BQ78 said:
Yes, I'm not pooh poohing the economic effects this is causing. But the health concerns are mostly media over-hype fueling fearful over-reaction. That over-reaction can can be readily found by some of the posts in this thread. My comment that the media will move on, does not mean I don't think the profound economic effects this is causing will be over, even after subsequent shiny objects come and go for the media. But I believe the health effects will be over long before the economic effects of the over-reaction.
No offense, but what you personally believe is irrelevant. What matters is the coronavirus data.
Given the fact that this is a
new virus with no proven vaccine yet, and given the fact that
the indications thus far are that this virus is pretty infectious and easily communicable and that
it apparently can survive on surfaces for hours and perhaps even days, and given the fact that
the numbers so far seem to indicate it has a fairly substantial mortality rate for adults age 60 and above, it would be imprudent and irresponsible to blindly assume the threat coronavirus poses to millions of Americans is overblown.
This is a new virus, so the pertinent data may possibly change in the weeks & months ahead. But what the data says so far is: don't take this virus lightly. If the data on the infection rate and mortality rate of coronavirus changes substantially for the better (i.e., if it decreases substantially) over the next few weeks and months, then everyone can be thankful, and you can boast how great your instincts are.
I'm unclear what you think the MSM should be doing differently. The MSM are talking to doctors, nurses, and public health officials. They're reporting what those professionals tell them. The medical and public health professionals are telling them: the public should not panic, but it should also definitely take this virus very seriously.
Do you you think the MSM should ignore and not report the warnings from medical and public health officials?