***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

989,916 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tony Franklins Other Shoe • 8:56a, 1/16/20
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.
Reply Quote
3
coolerguy12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aginlakeway • 8:57a, 1/16/20
AG
aginlakeway said:
Gary Johnson said:
aginlakeway said:
Gary or Jimmy or any others ...

$250 to SPCA on the election? I'll take Trump.

I'll take the first 4 posters who want to wager.


What if he resigns or is removed by the Senate?


I'll give you 5:1 odds on any amount you want to wager that doesn't happen. How much?


I'm absolutely shocked that Gary/Chase/Jimmy won't take this bet. Shocked I tell you.
Reply Quote
10
hbtheduce
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 8:58a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.


An unconstitutional act is not a crime.

Congress/President signs unconstitutional laws regularly. ITS NOT A CRIME!
Reply Quote
8
GMaster0
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:01a, 1/16/20
Rudy is the archetype of honest and credible government service, we need him on the President's defense team. This Lev guy was doing stuff to help his bottom line.

Rudy is the man and most likely the next President after Trump. Book it!
Reply Quote
1
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:02a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.
I'm just trying to distract you with your other favorite chew toy.

Plus, it's painfully dishonest to ignore what the market would do if Trump really was in trouble with all this nonsense and a Biden/Bernie/Pocahontas was gaining huge amounts of traction. Plenty of rich Dems in power places that know what would happen if those three knuckleheads get to grab the steering wheel.
Reply Quote
4
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hbtheduce • 9:05a, 1/16/20
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.


An unconstitutional act is not a crime.

Congress/President signs unconstitutional laws regularly. ITS NOT A CRIME!


Cool. Trump should file a case to get the articles dismissed on those grounds. He won't, which is how we know it's just sh** talk to comfort the dumbest of his followers.
Reply Quote
2
Agvet12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:10a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.


An unconstitutional act is not a crime.

Congress/President signs unconstitutional laws regularly. ITS NOT A CRIME!


Cool. Trump should file a case to get the articles dismissed on those grounds. He won't, which is how we know it's just sh** talk to comfort the dumbest of his followers.


Your troll job is 10x worse
Reply Quote
5
hbtheduce
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:11a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.


An unconstitutional act is not a crime.

Congress/President signs unconstitutional laws regularly. ITS NOT A CRIME!


Cool. Trump should file a case to get the articles dismissed on those grounds. He won't, which is how we know it's just sh** talk to comfort the dumbest of his followers.

You are the one swinging your big ole hog for 20 pages around claiming Trump is guilty. You can't name a law he broke. The people who hate Trump the most couldn't even find a law to pretend he broke.
Reply Quote
8
hbtheduce
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:12a, 1/16/20
AG
Now I'm supposed to believe after

Russiagate
Stormygate
Sharpiegate
Ukrainegate


that some idiot named "Hyde" has the keys to bring down the kingdom. You are deluding yourself.
Reply Quote
7
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:12a, 1/16/20
Trump finally gets Ukraine to investigate something, Trump.



For the mid morning crowd. Adding pages quickly.
Reply Quote
4
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 9:13a, 1/16/20
AG
Rockdoc said:
And certain posters gobble it up!
you know how Internet porn Addiction utterly fries some people's brains and even leaves them with erectile dysfunction? Well this insanity is a type of hope-porn that Gary/his multitude of socks is hopelessly addicted to and it has fried his brain.
Reply Quote
6
aginlakeway
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:18a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.


An unconstitutional act is not a crime.

Congress/President signs unconstitutional laws regularly. ITS NOT A CRIME!


Cool. Trump should file a case to get the articles dismissed on those grounds. He won't, which is how we know it's just sh** talk to comfort the dumbest of his followers.


I rarely block people. But your posts are a waste of time. Good luck in your efforts.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Reply Quote
2
Joe Exotic
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:19a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Trump finally gets Ukraine to investigate something, Trump.



For the mid morning crowd. Adding pages quickly.

This moves Trumps chances of being convicted and removed to 0.0% from 0.0%. Good job.
Reply Quote
7
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:27a, 1/16/20
"No law was broken" talking point gone.

Reply Quote
4
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:27a, 1/16/20
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
Wildcat said:
Why would the Ukrainian government investigate whether the American government was surveiling an American diplomat in The Ukraine?


1. It was Trump's private team, not the government
2. It's illegal

Since when is physically following someone a crime?


Do I have to spoonfeed everything? Click the link.

Quote:
However, the published references cited by the Washington Post contain a possible violation of the law of Ukraine and the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which protects the rights of a diplomat on the territory of the foreign country.


You really didn't think it might be illegal to physically and electronically surveill an ambassador?

Electronically, yes (without a warrant). Physically, in the United States, probably not. You know there is a whole industry based on it. So I doubt there is much blow back domestically.

This is like claiming criminality if an american woman drove in Saudi Arabia. I don't exactly care what the laws are in some second rate country.


I'm sure it's illegal here to sureveill a diplomat. They were in Ukraine which is why the Ukrainian government announced investigations under Ukrainian law.

If you care or not is irrelevant.
It is perfectly legal for the US government to investigate one of its diplomats if they believe said diplomat has done something wrong. We already know that this woman was using the resources of her office to spy on Americans connected to Trump and conservative media people.

As for Hyde, who holds no position in government, he would not be involved in it, unless he did it on his own, which would be illegal, but in no way connected to Trump.
Reply Quote
4
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:31a, 1/16/20
AG
I don't understand why the ICA wasn't cited in the articles of impeachment.
Reply Quote
6
houag80
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:34a, 1/16/20
AG
Hey Gary. Maybe you should go back to things you know something about.....like....maybe economics. Oh, my bad. We've already covered that.

Bwahahahahh. Bwahahahahh. Lmao.
Reply Quote
9
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:35a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
That's a weird defense of a crime.

But the stock market doesn't GIAF if Trump gets impeached.


An unconstitutional act is not a crime.

Congress/President signs unconstitutional laws regularly. ITS NOT A CRIME!


Cool. Trump should file a case to get the articles dismissed on those grounds. He won't, which is how we know it's just sh** talk to comfort the dumbest of his followers.


So you just can't help yourself. I guess when this gets banned you go back to chase
Reply Quote
2
hbtheduce
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:43a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
hbtheduce said:
Gary Johnson said:
Wildcat said:
Why would the Ukrainian government investigate whether the American government was surveiling an American diplomat in The Ukraine?


1. It was Trump's private team, not the government
2. It's illegal

Since when is physically following someone a crime?


Do I have to spoonfeed everything? Click the link.

Quote:
However, the published references cited by the Washington Post contain a possible violation of the law of Ukraine and the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which protects the rights of a diplomat on the territory of the foreign country.


You really didn't think it might be illegal to physically and electronically surveill an ambassador?

Electronically, yes (without a warrant). Physically, in the United States, probably not. You know there is a whole industry based on it. So I doubt there is much blow back domestically.

This is like claiming criminality if an american woman drove in Saudi Arabia. I don't exactly care what the laws are in some second rate country.


I'm sure it's illegal here to sureveill a diplomat. They were in Ukraine which is why the Ukrainian government announced investigations under Ukrainian law.

If you care or not is irrelevant.


Surveillance of a foreign ambassador, probably. Could you follow a US ambassador stateside? Its within your rights as a citizen in the public square. I'm sure there are laws on how and duration. But I'm not the one jumping to conclusions that the White House ordered illegal surveillance.
Reply Quote
3
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:49a, 1/16/20
Let it gooooooo
Reply Quote
2
AustinScubaAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 9:49a, 1/16/20
AG
aggiehawg said:
I don't understand why the ICA wasn't cited in the articles of impeachment.
My guess would be because every president have violated it at one time or another.
Reply Quote
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AustinScubaAg • 9:52a, 1/16/20
AustinScubaAg said:
aggiehawg said:
I don't understand why the ICA wasn't cited in the articles of impeachment.
My guess would be because every president have violated it at one time or another.
Exactly

And because the Democrats know it does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:52a, 1/16/20
AG
We surveill foreign ambassadors routinely under FISA. How Flynn and Kislyak conversations were picked up.

Yovanovitch was an ambassador in a former Soviet satellite. She was likely being watched by all sorts of people.
Reply Quote
5
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 9:54a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
"No law was broken" talking point gone.

I must have missed the law that says we have to give Ukraine taxpayer money, can you point me to that one?
Reply Quote
6
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FTAG 2000 • 9:56a, 1/16/20
Quote:
I must have missed the law that says we have to give Ukraine taxpayer money, can you point me to that one?
Especially when most was disappearing and unaccounted for.

But wanting to fight corruption is a bad thing if Trump is doing it.

And I'd put good money that the author of this "opinion" is an Obama appointee or known Democrat supporter.
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 9:57a, 1/16/20
AG
Rapier108 said:
AustinScubaAg said:
aggiehawg said:
I don't understand why the ICA wasn't cited in the articles of impeachment.
My guess would be because every president have violated it at one time or another.
Exactly

And because the Democrats know it does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.


My point was I don't think that act applies. If it did wouldn't Biden have violated it with his threats.
Reply Quote
4
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 9:58a, 1/16/20
aggiehawg said:
Rapier108 said:
AustinScubaAg said:
aggiehawg said:
I don't understand why the ICA wasn't cited in the articles of impeachment.
My guess would be because every president have violated it at one time or another.
Exactly

And because the Democrats know it does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.


My point was I don't think that act applies. If it did wouldn't Biden have violated it with his threats.
Biden is a Democrat, so under the current legal system, no.
Reply Quote
4
Wildcat
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:59a, 1/16/20
AG
A legal opinion from a swamp attorney is supposed to be a "bombshell"?
Reply Quote
7
hbtheduce
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 10:00a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
"No law was broken" talking point gone.



Finally something that possibly could have happened. One congress could have actually discussed but did not.

One that is ultimately mute because the funds were released on time, and in their full amount.

So it's possible you got trump on an accounting speeding ticket. One impeachment leaders chose to ignore.
Reply Quote
6
Tom Hagen
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 10:01a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Trump finally gets Ukraine to investigate something, Trump.



For the mid morning crowd. Adding pages quickly.
It's not illegal for a private investigator to surveille a person who they are investigating.
Reply Quote
5
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wildcat • 10:02a, 1/16/20
Wildcat said:
A legal opinion from a swamp attorney is supposed to be a "bombshell"?
Given the reaction from Democrats and leftists, they think it is.

Many think Trump will be marched out in chains by end of the day. Some are calling for people to storm the White House and remove him by force. Twitter is in the biggest meltdown in a while.

The thing is, the money was delivered within the time Congress said it had to be delivered.
Reply Quote
5
Gary Johnson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wildcat • 10:06a, 1/16/20
Wildcat said:
A legal opinion from a swamp attorney is supposed to be a "bombshell"?


The point of the GAO is to be the swamp watchdog. Trump is the swamp.

If they released an adverse legal opinion about Hillary this board would cream itself.
Reply Quote
5
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 10:08a, 1/16/20
AG
Have you paid attention to the GAO in years past?
Reply Quote
5
FireAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:08a, 1/16/20
AG
Did we "get him" yet?
Reply Quote
3
Wildcat
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gary Johnson • 10:09a, 1/16/20
AG
Gary Johnson said:
Wildcat said:
A legal opinion from a swamp attorney is supposed to be a "bombshell"?


The point of the GAO is to be the swamp watchdog. Trump is the swamp.

If they released an adverse legal opinion about Hillary this board would cream itself.

Thanks to you, we all know exactly what that looks like.
Reply Quote
3
First Page Last Page
Page 221 of 264 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.