The smart money is around January 2025.

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

I didn't say I did. I said he did. Which is why he doesn't want anybody to see the evidence he's blocking.

---

So, speculation. Congratulations, you just failed evidence 101.

Go away, comrade.

---

Cry more *****. I'm not a judge and jury I'm allowed to form an opinion.


The criminal fatass is going down sooner or later.

---

Yeah, we know....walls closing in....noose tightening.....etc

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

I didn't say I did. I said he did. Which is why he doesn't want anybody to see the evidence he's blocking.

---

So, speculation. Congratulations, you just failed evidence 101.

Go away, comrade.

---

Cry more *****. I'm not a judge and jury I'm allowed to form an opinion.


The criminal fatass is going down sooner or later.

---

I'm not the one bleeding all over this board. Change your tampon and move along, comrade.

And, to show how certain I am (as an attorney) that Trump will not only avoid removal, but that he'll win re-election.

I'll donate 500 dollars to your choice of non-profit, if I'm wrong.

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

Woah, woah, woah there little buddy. The Senate trial for Clinton did not have witnesses testify at the Senate. In fact they avoided it for a long time. They did depose Blumenthal, Vernon Jordan and Lewinski but just used the video of the deposition.

---

Taped depositions would be fine too. Trump wants none of that. Because he knows he's guilty.

---

What is he guilty of?

Isn't he presumed innocent?

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Great response, nazi.

Quote:

---

What is he guilty of?

---

Pelosi isn't even sure

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Is there an answer for this other than a condecending chuckle?

aggiehawg said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

I didn't say I did. I said he did. Which is why he doesn't want anybody to see the evidence he's blocking.

---

What evidence is he "blocking"? He released the transcript of the call. Zelensky has stated over and over again he never felt any pressure, he got his meeting with Trump during the UN General Assembly and he got all of the aid in a timely manner well before the deadline.

Where is the crime? Where is the "guilt" of a crime??

---

Exactly, not to mention that this was all over investigating legitimate concerns of diplomatic corruption by the party that ended up impeaching him. A duty that he was legally obligated to do according to a treaty with Ukraine and that he had an executive duty to do for the citizens of the US. The only thing criminal here is the Democrat cover up of crimes committed by the previous Democrat administration.

Clearly he's guilty of obstruction of congress. You see, Schiff had this terrific plan of coaching the "whistleblower" into submitting his complaint (after they changed the rules to allow 2nd hand information) to implicate Trump in his dastardly scheme to steal the 2020 election! It was all going to plan until that idiot released the transcript of the call, thus obstructing their plan and since Schiff is a congressman you get obstruction of congress!!

EKUAg said:

---

Not sure where Chase is from. Would like to see if that village is missing a idiot.

---

I wouldn't say they're missing him.

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

The criminal fatass is going down sooner or later.

---

What does Hillary have to do with any of this?

Wait. Is Gary saying the Senate Dems should take it to court to force the Senate to call witnesses the Dems want?

You truly don't understand our government, do you?

Why didn't the House do that? They obviously had time. It's been 3 weeks since they "impeached" Trump, but no articles submitted.

Bwahahahahahahaha

I have him blocked, so I see his nonsense in others replies.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

The criminal fatass is going down sooner or later.

---

What does Hillary have to do with any of this?

---

What's truly amazing to me is how the moronic left call Trump stupid, a criminal, literally WORSE than Hitler (because, you see, Hitler was much better educated than that stupid orange man) and yet, this evil person who has now been in the MOST POWERFUL POSITION IN THE WORLD FOR OVER THREE YEARS has managed to steward this country to:

• Record low unemployment
• REAL wage growth for the first time in over a decade
• Economy actually producing jobs that continually exceed predictions
• Stock Market hitting new highs every other month

There are plenty of other examples but I can never get a liberal to square that truth up for me...everyone agrees the POTUS is the most powerful position in the world (especially now with the legislative branch neutered) so how on earth could someone as evil as they purport Trump to be succeed? It's been over 3 years now, where is the gloom and doom? When can we expect it?

I know you only post on this thread but what's your thoughts on Krugman and his computer?

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Fighting to protect your rights in court is not blocking evidence.

hbtheduce said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Fighting to protect your rights in court is not blocking evidence.

---

Agree.


Fighting to preserve the right to present all relevant evidence is also not blocking evidence.

In a tweet, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz chided Smith's about face: "Did somebody get sent to the Principal's office?"

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/09/democrat-adam-smith-wants-pelosi-to-send-impeachment-articles-to-senate.html

"Democratic House chair Adam Smith says he 'misspoke' in saying Pelosi should send Trump impeachment articles to Senate"

That clown read fan fiction in his kangaroo court, bit is concerned about fairness in the Senate.

Wildcat said:

---

That clown read fan fiction in his kangaroo court, bit is concerned about fairness in the Senate.

---

Smith, not schiff. Or did Smith do the same?

hbtheduce said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Fighting to block evidence and witnesses in court is not blocking evidence.

---

Yes it is exactly that thing. One could argue "it's legal" but we know the underlying reason. He's guilty and he knows it.

justcallmeharry said:

---

In a tweet, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz chided Smith's about face: "Did somebody get sent to the Principal's office?"

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/09/democrat-adam-smith-wants-pelosi-to-send-impeachment-articles-to-senate.html

"Democratic House chair Adam Smith says he 'misspoke' in saying Pelosi should send Trump impeachment articles to Senate"

---

Guess Pelosi threatened to boot him from his chairmanship if he didn't retract.

when does Hillary get sworn in?

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

hbtheduce said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Fighting to block evidence and witnesses in court is not blocking evidence.

---

Yes it is exactly that thing. One could argue "it's legal" but we know the underlying reason. He's guilty and he knows it.

---

We know you won't answer because all you are is a troll, but how about you tell us what he is guilty of and back it up with some substance.

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

hbtheduce said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Fighting to block evidence and witnesses in court is not blocking evidence.

---

Yes it is exactly that thing. One could argue "it's legal" but we know the underlying reason. He's guilty and he knows it.

---

Why didn't the Dems fight fire with Fire then and make a public spectacle in the courts by challenging it then?

Surly that would've made a better story for "fairness" and "urgency" - as opposed to rushing full steam ahead then demanding the the next branch fix your mistakes. That's like failing a test and complaining the teacher didn't write the answers in for you, which caused you to fail.

It's hilarious that Chance believes in this impeachment **** more than Nancy Pelosi does.

Incredible

He can't answer honestly. He's one of those liberals that doesn't care about the truth and will
NEVER admit to it.

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

hbtheduce said:

---

Chance Chase McMasters said:

---

Quote:

---

What evidence is he "blocking"?

---

LOL.

---

Fighting to block evidence and witnesses in court is not blocking evidence.

---

Yes it is exactly that thing. One could argue "it's legal" but we know the underlying reason. He's guilty and he knows it.

---

LIAR.