Don't know.
It's not so much just blind mass testing - it's making sure that you can test each and every person that might have been infected through contact tracing as soon as possible. The absolute # of tests is inconsequential here just because they were able to stop the spread so quickly.Alta said:
Ok assuming it is under 1% that still doesn't seem like great "mass testing." Especially if people are negative then they theoretically should keep getting tested throughout the outbreak.
Maybe they are doing better than other countries but still doesn't seem to justify that their testing is so great.
True.Mordred said:Agreed. Would mean the CFR is much closer to 1% (absent breakdown in health services) than anyone would want to admit.cone said:
horrible news for severity of symptoms and CFR though
and doesn't match with Italy data showing lots of asymptomatic carriers
Like I said, the different sources of data don't jibe with each other. We basically fumbling around in the dark with this thing right now. Take everything and every study, even from good sources, with a heavy dose of salt.
And cases like that do not make sense.PJYoung said:
CFTXAG10 said:
Exactly. Maybe postpone the writing of that article until you get the facts instead of trying to spread panic. Irresponsible journalism.
You would think these idiots could check their agendas at the door when people's lives are at stake.riverrataggie said:CFTXAG10 said:
Exactly. Maybe postpone the writing of that article until you get the facts instead of trying to spread panic. Irresponsible journalism.
Why? The article is already out there with the premise she has it. No need for the journalist to fact check later and prove if her article is based in reality. She's a journalist after all.
dermdoc said:You would think these idiots could check their agendas at the door when people's lives are at stake.riverrataggie said:CFTXAG10 said:
Exactly. Maybe postpone the writing of that article until you get the facts instead of trying to spread panic. Irresponsible journalism.
Why? The article is already out there with the premise she has it. No need for the journalist to fact check later and prove if her article is based in reality. She's a journalist after all.
aginlakeway said:PJYoung said:
"Her test results have still not come back.
Anderson, 40, said what happened to his former girlfriend should be a wake-up call for anyone who still believes COVID-19 isn't as deadly as experts have claimed."
FPS_Dough said:
How come you don't' see recoveries posted on twitter?
FPS_Dough said:
How come you don't' see recoveries posted on twitter?
Txhuntr said:
We have 5x the population of Italy. We should fully expect more cases. It's a matter of does our severe caseload overwhelm our hospital system. Washington state has been dealing with this for at least two months and hasn't become Italy yet. New York will be interesting though
Edited to add: I would pretty well throw out China's numbers. They are not only likely misreported, but China also took the most drastic measures that I hope the US would never take to quell this
Quote:
She had a slight fever. Crescent Care, her employer, had only a handful of tests for the new strain of coronavirus on hand; she initially passed on the chance to take one, after being told she was low-risk for the serious disease.
When her symptoms didn't shake, she did take the test on Monday. By Thursday, she felt "something in her lungs," she told longtime partner Josh Anderson. But she still felt well enough by then to join Anderson as the pair walked her dog.
On Friday, Anderson found Ott dead in her kitchen.
cone said:
this thing is getting more alarming because a) Italy doesn't match up with expectations out of China and b) USA early results don't match and seem even worse than Italy
and the WHO says one thing but Italy experience says another
no one knows what the **** is going on
and you wonder why things are panicked
Proc92 said:
Stupid story on the dead girl. What do test results have to do with going to the er if the symptoms reach a worrisome level? Does the treatment at the er depend on test results if you have severe distress and symptoms? Why didn't she go?
Love ya Joe. But posters were predicting a lot more than 10k dead.Proposition Joe said:Agsrback12 said:cone said:
this thing is getting more alarming because a) Italy doesn't match up with expectations out of China and b) USA early results don't match and seem even worse than Italy
and the WHO says one thing but Italy experience says another
no one knows what the **** is going on
and you wonder why things are panicked
This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me.
Less alarming than what? 2 weeks ago where you were saying this isn't even as significant as the flu?
Just save yourself the time -- come back in a week and take whatever the death total is and post "This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me, people predicting [death total + 10,000] were just alarmists."
Just repost every week and you can always claim to be the voice of reason.
Millions in the US (6 million being a favorite number but sometimes up to 100) to billions worldwide have been thrown out there since the early days of this thread.dermdoc said:Love ya Joe. But posters were predicting a lot more than 10k dead.Proposition Joe said:Agsrback12 said:cone said:
this thing is getting more alarming because a) Italy doesn't match up with expectations out of China and b) USA early results don't match and seem even worse than Italy
and the WHO says one thing but Italy experience says another
no one knows what the **** is going on
and you wonder why things are panicked
This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me.
Less alarming than what? 2 weeks ago where you were saying this isn't even as significant as the flu?
Just save yourself the time -- come back in a week and take whatever the death total is and post "This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me, people predicting [death total + 10,000] were just alarmists."
Just repost every week and you can always claim to be the voice of reason.
Hind sight works both ways.
And I will be happy to repost every week right or wrong. The doom sayers will disappear. They always do.Proposition Joe said:Agsrback12 said:cone said:
this thing is getting more alarming because a) Italy doesn't match up with expectations out of China and b) USA early results don't match and seem even worse than Italy
and the WHO says one thing but Italy experience says another
no one knows what the **** is going on
and you wonder why things are panicked
This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me.
Less alarming than what? 2 weeks ago where you were saying this isn't even as significant as the flu?
Just save yourself the time -- come back in a week and take whatever the death total is and post "This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me, people predicting [death total + 10,000] were just alarmists."
Just repost every week and you can always claim to be the voice of reason.
Rapier108 said:Millions in the US (6 million being a favorite number but sometimes up to 100) to billions worldwide have been thrown out there since the early days of this thread.dermdoc said:Love ya Joe. But posters were predicting a lot more than 10k dead.Proposition Joe said:Agsrback12 said:cone said:
this thing is getting more alarming because a) Italy doesn't match up with expectations out of China and b) USA early results don't match and seem even worse than Italy
and the WHO says one thing but Italy experience says another
no one knows what the **** is going on
and you wonder why things are panicked
This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me.
Less alarming than what? 2 weeks ago where you were saying this isn't even as significant as the flu?
Just save yourself the time -- come back in a week and take whatever the death total is and post "This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me, people predicting [death total + 10,000] were just alarmists."
Just repost every week and you can always claim to be the voice of reason.
Hind sight works both ways.
You will admit that the initial estimates made by epidemiologists reflected the possible worst case scenario. Initially this virus was assumed to be equivalent to the 1918 H1N1 virus that killed 650,000+/- Americans. This total number was factored up by the population ratio indicating total deaths of about 2.2 million Americans to correlate 1918 to now. A frightening number. Other estimated larger total deaths. As you know more information has come to light and that 2.2 million estimate is greatly reduced.dermdoc said:Love ya Joe. But posters were predicting a lot more than 10k dead.Proposition Joe said:Agsrback12 said:cone said:
this thing is getting more alarming because a) Italy doesn't match up with expectations out of China and b) USA early results don't match and seem even worse than Italy
and the WHO says one thing but Italy experience says another
no one knows what the **** is going on
and you wonder why things are panicked
This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me.
Less alarming than what? 2 weeks ago where you were saying this isn't even as significant as the flu?
Just save yourself the time -- come back in a week and take whatever the death total is and post "This thing has gotten a lot less alarming for me, people predicting [death total + 10,000] were just alarmists."
Just repost every week and you can always claim to be the voice of reason.
Hind sight works both ways.