We'll see about that. They don't even have a media...or internet.
Maybe they can get a sense of which dates flights would be more iffy. This case might provide an example of a `still okay' point depending on when got here.basketaggie said:
https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/health/2020/01/24/coronavirus-tennessee-test-results-negative-individual-tested-cookeville-tech-student-cdc-says/4572158002/
Tennessee Tech student negative
[Cut off]foleyt said:
Erudite?
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
[/url]
Quote:
Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding (Eric Ding) is a health economist, epidemiologist, and nutrition scientist at the Harvard Chan School of Public Health, and an expert advisor to the World Health Organization.
His work focuses on the intersection of health economics and public policy. He also currently works on behavioral interventions for prevention, Medicare cost and quality improvements, evidence guideline improvements for nutrition, diabetes/obesity prevention, public health policy programs, drug safety reform, and food economics in the US. He has further expertise in public health program design, policy implementation, and leveraging big data for improving health systems.
These were posted on this thread, but they probably need to be reposted:Rock1982 said:
So, I'm reading on this thread, And in the associated links, lots of concerns about transmission. Particularly the rate of transmission and that transmission may happen before symptoms appear. Got it.
But what's missing in the discussion is the severity of the illness. Even in the most recent linked article from infectious the mortality rate is 3%, With almost all of the deaths occurring in people over the age of 70 with pre-existing conditions.
So is this like a common cold that most people recover from it a few days,
Or is this something that is going to kill young healthy people.
And how long does recovery require?
I agree, but with a sample size of 41 patients, 13 were sent to ICU, and 6 died. Those are distressing numbers.foleyt said:
The lancet article needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Earliest diagnosed cases were probably more severe than avg patient. Not that the information isn't valuable, just may be overstating severity
erudite said:
Also, one of the lessons to take away from this today:
There was a video posted back about several doctors/nurses having breakdowns and crying their eyes out. I think that also might happen in the US if such an outbreak was to occur but on a larger scale. In China doctors don't get paid much and generally are not the top earners unlike the US, but earn above average.
There's a difference between people who are in it for the money, and people who genuine love what they do...
Like my grandmother says. The job of medical professions is a risk trade off, if there is an outbreak you WILL be overworked. But that is a risk you must be willing to take alongside infection and death if you truly wish to be a doctor.
The people who treating people on that outbreak and manage to stay strong are real heroes. I cannot say the same with those who are desperately trying to get out.
Quote:
In Philadelphia, for example, 4,597 people died in the week ending 16 October, but by 11 November, influenza had almost disappeared from the city
The Fall Guy said:
I am watching it at this moment. Scary but you know what. Our population on this earth is too high.
I believe these viruses are here to keep it in check. It's only a matter of time.
PDEMDHC said:
To put things in perspective from the Spanish flu outbreak in 1918/19 and mutation to a less deadly strain.... the numbers alone shocked me. Didn't realized it killed roughly 3% to 5% of worlds population.Quote:
In Philadelphia, for example, 4,597 people died in the week ending 16 October, but by 11 November, influenza had almost disappeared from the city
Like what?azulAg said:
Time to go up a defcon level, gonna stockpile supplies today