Gary Johnson said:
Right. The other investigations were already known.
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/trump-whistleblower-scandal-explained-from-ukraine.html
The investigations "Biden killed": 1 was already dead, 1 continued to punishment, 1 continues to this day. And Shokin had no part in it.
Pyatt criticized Shokin for protecting the guys that sabotaged the British case, they were never punished. And he was also deeply unpopular in Ukraine for other reasons, that's why he got fired.
This Yuriy Sevruk character is a Shokin appointee and implicated in the "diamond bribe" scandal.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/why-poroshenko-s-support-for-shokin-is-dangerous/
So Shokin didn't authorize this activity?
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/322395.htmlYou are big on using timelines to make inferences regarding Trump's behavior with Ukraine. The announcement of the seizure of Zlochevsky's holdings takes place on February 4, 2016.
Why is Biden amping up his phone activity to the Ukraine later that month? Why are he and Blue Star moving against a prosecutor you claim had no part in the investigations against Burisma? And if Biden were truly targeting corruption across the Ukrainian landscape, then why was the only man with the bullseye on his back the same individual running an operation that just happened to be seizing the assets of the founder of the company for whom Hunter Biden earned a monthly bribe?
So in February we have Shokin's organization seizing the assets of Zlochevsky. That same day, Crackhead Biden gets in touch with Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken. The next week, VPOTUS starts calling Ukraine on a regular basis. Later that month, Blue Star begins talks with DoS requesting assistance to end the investigation into the corruption at Burisma Holdings you claim were not being pursued:
https://www.scribd.com/document/433389210/Bluestar-Novelli-ContactsThe next month VPOTUS uses Federal funds to protect his son's company from the consequences of its corrupt actions. He doesn't threaten withholding disbursement of funds if Ukraine fails to act on areas of corrupt activity in other aspects of his government (Especially the ones that directly benefit Democrats.). He doesn't threaten withholding funds unless others are fired who are corrupt within the government.
He targets Shokin and Shokin alone. Why? Because Shokin and the PGO are breathing down the neck of the corrupt company where Crackhead Biden "works."
If Shokin were as inconsequential as you claim him to be, then there would never have been a need to use Federal funds to force his ouster. If he were not really investigating Burisma, as you repeatedly claim throughout this thread, then why would VPOTUS consider him a threat at all and target him and him alone for ouster in a nation ripe with corruption on all levels of government?
I know you have this need for Joe Biden to be innocent. But the timeline, his lies when confronted on the subject, and his own boastful ignorance in a public forum, condemn him and prove the need for the present Chief Executive to launch an investigation into the activities taking place within his department before he arrived at the White House.