-one gain-of-function grants were halted during the 2014-2017 period, but ten were allowed to proceed with exceptions, Collins told The New York Times in 2017 signaling that fewer grants have been defined as gain of function since then.

Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin has described Fauci's role in gain-of-function research thus: "The head of the entire field really is Anthony Fauci he's the godfather of gain-of-function research as we know it," Rogin told "The Megyn Kelly Show" in April 2021. The National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Fauci currently leads had a $6 billion budget in 2021.

A good question for Fauci would be: Is "three or four" grants being forwarded to the review committee from 2017 to 2020 accurate, and is it enough? Were all approved and funded? In an exchange with Fauci, Paul stated "the committee has granted every exemption." An NIH spokesperson has said the agency doesn't discuss unfunded grant applications, which avoids providing information on rejection rates.

U.S. Grant to Wuhan Slipped Through Review Process

An example of a grant the committee did not review is one that sent U.S. taxpayer money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is considered a possible origin of Covid-19. The NIH has said its grant to the EcoHealth Alliance for bat-based coronavirus research did not meet the definition of gain of function and thus was not submitted to the committee.

The EcoHealth grant was originally approved during the 2014-2017 "pause," before the review committee process was created. The head of EcoHealth referred in 2016 to the research as "gain of function" and the NIAID program official who oversaw the grant flagged it as possibly meeting that definition.

EcoHealth convinced NIAID its research was not gain of function in part because the virus being studied "has never been demonstrated to infect humans or cause human disease." Yet months earlier, the virus had been shown in other research to do just that. The purpose of the grant was also to study which bat viruses might easily spread to humans.

More questions for Fauci: How did NIAID determine that the EcoHealth research was not meeting their definition of gain of function? How could the possible evolution of those viruses be studied without making them more transmissible among humans, which would make them gain of function research? How well did NIH oversee the total of ten gain-of-function grants it exempted during the pause, and are any ongoing?

Fauci, Should the Government's Definition Change?

Yet more questions for Fauci: Is the government's definition of "gain of function" research too narrow? Did he and does he still support the changes made to it back in 2017?

The 2014 government definition referred to pathogens "transmissible among mammals" that might accidentally cause human infections. It was narrowed in December 2017 to cover viruses "likely capable of wide and uncontrollable spread in human populations."

If the definition had remained as the original, would the EcoHealth project have been reviewed by the committee?

When Did Fauci Know About Lax Lab Security?

Also, when and how did Fauci learn of security concerns at the Wuhan Institute of Virology? Fauci's agency had its own official in Beijing who had visited the Wuhan lab in 2017.

Dr. Ping Chen, the director of the NIAID office in China located in the U.S. embassy in Beijing, "visited the WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] in 2017 and co-wrote one of the 2018 State Department cables from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing on the WIV that highlighted concerns there" about lab security, according to House Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans.

Whom at NIAID was notified of Chen's warning and how did such persons follow up? How does Fauci believe the research grant approval process needs to be improved so U.S. taxpayer money does not go to a lab with known security lapses?

---

As a reminder, Fauci is still doling out funds, with marginal oversight if any, to his pals to do gain of function research, in various labs across the globe.

If beagle torture doesn't change the narrative on what Fauci wants to do to your children, I don't know what will.

https://blog.whitecoatwaste.org/2021/11/15/case-study-how-wcw-exposed-the-role-of-anthony-fauci-in-funding-abusive-animal-experiments/

Great article in Dailymail today detailing Ecohealth and Fauci's fraud/lies/efforts to cover up WIV likelihood of being the origin.

And as I've stated for years, everything about the man has always been about 'how can I get camera time in the press?:'

Quote:

---

Daszak also repeatedly lauded Fauci, requesting he serve as a 'panel speaker' at select EcoHealth events.

In September 2013, Daszak reportedly emailed David Morens, Facui's senior adviser, seeking his participation on a panel.

According to Vanity Fair, Morens replied: 'Write Tony directly, thanking him for meeting with you all recently and then inviting him to be a member of this Cosmos Club discussion. That way, it is personal and doesn't look 'cooked' by us.'

Although Fauci declined that invitation, along with several others, Daszak remained firm in his pursuit of the health leader and his federal funding.

, seemingly trying to help Daszak in his mission, told the EcoHealth leader in February 2016: 'Fauci 'normally says no to almost everything like this. Unless ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox are all there with cameras running. If he were asked to give THE main talk or the only talk that might increase the chances.''
Per Morens' tip, Daszak invited Fauci to give a presentation on the Zika virus in March 2016, which he accepted, securing RSVPs among guest from an 'array of deep-pocketed federal agencies'.

---

Mustn't cast any aspersions about why the CCP researchers wanted to delete the early SARS-covid sequence from NIH databases;

Quote:

---

In June 2021, biologist Jesse D. Bloom - whom colleagues allege wanted to 'dig deep and discover the truth' about how COVID evolved - confronted Fauci by providing him with a preprint of a paper he was seeking to have peer reviewed and published.

Bloom's paper, which was obtained by Vanity Fair, detailed how a early genomic sequences of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, had 'somehow vanished without a trace'.

The biologist claims the genomic sequences were initially published in a Chinese paper but had since been deleted from NIH databases at the 'request of researchers in Wuhan'.

Bloom, alleging the deleted genomic sequences could be 'key to tracking when the virus emerged and how it might have evolved,' believed the disappearance of the sequences 'raised the possibility' that the Chinese government was trying to cover-up evidence about the early spread of COVID.

After receiving the preprint of Bloom's paper, Fauci and his boss, NIH director Francis Collins, allegedly organized a Zoom meeting with the biologist to discuss his findings.

Four additional scientists, biologist Kristian Andersen and virologist Robert Garry, who were invited by the NIH, and biologists Sergei Pond and Rasmus Nielsen, who were invited by Bloom, attended the call.
After he presented his research, Bloom claims Andersen interjected, claiming his preprint was 'deeply troubling.'

Andersen reportedly told the research that NIH policy entitled the Chinese scientists to delete their sequences from the database if they wanted to so and that it was 'was unethical for Bloom to analyze them further.

He also allegedly claimed 'there was nothing unusual about the early genomic sequences in Wuhan,' prompting a heated argument between Andersen and Nielsen.

'Fauci then weighed in, objecting to the preprint's description of Chinese scientists 'surreptitiously' deleting the sequences,' Vanity Fair stated, claiming the immunologist said: 'The word was loaded and the reason they'd asked for the deletions was unknown.'

---

Walking and talking hypocrites

I will support anything that reminds people of the hypocrisy of liberals and murderers which fauci is both.

They need more....$ pic.twitter.com/W6E62QCqy2

— George W (@gwsmileyatl) June 16, 2022

Lot of folks showed how guinea pug they were

When educated bit no wisdom you are just a bigger fool

Stat Monitor Repairman said:

---

You look at this whole Fauci thing from beginning to end and it's clear that we live in a simulation.

Somebody designed this Fauci character and set him in a storyline.

Its all too unbelievable to be true.

---

Apparently they used LoTR for their character templates

Is that a trial level offense? Sounds like it.

OP

Just found this Gem!
Enjoy!!

Direct Quote;

"This would not be the 1st time if it happened that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse."

Dr. Fauci.

Ya'll know what to do ;) pic.twitter.com/KqfmN5f0hV

— MamaBear (@GothamAsylum604) July 9, 2022

He literally looks like a Bond villain. You can't make this **** up!!!

BMX Bandit said:

---

It's the difference between how a scientist answers questions vs how the layman politician does.

Fauci has been a solid supporter of what Trump has said and done

---

You've whiffed on everything COVID related, but I still like you man.

mjfrog said:

---

If beagle torture doesn't change the narrative on what Fauci wants to do to your children, I don't know what will.

https://blog.whitecoatwaste.org/2021/11/15/case-study-how-wcw-exposed-the-role-of-anthony-fauci-in-funding-abusive-animal-experiments/

---

Man, that is horrible. That poor dog. If he was aware he was going to be tortured he'd probably offed himself somehow. How a human being could do this, which appears to be a form of torture more than anything, is beyond me.

The MSM was pumpin' covid this morning …. July 16, 2022.

They about to go full tilt/

Just time for a monthly bump for this one with his Royal Arrogance' latest interview/pronouncements:

“It's called ‘the Fauci effect’…people go to medical school and go into science…because I symbolize, integrity, and truth"pic.twitter.com/WNuMCG9YrG

— Aaron Ginn (@aginnt) August 12, 2022

Yes, I saw this one on DenverAg91's thread.

It was a good call.

Sigh….

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/rand-paul-fauci-caused-7-million-people-die-weve-caught-him-red-handed-he-wont-get-away

Apologies to captkirk.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3346833

No, he won't pay the price justice demands, but hopefully he at least racks up some legal bills that eat into his multiple federal retirement benefits and huge profits from investments the past few years.

His daughter worked for Twitter and now a left wing ai outfit around organizing groups for voting etc.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/12/06/deposition-reveals-faucis-interesting-connection-to-twitter-n669410

Stories like this, are why I will always, always hold contempt in my heart for Anthony Fauci.

He pushed the funding to create this virus, which escaped and became endemic.

Then he lied about how the virus might have originated, tried to suppress people who dissented from "Saint of Science" dogma, and then tried to convince people to believe in a redefined meaning of "gain of function."

Then he pushed (and still does!!!) lockdowns/masks, which have caused tremendous harm globally (including starvation for the poorer parts of the world). Meanwhile, Sweden has lower excess deaths than any neighboring country per capita despite refusing his advice which was followed throughout Europe/America/most of Asia.

Then, he pushed the MRNA vaccines on the public, and sowed discord/distrust towards the medical establishment.

People, and many kids have died for his ego/God complex, all over the planet. Vast numbers of elderly died early, or lived their final years in utter isolation from loved ones/friends.

The true numbers will never be known. This will also keep happening, for a long time.

2. Backstory: In 2021 the baby’s parents had a close family friend die of a heart attack shortly after she received her Covid—19 vaccine. By all accounts their friend was healthy and her death caused alarm bells to go off about the safety of the mRNA vaccine.

— DefeatTheMandates (@dchomecoming) December 14, 2022

8. Just 12 days later, Baby August sadly passed away as a result of the large blood clot.

— DefeatTheMandates (@dchomecoming) December 14, 2022

End of story/rant.

I am done with this thread, have a nice day everyone.

nortex97 said:

---

His daughter worked for Twitter and now a left wing ai outfit around organizing groups for voting etc.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/12/06/deposition-reveals-faucis-interesting-connection-to-twitter-n669410

---

I'm starting to really look for 5th generation warfare tactics. So this makes a ton of sense for them. All about hearts and minds. Never about facts and good ideas.